Topic 1: THE WORLD WOULD BE BETTER WITH 1 LANGUAGE

PROS:

- break / no language barrier

- easier to communicate

- Avoid misunderstanding between different cultures and countries

- Better job opportunities
- Easier to access to the references
- access to cultures of different countries

- People can communicate and understand to each other easily.

- Spend much time (about 900 hours) to learn something else or earn money instead of
learning a new language. / don't waste time learning new languges / reduce tuition for other
languages

- Gain the knowledge all over the world.

- open up to opportunities for learning and working

- minimize conflicts

- Reduce unnecessary expenses and make people more convenient

- easier to approach and communicate

- avoid misunderstanding causing by translation or interpretation

- no need translating assistant devices

CONS:

- lose cultural diversity

- lose ethnic identity

- lose unique cultures bw countries

- translator and interpreters will lose their jobs

- being good with different languages would no longer be a strength.

- difficult to identify the country

- minimize creation of people in learning a new language.

- lose a method of developing memory.

ATTACK / REFUTATION

* cultural diversification:

- the culture is made by people not the language

- One language, one culture. So, you will discover and know more deeply about this culture.

- Language just only one way which reflects culture, we can know many cultures from many
different fields

- the cultures will stay still but the language can be the same like American, Australian, and
so on speak English but they still have differrent cultures

* Job opportunity:

- Translators and interpreters will be out of job but it will open more job opportunities
for others

_Teachers would still be needed to teach that languge.

_No language aspect to worry so you can focus on other aspects
- career opportunities will never be lost for those who are always creative and progressive

* Mental development:

People can find lots of different methods to improve their intelligence not only through
learning new languages

TOPIC 2: EXAMINATION SHOULD BE ABOLISHED AT UNIVERSITY

Pros:

Examination does not define one's skill and capabilities.

- examination does not differentitate between students
- more stress for student
- people try trick or cheat at exam time

- stay up late or even skip meals just to revise for their upcoming examinations.
=> causes the lack of sleep and anxiety
_less pressure for students
_students can focus on other activities

Some cheaters go undetected and score high marks

help us save time and money

less exam will interest student in studying

Cons:

- Wouldn't classify students

- many students are not consciously learning

- exams can let the students know how well they understand the topic and where their
standard is allowing to improve

- help student's awareness of own standard

- through examination to give the right teaching method

- exams would motivate students to study

exams help student revise lesson that they slip their mind

must have an exam, students study hard

student can know what their weaknesses and strengths are

test is available to help parents assess their child's academic performance

REFUTATION:

Teacher: classify students / measure their understanding -> adjust / change teaching method

>< teacher can evaluate students through different/ other skills / ways/ methods (analysing /
leadership skills)

studying is a whole process so teacher can see through out the term

abilities are estimated whole process because sometimes has cheating on exam

Students: know weaknesses / strength + motivation to learn harder

The motivation originates from the interest in the new subject, which makes students study
better, not the exams

student can show off their skills, knowledge through presentations or essay
Nowdays, there' s been a suggestion that we should leave the exam in college, it has all the
support and disapproval. In my opinion, the abolished of tests in college has a lot of positive
aspects. Firstly, examination does not define our skill and capabilities. As we know , We
have too much knowledge to learn in a short time . Especially, some student have to stay up
late or even skip meals just to revise for their upcoming examinations. Therefore, we have
more and more stress . AS a reslts, our final test results have a low score that why the test
can' t measure our entire effort.Secondly, if we don' t have a test, we' ll have more time to
participate in outdoor activities such as go camping, go shopping, or do volunteer…. But
there are some other people said that it’s extremely bad if we leave the test in colloge.
Bescuase, the exams which can let the students know how well they understand the topic and
where their standard is allowing to improve. Moreover, the exams help student's awareness
of own standard and through examination to give the right teaching method. However, we
can totally reputate that studying is a whole process so teacher can see through out the term
.In additions, abilities are estimated whole process because sometimes we have some cheaters
go undetected and score high marks. Last but not least, the motivation originates from the
interest in the new subject, which makes students study better, it not come from the exams.
Student can show off their skills, knowledge through presentations or essay. In conclusion, in
any way, we need to learn to study hard in order to have a good knowledge

