EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Name of Work : “Construction of New Hospital at Siraspur, New Delhi (On EPC Mode-I) including all Civil, Electrical,
Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire Fighting, Horticulture & Medical Services etc.(SH.:Third Party Quality
Assurance for Civil Works)”

Construction Agency: M/s Ramacivil India Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Name of TPI Agency : RITES Ltd, RITES Bhawan-II, Plot No.-144, Sector-44, Gurugram -122003.

Period of Report : July 2021

A. TEST CONDUCTED BY TPQA TEAM

Remarks
Sr. Location, Reference & Particulars
Details of Tests Conformity / Compliance and
No of Work
References

Field Laboratory
Results were conforming to the requirement of CPWD Refer P/
1 Coarse Sand Silt Content – 07 tests
Specification.
Results were conforming to the requirement of CPWD
2 Coarse Sand Gradation – 05 tests Refer P/
Specification.

10 mm single size un-graded 2 nos. results were conforming and 1 no. result was not
3 Gradation – 04 tests Refer P/
aggregate conforming to the requirement of CPWD Specification

20 mm single size un-graded 2 nos. results were conforming and 1 no. result was not
4 Gradation – 04 tests Refer P/
aggregate conforming to the requirement of CPWD Specification

5 20 mm graded coarse aggregate Gradation - 01 test Result was not conforming to the requirement of IS: 383 Refer P/

6 10mm & 20mm single size aggregate AIV - 06 tests Results were conforming to the requirement of IS:383 Refer P/
7 8mm dia. reinforcement bar Unit weight Results were conforming to the requirement of IS:1786 Refer P/

8 10mm dia. reinforcement bar Unit weight Results were conforming to the requirement of IS:1786 Refer P/

9 12mm dia. reinforcement bar Unit weight Results were conforming to the requirement of IS:1786 Refer P/

10 16mm dia. reinforcement bar Unit weight Results were conforming to the requirement of IS:1786 Refer P/

11 20mm dia. reinforcement bar Unit weight Results were conforming to the requirement of IS:1786 Refer P/

12 25mm dia. reinforcement bar Unit weight Results were conforming to the requirement of IS:1786 Refer P/

13 32mm dia. reinforcement bar Unit weight Results were conforming to the requirement of IS:1786 Refer P/

7 days Compressive Results were found conforming to the requirement of IS:

14 M-25 grade concrete Refer P/
strength – 10 samples 456/2000
28 days Compressive Results were found conforming to the requirement of IS:
15 M-25 grade concrete Refer P/
strength – 11 samples 456/2000
28 days Compressive Results were found conforming to the requirement of IS:
16 M-30 grade concrete Refer P/
strength – 01 sample 456/2000

Results of 10 nos. samples were found more than 65% and 2

nos. samples were found less than 65% of required 28-day
07 days Compressive
17 M-40 grade concrete compressive strength of M40 concrete. The 28-day compressive Refer P/
strength – 12 samples
strength of the samples whose results were less than 65% need
to be checked to ascertain their actual attained strength.

28 days Compressive Results were found conforming to the requirement of IS:

18 M-40 grade concrete Refer P/
strength – 10 samples 456/2000
 B. PHYSICAL INSPECTION OBSERVATIONS FOR CIVIL WORKS

Location Remarks
Sr. Conformity /
/Reference & Observations and
No Compliance
Particulars of Work References

Following observations were made during random inspection.

1 Block-A 1. Reinforcement work was in progress. 'TATA TISCON' and 'SAIL' make of Fe500 and Conforming Refer P/
Basement-1 550D steel bars were being used.
Shear walls - SW-13 at 2. Details of stirrups and vertical bars was checked and found as per drawing.
grid (H20-H22/V1-V3) 3. Stirrups were being bent to 135 ̊.

Block-A 1. Steel reinforcement work for slab and beams was in progress. Conforming Refer P/
Ground Floor level
Grid (H15-H17/V1-V9)

2 Field Laboratory 1. Silt content of sand was checked and result was found conforming. Conforming Refer P/
2. Sieve analysis of sand was carried out and the result was found conforming.
3. 7-days compressive strength test was carried out on M25 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.
4. 7-days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.
 3 Block A 1. Reinforcement work of shear walls and columns was in progress. Fe500D and Conforming Refer P/
Ground Floor level to Fe550D of 'TATA TISCON' make steel bars were being used.
1st Floor level 2. Vertical bars and shear stirrups were checked and found as per drawing.
Columns C! at grid 3. Shear stirrups were bent to 135 ̊.
(H5/V3), C2 at grid 4. Cover blocks were being provided to columns and shear walls.
(H5/V4), C8 at grid 5. Lap length of the vertical bars in columns and shear walls was checked and found
(H6/V3), C7 at grid satisfactory.
(H6/V4) and shear
walls SW1 at grid
(H5/V2), SW1 at grid
(H6/V2)

4 Block A 1. Reinforcement work of beams and slabs was in progress. Fe500D and Fe550D TMT Not Refer P/
Ground Floor level slab bars of 'TATA TISCON" make were being used. conforming
Grid (H13-H15/V1-V9) 2. Reinforcement details of beas and slabs was checked and found as per drawing.
Beams and slabs at 3. Cover blocks in beams and slabs were provided properly.
grid (V1-V9/H1-H5) 4. Shear stirrups in beams (3 nos.) were not properly bent to 135 .̊ Agency was
advised to rectify it at the earliest/before casting.
5. Shuttering of slab was not properly filled/plugged with foams in gaps of
shuttering plates to stop the leakage of cement slurry. Agency was advised to
rectify it at the earliest/before casting.

