Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JUNE; 2020
DESSIE; ETHIOPIA
1
ACKNOLEDGMENT
Above all I would like to thank GOD for giving me endurance while I was writing this research
paper. Besides I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to advisor Abdurehman Talema for
commenting. Correcting and editing etc my research paper. Soye primary school English
language teachers and in grade seven students taking their previous time filling the
questionnaires of the participation of English language teacher during the interview.
Table of contents
2
Table of Contents
COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES.........................................................................1
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE.........................................................1
ASSESSMENT OF READING STRATEGIES USED BY GRADE SEVEN STUDENTS THE CASE OF
SOYE PRIMARY SCHOOL IN BORENA WOREDA..............................................................................1
ACKNOLEDGMENT.................................................................................................................................2
Table of contents.........................................................................................................................................3
List of tables................................................................................................................................................3
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................5
CHAPTER ONE..........................................................................................................................................7
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................7
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY......................................................................................................7
1.2 Statement of the problem.......................................................................................................................8
1.3 Objective of the study..........................................................................................................................10
1.3.1 General objectives............................................................................................................................10
1.3.2 Specific objectives of the study........................................................................................................10
1.4 Scope of the study...............................................................................................................................10
1.5 Significance of the study.....................................................................................................................10
1.6 Organization of the study.....................................................................................................................11
CHAPTER TWO.......................................................................................................................................12
REVIEW OF RELATED LITRATURE....................................................................................................12
2.1 CONCEPTS OF READING................................................................................................................12
2.1.1 Purpose of reading............................................................................................................................12
2.1.2 Needs for knowledge of the topic.....................................................................................................13
2.1.3 Schema theory..................................................................................................................................13
2.1.4 Pre- reading phase............................................................................................................................14
2.1.5 Pre- reading activities.......................................................................................................................14
2.1.6 Factors affecting of reading strategies..............................................................................................15
2.1.8 Examine the factors Hinder Students...............................................................................................16
2.1.9 Criticism of pre- reading activities....................................................................................................16
CHAPTER THREE...................................................................................................................................17
METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY.......................................................................................................17
3
3.1. Description of the study area..............................................................................................................17
3.2. Data type and sources.....................................................................................................................17
3.3. Sampling Techniques......................................................................................................................17
3.4 Sampling Size...................................................................................................................................17
3.5. Method of data Analysis of the study.................................................................................................18
CHAPTER FOUR.....................................................................................................................................19
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS...........................................................................................19
4.1 Demographic characteristics of respondents........................................................................................20
Table 1 Demographic characteristic of respondents..................................................................................20
Table 2 Pre- reading strategies..................................................................................................................21
TABLE 3 while reading strategies.............................................................................................................22
4.2 Data obtained from interview..............................................................................................................25
4.3 Data obtained from class room observation.........................................................................................26
4.4 Result and discussion pre-reading.......................................................................................................26
4.5 Data obtained from interview..............................................................................................................27
CHAPTER FIVE.......................................................................................................................................28
Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation............................................................................................28
5.1 Summary.............................................................................................................................................28
5.2 Conclusion...........................................................................................................................................29
5.3 Recommendation.................................................................................................................................29
Reference...................................................................................................................................................30
List of tables
Table 1 demographic characteristic of respondents ------------------------------- 14
4
Table 2 pre-reading strategies -------------------------------------------------------- 16
5
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to assess the reading strategies in grade seven students the case
of Soye primary school so as to achieve the above mentioned objective. The researcher employed
descriptive survey involving qualitative and quantitative methods. The population the study were
two English language teachers using sampling techniques grade seven students were sampled
using available method. The data gathering tools were questionnaire interview and class room
observation. The data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The finding of the study
related that the English language teachers don`t teach in stage of reading. The factors that
affecting reading strategies at Soye primary school.
6
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
International research on teaching reading has reading has related number of reasons at a home
are important as the process of becoming literate begins long before enters formal education
reasons for poor reading strategies include parents emphasizing for meaning (Fiala and Sheridan
2003).