Tham khảo bài viết của các bạn

From 19D170235-Vu Thi Loan (41856) to Everyone: 02:25 PM

Examination should be abolished at universities as the studying pressure would decrease and
other skills would be improved.First, they do not have to cheat to pass the exam because it
does not evaluate their results in the studying process. Next, they do not have to stay up late
or even skip meals just to revise for their upcoming test so they will avoid the lack of sleep,
stress and other mental diseases. In addition, student can save both money and time to focus
on other activities which appeal to them. For example, they can take part in other clubs to
improve their soft skills like leadership or analysing skills which almost recruiters favorn in
the modern life.However, it will be difficult to classify student’s capacities so teachers can
not use suitable methods in teaching. Despite of this disadvantage, people argue that studying
is a whole process so teachers should evaluate their student through the process, not a test.
For example, student can show off their skills through presentations and essays.In

From 19D170224-Nguyen Thi Hoa (41812) to Everyone: 02:26 PM

It may be that the world would be better with one language. Language is a tool to approach
everything all over the world, it would be easier when breaking barrier language with only
one. In addition, one language hepls us access to various cultures of different countries.
Furthermore, people have big chances to open up to opportunities for learning and working.
Those who disagree with this proposal might argue that the world would lose cultural
diversities if we use only one language. However, all we know that language is just only one
way which reflects culture and we can discover many cultures from many different fields. No
barrier language, no misunderstanding cultures by using only one language would be an
advantage for us to access the world easily and effectively.

From 19D170235-Vu Thi Loan (41856) to Everyone: 02:26 PM

conclusion, it will be better to reduce studying pressure if examination is abolished at school

From 19D170228-Nguyen Manh Hung (41820) to Everyone: 02:27 PM

they have become parts of their history. But overall languages don't define a single culture,
what makes the culture is by the people too and many others. And with a single language,
you can easily learn and know deeply about a culture so culture diversity won't be lost. In
conclusion, i think the world will be much better if we only speak one language

From 19D170250-Nguyen Van Thao (41916) to Everyone: 02:27 PM

Examination is a way to evaluate student’s ability, however, there are some people say that
examination should be abolished at university. In my point of view, I completely disagree
with that statement because of the following reasons. Firstly, examination is the best way for
student to help them know their weakness and strength about the subject and from it they can
know exactly what they need to improve. If there is no any examination, student will think
that they understand everything and they don’t have to improve anything at all. That is really
big disadvantage to them. Secondly, without examination, student will become lazy because
they don’t have any motivation to do it and teacher will use the lessons for what? And who is
the person that will receive it. Studying become meaningless for student because there is no
any test so why they must listen the lecture in the class. Thirdly, examination will evaluate a
student’s ability. This is time for them to use their memory, remember everything which they
h

From 19D170250-Nguyen Van Thao (41916) to Everyone: 02:27 PM

had leant as well as is shows that how much they learnt. At the same time, it helps student
apply skills in real life situatuions. However, I believe that examination is still not evaluated s
student’s ability because they can be cheating in the exam. Inshort, I still think that
examination shouldn’t be abolished at university because of their benefits

From 19D170217-Cao Thi Thu Duyen (41788) to Everyone: 02:28 PM

The world will be better with one language. If people use a language, they will be able to
communicate with each other more. An example is if you have to communicate with
someone who shares the same language and someone with another language, make sure
communicating with people who use the same language you are much easier than people who
use the same language. that language. In fact, using the same language will cut some
unnecessary costs and time. According to statistics, the European Union, which has 23
official languages, spends 300 million dollars a year translating different languages. So if
countries use the same language, there won't be so much expense for language translation. In
addition, if the world uses the common language, your free communication with the rest of
the world will open up many opportunities for study and work, human-to-human
relationships, or national with together. You can argue that the use of the same language in
the world can lose the cultural identity of each country. However,