5 Field Laboratory
1. 28-days compressive strength test was carried out on M30 concrete cubes and the Conforming Refer P/
result was found conforming.
2. 7 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.
3. Silt content test was carried out on coarse sand and the result was conforming.
4. Sieve analysis was carried out on coarse sand and the result was conforming.
5. Sieve analysis was carried out on 10mm ungraded coarse aggregate and the result
was conforming.
6. Sieve analysis was carried out on 20mm ungraded coarse aggregate and the result
was conforming.
7. Aggregate impact value test was carried out on 20mm graded coarse aggregate and
the result was found conforming.
6 Block-A 1. Concreting work was in progress. M25 grade of concrete was being used. Conforming Refer P/
Ground Floor level 2. Slump of M25 grade of concrete was checked and found as 110mm.
beams and slabs 3. Compaction of concrete was being done by using needle vibrator.
Grid (V1-V9/H1-H5) 4. Shuttering was not properly plugged to stop the leakage of slurry (cement). However
plugging of shuttering with foam started after being pointed out.
5. 6 nos. cubes were being filled for compressive strength testing.
6. Nito bond was being applied on old slab sides ('FOSROC' brand and 'Nitobond L-P
Standard' make was being used.
7. Thickness of slab was checked and found satisfactory.

Field Laboratory 1. 28 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the Conforming Refer P/
result was found conforming.
2. 7 days compressive strength tests were carried out on M25 concrete cubes (2 nos
samples) and the results were found conforming.

7 Block A 1. Reinforcement work for columns C49 at grid (V1/H10), (V1/H9) and (V1/H8), shear Not Refer P/
Ground Floor wall SW5A at grid (H4/V1-V3), SW4 at grid (H4/V3'-V4'), columns C28 at grid (H13/V4), conforming
C34 at grid (H14/V4) and (H14/V6) had been done.
2. Reinforcement details were found as per drawing except for the following:
(i) Ends of ties were not bent upto 135 ̊ at some places.
(ii) Ties were not properly tied with binding wires at some places.
(iii) 5 nos. triangular rings were yet to be provided at grid (V1/H8).
(iv) Ties were yet to be provided at 10 nos. places at grid (H4/V3'-V4')
- Agency was advised to rectify the above non-conforming observations.

8 Field Laboratory 1. Silt content of sand was checked and result was found conforming. Conforming Refer P/
2. Sieve analysis of sand was carried out and the result was found conforming.
3. 7-days compressive strength test was carried out on M25 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.
4. 7-days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.
5. Average unit weights of 8mm, 10mm, 12mm, 16mm, 20mm, 25mm and 32mm dia.
reinforcement steel bars were checked and the results were found conforming.
9 Field Laboratory 1. 28 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the Not Refer P/
result was found conforming conforming
2. 7 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and
the result was less than 65% of required 28 days compressive strength. Its 28
days compressive strength need to be checked to ascertain its actual attained
strength.

10 Field Laboratory 1. 28-days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the Conforming Refer P/
result was found conforming.
2. 7 days compressive strength tests were carried out on M40 concrete cubes (2 nos.
samples) and the results were found conforming.
3. 7 days compressive strength test was carried out on M25 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.

Block-A 1. Reinforcement work of slab and beams was in progress. Fe500D and Fe550D TMT Conforming Refer P/
Ground Floor level bars of 'TATA TISCON' and 'SAIL' make were being used.
Beams and slab 2. Though the work was in progress the following defects were found:
Grid (H15-H19/V1-V9) (i) Skin bars had not been provided in beams at grid (H15-H19/V1).
(ii) Ld of bars in beams (5 nos.) were not adequate (nearly 650mm against 1008mm
required for 16mm dia.)
- However the above defects were found being rectified/rectified during subsequent
inspection. Refer P/ ....
3. Spacing of slab reinforcement was checked and found as per drawing.
4. Cover blocks in slabs were being provided.
11 Field Laboratory 1. Sieve analysis of 10mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out and the result Conforming Refer P/
was found conforming.
2. Sieve analysis of 20mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out and the result
was found conforming.
3. Aggregate impact value test of 10mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out
and the result was found conforming.
4. 7 days compressive strength test was carried out on M25 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.
5. 7 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.

12 Block-A 1. Reinforcement work was in progress. Though the work was in progress following Conforming Refer P/
Ground Floor level defects were being rectified:
Beams and slabs at (i) Effective width of outer beams at the junction of columns.
grid (H15-H19/V1-V9) (ii) At grid (H15-H19/V1) skin bars of beams was being provided.
(iii) Ld of bars in beams (5 nos.) had been provided.
2. Curing of columns at grid (V9/H15-H19) was being done.

Field Laboratory 1. 7-days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the Conforming Refer P/
result was found conforming.
2. 28-days compressive strength tests were carried out on M40 concrete cubes (2 nos.
samples) and the results were found conforming.

13 Block A 1. Reinforcement work of shear walls was in progress. 'TATA TISCON' and 'SAIL' make Not Refer P/
Ground Floor to 1st of steel bars (TMT Fe550D grade) were being used. conforming
Floor level 2. Reinforcement details of wall was checked and found as per drawing.
Lift Area 3. Ld of vertical bars in shear walls was not properly bound with binding wires.
Shear Wall at grid (H1- Agency was advised to rectify it at the earliest as per IS code/specification.
H3'/V3'-V4') 4. Stirrups were not properly bent to 135 .̊ However bending of stirrups to 135 ̊ started
after being pointed out.

