EXPERIMENT -8 DATE: 09/11/2020

 AIM:
To understand the behavior of non-minimum phase systems.

 APPARATUS:
MATLAB

 THEORY:

Minimum phase
Systems that are causal and stable whose inverses are also causal and stable are known
as minimum phase systems.

Non-Minimum phase
Systems that are causal and stable whose inverses are causal and unstable are known as
non-minimum phase systems.

Definition
 Certain process control systems exhibit their initial response in the opposite
direction with respect to the steady-state gain.
 This characteristic of the system is an inverse or non-minimum phase response,
which is a result of two opposing parallel dynamics.
Effects of Non-minimum phase zeros
 The controller’s achievable closed-loop performance is affected.
 The presence of NMP zeros in the system transfer function limits the controller from
achieving desired control.
 The closed-loop system exhibits undershoot in the response.
 The limited gain margin also implies a limitation on the robustness of the closed-loop
system, which may lead to inevitable destabilization of the feedback control system.

Examples
A. Boiler drum level
B. van de Vusse reactor
C. Re-boiler section of the distillation column
D. Exit temperature control of a tubular catalytic reactor etc.

Effects of Multiple RHP zeroes

  The system with an odd number of RHP zeros exhibits true inverse response in the
sense that the initial direction of the step response will always be opposite to the
direction of the final steady state, regardless of the number of inversions involved in
this response.
 On the other hand, the initial portion of the step response of a system with an even
number of RHP zeros exhibits the same even number of inversions before heading in
the direction of the final steady state, but the initial direction is always the same as
the direction of. the final steady

 EXERCISE:
1.

Time domain specifications

Original:

 Rise Time: 4.5638

 Settling Time: 8.7129
 Settling Min: 4.5093
 Settling Max: 4.9986
 Overshoot: 0
 Undershoot: 6.8692
 Peak: 4.9986
 Peak Time: 17.4536

Adding a pole:

 Rise Time: 10.3893

 Settling Time: 19.3759
  Settling Min: 4.5014
 Settling Max: 4.9999
 Overshoot: 0
 Undershoot: 0.7587
 Peak: 4.9999
 Peak Time: 47.7096

Adding a pole and a zero:

 Rise Time: 10.0103

 Settling Time: 20.5658
 Settling Min: 4.5043
 Settling Max: 4.9938
 Overshoot: 0
 Undershoot: 12.2390
 Peak: 4.9938
 Peak Time: 32.1901

Response

Comment
…………………………………………..
 2.

Time domain specifications

Original:

 Rise Time: 15.5764

 Settling Time: 29.9015
 Settling Min: 1.8005
 Settling Max: 1.9987
 Overshoot: 0
 Undershoot: 4.6908
 Peak: 1.9987
 Peak Time: 54.0033

Adding a pole:

 Rise Time: 16.4995

 Settling Time: 32.4557
 Settling Min: 1.8017
 Settling Max: 1.9984
 Overshoot: 0
 Undershoot: 1.7596
 Peak: 1.9984
 Peak Time: 55.1699
Response

Comment
……………………………….

 CONCLUSION: