OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE

Term of Reference – TOR

STUDIO OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 04

Architectural Design Studio 04 – ADS 04
Even Semester 2019/2020

Commercial Facilities in Urban Area of

Yogyakarta
1. Course Identity :

Subject : Studio of Architecture Design 04

Subject code : ARB – 401
Course Cluster : Integrated Design
Status : Obligatory Course
Credits : 6 credits
Semester : 4
Prerequisite : Studio of Architecture Design 3
Co-requisite : -
Faculty/ Department/ Study Program : Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning / Architecture/ Architecture
Graduate Degree

2. Course Description
Architectural Design Studio (ADS) 04 is a 6 credits compulsory course. It is conducted by applying
the method of studio based on urban context. This subject is provided in the 4th semester and
focuses on designing which is based on studio. In curriculum 2018, it is sequential with STUPA 3
which becomes its pre-requisite and becomes a prerequisite for STUPA 5 with a minimum value
of C.

The urgency of ADS 4 is designing fostered environment which is suitable for urban site location.
It is in line with the vision and mission of architecture department such as; creating character
Excellency for urban areas, fostered environment which becomes responsive towards social
changes in urban areas, and professionalism development which is based on planning.

After taking this course, the students are expected to be able to design simple mix – use building
in a site of 500 m2 – 750 m2, the size of building capacity 500m2-1500m2, consisting of 2-4 floors
accommodating spatial that boast the complexity of public buildings that respond to the social
needs of the local community with a large number of users. The result is a geometric composition
that responds to structural patterns in urban areas, structure systems and infrastructure, with the
control of artificial environments. In relation to SPC KAAB 2018 adopted the UII Architecture
Department, ADS 4 aims to achieve the following points as listed in table 1:

Table 1. Expected Output Indicators in The ADS according to SPC

SPC SPC Description Indicators
7 Architectural The students are able communicate ideas through various
Communication communication techniques, including presentations, manual and
digital drawings, communicative concept narratives
8 Form and Spatial The students are able to do a mass exploration process coherently,
Organization and arrange according to the rules of architectural design and
design building facades that consider the urban context for a
commercial facility
10 Site Planning The students are able to explore the sites, analyse them
comprehensively, and design them in an urban context for low-
floor commercial facilities that focus on driveways, parking and
landscape layout in accordance with local building regulations
11 Accessible The students are able to design a circuit path or circulation way
Design for all users from outside the building into the building and vice
 versa on all floors of the building along with the design
consequences that must be applied correctly
12 Safety and Fire The students are able to create concepts related to building
Protection safety and security and design them in the context of low-rise
commercial buildings in urban areas by focusing in safety
systems against fire hazards and passive building safety
13 Integration of The students are able to make the concept of building system
Building System integration in the design which includes spatial, structural,
and Design mechanical electrical systems in the context of low-rise
commercial buildings in urban areas
14 Design of The students are able to analyse the existing condition of
Adaptive Re-use buildings, making it the main consideration in designing and
realizing new designs to accommodate low-floor commercial
facilities in urban areas according to the theory of adaptive re-use
and commercial buildings
18 Environment The students are able to make the concept or strategy of the
Control Systems passive design aspect and realizing the design idea for a low-floor
commercial facility that applies the principles / basis of passive
lighting, passive thermal, active indoor air quality and basic
acoustics according to problems / conflicts topics and urban
contexts

3. Design Project
The annual agenda for ADS this year is covered by the theme “Places for Commerce. ADS 04 take
the title Commercial Facilities in the Urban Area of Yogyakarta. The purpose of this
commercial facility is to improve the quality and vitality of an existing store / house / campus.
Existing houses, shops or campuses are explored in the quality of the buildings, current activities
and the surrounding context. Commercial facilities to be designed include culinary functions, co-
working spaces, and craft centers (see figure 1). New functions include at least 2 of the 3 functions
commercial is taking into account the existing building. Old functions can be maintained or
replaced altogether, according to the results of the analysis conducted. The selection of new
functions is largely determined by the results of the analysis of existing buildings, market needs
and other considerations that are closely related to the location of the site.

