Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted to :
Prof. Dr. Md Abdullah Al Mamun
Department of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology
Sylhet -3114, Bangladesh.
Submitted by :
Name : Sharmista Deb
Reg. No. : 2019451001
Session : 2019-2020
Department of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology
Sylhet -3114, Bangladesh.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology is a broad area of biology, involving the use of living systems and organisms to
develop or make products. Depending on the tools and applications, it often overlaps with related
scientific fields. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, biotechnology has expanded to include new
and diverse sciences, such as genomics, recombinant gene techniques, applied immunology, and
development of pharmaceutical therapies and diagnostic tests. The term "Biotechnology" was first
used by "Karl Ereky" in 1919, meaning the production of products from raw materials with the aid of
living organisms.
The wide concept of "biotech" or "biotechnology" encompasses a wide range of procedures for
modifying living organisms according to human purposes, going back to domestication of animals,
cultivation of the plants, and "improvements" to these through breeding programs that
employ artificial selection and hybridization. Modern usage also includes genetic engineering as well
as cell and tissue culture technologies. The American Chemical Society defines biotechnology as
the application of biological organisms, systems, or processes by various industries to learning about
the science of life and the improvement of the value of materials and organisms such as
pharmaceuticals, crops, and livestock.[1] Per the European Federation of Biotechnology,
biotechnology is the integration of natural science and organisms, cells, parts thereof, and molecular
analogues for products and services.[2] Biotechnology is based on the basic biological
sciences (e.g. molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, embryology, genetics, microbiology) and
conversely provides methods to support and perform basic research in biology.
Biotechnology is the research and development in the laboratory using bioinformatics for exploration,
extraction, exploitation and production from any living organisms and any source of biomass by
means of biochemical engineering where high value-added products could be planned (reproduced
by biosynthesis, for example), forecasted, formulated, developed, manufactured, and marketed for
the purpose of sustainable operations (for the return from bottomless initial investment on R & D)
and gaining durable patents rights (for exclusives rights for sales, and prior to this to receive national
and international approval from the results on animal experiment and human experiment, especially
on the pharmaceutical branch of biotechnology to prevent any undetected side-effects or safety
concerns by using the products).[3][4][5] The utilization of biological processes, organisms or systems to
produce products that are anticipated to improve human lives is termed biotechnology. [6]
By contrast, bioengineering is generally thought of as a related field that more heavily emphasizes
higher systems approaches (not necessarily the altering or using of biological materials directly) for
interfacing with and utilizing living things. Bioengineering is the application of the principles
of engineering and natural sciences to tissues, cells and molecules. This can be considered as the
use of knowledge from working with and manipulating biology to achieve a result that can improve
functions in plants and animals. [7] Relatedly, biomedical engineering is an overlapping field that often
draws upon and applies biotechnology (by various definitions), especially in certain sub-fields of
biomedical or chemical engineering such as tissue engineering, biopharmaceutical engineering,
and genetic engineering.
History
Although not normally what first comes to mind, many forms of human-derived agriculture clearly fit
the broad definition of "'utilizing a biotechnological system to make products". Indeed, the cultivation
of plants may be viewed as the earliest biotechnological enterprise.
Agriculture has been theorized to have become the dominant way of producing food since
the Neolithic Revolution. Through early biotechnology, the earliest farmers selected and bred the
best suited crops, having the highest yields, to produce enough food to support a growing
population. As crops and fields became increasingly large and difficult to maintain, it was discovered
that specific organisms and their by-products could effectively fertilize, restore nitrogen, and control
pests. Throughout the history of agriculture, farmers have inadvertently altered the genetics of their
crops through introducing them to new environments and breeding them with other plants — one of
the first forms of biotechnology.
These processes also were included in early fermentation of beer.[8] These processes were
introduced in early Mesopotamia, Egypt, China and India, and still use the same basic biological
methods. In brewing, malted grains (containing enzymes) convert starch from grains into sugar and
then adding specific yeasts to produce beer. In this process, carbohydrates in the grains broke down
into alcohols,e such as ethanol. Later, other cultures produced the process of lactic acid
fermentation, which produced other preserved foods, such as soy sauce. Fermentation was also
used in this time period to produce leavened bread. Although the process of fermentation was not
fully understood until Louis Pasteur's work in 1857, it is still the first use of biotechnology to convert a
food source into another form.