Field Laboratory 1. 28 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the Conforming Refer P/
result was found conforming.
2. 28 days compressive strength tests were carried out on M25 concrete cubes (3 nos.
samples) and the results were found conforming.
14 Block A 1. Reinforcement work was in progress. Fe500D and Fe550D steel bars of 'SAIL' and Not Refer P/
Ground Floor to 1st 'TATA TISCON' make were being used. conforming
Floor level 2. Reinforcement details of shear walls was checked and found as per drawing.
Shear walls SW11B 3. Shear stirrups were not bent to 135 ̊ properly. Agency was advised to bend the
and SW13 at grid stirrups at 135 ̊at the earliest/before casting.
(V4/H1-H4) and (V1-
V3/H1-H3) respectively

Field Laboratory 1. 28 days compressive strength test was carried out on M25 concrete cubes and the Conforming Refer P/
result was found conforming.
2. 7 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.

15 Block-A 1. Reinforcement work of slabs and beams was in progress. Fe500D and Fe550D TMT Not Refer P/
Ground Floor level bars of 'SAIL' and 'TATA TISCON' make were being used. conforming
Slab and beams at grid 2. Spacing of bottom bars of slabs (S9B) at grid (V3-V4/H21-H22) were at 300mm c/c
(H19-H22/V1-V9) instead of 225mm c/c. However the rectification of spacing started after being pointed
out.
3. Steel bars at site stock were not stacked at 150mm above the ground. Instead
they were stacked directly on the ground. Agency was advised to stack the steel
as per CPWD specification.

Field Laboratory 1. 28 days compressive strength test was carried out on M25 concrete cubes and the Conforming Refer P/
result was found conforming.
2. 28 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.
16 Field Laboratory 1. Average unit weights of 8mm, 20mm, 25mm and 32mm dia. reinforcement steel bars Not Refer P/
were checked and the results were found conforming. conforming
2. 28 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.
3. Aggregate impact value test of 20mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out
and the result was found conforming.
4. Sieve analysis of 10mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out and the
result was found not conforming.
5. Sieve analysis of 20mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out and the
result was found not conforming.
6.Sieve analysis of 20mm graded coarse aggregate was carried out and the result
was found not conforming.
- Agency was advised to remove the stock of coarse aggregate from site which
were found non-conforming.

17 Field Laboratory 7 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the result Conforming Refer P/
was found conforming.

18 Field Laboratory 1. 28 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the Conforming Refer P/
result was found conforming.
2. 7 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.

19 Field Laboratory 1. 28 days compressive strength tests were carried out on M25 concrete cubes (2 nos. Not Refer P/
samples) and the results were found conforming. conforming
2. 7 days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete cubes and
the result was found less than 65% of required 28 days compressive strength. Its
28 days compressive strength need to be checked to ascertain its actual attained
strength.
 Block A 1. Reinforcement work for slabs and beams was in progress. Not Refer P/
Ground Floor 2. Reinforcement details of slab S16, S20, beams YB3, XB2 and XB3 were checked conforming
Grid (H20-H22/V1-V3) and found as per drawing except for the following:
(i) Spacings of the rings of beams and top bars of slabs were not proper at some
places.
(ii) Large gaps were observed between the shuttering plates at some places.
(iii) Main reinforcement bars of beam YB3 was not properly placed as a result of
which excessive cover was observed on one side.
- Agency was advised to rectify the above non-conforming observations before
concreting.

Block-A 1. AAC block work (wall) was in progress. Conforming Refer P/

Basement I 2. Blocks being used were of size 200 x 250 x 600mm and of make 'JK SMART BLOX'
Grid (H12-H11/V5-V6) 3. Thickness of joint when randomly checked was found as 4mm.
4. Mortar being used was prepared by adding 25% by weight of water in 'ULTRATECH
FIXOBLOCK' make jointing mortar powder.

20 Block-A 1. AAC block work was in progress. 'JK SMART' make and 'JK LAXMI' brand AAC Not Refer P/
Basement I Floor level blocks of size 600 x 200 x 250mm were being laid with chemical mortar 'FIXOBLOCK' conforming
Grid (H5-H6/V1-V3) make and 'ULTRATECH' brand.
2. Mortar filling of joints was checked and found satisfactory.
3. Toothing of AAC blocks was being done with adjacent wall.
4. 2 nos. GI stirrups of size 20 x 1.15mm were being provided at every third layer of
AAC block at grid (V3/H5-H6).
5. One piece of AAC block was broken. Broken block was cross marked. Agency
was advised to replace the broken piece with good one at the earliest.
Field Laboratory 1. Silt contents of coarse sand (2 nos. samples) were checked and results were found Conforming Refer P/
conforming.
2. Sieve analysis of coarse sand (2 nos. samples) were carried out and the results were
found conforming.
3. Sieve analysis of 10mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out and the result
was found conforming.
4. Sieve analysis of 20mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out and the result
was found conforming.
5. Aggregate impact value test of 10mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out
and the result was found conforming.
6. Aggregate impact value test of 20mm ungraded coarse aggregate was carried out
and the result was found conforming.
7. 7-days compressive strength test was carried out on M25 concrete cubes and the
result was found conforming.
8. 28 days compressive strength tests were carried out on M25 concrete cubes (4 nos.
samples) and the results were found conforming.

R.K.Bobosana Singh A.K.Pandey

Engr(Civil) Engr(Civil)
 Compliance of Previous Inspection Reports
Name of Work : “Construction of New Hospital at Siraspur, New Delhi (On EPC Mode-I) including all Civil,
Electrical,
Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire Fighting, Horticulture & Medical Services etc.(SH.:Third Party
Quality
Construction Agency: M/sAssurance
Ramacivilfor
India Construction
Civil Works)” Pvt. Ltd.
Name of TPI Agency : RITES Ltd, RITES Bhawan-II, Plot No.-144, Sector-44, Gurugram -122003.