From 19D170244- Nguyen Thi Phuong to Everyone: 02:28 PM

of understanding and hard work, we can test in different ways such as giving students
presentations or writing essays. This is easier and helps students study better than taking
theoretical tests. Therefore, educators should have different reforms to test student’ s level of
understanding. This will help schools and students reduce the burden and pressure in the
learning process.

From 19D170216-Phan Thi Cam Chi (41776) to Everyone: 02:28 PM

In different countries wwill

From 19D170217-Cao Thi Thu Duyen (41788) to Everyone: 02:28 PM

However, it is only partially correct. The cultural identity of each nation will not really be lost
if the people always retain the patriotism and keep the national identity of their country. If we
use the same language in the future, we will have more opportunities in all fields and absorb
more cultures in the world.
 
Gửi

From 19D170237-Nguyen Thi Mo (41864) to Everyone: 02:29 PM

Examination is a very wide word, which shouldn’t be abolished at university. First of all, it
helps student's awareness of own standard. The fact that you aren’t good at this field but
excellent in other skills. The second thing I should mention is that exams would motivate
students to study. Usually before testing, students focus on reviewing in the hope of
achieving high results. Moveover, Examination will be always the first choice to help
teachers with approprite teaching methods. The teacher know how much students understand
the subject and how to help them improve more. Last but not least Examination define one's
skill and capabilities between students. On the other hand, some don’t agree that exams are
important. One clear example is that Some cheaters go undetected and score high marks.
Neverthless, studying is a whole process so teacher can see through out the term and a high
score can’t completely assess a studen’t ability . All in all, examination shouldn’t be
abolished at university

From 19D170220-Bui Thu Ha (41796) to Everyone: 02:30 PM

Someone people think examination should be abolished at university. However , I don't agree
with this agreement because of many reasons. The university has a big amount of number
students . So if it doesn't have examination , lecturers wouldn't classify students. Exam can
test the students how well they're learning . By doing the exam , lecturers know how well the
students understand the topic and where the standard is improve. Next , exam help students
aware of own standard . When students do exam , they use their knowledge to show off their
ability . If their score is good , they're happy and will study more . If it is bad , they'll try
more . So , exam not only motivate students to study but also help students know their
weaknesses and strengths they are . Morever , it is a way to help lecturer have a right method
to teach . As a conclusion, examinations give many good impacts on someone’s
life.Therefore, examinations should not be abolished

From 19D170225-Ngo Thi Hue (41816) to Everyone: 02:31 PM

The world would be better if we all spoke one language. These are the reasons why we
should speak one language. Firstly, there would be no language barriers and it would be
much easier to communicate, to trade and negotiate. Secondly, learning a new language takes
time and money always so if we spoke the same language, we could save time and money for
learning other necessary skills. Thirdly, speaking the same language helps us gain the
knowledge all over the world easier. We would never have to translate the original version
into our own language because we all spoke the same language. However, many people say
that speaking one language will be boring and there would be a loss of cultural diversity if we
spoke one language. To be honest, cultures are made by people not the language and in the
world, there are many countries speak the same language (English) such as: America,
Australia, Canada but they still have their own cultures. In conclusion, speaking one language
in the world has many advantages
and I think it’s a goal we all want to achieve in the future.