Before the time of Charles Darwin's work and life, animal and plant scientists had already used
selective breeding. Darwin added to that body of work with his scientific observations about the
ability of science to change species. These accounts contributed to Darwin's theory of natural
selection.[9]
For thousands of years, humans have used selective breeding to improve the production of crops
and livestock to use them for food. In selective breeding, organisms with desirable characteristics
are mated to produce offspring with the same characteristics. For example, this technique was used
with corn to produce the largest and sweetest crops. [10]
In the early twentieth century scientists gained a greater understanding of microbiology and explored
ways of manufacturing specific products. In 1917, Chaim Weizmann first used a pure microbiological
culture in an industrial process, that of manufacturing corn starch using Clostridium
acetobutylicum, to produce acetone, which the United Kingdom desperately needed to
manufacture explosives during World War I.[11]
Biotechnology has also led to the development of antibiotics. In 1928, Alexander Fleming discovered
the mold Penicillium. His work led to the purification of the antibiotic compound formed by the mold
by Howard Florey, Ernst Boris Chain and Norman Heatley – to form what we today know
as penicillin. In 1940, penicillin became available for medicinal use to treat bacterial infections in
humans.[10]
The field of modern biotechnology is generally thought of as having been born in 1971 when Paul
Berg's (Stanford) experiments in gene splicing had early success. Herbert W. Boyer (Univ. Calif. at
San Francisco) and Stanley N. Cohen (Stanford) significantly advanced the new technology in 1972
by transferring genetic material into a bacterium, such that the imported material would be
reproduced. The commercial viability of a biotechnology industry was significantly expanded on June
16, 1980, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that a genetically
modified microorganism could be patented in the case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty.[12] Indian-
born Ananda Chakrabarty, working for General Electric, had modified a bacterium (of the
genus Pseudomonas) capable of breaking down crude oil, which he proposed to use in treating oil
spills. (Chakrabarty's work did not involve gene manipulation but rather the transfer of entire
organelles between strains of the Pseudomonas bacterium.
The MOSFET (metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor) was invented by Mohamed M.
Atalla and Dawon Kahng in 1959.[13] Two years later, Leland C. Clark and Champ Lyons invented the
first biosensor in 1962.[14][15] Biosensor MOSFETs were later developed, and they have since been
widely used to measure physical, chemical, biological and environmental parameters.[16] The first
BioFET was the ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (ISFET), invented by Piet Bergveld in 1970.[17][18] It
is a special type of MOSFET,[16] where the metal gate is replaced by an ion-
sensitive membrane, electrolyte solution and reference electrode.[19] The ISFET is widely used
in biomedical applications, such as the detection of DNA hybridization, biomarker detection
from blood, antibody detection, glucose measurement, pH sensing, and genetic technology.[19]
By the mid-1980s, other BioFETs had been developed, including the gas sensor FET
(GASFET), pressure sensor FET (PRESSFET), chemical field-effect
transistor (ChemFET), reference ISFET (REFET), enzyme-modified FET (ENFET) and
immunologically modified FET (IMFET).[16] By the early 2000s, BioFETs such as the DNA field-effect
transistor (DNAFET), gene-modified FET (GenFET) and cell-potential BioFET (CPFET) had been
developed.[19]
A factor influencing the biotechnology sector's success is improved intellectual property rights
legislation—and enforcement—worldwide, as well as strengthened demand for medical and
pharmaceutical products to cope with an ageing, and ailing, U.S. population.[20]
Rising demand for biofuels is expected to be good news for the biotechnology sector, with
the Department of Energy estimating ethanol usage could reduce U.S. petroleum-derived fuel
consumption by up to 30% by 2030. The biotechnology sector has allowed the U.S. farming industry
to rapidly increase its supply of corn and soybeans—the main inputs into biofuels—by developing
genetically modified seeds that resist pests and drought. By increasing farm productivity,
biotechnology boosts biofuel production. [21]
Applications Of Biotechnology
Biotechnology has applications in four major industrial areas, including health care (medical), crop
production and agriculture, non-food (industrial) uses of crops and other products
(e.g. biodegradable plastics, vegetable oil, biofuels), and environmental uses.
For example, one application of biotechnology is the directed use of microorganisms for the
manufacture of organic products (examples include beer and milk products). Another example is
using naturally present bacteria by the mining industry in bioleaching. Biotechnology is also used to
recycle, treat waste, clean up sites contaminated by industrial activities (bioremediation), and also to
produce biological weapons.