Picture 1. Illustration picture of commercial facilities in culinary

Source: tribuntravel.com and arsitag.com

Commercial building is a building that has the main function as a space for trade activities, such
as shops, restaurants, cafes and so on. Existing buildings are used as a reference in redesigning so
 that there is integration between old buildings with an approach adaptive re-use. Utilization of
the old building may be part or all, depending on the extent of analysis and concepts used.
ADS 4 is followed by 12 classes. Each class can reduce the task theme to a more specific topic.
Site location as a case study has been determined (See Table 3). Each group was divided into 3
groups to observe and collect site data within a specified area.

4. General Criteria of A Design

In brief, the criteria of a building which is designed in ADS 4 as follows :
Table 2. General Criteria of A Building
Theme Commercial facilities in Urban area of Yogyakarta

Topic Commercial Facilities in Urban Areas, covering culinary

functions, co-working space, and craft

Site 500-750 meter2 (tolerable to 10%)

Total Building Area 500-1000 meter2 (tolerable to 10%)

Existing Building Area 100-500 meter2

The scope of existing shape/silhouette of the building, appearance, structure of the

buildings to be maintained building

/ developed
Floor 2 – 4 Floor

5. Location for Designing and Supervisor

In the academic year 2019/2020 the ADS 4 is followed by twelve parallel classes, with details of the location
are listed in the table 3 below:

Table 3. Site Location Distribution for ADS 4

Class Lecturer Lecturer Assistant Site Location
A IP Wiryono Raharjo, PhD Salsabila Ghaisani House of Prawirotaman
B IP Hastuti Saptorini, MA Qois Ridha Dhiyaulhaq House of Prawirotaman
C IP Baritoadi Buldan RGR, MA Ihsan Hernanta House of Prawirotaman
A Reg Etik Mufida, M. Eng Mustafidul Umam Gama Techno
B Reg Abdul Robbi Maghzaya, Alvi Bariroh Ex Coral, Gejayan Street
MSc
C Reg David Hendri, MT M. Irfan Zaky Toko Batik Terang Bulan,
Simanjuntak Street
D Reg Dyah Hendrawati, MSc M. Rafif Nauval Gama Techno
E Reg Fajriyanto, MT Febriyansyah Wijaya Toko Batik Terang Bulan,
Simanjuntak Street
F Reg Iftironi, Ir., MLA (studio Junian Achmad M House of Colombo
vertical bersama STUPA 6)
G Reg Nensi Golda Yuli, Dr.-Ing M. Nasrullah, S. Ars House of Colombo
H Reg Rini Darmawati, MT Ahmad Rosyid House of Colombo
I Reg Iwan Dharmawan, M.Sc Fairuz Abiyyu Ex Coral, Gejayan Street

6. Expected Product
There are six final products ADS 4 with the details listed below;
 Table 4. Final Product of ADS 4
NO PRODUCT Explanation Deadline
1 Logbook A3 size sketchbook. Used to record the Reporting the progress in
exploration process, look for ideas, each meeting, submitted in
concepts and ideas manually midterm and final exam
2 Study model 3D Model made from simple materials Presented in design
and the detail for exploration during UTS (various exploration, midterm and
of the study models) and UAS (detailed final exam
mockups model), scale of model 1: 100
3 Design Report The draft report in A4 format contains a Final Exam
description of the design project and its
progress. The report is supposed to be
typed by computer, digital drawing and
or manual from the results of a sketch
4 APREB Poster in A1 format consist of 2-4 Midterm and Final Exam
(architectural sheets with the contents listed below:
presentation • General description of the
board) project and its problems as
well as the results of the design
exploration carried out
(midterm)
• The design concept is
accompanied by reasons with
progress that is adjusted to the
specified SPC (midterm)
• The results of the design are
site plan, floor plan, looks,
pieces, details and relevant 3Ds
(Final Exam)
5 Pictures and Pre-designed drawings and details with Midterm and weekly
Design ideal scale on A2 paper. Design progress after midterm, and
Document drawings can be done manually and by Final Exam
computer
6 critique notes Notes that review the achievements of Midterm and Final Exam
the SPC which are the achievements of
graduate learning (UTS and UAS) in
A4 format.