From 19D170242 - Phạm Tuyết Nhung to Everyone: 02:31 PM

In my opinion , examination should be abolished at university is right . Firstly, examination

does’nt define one’s skill and capabilities because examination does not differentitate
between students and more stress for studentes . Students stay up late or even skip meals just
to revise for their upcoming examinations . This is causes the lack of sleep and anxiety .
Secondly , When the test are abolished , some cheaters go undetected and socre high marks .
This help the school save time and money and make students more interested in the school .
However , there are other views that it is not avisable to abolish the test . When the university
abolishes the tests , many students are not consciously learning . But that is wrong , because
the sense of learning will depend on the mind of every person and not on the test . Therefore ,
the school should not too much emphasis on tests because that will pressure on students . The
motivation originates from the interest in the subject ,not the exams

From 19D170215-Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh (41770) to Everyone: 02:32 PM

THE WORLD WOULD BE BETTER WITH 1 LANGUAGE Some people think that the
world would be better with 1 language . In my opinion , I completely agree with that opinion
. Firstly , it is easier to communicate with others . You don’t have to waste time to learn a
new language or spending a lot of money studying it or need translating assistant devices to
translate the conversation. Secondly , People don’t misunderstand between different cultures
and countries . It helps promote understanding and economic cooperation among the
countries in the world , in addition , it make trade discussions easier . Besides , If the world
had only a language , it would have many job opportunities and open up to opportunities for
learning and working in another countries and help us gain the knowledge all over the world.
However , there is a opinion for that if there was only one language in the world , this would
make cultural diversifications lost . The opponent is partially right , but you can see that
although American, Austra

From 19D170223-Le Thi Hang (41808) to Everyone: 02:32 PM

i agree that examination should be abolished at university and bring a lot of effects. firstly,
examination can't define students' skills and capabilities objectively. in fact, during the test,
there are many problems such as cheating, sick,.. and affects exam results. secondly, students
are under of pressure. they stay up late or skip meals to learn and cram the knowledge. next,
students can save money and time. they can join in activities for fun, learning other skills,
have no testing fee. i can agree with you that there are examinations , students student can
know what their weaknesses and strengths and through examination to give the right teaching
method. however, it's only partially correct. students can know their abilities through the
learning process and the teacher will rely on that for adjust the teaching method. judging
through the process will be comprehensive and accurate. in summary, i strongly agree with
the point : examination should be abolished at university .

From 19D170222-Nguyen Thi Hai (41804) to Everyone: 02:33 PM

Some people said that universities should abolish the examination while I accept that there
are benefits and draw backs of this decision. The option to do the test after learning is
disadvantageous. First, examination does not define one ‘s skills and capabilies. You know,
person is not perfect and each people has a special point. And when we must take the exams,
teachers often request the high scores but they don’t know that students are not good.
Moreover, students are stressful, this cause the lack . of sleepy and anxieties. In addition,
exams also make the competition between students and the friendship is not beautiful.In other
hand, it seems to me that students who take the exam bring them undeniable advantages.
Students will have more motivation to study. In conclusion, there are many disadvantages for
students to take the exam, although this decision has some benefits

From 19D170245-Vu Thi Thu Phuong (41896) to Everyone: 02:33 PM

It is essential that examination should be abolished at university. First, when exams are
cancelled both universities and students can save a lot of money and time for that. According
to the statistics of Ministry of Education and Training, we spend thousands billion VND for
organizing examinations in over country every year. Second, there will be less stress and
pressure for pupils if exams are abolished. Students will not stay up late and get up early to
review their lessons for tests. Therefore, they will have more energy and interest in studying.
You may think that if there is no exam, teachers can't classify students, but studying is a
whole process so the teachers can evaluate the students' abilities through their performances
instead of the tests. Finally, we can reduce the cheats and negative things in exams when the
exams don't exist. In conclusion, abolishing the exams at university is extremely necessary to
each country.

From 19D170221-Nguyen Thi Thu Ha (41800) to Everyone: 02:34 PM

the world would be better with language. If this happens, there will no language barrier, so
that people can communicate easier. Human being avoid misunderstanding between
differrent cultures and countries to minimize conflicts. With one language, we gain the
knowledge all over the world and open up opportunities for learning and working anywhere.
Some people said that : " We will lose cultural diversity if the world has only one language " .
But i think, the culture is made by people not by language. Language just one way which
reflects culture partly, we can know culture from many fields. Others also said : " Translators
and interpreters will lose their job ". They will be out of this job but it will open more job
opportunities. Carreer chances will never be lost for those who always creativ and
progressive. Inshort, the world will change in positive and optimistic way with one language.