Learning to read is an essential part of basic education. Reading, after all, is an important gate
way to the other disciplines. It has been said that reading is the primary avenue to knowledge
(Montgomery, 2007). It is the corner stone of education and the foundation of lifelong learning.
It unlocks the unknown and carries the reader to new discoveries and learning. It equips the
person with varieties of knowledge which he can use in his daily living. A person who loves to
read understands any phenomenon easily. In Mihaljević and Krevelj (2009) in book of
Psychology and Teaching of Reading, reading was defined as imagining, thinking and feeling
about ideas and thoughts made from past experiences that are suggested by perception of printed
words. Reading, as asserted by the author, is an activity that requires the different capabilities of
the mind, as the reader processes words and their meanings.
Hence, this study is will be done to systematically identify the reading difficulties of grade seven
students in Soye primary school.
7
1.2 Statement of the problem
Although Ethiopia has been using English for academic purpose as long as Nigeria and Ghana,
and English has long been the medium of instruction, there is nothing that can really be called
varieties that is largely brought about through mother tongue interference? Hence, an Ethiopian
using English for academic purpose reading can be identified if he or she gave equal stress to all
syllables, did not use standard intonation patterns and had difficulty pronouncing ―the‖ words.
Regarding Lexis, Ethiopian speakers sometimes use words transliterated directly from their
mother tongue, so might for example confuse ‗tall‘ and ‗long‘, if there is only one word for both
these in them mother tongue. Grammatically too, some constructions might be awry. According
to Gebeyehu et, al., (1992) Ethiopian academician‘s readers sometimes use words translated
directly from their mother tongue this is due to vulnerable reading difficulties go facing them
since the primary schooling which is they used to learn. According to MoE (2013) if students
were not reading English at early grade three, they would be in trouble, where, she/he did not
able to read independently in the next grades: fall behind his/her class meets and not able to
understand what the teacher write on the blackboard and not able to write essays and reports. The
Institute of Curriculum Development and Research (2007) reported that 40% of third graders,
30% of eighth graders, and 25% of twelfth graders are below grade level. The percentages are
even higher and the gaps even wider between grade levels in schools predominately made up of
free or reduced lunch eligible student populations (Ministry of Education, 2008). There is a
connection gap which is not clearly settled about the level of students reading difficulties by
previous study. Because it is imperative that school psychologists work with a team of
professionals to help students with reading problems by designing interventions from data-based
decision-making activities.
8
Therefore, much of the prior research on reading strategies focused on their back ground
characteristics. Therefore the researcher wanted to identify the common reading strategies given
by the students, investigate the teacher’s supports given to students to improve their reading
skills and to examine the factors that hinder student’s use of appropriate reading strategies.
9
1.3 Objective of the study
- It is hoped the students may prefer to use the target reading strategies when they attend in
the classroom. First it would help English language teachers and students Borena woreda
general primary schools and student parents would have benefits from it.
- Second Borena woreda education office and education expert of Amhara region. Finally
it would help curriculum develops, collages and other scholars would conduct research its
topic.
10
1.6 Limitation of the Study
The researcher has faced many problems in undertaking this study. The major one is Lack of
experience to conduct the research, and also they faced endemic disease or corona virus. The
other problem is unwillingness of respondents to answer the question. In addition to the above
the researcher has faced financially due to transportation.
11
CHAPTER TWO
12
the purpose for pleasure. Williams’s /1984/ usually categorizes reading in to (1) getting
general information (2) getting specific information from a text and (3) reading for
pleasure or wisdom.
- Temper Joey (1978-1987) have listed the following example of some reasons of reading.
- To obtain information for some purpose or because we are related about some topic.
- To obtain instruction on how to perform some tasks for our work or daily.
- To build general back ground.
- To understand general idea.
- For enjoyments.
Generally reading strategies reader in the content areas can be broken in to seven areas ( Hollas
2002)
13
2.1.3 Schema theory
In the knowledge of reading Shema theory has major contribution Bartlet (1932) first used this
term to explain our knowledge which passes about the world is arranged in to interested patterns.