A series of derived terms have been coined to identify several branches of biotechnology, for
example:
Agriculture
Genetically modified crops ("GM crops", or "biotech crops") are plants used in agriculture,
the DNA of which has been modified with genetic engineering techniques. In most cases, the main
aim is to introduce a new trait that does not occur naturally in the species. Biotechnology firms can
contribute to future food security by improving the nutrition and viability of urban agriculture.
Furthermore, the protection of intellectual property rights encourages private sector investment in
agrobiotechnology. For example, in Illinois FARM Illinois (Food and Agriculture RoadMap for Illinois)
is an initiative to develop and coordinate farmers, industry, research institutions, government, and
nonprofits in pursuit of food and agriculture innovation. In addition, the Illinois Biotechnology Industry
Organization (iBIO) is a life sciences industry association with more than 500 life sciences
companies, universities, academic institutions, service providers and others as members. The
association describes its members as "dedicated to making Illinois and the surrounding Midwest one
of the world’s top life sciences centers."[41]
Examples in food crops include resistance to certain pests,[42] diseases,[43] stressful environmental
conditions,[44] resistance to chemical treatments (e.g. resistance to a herbicide[45]), reduction of
spoilage,[46] or improving the nutrient profile of the crop.[47] Examples in non-food crops include
production of pharmaceutical agents,[48] biofuels,[49] and other industrially useful goods,[50] as well as
for bioremediation.[51][52]
Farmers have widely adopted GM technology. Between 1996 and 2011, the total surface area of
land cultivated with GM crops had increased by a factor of 94, from 17,000 square kilometers
(4,200,000 acres) to 1,600,000 km2 (395 million acres).[53] 10% of the world's crop lands were planted
with GM crops in 2010.[53] As of 2011, 11 different transgenic crops were grown commercially on 395
million acres (160 million hectares) in 29 countries such as the US, Brazil, Argentina, India, Canada,
China, Paraguay, Pakistan, South Africa, Uruguay, Bolivia, Australia, Philippines, Myanmar, Burkina
Faso, Mexico and Spain.[53]
Genetically modified foods are foods produced from organisms that have had specific changes
introduced into their DNA with the methods of genetic engineering. These techniques have allowed
for the introduction of new crop traits as well as a far greater control over a food's genetic structure
than previously afforded by methods such as selective breeding and mutation breeding.
[54]
Commercial sale of genetically modified foods began in 1994, when Calgene first marketed
its Flavr Savr delayed ripening tomato.[55] To date most genetic modification of foods have primarily
focused on cash crops in high demand by farmers such as soybean, corn, canola, and cotton seed
oil. These have been engineered for resistance to pathogens and herbicides and better nutrient
profiles. GM livestock have also been experimentally developed; in November 2013 none were
available on the market,[56] but in 2015 the FDA approved the first GM salmon for commercial
production and consumption.[57]
There is a scientific consensus[58][59][60][61] that currently available food derived from GM crops poses no
greater risk to human health than conventional food, [62][63][64][65][66] but that each GM food needs to be
tested on a case-by-case basis before introduction. [67][68][69] Nonetheless, members of the public are
much less likely than scientists to perceive GM foods as safe.[70][71][72][73] The legal and regulatory status
of GM foods varies by country, with some nations banning or restricting them, and others permitting
them with widely differing degrees of regulation. [74][75][76][77]
GM crops also provide a number of ecological benefits, if not used in excess. [78] However, opponents
have objected to GM crops per se on several grounds, including environmental concerns, whether
food produced from GM crops is safe, whether GM crops are needed to address the world's food
needs, and economic concerns raised by the fact these organisms are subject to intellectual
property law.
Industrial
Industrial biotechnology (known mainly in Europe as white biotechnology) is the application of
biotechnology for industrial purposes, including industrial fermentation. It includes the practice of
using cells such as microorganisms, or components of cells like enzymes, to
generate industrially useful products in sectors such as chemicals, food and feed, detergents, paper
and pulp, textiles and biofuels.[79] In the current decades, significant progress has been done in
creating genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that enhance the diversity of applications and
economical viability of industrial biotechnology. By using renewable raw materials to produce a
variety of chemicals and fuels, industrial biotechnology is actively advancing towards lowering
greenhouse gas emissions and moving away from a petrochemical-based economy. [80]
Environmental
The environment can be affected by biotechnologies, both positively and adversely. Vallero and
others have argued that the difference between beneficial biotechnology (e.g.bioremediation is to
clean up an oil spill or hazard chemical leak) versus the adverse effects stemming from
biotechnological enterprises (e.g. flow of genetic material from transgenic organisms into wild
strains) can be seen as applications and implications, respectively. [81] Cleaning up environmental
wastes is an example of an application of environmental biotechnology; whereas loss of
biodiversity or loss of containment of a harmful microbe are examples of environmental implications
of biotechnology.