Location/Reference
Sr. Conformity /
& Particulars of Observations Remarks and References
No Compliance
Work

A Please Refer Periodical report No. 01 dated 06.02.2021

Block-A Kota stone waterproofing work was in Complied Refer P/3.
Basement 2 progress:
Grid (H15-H17/V4-V8) (iii) Top surface of mortar was not in Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
2 level. Agency was advised to rectify it at vide EE letter no-
the earliest. 23(39)/EE/HPD(North)/PWD/2021-22/870,
dated- 18/06/2021

3 Block-A (i) Agency was advised to roughen Complied Refer P/8-9

Lift Area the surface of PCC to form proper
Grid (H1-H3/V1-V9) bond with subsequent kota stone Complied by agency as intimated by
waterproofing work PWD vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021

4 Block-A (i) Sand filling around boundary wall Complied Refer P/16
Lift pit area of lift pit was not being done in layer.
Grid (H1-H1'/V1-V2) Available sand need to be filled in Complied by agency as intimated by
layers and compacted well. PWD vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021
5 Block-A (i) Bricks were not good in shape Complied Refer P/16-17
Lift pit area and yellowish in colour. Agency was
Grid (H19-H22) advised to sort out yellow and bad Complied by agency as intimated by
shape bricks before laying. PWD vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(ii) At some places joints were not (North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
filled properly with mortar. Agency 18/06/2021
was advised to fill the joints properly.
(iii) Toward Highway side lift pit soil
cutting was not shored and protected
against soil-slide. Agency was
advised to make proper safety
arrangements against soil slide of
vertical cutting.

6 Block-A (i) Curing of vertical wall (brickwork) Complied Refer P/23

Grid (H1-H4/V0-V5) at grid (H1/V5-V0) was not being
done. Agency was advised to do
proper curing for at least 7 days.
Complied by agency as intimated by
PWD vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021
7 Block-A (i) Proper compaction work of the Complied Refer P/25
Grid (H1-H4/V9-X1) backfill was not done. Agency was
advised to do the backfill layerwise Complied by agency as intimated by
(in layer of 200mm thick) and PWD vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
compact each layer by using (North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
compacting equipment before laying 18/06/2021
the subsequent layers.
(ii) Some of the workers at site were
found without safety helmets and
safety shoes. Agency was advised to
follow all specified safety measures
at site.

8 Field Laboratory (i) Sample of sand (fine aggregate)
was tested for sieve analysis and the
result was not found conforming.
Agency was advised to remove the
stock of sand from site.
Complied Refer P/32
Complied by agency as intimated by
PWD vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021

B Please Refer Periodical report No. 02 dated 08.03.2021

One result was not Refer P/1,5-7

conforming and
three results were Complied by agency as intimated by DDA
1 Coarse Sand Gradation – 04 tests
found conforming vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
to CPWD (North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
specification. 18/06/2021
 12 samples were
Refer P/23-56
found not
conforming and 22
07 days Compressive Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
2 M-30 grade concrete samples were
strength – 34 samples vide letter no: EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
found conforming
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
to the requirement
18/06/2021
of IS: 456/2000

3 General Observation (i) Binding in raft reinforcement cage Complied
was not cross linked at grid (H12-
H13/V1-V2). Agency was advised to
cross link the bindings of reinforcement
cage.
Refer P/65
Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021

4 Block-A (i) Curing of concrete work was being Complied Refer P/67
Grid (H10-H11/V1-V3) done. But date of casting was not
labelled. Agency was advised to label Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
the date of casting and thus do proper vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
curing for 7 days. (North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021

5 Block-A, Grid (H13'- (i) Vertical reinforcement bars for Complied
H15'/V1-V9) retaining wall along grid (V1) were not of
uniform spacing. Agency was advised to
provide uniform spacing as specified.
Refer P/70-71
Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021

6 Block-A (i) Shear keys were not provided Complied Refer P/72
Raft properly. Agency was advised to provide
Grid (H14-H15'/V1-V9) proper shear keys while concreting. Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021
7 Field Laboratory (i) Slump of concrete with moisture Complied
correction was found as 50mm and that
without moisture correction as 115mm
against the required 110mm to 130mm.
Agency was advised to review the
design mix and do the needful.
8 Block A, (i) Shuttering work of pedestal in Complied
Grid (H13-H14/V8-V9) progress. Dimension checked and found
as 2880 x 1745mm against 2900 x
1750mm as per drawing. Agency was
advised to rectify the same.
9 Raft (i) Raft curing work was not done Complied
Grid(H16-H4/V1-V3) properly and few pedestals were found
in dry condition. Agency was advised to
depute one person for proper curing
work at site.
10 Field Laboratory (i) 5 nos. samples of M30 concrete Complied
cubes whose 7-day compressive
strength testing was due was tested and
4 of the samples were found not
conforming.
(ii) Oven (electric) available at the field
laboratory was out of order. Agency was
advised to repair it and get it calibrated.
Refer P/75
Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021
Refer P/76
Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021
Refer P/80
Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021
Refer P/93
Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021
11 Field Laboratory ((i) 7 days compressive strength tests Complied Refer P/94
on 2 nos. samples of M30 concrete
cubes was carried out and the results Complied by agency as intimated by PWD
were found not conforming. vide EE letter no-23(39)/EE/HPD
(North)/PWD/2021-22/870, dated-
18/06/2021

R.K.Bobosana
Singh A.K. Pandey
Engineer(Civil)) Engineer(Civil)
 Non-Compliance of Previous Inspection Reports
Name of Work : “Construction of New Hospital at Siraspur, New Delhi (On EPC Mode-I) including all Civil,
Electrical,
Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire Fighting, Horticulture & Medical Services etc.(SH.:Third Party Quality
Assurance for Civil Works)”
Construction Agency: M/s Ramacivil India Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Name of TPI Agency : RITES Ltd, RITES Bhawan-II, Plot No.-144, Sector-44, Gurugram -122003.

