Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Developed by:
August 2020
Template for Feasibility Study and
Detailed Project Report
Developed by:
August 2020
Contents
1. Background 1
1.1 Typical feasibility study 2
1.2 Typical detailed project report 2
1.3 Approach to preparing the templates 2
1.4 Some key highlights of the templates 3
Under the CITIIS program, each of the selected cities are expected to conduct a feasibility study and prepare
a detailed project report before the project can be taken up for implementation.
This ensures that the proposed project remains technically, economically, socially, environmentally and
financially viable for all stakeholders. Wide range of projects are proposed under the CITIIS program. The
matrix below captures the overall composition of the projects financed under CITIIS:
Sr.
Category Cities Project Description
No.
Child-friendly & Commuter Centric Dehradun Smart City
Dehradun
Sustainable Mobility Plan
1 Sustainable Mobility
Development of Sustainable and Green Public Transportation
Amritsar
in Amritsar City
Agartala Howrah River Front Development (Phase- II)
Bhubaneswar B-Active (Be Active or Bhubaneswar Active)
Hubbali-
Green Mobility Corridor
Dharwad
2 Public Open Spaces
Mahakal Rudra Sagar Integrated Development Approach -
Ujjain
Phase – II
Creating ‘Wild Valley Bio-Diversity Park’ as City Lungs by
Surat
Rejuvenation of Existing Wasteland along the Creek
Urban E-Governance
3 Kerala E-health Solution
and ICT
Basic Infrastructure Development in Low- income Settlements
Amravati
in Amaravati City
Evidently, some of the projects may not manifest tangible financial outcomes and will need to find
measures of the intangible benefits that accrue to various stakeholders due to the implementation of these
projects.
The feasibility study therefore needs to find a balance between outlining tangible and intangible benefits
for the stakeholders. Over the years, especially in the case of urban infrastructure projects, the gap between
the feasibility study and the detailed project report has been very wide which leads to poor implementation
of projects.
Often, the feasibility studies are conducted from the financial perspective without adequate technical
detailing of the projects. When detailed project reports are prepared, the costs often significantly change
along with the technical requirements.
1. Market analysis and project scope – this typically includes needs analysis, options analysis, output
definition and demand estimates.
2. Social and environment feasibility – key impact assessments and mitigation measures.
3. Technical feasibility – technical design options and their suitability based on market and demand
estimates.
4. Risk analysis – key risk factors likely to impact the project and their mitigation measures; this includes
market demand risks, contractual risk, and other relevant risks.
5. Preliminary cost estimates – based on technical options with sufficient buffers for cost over/under-run.
6. Financial analysis and due diligence – revenue structure and estimates, financing requirements (viability
gap financing) etc.
7. Economic feasibility – outlining the net economic benefits of the project including net social and
environmental benefits.
This overall approach for a feasibility study can be applied to any project, whether commercial or otherwise,
and can be utilized to determine the overall feasibility.
Various stakeholders utilize the above approach and develop versions of feasibility template based on their
requirements and convenience.
Analyzing the overall nature of the projects proposed under the CITIIS program, a draft template for
feasibility study has been proposed in the following sections.
1. Project scope and objectives – lays out the overall project and the objectives it aspires to achieve.
2. Existing situation analysis – takes stock of current circumstances and details out the state of the current
assets.
3. Detailed design – presents the detailed design of the overall asset as well as various components of the
asset.
4. Project cost – presents the overall capital and operation and maintenance costs of implementing the
projects.
In certain cases, the DPR also focuses on economic analysis and outlines the overall economic benefits of
the project.
a. a logical sequence between feasibility study and detailed project report should be evident.
b. both reports together enable easy project implementation.
c. the feasibility should inform the detailed project report and vice versa.
Therefore, as will be evident from the templates, there is a very large focus on undertaking the feasibility
study in much greater detail while the DPR template only compliments the contents of the feasibility.
The rationale is to ensure that the feasibility is detailed and thorough such that the DPR is utilized only to
re-confirm the detailed designs and put in place the final working drawings or final plans in place.
The templates are presented in a matrix and the contents defined in the matrix are accompanied with very
brief explanatory notes of what each section / heading should elaborate upon.
Quite often, only conceptual drawings are utilized to prepare cost estimates and establish financial
feasibility. However, when the DPR for the same project is developed, a stark contrast in costs is observed.
This departure in costs between the feasibility and the DPR is quite common and can range between 10% to
400%.
To avoid this pitfall, higher emphasis is placed on the feasibility study and it is expected to be detailed to
provide for prudent decision making.