The basic task of this paper is to assess national technological capabilities for
biotechnology management in developing countries. The paper is concerned with
what constitutes a nation's capabilities for managing the development and application
of biotechnology as well as guiding its evolution in local socioeconomic systems. We
examine national policies to develop biotechnology in a number of countries in south
and south-east Asia and Africa and compare their experiences in an attempt to
determine what their particular strengths and weaknesses are. Due to the different
levels of capability found in these parts of the world as well as different industrial
structures across sectors, the tendency has been to concentrate on developing different
areas of specialisation. Thus, technological change has been incremental rather than
radical in both these areas. However, Asia and especially the newly industrialising
countries of Southeast Asia have a tendency to race ahead of many other countries, as
would be expected, because of their previous accumulation of technological
capabilities. Nevertheless, the fact that even these countries have had differing
degrees of success in commercialising biotechnology in different sectors, shows that
possessing scientific capability to adapt technology is not sufficient. Instead,
capabilities at different levels, to innovate and also to efficiently manage the
technology must be developed in order for developing countries to register success in
harnessing biotechnology for their own needs and priorities.
In the area of biotechnological R&D activities in the food industry, the Ministry
started the project "Development of bioreactor systems for the food industry" in 1984.
This project has achieved a number of remarkable results regarding the conversion of
saccharides, fat and other substances. Another project, the "Development of
technology for improvement of enzyme functions for the food industry" aims to
improve the functions of enzymes for food production utilizing recombinant DNA
technology. In fiscal 1989, the Ministry began a new programme, "Food production
by large-scale, high-density fermentation under ultra-high pressure conditions" with a
view to increasing the efficiency of the food production process under ultra-high
pressures and to finding food materials with a higher value added.
Two more projects were launched in 1989: the "Utilization of extracts from trees
(green sprouts project)" and "Advanced and multipurpose utilization of unused marine
resources (marine-frontier project)". The objective of these projects is to develop the
technique for extracting useful substances from trees and marine organisms and
utilizing them for foods, perfumes and medicines, thereby helping further growth of
forestry and fishery industries.
During three years from fiscal 1986 to 1988, BRAIN invested in 14 study projects and
offered loans to 70 projects. In fiscal 1989, the Institution invested in, among others,
the Institute of Aquacultural Technology of Cold Water Fishes, Wakayama Agro-
biological Research Centre and the Japan Turf Grass Co. The first is engaged in the
development of aquaculture systems of cold water high-class fishes, the second in
R&D activities for rationalized process of tangerine juice production and the third in
the breeding of better turfs.
Since 1986, MAFF has also been implementing the "Project for assisting local R&D
activities in biotechnology". This project offers financial assistance to the R&D
activities of prefectural research institutes concerning the breeding and utilization
technology of biological resources. Other biotechnology-related activities of the
Ministry include regional biotechnology meetings held in seven locations across the
country with the object of exchanging information on R&D. The Ministry's new
initiative in fiscal 1989 included surveys and studies for examining the direction of
the practical use of biotechnology in each region. The Tsukuba Bioscience Hall
created in 1989 provides a forum for collaboration among trainees from industries,
universities and the government and international exchange programmes.
Furthermore, to foster links among genetic resources and biotechnology, the Ministry
has a strong national genebank and germplasm conservation programme.
Of the developed countries in the region, the involvement of the private sector in
biotechnology, especially plant biotechnology, is rather limited in New Zealand. Very
little research on plant biotechnology is being carried out by private companies. A
shortage of venture capital, low taxation incentives and tough competition from large
overseas firms make such ventures unattractive. Several small companies are engaged
in either product formulation, or manufacture of biological control agents. Larger
international companies (e.g. Monsanto, MPI Koln, PGS Ghent, ICI) and overseas
research institutions (UCLA, California; John Innes Institute, United Kingdom;
Christian Albrecht University, Germany) have provided personnel, facilities and some
supportive funding on collaborative projects. Producer Boards (e.g. New Zealand
Kiwifruit Marketing Board) also support research through joint funding of
government programmes.