Location/Reference
Sr. Conformity / Remarks and
& Particulars of Observations
No Compliance References
Work

A Please Refer Periodical report No. 01 dated 06.02.2021

Agency was advised to provide the following documents for the Agency was
inspection of work: advised to
(i) Copy of contract agreement between PWD and executing agency provide the
(ii) Approval of source of all input materials including construction water. documents.
(iii) Calibration certificates of equipments other than those provided. Refer P/1-2
(iv) Copy of Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan submitted by
Working Agency as per clause of agreement.
1 General Observation (v) Copy of all the approved Good for Construction drawings. Not Complied
(vi) Copy of the bar chart/PERT/CPM submitted by agency to PWD
(vii) Details of authorised representative of executing agency.
(viii) Copy of Soil Investigation Report.

B Please Refer Periodical report No. 05 dated 06.07.2021

1 Block-A Post concreting work of the slabs and beams between grid (H1-H5/V1- Not conforming Refer P/85
Basement-1 V4) was randomly checked and the followings were observed:
Grid (H1-H5/V1-V4) (iii) Top surface of the slab between grid (H1-H2'/V3-V4) was not at
proper level at some area (i.e. level was down). Agency was advised to
rectify the same.
2 Block-A 2) Reinforcement work of the 1st lift of the shear wall SW10 was Not conforming Refer P/86
Basement-1 randomly checked and the followings were observed:
Grid (H11-H12/V7-V9) (ii) Ends of ties/rings were bent upto 90 ̊ instead of required 135 ̊ at
some places.
(iii) 6 nos. tringular rings were yet to be provided.
- Agency was advised to rectify the above non-conforming observations
before concreting.

4 Field Laboratory Following tests were carried out at the field laboratory: Not conforming Refer P/91-92
4) Sieve analysis was carried out on 20mm graded coarse aggregate
and the result was found not conforming. Agency was advised to
remove the material from site.

Staircase Reinforcement work for 1st flight, 2nd flight, 1st landing and 2nd landing Not conforming Refer P/92-93
(Basement 1 to had been done and the followings were observed during the random
Basement 2) inspection:
Grid (H19-H20/V1-V3) 6) Cover blocks were not provided at some places (at the side) as a
result of which reinforcement bars were touching the shuttering boards.
Agency was advised to rectify the same.

5 Block-A Reinforcement work for shear wall SW5A had been done at grid Not conforming Refer P/95
Basement-1 (H4/V1-V3). It was checked and the followings were observed:
Shear wall at Grid 1) Ends of ties/rings were not bent upto 135 ̊ at some places.
(H4/V1-V3) 3) Proper staggering of adjacent lappings of vertical bars were not done
at some places.

7 Block-A 1) Reinforcement work for beams had been done between grid (V6- Not conforming Refer P/98
Basement-1 V9/H18'-H18) for beams XB14C and XB11.
Floor slabs and beams 2) Reinforcement details was checked and followings were observed:
i) Top extras of beam XB14C at grid (H18/V8) were not properly placed
(i.e. it was shorter at one end)
ii) There was no spacer bars between the top extra and the top main
bars as a result of which the reinforcement bars were touching each
other at grid (H18/V8).
9 Block-A 2) Slab and waist slab reinforcement were not bound as per drawing. Not conforming Refer P/102
Roof of Basement 2 Agency was advised to rectify it as per drawing at the earliest/before
Staircase casting.
Grid (H19-H20/V1-V3)

Block-A 2) Position of the main steel bars at the top was not as per specification Not conforming Refer P/102
Roof of Basement 2 (not proper) in beam B4 at grid (H20'/V1-V3). Agency was advised to
Beams at rectify it at the earliest/before casting.
Grid (H19-H20/V1-V3)
10 Field Laboratory 2) 7-days compressive strength test was carried out on M40 concrete Not conforming Refer P/103
cubes and the result was found less than 70% of required 28 days
compressive strength. Its 28-days compressive strength needed to be
checked to find out its actual attained strength.

13 General Site 1) Finishing of RCC surface was not proper at some places (i.e. surface Not conforming Refer P/108
Observation of shear wall, slab bottom etc.). Agency was advised to cut the
Grid (H5-H17/V1-V9) protruding ends of ties used for fastening the formwork and seal the
ends to prevent corrosion and also to remove the remnants of the
materials used for sealing the formwork and carry out proper finishing.
2) Loose concrete materials were observed on top of columns at some
places. Agency was advised to remove them before any concreting was
done over the columns.

R. K. Bobosana Singh A.K. Pandey

Engr (Civil) Engr (Civil)
 Compliance of Previous Inspection Reports
Subject : Engaging Services for Third Party Quality assurance Consultancy for the work of “C/o 1750 Two
BHK 900 Three BHK and 1016 EWS Houses (Design& Build Model) earmarked in Pocket-11
Sector A-1 to A-4,Narela."

Construction Agency: M/s B.G. Shirke Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd.

Name of TPI Agency : RITES Ltd, RITES Bhawan-II, Plot No.-144, Sector-44, Gurugram -122003.