From 19D170215-Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh (41770) to Everyone: 02:34 PM

THE WORLD WOULD BE BETTER WITH 1 LANGUAGE Some people think that the
world would be better with 1 language . In my opinion , I completely agree with that opinion
. Firstly , it is easier to communicate with others . You don’t have to waste time to learn a
new language or spending a lot of money studying it or need translating assistant devices to
translate the conversation. Secondly , People don’t misunderstand between different cultures
and countries . It helps promote understanding and economic cooperation among the
countries in the world , in addition , it make trade discussions easier . Besides , If the world
had only a language , it would have many job opportunities and open up to opportunities for
learning and working in another countries and help us gain the knowledge all over the world.
However , there is a opinion for that if there was only one language in the world , this would
make cultural diversifications lost . The opponent is partially right , but you can see that
although American, Austra

From Me to Everyone: 02:34 PM

From 19D170219-Nguyen Thi Thu Giang (41792) to Everyone: 02:35 PM

what do you think about the world would be better one language?? in my opinion, use one
language has three big advantages. First, people can communicate and understand to each
other easily no language barrier . Second, avoid misunderstanding between different cultures
and countries therefore you can travel around the world.finally, better job opportunities and
gain the knowledge all over the world. However. some people don't like it. Because if the
world only use one language will happen many problems such as: one language, one culture.
So, you will discover and know more deeply about this culture language just only one way
which reflects culture, we can know many cultures from many different fields. In conclusion,
speaking one language in the world has many benefits.

From 19D170218-Le Quang Dat (41782) to Everyone: 02:35 PM

Language is the method of human communication, either spoken or written, consisting of the
use of words in a structured and conventional way. But what if the world only has one
language, would it be better with just one language. Firstly, if the world only has one
language there will be no language barrier, people will communicate with each other more
easier and avoid misunderstanding between different cultures and countries. Secondly, you
don't have to learn any new languages instead of that you can spend some times to learn
something new or just do some other activities that you like. Thirdly, translation devices or
apps would be no needed anymore. You can learn all the knowledge with just one language
only, how convinient is that. But if we speak only 1 language some people may think some
countries will lose their culture diversity. But i think it only right partly. Because the people
is what make the culture not the language

From 19D170215-Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh (41770) to Everyone: 02:35 PM

but you can see that although American, Australian speak English , they still have different
cultures . Moreover, with one language and one culture , you will discover and know more
deeply about this culture. In short , I think that it is very great if the world had only one
language , which will help to break the language barier and creates Friendly Relationship
among the countries

From 19D170211-Le Pham Ngoc Anh (41750) to Everyone: 02:36 PM

More and more problems with exams nowaday, especially at university, lead to the debate
about whether to abolish the test or not. Firstly, if you look at the opinion of the students,
most of them agree with this issue. According to them, the tests put them under a lot of
pressure, which make they no longer have time to focus on other things. A life that only
studying and testing is boring, isn't it? Others argue that exams cannot fully define a person's
ability or skill. Indeed, there are many compulsory subjects that students do not like to study
and are not suitable for students in college, and they still have to do the exams of that subject
in the end. Moreover, if examination be abolished, both students and the school can save a lot
of money and time. Secondly, in contrast to the students, the teachers said that abolishing the
exams made them unable to classify students, so they could not find the right methods to
teach. But can that be overcome? The answer is possible. Because classifying students takes

