Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M/S Auto India is a public limited company; they manufacture SUVs (sports utility vehicle), in
technical collaboration with General Motors of USA. The company has established their
manufacturing base at Ranjangaon in Pune. They have acquired an area of 250 acres and the total
project cost is estimated at Rs 1500 crores. As per the projections, the company is slated to
achieve a 25% market share in the Indian market, within a period of two years. Out of the total
project cost, 49% is brought in by General Motors and the rest is tied up with financial
institutions, international banks and Indian banks. The working capital is financed by a
consortium of banks in which Global bank, Pune branch, is the leader. The company imports
many parts of the car engine in a CKD (completely knocked down) condition from General
Motors, Detroit, after establishing import letters of credit through its main bankers, Global Bank,
Pune Branch. M/S Auto India approached Global Bank, Pune for opening of import letter of
credit as per UCP ICC 600 for USD 100,000, on sight basis, in favour of General Motors,
Detroit.M/S Auto India approached Global Bank, Pune for opening of import letter of credit as
per UCP ICC 600 for USD 100,000, on sight basis, in favour of General Motors, Detroit. Type of
credit - Irrevocable negotiable Application - UCP ICC 600 Applicant - M/S Auto India, Pune,
India Beneficiary - M/S General Motors, Detroit, USA Issuing Bank - Global Bank, Pune, India
Advising Bank - The American Bank, New York Negotiating Bank - The American Bank, New
York Reimbursing Bank - International Bank, New York Availability - Negotiable at sight
Expiry - At the counters of The American Bank, New York Amount - USD 100,000
Merchandise - Car engine parts Quantity and price - 50 units @ USD 2000 per unit.
a. Was Global Bank, Pune Branch correct in its argument, as the credit issuing bank?
b. Was the stand taken by The American Bank, New York correct, as the negotiating bank?
Taneja Exports argued that they had clearly mentioned in the bills of exchange that the
documents were to be released against the co-acceptance of the Facility (Amount in Lakhs) 2003
2004 2005 Fund based a) Export packing credit 5.00 7.00 10.00 b) Foreign bill
purchased/Foreign bill negotiated 5.00 7.00 10.00 Non Fund based a) Performance guarantee
2.00 5.00 7.00 Export sales 20.00 30.00 40.00 French bank only. Immediately the Indian bank
send a message to Credit Lyonnais that since the bill of exchange contained the co-acceptance
clause by the French bank, they are liable to pay even though the importer had become bankrupt.
The French bank refuted the claim of the Indian Bank and intimated that the bank’s collection
instruction did not contain any co-acceptance clause by the French bank and they had acted as
per the provisions in the uniform rules for collection in the ICC publication No 522. Since
payments were not forthcoming, Taneja Exports filed a suit with the National Consumer Forum,
New Delhi for deficiency of services by International Bank of India, Mumbai, on November 10,
2005. They put forth the argument that the bank was deficient in not mentioning about the co-
acceptance clause in their covering letter to the French bank and in case of non-acceptance by the
French bank they would have returned the documents to India and the exporter could have
arranged for an alternate buyer or reimport of the merchandise. This negligence on the part of the
bank had caused them total financial loss. After hearing the arguments of both the parties, The
National Consumer Forum gave the judgement, on February 6, 2006, that the International Bank
of India was deficient and negligent in their services and ordered them to compensate the value
of the export bill of Euro 53000.00 (approx Rs 24 lakhs) along with 15% interest, till the date of
payment. Answer the following question:
Discuss the remedial measures the bank in India should take to avoid such damaging judgments
by the consumer forums.
(a) Which Mode of Transportation will you suggest for international supply chain?
(b) If oil companies are starting to use the already congested rail lines, will going 100% into
rail travel be dependable?
(a) How does Starbucks follow the path to effective cost reduction?
(b) Iidentify the supply chain risks and challenges the company will face? How the risks
could be mitigated?