Location/Reference
Sr. Conformity /
& Particulars of Observations Remarks and References
No Compliance
Work

A Please Refer Periodical report No. 07, dated 07.12.2020

a) Wall member DNS 5-3 was severely damaged to Complied Agency was advised to replaced
noze wall side. the member at the earliest.

b) Wall member DMNS 15-2 was broken and Inspection Report enclosed at
damaged at the mid point. page no- 66
Connecting Wall Necessary Photograph placed on page no.- 90 Complied by agency as intimated
i)
building no-61 by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/660,
dated- 31/12/2020

Screed reinforcement of the ramp slab & beams was Complied Agency was advised to rectify it
checked & found as per drawing no: 13-15/Project- before casting.
IV/Pocket-11/Basement/WD/STR-329/R0 for beam &
STR-334/R0 for slab. Inspection Report enclosed at
Ramp-3, lower a) Spacers bars of 25mm dia at top slab & beam page no-70
ii) basement near reinforcement was not provided at two places. Complied by agency as intimated
Building no-72 by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
Necessary Photograph placed on page no.- 95(1) no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/660,
dated- 31/12/2020
 Half grouting of columns & walls were in progress. M- Complied Agency was advised to rectify at
40 grade SCC was being used. the earliest.
a) Wall member DMNS11 was cracked at upper
MIG,Building no-61, corner. Inspection Report enclosed at
Stilt floor, Necessary Photograph placed on page no.-105-106 page no-79
iii) Grid J/(13-20) Complied by agency as intimated
by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/660,
dated- 31/12/2020

B Please Refer Periodical report No. 05, dated 06.10.2020

Working agency was advice to
replace the column at earliest
before it grouting.
Podium no-21 lower c) Columns 2 core found broken at upper portion and
basement in between used A2L3 member in place of column A2L4 at grid Please refer page no-76
i) Complied Complied by agency as intimated
building no-70 &71, no-B1/34 in podium part.
Grid (C1-D1)/(33-34) Necessary Photograph placed on page no.- 139-140 by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/660,
dated- 31/12/2020

A Please Refer Periodical report No. 04, dated 05.09.2020

Podium part Upper Screed reinforcement work was in progress.
basement near MIG a) Screed reinforcement was being checked and
building no-48 found as per drawing no-13-15/Project-IV/Pocket-
11/basement/WD/STR-278,R0.
i) b) At some places reinforcement was loosely
bounded.
Necessary Photograph placed on page no.- 141
Complied Agency was advised to rectify at
the earliest.
Inspection Report enclosed at
page no-98
Complied by agency as intimated
by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
dated- 14/12/2020
 Erection of columns and wall was in progress.
a) Vertical alignment of the column no-CM3L63 &
CM3L65 and double wall was checked and found
satisfactory.
MIG, Building no-50, b) Gap between the wall panel no- FML124 and FML
ii)
1st floor no-120 was being observed more than 20mm.
Necessary Photograph placed on page no.- 142
Reinforcement of the band was being checked shear
reinforcement (U-bars) and found 600C/c spacing
against required 300mm C/c.
Necessary Photograph placed on page no.- 145(2)
MIG,Building no-48,
iii)
3rd floor
02 samples of Coarse sand were collected from
batching plant and tested for field laboratory for
gradation test and found 01 sample confirming & 01
Field Laboratory, sample not confirming in gradation test as per CPWD
iv)
Batching plant no-6 specification.
Necessary Photograph placed on page no.- 151
Complied Agency was advised to keep the
gap within tolerance limit.
Inspection Report
enclosed at page no-98
Complied by agency as intimated
by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
dated- 14/12/2020
Complied Agency was advised to rectify the
spacing at the earliest before
concreting.
Inspection Report enclosed at
page no-102
Complied by agency as intimated
by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
dated- 14/12/2020
Complied Inspection Report enclosed at
page no- 108
Complied by agency as intimated
by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
dated- 14/12/2020
 Casting of HIG balcony wall SPW-13,14 &15(03nos.) Complied Agency was advised to rectify it
& SPW-17 &18(02nos.) were in progress. M-35 grade before casting.
concrete was being used.
b) Lifting hooks of the member SPW-14 was not tie Inspection Report enclosed at
properly. page no- 119
Double wall Necessary Photograph placed on page no.- 163
v) Complied by agency as intimated
manufacturing unit
by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
dated- 14/12/2020

Floor tiles work was in progress. Tiles size Complied Agency was advised to removed
600X600mm were being fixed with chemical mortar the cross marked tiles & proper
Fosroc Nitotile GPX. filling.
a) Holloness of tiles was checked & found 05nos of
tiles sounded hollow. The same have been cross Inspection Report enclosed at
MIG,Building no-49, marked. page no- 127
vi) 2nd floor, Flat no-307, b) Joints of tiles were not filled with white cement & Complied by agency as intimated
Drawing room matching pigment. by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
Necessary Photograph placed on page no.- 167 dated- 14/12/2020
B Please Refer Periodical report No. 03, dated 05.08.2020

a) Working agency was asked for quantity of materials

being used as per design mix at site. Agency was Complied by agency as intimated
requested to provide MTC/Challan/Invoice of input by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
materials being used during period 23.03.2020 to till no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
date. However in this regards some of MTC/test dated- 14/12/2020
reports of Cement OPC-43 grade, Fly ash grade-I,
i) Field Laboratory admixture make Fosroc chemical and reinforcement Complied
TMT bars 8mm, 10mm, 12mm, 20mm &25mm was
provided by agency.
Copy of MTC/Test reports are placed on page no-92-
106. MTC's of materials was submitted by agency and
same is placed at page no-
 03nos concrete cubes were randomly collected from
curing tank and checked for 28th days compressive Complied by agency as intimated
and value find 48.89N/mm2 in average.i.e. the test by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
result were higher side as per design mix/IS code. no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
ii) Field Laboratory Complied dated- 14/12/2020

Necessary Photograph placed on page no.-112

Pocket-11, HIG, a) At three places gaps between wall member was Agency was advised to rectify the
Building no-75, Lowe observed more than 20mm. Agency is advised to same.
basement podium, rectify the same before casting. Please refer page no.-88
Grid (N-M)/(34-38) b) Column member at grid (36-37)/(M-N) was broken
at upper portion. Agency was advised to rectify the Complied by agency as intimated
Columns A1L1 at same. by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
N/34 01no. d) Working agency was advised to follow the safety no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
iii) Columns A1L2 at norms during execution of works. Photographs Complied dated- 14/12/2020
N/35 01no. attached at page no-124&125
Columns A1L4 at
N/36,N/37,N/38 &
N/35 04nos.