Many New Zealand research programmes on plant biotechnology are not mature
enough to have reached the stage of successful commercialization. In addition, some
programmes are commercially sensitive, particularly where research is collaborative
with private companies. Examples of plant biotechnology research that have been, or
are in the process of being commercialized in New Zealand include:
In the developing countries, in vitro culture for micropropagation of elite and disease-
free materials, production and distribution of efficient nitrogen-fixing microbes,
diagnostic kits and monoclonal antibody-based vaccines are the main areas that have
been commercialized to varying degrees in different countries.
In developing countries, the role of the private sector in modern biotechnology has
been rather limited. This is attributed partly to (i) vague government policies
regarding the private sector; (ii) unclear policies or no policies/views on patents and
intellectual property rights; (iii) poor links between public and private sectors; (iv)
low purchasing power for new products that are usually highly priced and are out of
reach of the majority of resource-poor farmers and low-income consumers; and (v)
inadequate local expertise and infrastructure and R&D support to new biotechnology.
In India, biotechnology industries have recently been growing in the private sector.
Hindustan Lever Ltd, an Indian subsidiary of the multinational Unilever, the Tata
Energy Research Institute (TERI) and Southern Petrochemical Industries are some of
the leading biotechnology companies in the country. These have considerable in-
house R&D bases active in the application of new technology to agribusiness, such as
enzyme technology for high-value chemicals and quality edible oil by using
genetically modified bacteria; protoplast fusion in yeast for efficient fermentation and
production of edible oil from biomass; tissue culture of plantation and ornamental
crops; biological nitrogen fixation; organic components for higher rate of
photosynthesis; big-insecticides; plant growth promoters; biomass processing for
animal feeds; and hybrid seeds. Some small and medium-size companies are also
initiating biotechnology activities but, with less R&D capacity, are more wary of what
they consider to be a higher-risk technology.
The private sector in India is particularly active in tissue culture products. There are
about 50 private sector companies such as Indo-American Hybrid Seeds, A.V.
Thomas and Co., Unicorn Biotek, the three companies mentioned above and others
that are comprehensively involved in commercial in vitro production of planting
materials of several horticultural and plantation crops such as cardamom, coffee, tea,
oilpalm, orchids, strawberry, roses, Spatiphyllum, banana, lily, Gerbera, etc. both for
domestic and export markets. These companies have established effective links with
the public sector.
The recent liberalization of trade, including that of certified seed, coupled with the
greater priority given to science and technology and the promotion of private sector
and public-private sector links, should encourage increased participation of the
industry in agricultural biotechnology R&D. Financial incentives are available for
supporting the growth of indigenous biotech industries.
Vectors
The vectors help in carrying and integrating the desired gene. These form a very important part
of the tools of recombinant DNA technology as they are the ultimate vehicles that carry forward
the desired gene into the host organism. Plasmids and bacteriophages are the most common
vectors in recombinant DNA technology.
Host Organism
Host organism is the organism into which the recombinant DNA is introduced. The host is the
ultimate tool of recombinant DNA technology which takes in the vector engineered with the
desired DNA with the help of the enzymes. There are a number of ways in which this
recombinant DNA’s are inserted into the host, namely – microinjection, biolistics or gene gun,
alternate cooling and heating, use of calcium ions, etc.
Gin modification
Fred Couch's customers at Rabbit Ridge Gin in Lepanto, Ark., don't fully understand how the
powered paddle roll technology in the gin works, or that it increases capacity for the facility. All
they know is that they've seen an improvement in turnout and staple length since the technology
was installed three years ago.
The paddle roll device was invented by USDA/ARS engineer Weldon Laird at the Lubbock,
Texas, ARS facility, through research funded by Cotton Incorporated. It is a spinoff of Laird's
work on EasiFlo cottonseed — cottonseed which is treated with a starch and water coating after
ginning to make it easier to handle for dairies and feedlots.
Laird was researching ways to remove excess fiber, or tags, from the seed. USDA scientists
found that this extra fiber coming off the seed during the coating process resulted in clumping of
tangled seeds.
Laird set out the remove the tags by running ginned seed through a second gin with a powered
paddle roll and seed finger modifications. It worked so well that Laird started looking for a way
to retrofit the technology on existing gin stands — in effect to remove the excess fiber during the
original ginning process.