7. Evaluation and Final Score

Evaluation is conducted to determine the student's final grade by considering the results of the
process, final results, presentations during the Final Exam and Final Exam and the evaluation of
the cross-examiner lecturers as shown in Table 5 below. Formative evaluation is done to assess
the achievement of SPC on student products and summative evaluation to assess the performance
produced by students on the 6 products produced, including: logbooks, design reports, mockups,
design documents, critical notes, and posters. As for who will assess the work of students, with
the following details:
 Table 5. Scoring Types
No Types of Steps Assessor Notes
Evaluation
1 Formative Weekly process to Supervisor and lecturer
assessment measure SPC indicators assistant
2 Summative Midterm final product Supervisor lecturer, cross
Evaluation supervisor
3 Summative Final Exam Product Supervisor lecturer, cross Assessment on
evaluation supervisor the detail of
ideas
4 Summative Final Product (Final Judges Blue Ribbon Award Selected
evaluation Exam) representative
from each
classes
5 Summative and All products and Supervisor Selecting the
formative considering SPC best, middle,
evaluation indicators and the lowest
one for KAAB
report

Table 6. Formative Assessment Rubric for Monitoring SPC Indicators

Aspect/ 4 3 2 1
Parameter/ Impressive Fair Need Poor
SPC (CPL) Improvement
Indicators
The required SPC The achievement The effort to The effort is not
SPC 7
achievement can of SPC has been acquire the SPC reflected in the
SPC 8 describe comprehensive carried out has been reflected design and there is
thinking between SPC, relevantly and in in the design but no progress from
SPC 10 show the novelty of accordance with the progress from week to week
design solutions and can the expected week to week is
SPC 11 produce and present indicators and is very slow
work progressively from proceeding well
SPC 12
week to week very well from week to
week
SPC 13

SPC 14

SPC 18

Table 7. Summative Rubric Assessment to measure the detail of the ideas

Aspect/ 4 3 2 1
Parameter/ Impressive Fair Need Improvement Poor
SPC (CPL)
Indicators
Being able to Can present a The ideas have been Unable to present
present a variety of variety of ideas in presented in the an exploration of
ideas very the logbook in a logbook through a design ideas in
impressive through a relevant manner, weekly process, but the lecture
variety of idea read the design they are not well process from
exploration process carried out, documented, so the week to week, the
techniques that are documented exploration process documents are
Logbook so well documented. coherently as an cannot be understood incomplete and
It can be read that exploration of enough to produce have not been
the design ideas architectural ideas design work. able to read the
outlined are capable ideas given
of answering
solutions to the
design problems
being solved
The design drawings Can present design Has been able to
presented is a drawings with present the design The image
complete products relevant scale, drawings but is not presented cannot
ranging from carried out using accompanied by a be referred to as a
notation and image relevant drawing complete notation design drawing,
captions, are able to techniques and and picture because there is
present the include various description, the no notation and
information of image information design idea cannot be description of the
existing buildings that can tell the read properly, the drawing, does not
Design
and design results design as a whole, position of the include the
Drawing
very well which are especially conditions existing building and position of the
able to read in before and after the the design results are existing building,
various products, as design are well read not detected easily, there is only a
well as giving overall the product new building
outstanding drawings still need to design, and
impression of the be revised a lot requires a lot of
product design revisions to the
drawings. product design
drawings
APREB is presented Can present a poster There have been There have been
with a / APREB that attempts to present attempts to
communicatively, illustrates all design posters / APREBs, present posters /
using an impressive ideas in a but they are not APREBs, but the
composition of comprehensive communicative, do products produced
layout and color, manner, layout with not convey the have not been
APREB and can provide a good composition completeness of ideas able to be called
thorough and communicative and do not consider architectural
understanding of for the readers good layout and color products
design ideas in techniques.
solving design
problems