From 19D170211-Le Pham Ngoc Anh (41750) to Everyone: 02:37 PM

Because classifying students takes place over a long learning period, not a exam. Or students
can express their own understanding of the subjects by speaking or writing that they enjoy.
Of course, there are no topics and no requirements for that speaking or writing. Finally, with
all of the above opinions, the abolishing of examination is perfectly reasonable.
From 19D170214-Vu Thi Lan Anh (41764) to Everyone: 02:44 PM

In university, we have a lot of things to learn so examination is one of important steps to

understand clearly all of those knowledge. Firstly, because of a lot of things to study, we can
forget or misunderstand among them that why we need exams as a meaure which let the
students know how well they understand the topic and where their standard is allowing to
improve. Secondly, exams can bring to students motivate to keep learning instead of being
bored when have to study many things. Thirdly, students can also manage their time better.
Besides studying, students usually have some entertain activities but some of students unable
to balance learning and playing so they will waste time on them and exams can solve that
problem. They will force students to spend more time to study. however, some people
suppose that examnination put many pressure on student and I think that opinion not quite
right. The pressure which exams bring to still work well with students.
. It can let them know how to face difficulties , pressure and get used to that in the future;
make their brain working effectively and promote creativity; recognize the importance of
time and use it clever;…. And there are still many advantages of the pressure which exams
bring to useful for student's future. Therefore, we should keep and join all the examinition to
take as much helpful knowledge, skills as possible.

From 19D170234-Hoang Thi Thanh Loan (41852) to Everyone: 02:45 PM

There are numerous types of language being used in the world but in my opinion, it would be
better if only one common language will be existed in the human world. If we spoke the same
language, the bridge to harmony and understanding would reach across cultural and national
boundaries and bring people together. Perhaps the best example of this would be we have the
similarity in language so we could communicate with each other easily but no more
misunderstanding. Furthermore, it would be really great that we could access to the
references and cultures that could be interpreted due to a linguistic barrier. On the other hand,
language is not only a means of communication but also a symbolizes their identities and
origins. So, many languages could help diversify culture of the country and help every people
can identify it with other. The facts that there are many languages in the world also create
more jobs for interpreter and translators. so, being good with different languages would no
longer be a strength. To

From 19D170234-Hoang Thi Thanh Loan (41852) to Everyone: 02:45 PM

To argue with, I have to say that culture is made by people not the language such as
American and England both speak English but they all have their own culture and identity.
Language just only one way which reflects culture, we can know many cultures from many
different fields. In term of job, career opportunities will never be lost for those who are
always creative and progressive. In conclusion, the world with one language has advantages
outweigh its disadvantages.

From 19D170243- Vũ Thị Hồng Nhung to Everyone: 02:55 PM

If all the countries in the world spoke the same language, I think the world would be much
better. Actually, If we all spoke one language, there would be bring some benefits. First of
all, there would be no language barier, it would be much easier for you to understand and
communicate with each other. We would not be afraid to misunderstand each other's
ideas.Next, it would be the bridge to harmony and understanding between different cultures
and countries. It would eliminate the key hurdle that keeps a group of people away from
others because we all have a sense of familiarity in language. We can therefore comprehend
more profoundly different cultures. And it would be avoid misunderstanding between
different cultures and countries. Moreover, we also would spend much time ( about 900
hours) to learn something else or earn money instead of learning a new languages, so people
don't waste time to learn a new language. But now, many people disagree and they believe if
there were one common language, a part of a c

From 19D170243- Vũ Thị Hồng Nhung to Everyone: 02:56 PM

But now, many people disagree and they believe if there were one common language, a part
of a country’s core identity would be sacrificed. Language not only is the way people living
in the same society communicate but also symbolizes their origins and defining characters.
Vietnamese people, for example, have been known for their heroism and patriotism through
words of their anthems. Or everyone thinks of France as a land of romance because French is
a language of love. But I attack that idea, because the cuture made by the people not the
language, for example, the language will still stay but the language can be the same like
American, Australian and so on speak English but they still difference cultures. So i think, it
also has advantage and disadvantages. But we can improve that matter.