The successful venture now is marketed as the Power Roll gin stand and is being distributed
through PRT Marketing. The president of the company is Laird's son, Russell Laird.
The technology does not require the installation of a new gin stand. Instead the existing gin front,
or breast, is replaced with a new one that contains a larger seed roll area, a paddle roll to actively
turn the seed roll and a seed finger roll.
Couch believes that the increase in capacity at Rabbit Ridge is due to the Power Roll's addition
of a 30-horsepower motor to turn the seed roll. The gin has three 1973 Lummus 700 feeders and
three, early-1970s model Continental 141 gin stands, which do not have a seed roll turning
device.
“The ginning takes place by the saw causing the seed roll to begin to turn. So if I have 100
horsepower turning the saw, the 100 horses are also turning the seed roll.”
Adding the paddle roll technology allows all of the 100-horsepower motor to be used for turning
the saw. “The more power you can put on the saw, the more seedcotton you're going to put
through it. Our capacity increased a lot.”
In fact, capacity increased from 21.4 bales per hour in 2002 to 23.5 bales per hour in 2003, the
year the technology was added. That increased to 25.11 bales per hour the following year with
the addition of a higher-capacity press and moisture restoration. In 2005, capacity increased to
27.14 bales per hour with the installation of an improved gin front.
At Servico Gin, in Courtland, Ala., capacity increased from 26.5 bales per hour prior to
installation of the power roll to 29.2 bales per hour after installation, even though the gin stands
there do have a seed roll turning device.
Three years ago, the technology was installed on Murray 142 gin stands at Midnight Gin,
Midnight, Miss. Ginner Robert Royal says, “There were some nagging engineering problems,
but they were expected. But through it all, the seeds have been just buck-naked. That benefit
goes directly into the farmers' pockets.”
Initially, Royal wanted to increase capacity without losing turnout, but that wasn't accomplished
to his satisfaction until the end of the 2005 ginning season. “Weldon (Laird) and an engineer
made some additional modifications and all of a sudden, it started ginning cotton like we had
hoped it would, and turnout was still way up there. But it hasn't been through the paces of a full
season yet.”
Royal noted that fiber quality improvements due to the technology “were nominal, but there
wasn't any deterioration of quality.”
For Couch, the increase in capacity “has offset the labor costs and the increase in power and gas
to dry. Just being able to gin another one or two bales per hour has allowed us to keep our per-
bale costs stable.”
In addition, most of the gin's cotton producers — around 20 — “don't see nearly the deducts that
they did prior to the technology,” Couch said.
According to tests conducted by USDA, PRT Marketing and the gin, turnout in the three years
prior to installation of the technology averaged 35.7 percent. In the three years since the
technology was installed, turnout has averaged 38.2 percent.
“Normally, there will be a tail left on the seed during the ginning process,” Couch said. “That tail
essentially is excess lint. I was running somewhere around 12 percent residual lint left on the
seed prior to the Power Roll. With the technology, I got that under 10 percent. In cleaning the
seed better, that increased the return to the producer.”
The technology “won't take a 34 staple to a 35 staple,” Couch said. “But there will be more 35
staple length than what would come out of the conventional 141 Continental gin stand. I'm
seeing a significant improvement in turnout. I also reduced my short fiber content from 10
percent to 7.5 percent.”
Couch has an idea of how the technology works because he sees many of the same benefits from
slowing gin speed down considerably. “When you're ginning at a high rate, you're create a seed
roll that is really packed. Sometimes it's packed so tightly that the saw cannot pull the seed to the
ginning point. With the paddle roll technology keeping the flow of seedcotton broken up, every
time the lint touches the saw, it's able to take it to the gin point.”
Greg Holt, USDA/ARS agricultural engineer in Lubbock, says some research on some of the
Power Roll models has been mixed.”
On gin stand models where results were favorable, “studies showed that it did increase ginning
rate and turnout. There were some fiber properties that appeared to be better with the technology.
“Like any new technology coming in, there were some rough spots. The wrinkles are being
ironed out and the technology is turning the corner.”
Models that were having problems appear to have been fixed by a new design in 2005, according
to Holt. “But we haven't collected enough data to definitely say that we found the problem.”
Holt said the ginning laboratory in Lubbock is expecting to collect that data with the coming
ginning season.