The product can Can present a mock There have been

Mockups provide a picture of product that The mass mockups attempts to
mass exploration illustrates 3D mass produced have not present mass
 with various exploration at UTS shown the mockup and
alternatives (UTS), and presents a exploration process, detailed models,
detailed mockups physical 3D design the detailed mockups but they are not
can depict physical form to explain the presented do not relevant to the
3D building design design in an urban show the existing design case
works that show context urban context
urban contexts very
well
Can reflect the entire Can reflect the entire Can reflect most of There has been no
design process by design process with the design process attempt to reflect
including the SPC descriptive methods according to the SPC the design process
achievement through the that is required but through the
strategy required in achievement of all not presented as achievement of
Critics Note
a coherent way SPC through a relevant the SPC and is not
through relevant variety of relevant accompanied by
design products design products examples of
relevant design
products
The product design Can report the The product The product
report is very design results by presented has been presented has not
impressive, provides displaying various able to describe the been able to
a comprehensive design advantages entire design but is describe the
description of the along with relevant incomplete in overall design, is
The report of
completeness of product examples describing the design incomplete and
Planning
ideas, is very well idea unable to provide
executed and easily an understanding
read the ideas of the idea itself
proposed and their
completeness

Table 8. Scoring System

No Criteria Weight Notes
(%)

1 Formative assessment and Pre-midterm 20 5% from the lecturer assistant

2 Formative assessment post - midterm 20 5% from the lecturer assistant

3 Summative assessment (Final Exam) 30 5% from Jury

4 Summative assessment (Final Exam) 30 5% from Jury

Total 100

Recapitulation of values from various components will be submitted to the assessment document in
excel format. Conversion formative and summative assessment will refer to a standard assessment of
UII in Table 9 below:
Table 9. Scoring Range
 Letter Range Letter Range
A <80 – <100 C <60 to <62.5
A- <77.5 to <80 C- <55 to <60
A/B <75 to <77.5 C/D <50 to <55
B+ <72.5 to <75 D+ <45 to <50
B <70 to <72.5 D <40 to <45
B- <67.5 to <70 E <1 to <40
B/C <65 to <67.5 F Attendance less than 75%
C+ <62.5 to <65
Source: peraturan Rektor No. 5/PR/REK/BPA/III/2014

8. Supporting Lecturers
The ADS lecture will be supported by 6 supporting lectures with competent speakers in their fields. The
students are obliged to make resume in each supporting lectures that will be assessed by an assistant. The
resume is about the important points of the material delivered and reflections on learning that can be
learned by students in supporting the design of ADS 4. Details of general lecture plans are in table 10
below:

Tabel 10. Rencana Kuliah-kuliah Pendukung Stupa 4 2020

No Day / Date Lecture Material PIC Lab

1 Tuesday, 25 Lecture Coorcinator and Lecturers

February 2020 of STUPA 4
Designing in Context Urban David Hendri, MT
2 Thursday 27 Design Strategies Using the Adaptive Popo Dannes
February or Reuse
Friday, 28
February 2020
3 Tuesday, 2 Technical Procedures for Adaptation of Assist. Prof Revianto BS
March 2020 Buildings
Passive Design Strategy in Commercial Etik Mufida, M.Eng
Buildings in Urban
4 Friday, 6 March Commercial Building Design Tony Kunto W, MSc
2020
5 Friday, 13 March Building Infrastructure System Dyah Hendrawati, MSc
2020