Shema theory explains how readers unit their own back ground knowledge with the information
they get from the passage founder stand the text. Reading an act with relates our principle that
every act of comprehension involves one`s knowledge of the world as well as (carrel and ester
hold ) (1983-73) Schema are readers material stores ( after Bartlet in cook 1997; 86) and are
divided in to two main types (1) conset Shema and (2) formal Shema.
Consent Shema is background knowledge of the world and the formal Shema is the background
knowledge of sister hood (1983) states does not carry meaning by itself; readers have to bring in
the relevant Schema theory from their memory and make sense out of the text. Schema theory
research shows that the greater the back ground of text contact area the greater comprehension of
that text. The implication of this for teaching is that some students apparent reading problems
may be problem of in sufficient back ground knowledge, culturally specific problem.
Many teachers and students complain that reading literature in second language is
problematic because of the language also the Shema does not always match up. Carre
(1988) suggests we should prepare students by helping them to build back ground
knowledge on topic prior to reading through appropriate pre- reading activities.
14
2.1.5 Pre- reading activities
Several researchers have highlighted the point that reader’s participation of bringing their
knowledge and experience while reading text is a great importance in reading comprehension. In
order to bring greater necessity. There are various pre- reading activities. Activities of reading
depend on the teacher and types of the text. Teacher must provide pre reading that would match
with the text to be read. Pre reading activities acts as away to access the reader’s former
knowledge and home break up pre reading activities in two parts teacher centred and student
centred or pre interaction. Teacher centred is a one way question /answer activates student-
centred activities are more up to develop an independent behaviour from the beginning. Pre
reading activates can also be defined as warm up activities which a courage students in the
preparation for reading tasks. The activities may require low level of interaction.
Generally many researchers should those pre- reading activities aids students understanding a
text. Better Shema theory researcher should greater importance of back ground knowledge for
better understanding text.
Pre reading activities of pictures and discussion were able to predict what they would find
in the reading text.
15
2.1.6 Factors affecting of reading strategies
PDF the reading habits and interests students examined with may 2017 (PDF) the characteristics
of struggling university reader. This examines reading strategies and characteristics of struggling
readers these students are not able to comprehend academic text which hinder
Factors that foster or hinder students reading motivation may 2013 can increase the
reading motivation of their students the student’s strategies and skills in reading.
Factors associated with reading problems – higher education. Difficultly in reading can
also be linked with emotional factors these environment can affect students reading
Factors that affect the reading comprehension of secondly 27 may 2014 reading strategies. To
understanding the factors integral to reading comprehension this study explored.
16
2.1.9 Criticism of pre- reading activities
Although there many approach (affirmative) to the view that, pre- reading activities are
helpful but still there is negative view to this as well. We need to look and the criticism
before we make any assumption. In the study of prediction activities and prior –
knowledge and stall man (1989) carver based on their experiment on reading came up
with view that predication activities that activate prior knowledge do not in improve
comprehension.
These patterns seem to indicate that overall engorging in particular types of prior –
knowledge tasks do not facilitate comprehension differences between students who in
these activities did not complete any prior knowledge.
CHAPTER THREE
Primary Data: the data in this study was mainly based on primary sources of data including
interview, questionnaire and field observation as well as discussion with responds on the
related points to the study.
Secondary Data: the secondary data that the researcher used includes the data taken from
book, internet and other published and unpublished documents related to the study.
17
3.3. Sampling Techniques
The researcher used purposive sampling techniques for selected students and teachers. Firstly,
the researcher selects Soye primary school by considering the occurrence of the problem its
nearness to the researcher work place. Additionally, different limitations such as time and budget
constraints, it is impossible to take all schools and all students of the Woreda for the study. The
total number of students in the school is in Soye primary school, thus Second stage the
researcher selects grade seven students and thirdly all students (87) are taken as a sample since
they are two section and their English two teachers to gave equal chance for the participant
bodies.