Screed reinforcement work was being checked and Agency was advised to rectify the
found as per drawing no-(5’-15)/Project-IV/M- same before casting.
8/WD/STR/736/Rev-0.
a) At 4 places reinforcement was loosely bound.
Pocket-11, MIG, Agency was advised to rectify the same before Please refer page no.-89
Building no-51, Slilt casting.
iv) Complied
floor top slab, Grid (K- b) At 03 places reinforcement was not provided. Complied by agency as intimated
E)/(10-14) Agency was advised to rectify the same before by DDA vide letter no: EE letter
casting. Photograph attached at page no-126 no-F2(1193)/NPD-1/DDA/634,
dated- 14/12/2020
Note: Compliance report is placed on page-

RANJEET VERMA A.K. PANDEY

ENGINEER(CIVIL) ENGINEER(CIVIL)
 Compliance of Previous Inspection Reports
Name of Work : “Construction of New Hospital at Siraspur, New Delhi (On EPC Mode-I) including all Civil, Electrical,
Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire Fighting, Horticulture & Medical Services etc.(SH.:Third Party Quality
Assurance for Civil Works)”

Construction Agency: M/s Ramacivil India Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Name of TPI Agency : RITES Ltd, RITES Bhawan-II, Plot No.-144, Sector-44, Gurugram -122003.

Location/Reference
Sr. Conformity /
& Particulars of Observations Remarks and References
No Compliance
Work

B Please Refer Periodical report No. 03 dated 06.04.2021

2 Block-A (i) At columns C7 at grid (H7/V5) and C14 at grid (H9/V5) Complied Refer P/64
Grid (H10/V4), (H9/V4), the shear reinforcement were not properly binded and
(H8/V4), (H7/V4), placed. Agency was advised to rectify it at the Complied by agency as
(H7/V5), (H10/V5), earliest/before casting. intimated by PWD vide EE letter
(H9/V5), (H8/V5), (ii)In alternate vertical bars shear tie had been provided as no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(H6/V5), (H11/V7-V9) per drawing. Agency was advised to discuss the matter (N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
with PWD officials (to provide shear ties in each pair of 05/07/2021
vertical bars) before casting.

3 Block-A (i) Tie (shear) reinforcement of columns and shear wall Complied Refer P/67
Basement-I were not bent and binded to 180 deg./135 deg. properly.
Columns at grid (H13- Agency was advised to rectify it at the earliest/before Complied by agency as
H18/V3) & Shear walls casting. intimated by PWD vide EE letter
at grid (H13-H18/V8) no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021
4 Block-A (i) Hacking of the columns were not being done. Agency Complied Refer P/70
Basement-I was advised to do hacking of columns at the earliest.
Columns at Grid (H7- (ii) Shear key were not being provided properly. Agency Complied by agency as
H10/V4), (H8/V5), was advised to provide construction key in concrete intimated by PWD vide EE letter
(H10/V5) properly. no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021

5 Grid (H18/V7-V8) (i)Dimension test of the bricks was carried out and result Complied Refer P/77
was found not conforming. Agency was advised to
remove the stock of bricks and reconstruct the brickwork Complied by agency as
with conforming bricks. intimated by PWD vide EE letter
no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021

6 General Site Curing compound had been applied on the columns/shear Complied Refer P/77
Observation walls/retaining walls. However hacking had been done on
some of them before the curing period which would make Complied by agency as
the curing compound ineffective. Agency was advised to intimated by PWD vide EE letter
do the hacking before applying curing compound. no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021
7 Block-A (i) Reinforcement details of beams and slabs between grid Complied Refer P/86
Basement-II (H5-H10/V1-V3) was checked and the followings were
Grid (H5-H10/V1-V3) observed at some places: Complied by agency as
(a) Improper level and undulation of shuttering plates intimated by PWD vide EE letter
observed. no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(b) Gaps observed between shuttering plates. (N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
(c) Absence of cover blocks as a result of which 05/07/2021
reinforcement bars were touching the shuttering boards.
(d) Absence of chair as a result of which no proper gap
between upper and lower reinforcement was observed.

8 General Site Piles of sand etc. kept for use in the work were not Complied Refer P/88
Observation covered with clothes/tarpaulin sheets. Agency was
advised to cover the piles of sand etc. to avoid generation Complied by agency as
of dust and particulate matter. intimated by PWD vide EE letter
no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021

9 Block-A (i) At three places lapping of beams bars (top & bottom Complied Refer P/89
Basement-II inclusive) was not in lapping zone. However lap length
Beams at Grid (H13- was found satisfactory. Agency was advised to retify it at Complied by agency as
H8/V1-V5) the earliest/before casting. intimated by PWD vide EE letter
(ii) Shuttering joints were not being plugged properly to no-23(39)/EE/HP-
stop the leakage of cement slurry. Agency was advised to (N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
plug the joints properly before casting/at the earliest. 05/07/2021

C Please Refer Periodical report No. 04 dated 05.06.2021

1 Field Laboratory (i) 7-day compressive strength test was carried out on 1 Complied Refer P/34
no. sample of M40 concrete cubes and the result was
found as 29.997 N/mm2 which is less than the 70% of Complied by agency as
required 28-day compressive strength of M40 concrete. intimated by PWD vide EE letter
Its 28-day compressive strength need to be checked to no-23(39)/EE/HP-
ascertain its actual attained strength. (N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021
2 Block-A (i) Loose concrete was observed on shuttering of beams Complied Refer P/35
Basement-2 at four places. Agency was advised to clean it at the
Floor slab earliest/before concreting. Complied by agency as
Grid (H13-H18/V5-V9) intimated by PWD vide EE letter
no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021