9. Implementation of Extra Studio

STUPA 4 learning is held 3 times a week, with two class meetings together with lecturers, namely
lectures on Tuesday and Thursday, and extra studio activities on Friday. Each class will also be
accompanied by 1 course assistant, who will attend one of the class schedules when together with
the lecturer (Tuesday or Thursday) and at the extra studio on Friday. Assistants have the
obligation to provide formative assessments of student assignments with the following
assignment details:

Table 11 Extra Studio Assignment Assessed by Assistant

No Assignment Scoring types
1 Survey Site Formative Assessment
2 Resume of expert lecture 01 Formative Assessment
 3 Resume of expert lecture 02 Formative Assessment
4 Resume of expert lecture 03 Formative Assessment
5 Resume of expert lecture 04 Formative Assessment
6 Resume of expert lecture 05 Formative Assessment
7 Resume of expert lecture 06 Formative Assessment
8 Site Analysis Formative Assessment
9 Design Concept and Room Program Formative Assessment
10 Design Exploration Formative Assessment
11 Drawing Progress Pre-design Formative Assessment
12 Practical Building Lighting Simulation Formative Assessment
13 APREB Draft Formative Assessment
14 Final Mockup Formative Assessment

To avoid subjectivity ratings from the assistants in each class, the assessment rubric in table 11
below will be a guide to assess the assistant to the tasks generated by the students.

Table 11 Assessment Rubric for Student Assignment

Aspect/ 4 3 2 1
Parameter/ Impressive Fair Need Poor
SPC (CPL) Improvement
Indicators
The resulting product The product There have been There is no
has described presented is attempts to attempt to
comprehensive thinking relevant and in produce products present the
14 Assignment that shows novelty. It accordance with that have been product as
assessed by also can produce and the assignment assigned but it is assigned
assistant in the present the work very order not executed
extra studio well relevantly

10. Reading Materials

ADS 4 lecturers had prepared reading material to enrich theoretical knowledge of the students
towards the study of commercial buildings in urban areas. This reading material is aimed to give
a positive contribution to the quality of designs produced by students. Furthermore, from the
reading material provided, it is hoped that there is an ISBN book product produced by several
ADS 4 classes as one of the outcomes of the learning process.

11. Reference
Allen, Edward & Joseph Iano, 2002, The Architect’s studio companion: Rules of Tumb for
Prelimanary Design, John Willey & Sons, New York. Tpic: Design The Structure hal
15-47.
 Ching, Francis D.K. 2001, Architecture: Form, Space and Order. Illustrated”, Van Nostrand
Reinhold.
Ching, Francis D.K. and Adams, Casandra, 2001, Building Contraction Illustrated”, Van
Nostrand Reinhold.
Douglas, James. 2006. Building Adaptation. Elsevier
Gelfand Lisa dan Duncan Chris, 2012, Sustainable renovation: Strategies for Commercial
Building Systems and Envelope, Penerbit: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Kincaid, David, 2002, Adapting Buildings For Changing Uses. Guidelines for change of use
refurbishment, Spon Press: London.
Lasseau, Paul, 1980, Berpikir Gambar bagi Arsitek dan Perancang (terjemahan), ITB: Bandung.
Scott, Fred, 2008, Altering Architecture, Routledge: London.
Schodek, Daniel L, Terjemah: Suryoatmono, Bambang, 1999, Struktur, Erlangga : Jakarta.
Bab III. Prinsip prinsip Desain Struktural, hal 403-491.
Snibbe Richard W., 1956. Small commerciall buildings. Penerbit: Reinhold Publishing
Tuluca Adrian, 1997. Energy efficient design and construction for commercial building,
Penerbit: McGraw-Hill.