18
CHAPTER FOUR
19
4.1 Demographic characteristics of respondents
20
Table 2 Pre- reading strategies
Strongly disagree
disagree
No Activities
Response
Strongly agree
Agree
Undecided
1 Our teacher give as a reason for reading and No 25 15 42 5
interesting in the passage
% 28.73 17.2 48.27% 5.74%
4
As indicated in the table 2 our teacher give us a reason for reading and interest in the passage
25(28.73%) responded strongly agree 15(17.24%) 42 (48.27%) disagree and 5 (5.74%) strongly
disagree
As depicted in item 2 our teacher get us to bring our knowledge of the topic to the passage
40(45.97%) of the respondents responded strongly agree. This indicated 40(45.97%) respondents
responded agree. Their agreement on the other hand 47(54%) of them expressed their
disagreement.
As indicated in item 3 our teacher get us to established about what we expect the passage to
contain and make prediction about the text. 30(34.48%) of the respondents responded agree. 20
21
(22.9%) neutral and 37(45.52%) strongly disagree, 20(22.9%) neutral and 37(45.52%) strongly
disagree, 20(22.9%) neutral while 37(45.52%) of the respondents strongly disagree.
As indicated in table 4.3 1 our teachers encourage us to read the passage quickly and silently
4(47.12) disagree. This indicate 41(47.12) of the respondents responded strongly agree and
46(52.8%) disagree. This indicate 46(52.8%) respondents expressed their disagreement while
41(47.12%) of them disagreement.
As indicated in item 2 our teachers let us compare our answers with our collages 32(36.78%) of
the respondents responded agree. 15(17.24%) neutral and 40(45.97) disagree. This indicated
22
43(49.42%) of the respondents expressed the 15(17.24%) and 40(45.97) of them their
disagreement.
As indicated in item 3 our teachers check the answers briefly 43(49.42%) of the respondents
responded agree and 44(50.57%) disagree. This indicated 43(49.42%) of the respondents
expressed their disagreement. whereas 44(50.57%) of them disagreements. As indicated in item
4 our teachers give us questions or tasks to be defined 35(40.22%) of the respondents responded
agree. And 52(59.77%) disagree. This indicated 35(40.22%) of the respondents expressed their
disagreement and 52(59.77%) of them their disagreement.
As indicated in item 5 our teachers give us vocabulary questions in which inter their meaning
20(22.98%) of the respondents responded agree. 22(22.44%) disagree and 45(51.72%) strongly
disagree. This indicated 20(22.98%) of the respondents expressed their agreement 22(22.44%)
disagree and 45(51.72%) of the respondent expressed their agreement 22(22.44%) their
disagreement and 45(51.72%) of them their strongly disagreement.
23
Table 4 post reading strategies
Strongly agree
No Activities
Agree
Strongly disagree
Responders
Disagree
Undecided
1 Our teacher check our overall No 43 44
compression of the passage
% 49.42% 50.57%
As indicated in item 1 our teacher check overall comprehension of the passage 43(49.42%) of the
respondents expressed agree and 44(50.57%) of them disagree. This indicated 43(49.42%) of the
respondents expressed their disagreement.
24
As indicated in item 2 our teacher encourage us to evaluate the passage whether interesting or
not 30 (34.48%) of the respondents responded agree. On the other hand 35(40.22%) disagree and
22(25.28%) strongly disagree. This indicated 30 (34.48%) of the respondents expressed their
agreement where as 35(40.22%) of them their disagreement and 22(25.28%) of them their
strongly disagreement.
As indicate item 3 our teacher get us to relate the passage to their own experience 38(43.67%) of
the respondents responded agree on the other hand 19(21, 83%) disagree and 30(34.48%)
strongly disagree. This indicated and 19(21,83%) disagreement and also 30((34.48%) of the
strongly disagreement.
As indicated in item 4 our teachers get us imagine ourselves in the situation in the text
20(22.98%) of the respondents responded agree on the other hand 28(32.18%) neutral and
39(44.82%) disagree this indicated 28 (32.18%) neutral. on their hands 39(44.82%) of them
disagreement.
As indicated in item 5 our teacher encourages us to perform related activities possibly involving
other skills such as completing a paragraph or summary of text. 25(28.73%) of the respondents
responded agree and 35(40.22%) disagree and 27(31) strongly disagree this indicated 25(28.73)
of the respondents responded their agreement. On the other hand 35(40.22%) of them
disagreement and 27(31%) of them their strongly disagreement.