With the realization that ‘one size does not fit all’, these templates have a key difference from typical
‘templates’. As is very common, with templates it is expected that the user will stick to the contents in the
template. However, the templates in the following pages have built-in flexibility to ensure that the users can
maneuver the contents and can adopt the contents based on their relevance to the project at hand.
All contents of the templates have a ‘mandatory’ and ‘optional’ classification. This will aid the users in
making decisions relating to retention or modification or removal of contents within the templates for their
use.
Wherever possible, crisp guidelines are included to provide an overview of the overall contents and what
should be included in the sections / sub-sections.
Mandatory / Optional
Section Contents Guidance Notes
Components
Background and
1
Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 Introduction to CITIIS
• Introduce CITIIS
1.3 Project introduction • All components of this • Explain in brief the overall project
section are mandatory • Briefly state the need and purpose of the
1.4 Need for feasibility feasibility
Key takeaways of previous
1.5
studies
The structure of feasibility
1.6
report
Project background,
2
scope, and details • Briefly describe decadal growth, city area
over a period, city economic profile, etc.
City Demography and
2.1 • Outline the key reasons for taking up this
socio-economic profile
project.
2.2 Need for the project • Outline and describe the project
constituents and what individual
Project overview and components are part of overall project
2.3
objectives ad what are the overall outcomes and
Key project components benefits that are likely to accrue if the
2.4 • All components of this
and outcomes project is implemented.
section are mandatory
• Detail out how the stakeholder
Stakeholder engagement engagement process was utilized to not
2.5 process for project only evolve the project by addressing
selection and maturation citizen aspirations and keeping them
engaged in the process.
Project development
• Outline how the CITIIS values are central
2.6 principles and
to the entire project development process
methodology
as well as the overall methodology for
Best practices project implementation
2.7
benchmarking
3 Technical feasibility • Technical feasibility studies are carried out
primarily to analyze the possible design
Existing infrastructure and engineering options that could be
3.1
assessment applied and the different technologies
3.1.1 Demand analysis • Mandatory that could be adopted for project
implementation.
• Mandatory – in case • Establish and accurately capture the
of multiple sites under existing conditions with respect to the site
consideration and the project environs.
• Optional – for projects • Establish that the proposed site is the best
3.1.2 Site suitability analysis
with only 1 site or option for the project
in case where site • Gap assessment is to establish the gap in
suitability is irrelevant service standards thereby re-confirming
(e.g. E-governance) the need for the project.
Mandatory / Optional
Section Contents Explanation (if any)
Components
Background and
1
Introduction
1.1 Background
• Introduce CITIIS
1.2 Introduction to CITIIS • Explain in brief the overall project
• The key takeaways from the feasibility
1.3 Project introduction • Mandatory
are to ensure that this report adheres to
the most important points that feasibility
Key takeaways of
1.4 has presented.
feasibility study
The structure of Detailed
1.5
Project Report
2 Project rationale • Set out the context of the project
highlighting the key issues being faced
2.1 Context resulting in the conceptualization of the
City Demography and project and the key reasons and benefits
2.1.1 of taking up this project.
socio-economic profile
• Outline and describe the project
2.1.2 Key issues constituents and what individual
components are part of overall project.
2.1.3 Need for the project
• Outline the outcomes and benefits likely
2.1.4 Project benefits to accrue if the project is implemented.
• Mandatory • In the overall methodology, present
Project overview and a snapshot of how the project is
2.2
objectives conceptualized from ideation to
implementation.
Key project components
• Chapters 1 and 2 might appear to be
2.2.1 and methodology of
a repetition and to a large extent it is
project development
reiterating some aspects of the feasibility
2.2.2 Key intended outcomes study. However, this is to ensure that
the reader / user of the document can
2.3 The overall methodology understand and appreciate the overall
context of the project.
Existing situation • Mandatory – in
3
analysis case only limited
investigations were
3.1 Soil investigation carried out during the • This section should highlight the
3.2 Topographic surveys feasibility. existing situation in all possible details
• Optional – if the including all the detailed surveys and
3.3 Hydrological surveys feasibility study has investigations that have been carried out
comprehensively • The technical studies for each set of
3.4 Climate studies
covered all surveys and projects will be different and can have
tests and it is further different constituents.
determined that no • The sample for Geotech investigation will
more surveys or tests increase to ensure full site is workable for
Mapping of existing
3.5 are necessary, the the project.
infrastructure / services
relevant sections of the
FS can be utilized to
populate this section.