12. Weekly Activities

TABEL 13. Discussion and Product Design per-Week

Week Date Topic Discussion and Sub-Topic Discussion Product

1 25 February General Explanation: TOR and RPS Document TOR, and SAP
General Lecture 01:
Design in Urban Context Resume 01
27 February General Lecture 02: Resume 02 or Site Location Data and
Design Strategies Using the Adaptive Reuse survey guideline
Approach or Studio in class with Site survey topic
28 March General Lecture 02 or Extra Studio Survey Site Resume 02 or survey site report
2 3 March General Lecture 03 and 04: Resume 03
1. Building Adaptation Technical Procedure Resume 04
2. Passive Design Strategies in Commercial Document on the results of the site survey
Buildings in Urban
Studio: Presentation of survey results in urban
context

March 5 Studio:
Analysis of the existing condition of the building Existing building appraisal document
and its feasibility assessment

March 6 Public Lecture 05:CommercialBuilding Design Resume 05

Extra Studio: Site Analysis Draft analysis of existing sites and
buildings contained in logbook

3 March 10 Studio: Presentation Documents containing

Presentation of the Conditions of Existing Appraisal of Existing Buildings and Site
Buildings and site analysis Analysis as contained in the logbook

March 12 Studio: Document presentation of commercial

Presentation of selected topics for Commercial building topics
Buildings
 March 13 Public lecture 06:Building Infrastructure
Studio Extra:
Refinement of selected commercial building topics
and exploration of building precedents
4 March17 Exploration of similar / relevant building
precedents Exploration
March 19 Presentation of exploration results of similar /
relevant building precedents relevant
March 20 Extra Studio: Completion of exploration
precedents
5 March 24 exploration adaptation functional footprint
March 26 exploration adaptation of the functional layout of
the building and the circulation of the buildings
March 27th the Extra studio: mockups to discover the mass
6 March 31 Exploration of building form adaptation
April 2 Exploration of building facade adaptation
April 3 Studio extras: Completion of the exploration of the
shape and facade of buildings structural
7 April 7 Exploration of adaptation construction, utility and
mechanical electrical systems to support building
functions as well as the principles of security,
safety and protection of fire
9 April Exploration of building design by applying the
principles / basis of passive lighting, passive
thermal, indoor air quality active and acoustic
8 UTS
9 May 5 Alternative Design (3 pieces) site plan
May 8 Extra Studio: Improving 3 alternative site plan
10 May 12 Pre Design Generation
Resume 06
Finalized documents on selected
commercial building functions and
various building precedents
sketches and analysis of building
precedents
Lesson learnt case precedents
Documents exploration precedent
sketch exploration planning period,
planning outdoor space and footprint
Sketches of exploratory spatial structure
and circulation of the building
mockup mass
Sketching of building forms exploration
Sketching of building facade exploration
Exploration documents
1. Sketch of building structure exploration
2. Sketch of an exploration of utility and
mechanical electrical systems to support
building functions as well as the
principles of safety, safety and fire
protection
Sketch of building design exploration by
applying the principles / basis of passive
lighting, passive thermal, indoor air
quality active and acoustics
Alternative sketches site plan
Alternative sketches alternative site plan
alternative Sketch plan
 May 14th Generation Pre Design Sketch plan alternate

May studio Extras15:Completion of the plan draft plan

11 June 2th Generation Pre Design Sketches of alternative Looked

June 4th Generation Design Pre Sketches alternatives Looks

June 5th Studio extras: Improved looks Draft visible

12 June 9th Design Development Site Plan final

June 11 Design Development Final Plan

June 12 Extra studios: Improved design Development Looks and Final Pieces
(looks and pieces)

13 June 16th Design Development Looks and Final Pieces

June 18 Design Development of Looks and Final Pieces

June 19 Extra studio: Practical building lighting simulation Results of lighting simulation

14 June 23 Design Development System Structure Plan (columns and

beams), sanitation system, Fire Protection
and building safety,

June 25 Design Development Plan Passive, thermal lighting system

passive, indoor air quality active and
basic acoustics

June 26 Extra studio: Completion of building system plans Design Development Documents

15 June 30 Design Development architectural detail

2 July Design Development detail accessibility for diffable

July 3 Extra Studio: APREB draft and detailed mockups APREB draft and detailed mockups

UAS