25
Participation of the students was too poor during discussion this is because only two three
students participation in the discussion. The factors that affecting reading in grade seven
students. Soye primary school students have not enough reading experience as skill. The
students also are not motivated to read, there back ground knowledge is poor, the text
book is not enough lack of material and the student’s education back ground in other
grade affect their reading in Soye primary school.
Furthermore they encourage students to read allowed in study of silently. The student’s
participation was too poor and their reading experience reading allowed without any activities.
The students didn’t use bringing their own knowledge of the topic to passage, they didn`t
establish expectation about the passage. To contained and made prediction about the given text
and the students response was back up their teacher’s response.
While reading
The students did not read passage quickly and silently didn1t late the students compare answer
with friends didn`t check answer to the questions and discusses the answers briefly. Didn`t infer
meaning of given vocabulary the students respond rein force teachers response.
Post reading
The students didn`t check overall compression of the text didn`t evaluate the passage whether it
interesting or not they didn`t related the passage to their own experience. They didn`t imagine
26
themselves the situation of the text and they didn`t perform related activities possibly involving
other as completing a paragraph or summary text.
The English language teachers didn`t teach students in three reading strategies and the students
have not experience in stages of reading. The students didn`t motivate themselves to common
reading strategies allowed instead of silent teachers didn`t encourage students to read silently and
participation of students was poor. This was only too few students showed participation.
The factors affecting reading in grade seven students Soye primary school the passage is not
interesting relief situations. More over the students reading speed was too poor vocabularies
were unfamiliar to them and the students didn`t motivate to read passage because lack of reading
experiences in their lower grade level.
27
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1 Summary
The objective of the study was primary conducted to assess reading strategies in grade seven
students. The case of Soye primary school. The population of the study was 87 students and 2
English language teachers. The population selected using available techniques. Therefore,
sampling population 87 students and two English language teachers selected by available
sampling. The data gathering tools were questionnaire interview and class room observation.
How in grade seven students identify the common reading strategies in Soye primary
school
How in grade seven English teachers support students improve reading stage of reading
skills in Soye primary school
How in grade seven teachers to examine hinder students use appropriate reading
strategies.
Generally the data obtained from questioner interview and class room observation in grade seven
students didn`t read passage to given text.
The factors affecting reading in grade seven students Soye primary school were students not
interested to read. As the text book not full this means lack of shortage of material. The parents
didn`t encourage their children. Teacher’s didn`t gives students experiences to read the passage
and the student’s didn`t gives attention for reading activities.
28
5.2 Conclusion
The objective of the study to assess reading strategies in grade seven Soye primary school.
The data obtained from questioner interview and class room observation. The factors affecting
reading strategies where the students not interested to read the text book and parents didn`t
encourage to their children to read at homed library and other suitable place and teachers didn`t
stage of reading. The students didn`t give attention for reading experience was aloud without
principles of reading.
5.3 Recommendation
Based on the conclusion given above the following recommendation were in order to improve
students reading strategies in grade seven students in Soye primary school.
29
Reference
Addis Ababa university research methodology
Anderson R.C. Aperson Shema- theoretic view of basic process in reading Hand book of reading
research.
Biundel – Catherine, Warming – up for reading how can we help students develop an effective
approach 10 reading?
Immanuel kant, critique of pure reason trans,N. KEMO SMITTH ( London ; Macillan . 1963) me
Donugh . Joanshew. Christopher. (2004). Materials and methods in ELT New Delh;; Atlantic
publishers and distributors.
Carrwl .L. patricia theory ESL reading; class room Implication and Application Rume hart. D.e
Schemata the building blocks of cognition Comprehension and Teaching; Research review E.D
By Johnt. Guthire , Newark ,De.IRA.
STOLLER f. (1994) making the most of a new Magazine passage for reading skills development
English teaching form Vol -32.N/12-7.
30
Appendix
Wollo University
For general information `x` make in space provide directions for closed ended
questions write `x` mark in the rating box below.
31
Pre-reading strategies
32