3 Block-A (i) In lift pit area reinforcement cage binded in hanging Complied Refer P/36
Basement-1 design as shown in drawing. However this drawing was
Lift Area not finally approved. Complied by agency as
Grid (H5-H6/V5-V6) (ii) Instead of beams load was transferred on column intimated by PWD vide EE letter
through rebarring of bars which was not acceptable. no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(iii) Beams of this lift were not completely supporting on (N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
column. 05/07/2021
(iv) Shuttering of this area was also being provided
without completing the reinforcement work.
(v) At some locations ends of shear reinforcement bars
were found not completely bent to 135 ̊.

4 Field Laboratory (ii) 28-days compressive strength test was carried out on Complied Refer P/37, 31
M40 concrete cubes and the result was found not
conforming. Complied by agency as
intimated by PWD vide EE letter
no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021

5 General Site (i) Calibration certificate of the new compressive strength Complied Refer P/37
Observation testing machine which was calibrated on 7/4/21 was yet to
be provided to TPIA. Agency was advised to provide the Complied by agency as
same. intimated by PWD vide EE letter
(ii) Some portions of the floor slab of Basement-2 between no-23(39)/EE/HP-
grid (H13-H18/V6-V9) were found in dry condition. Agency (N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
was advised to keep the area wet until the curing period 05/07/2021
was over.
6 Basement-2 Centre-to-centre spacing of main and distribution bars Complied Refer P/40
Roof slab were not found at uniform spacing. Agency was advised
Grid (H10/V3-V4) to rectify the same before casting. Complied by agency as
intimated by PWD vide EE letter
no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021

7 Beam Outer bars of beam were not passing through inside of Complied Refer P/40
Grid (H10/V4) column 'C18'. Agency was advised to rectify the same
before casting. Complied by agency as
intimated by PWD vide EE letter
no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021

8 Field Laboratory Concrete cube tests which were due that day couldnot be Complied Refer P/41
carried out as calibrated compressive strength testing
machine was not available according to the Agency. Complied by agency as
Agency was advised to make available calibrated intimated by PWD vide EE letter
compressive strength testing machine at the earliest and no-23(39)/EE/HP-
inform TPIA so that testing was not hampered. (N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021

9 Field Laboratory (i) 7-day compressive strength test was carried out on Complied Refer P/47
M40 concrete cubes and the result was found less than
the 70% of required 28-day compressive strength of M40 Complied by agency as
concrete. Its 28-day compressive strength need to be intimated by PWD vide EE letter
checked to ascertain its actual attained strength.. no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021
10 Slab Slab reinforcement work was in progress. It was randomly Complied Refer P/47
Grid (H10-H13/V5-V9) checked and found that required number of cover blocks
were not provided. Agency was advised to provide Complied by agency as
required number of cover blocks in slab at zig-zag pattern. intimated by PWD vide EE letter
no-23(39)/EE/HP-
(N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
05/07/2021

11 Block-A Reinforcement work of beam 'YBY1' at grid (H4-H5/V1), Complied Refer P/51
Basement-2 beam 'XB11A' at grid (H4/V1-V3), beam 'YB10' at grid
Grid (H4-H5/V1-V3) (H4-H5/V3), beam XB14' at grid (H5/V1-V3) were Complied by agency as
randomly checked and the followings were observed: intimated by PWD vide EE letter
(i) Large gaps were observed between the shuttering no-23(39)/EE/HP-
plates for slabs. Agency was advised to properly seal the (N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
gaps. 05/07/2021
(ii) Bottom extra bars were provided at 930mm from the
end instead of required 500mm from the end (grid (V1))
for beam 'XB11A'.
(iii) Width of beam was found as 215mm to 220mm
instead of required 230mm at beam 'XB11A' and beam
'XB14' at some locations.
(iv) Cover blocks of 25mm thick were provided instead of
30mm thick required on beams at some places.
(v) Cover blocks was yet to be provided on one side of the
beam 'XB14' at most places.
12 Block-A Reinforcement work of beam 'XB4' at grid (H2'/V1-V3), Complied Refer P/52
Basement-2 beam 'YB8' at grid (H1-H2'/V3), beam 'YB7' at grid (H1-
Grid (H1-H3/V1-V3) H2'/V2'), beam 'YB8A' at grid (H2'-H3/V2'), beam 'YB3' at Complied by agency as
grid (H1-H2'/V1') and slab 'S16' at grid (H2'-H3/V1-V1') intimated by PWD vide EE letter
were randomly checked and the followings were no-23(39)/EE/HP-
observed: (N)/PWD/2021-22/958, dated-
(i) Large gaps and difference in levels observed between 05/07/2021
shuttering plates/boards at some places.
(ii) Width of beam 'XB4' and beam 'YB3' were found
varying from 200mm to 210mm instead of required
230mm at some places.
(iii) Required cover blocks of beams was not provided at
some places of beam 'XB4' and beam 'YB8' as a result of
which reinforcement bars are touching the shuttering
boards.
(iv) Spacing of stirrups of beam 'XB4' and beam 'YB8'
were not uniform/not proper.
(v) Top curtailed reinforcement bars along longitudinal
direction of slab 'S16' was found as 1200mm long instead
of required 1290mm at grid (H2').

R. K. Bobosana Singh A.K. Pandey

Engr (Civil) Engr(Civil)