“One of the potential benefits of the technology is the idea that it can control the speed of various
components in the gin stand,” Holt added. In the past, everything ran off one motor, which may
not have been the best for quality.
This gin stand could allow the ginner to change the speed of the individual components to
accommodate different cotton varieties. Some of the research indicates that on a varietal basis,
the setups probably need to be different.
Methods of Gene Transfer: 6 Methods
The six methods are: (1) Transformation (2) Conjugation
(3) Electroporation (4) Liposome-Mediated Gene Transfer
(5) Transduction and (6) Direct Transfer of DNA.
Method # 1. Transformation:
Transformation is the method of introducing foreign DNA into
bacterial cells (e.g. E.coli). The uptake of plasmid DNA by E.coli is
carried out in ice-cold CaCl2 (0-5°C), and a subsequent heat shock (37-
45°C for about 90 sec). By this technique, the transformation
frequency, which refers to the fraction of cell population that can be
transferred, is reasonably good e.g. approximately one cell for 1000
(10-3) cells.
Transformation efficiency:
It refers to the number of trans-formants per microgram of added
DNA. For E.coli, transformation by plasmid, the transformation
efficiency is about 107 to 108 cells per microgram of intact plasmid
DNA. The bacterial cells that can take up DNA are considered as
competent. The competence can be enhanced by altering growth
conditions.
The mechanism of the transformation process is not fully understood.
It is believed that the CaCI2 affects the cell wall, breaks at localized
regions, and is also responsible for binding of DNA to cell surface. A
brief heat shock (i.e. the sudden increase in temperature from 5°C to
40°C) stimulates DNA uptake. In general, large-sized DNAs are less
efficient in transforming.
Other chemical methods for transformation:
Calcium phosphate (in place of CaCI2) is preferred for the transfer of
DNA into cultured cells. Sometimes, calcium phosphate may result in
precipitate and toxicity to the cells. Some workers use diethyl amino
ethyl dextran (DEAE -dextran) for DNA transfer.
Method # 2. Conjugation:
Conjugation is a natural microbial recombination process. During
conjugation, two live bacteria (a donor and a recipient) come together,
join by cytoplasmic bridges and transfer single-stranded DNA (from
donor to recipient). Inside the recipient cell, the new DNA may
integrate with the chromosome (rather rare) or may remain free (as is
the case with plasmids).
Method # 3. Electroporation:
Electroporation is based on the principle that high voltage electric
pulses can induce cell plasma membranes to fuse. Thus,
electroporation is a technique involving electric field-mediated
membrane permeabilization. Electric shocks can also induce cellular
uptake of exogenous DNA (believed to be via the pores formed by
electric pulses) from the suspending solution.
Method # 5. Transduction:
Sometimes, the foreign DNA can be packed inside animal viruses.
These viruses can naturally infect the cells and introduce the DNA into
host cells. The transfer of DNA by this approach is referred to as
transduction.
Microinjection:
DNA transfer by microinjection is generally used for the cultured cells.
This technique is also useful to introduce DNA into large cells such as
oocytes, eggs and the cells of early embryos. The term transfection is
used for the transfer DNA into eukaryotic cells.
Transgenic Organisms
Transgenic organisms contain foreign DNA that has been introduced using
biotechnology. Foreign DNA (the transgene) is defined here as DNA from another
species, or else recombinant DNA from the same species that has been manipulated in
the laboratory then reintroduced. The terms transgenic organism and genetically
modified organism (GMO) are generally synonymous. The process of creating
transgenic organisms or cells to be come whole organisms with a permanent change to
their germline has been called either transformation or transfection. (Unfortunately,
both words have alternate meanings. Transformation also refers to the process of
mammalian cell becoming cancerous, while transfection also refers to the process of
introducing DNA into cells in culture, either bacterial or eukaryote, for a temporary use,
not germ line changes.) Transgenic organisms are important research tools, and are
often used when exploring a gene’s function. Transgenesis is also related to the medical
practice of gene therapy, in which DNA is transferred into a patient’s cells to treat
disease. Transgenic organisms are widespread in agriculture. Approximately 90% of
canola, cotton, corn, soybean, and sugar beets grown in North America are transgenic.
No other transgenic livestock or crops (except some squash, papaya, and alfalfa) are
currently produced in North America.
To make a transgenic cell, DNA must first be transferred across the cell membrane,
(and, if present, across the cell wall), without destroying the cell. In some
cases, naked DNA (meaning plasmid or linear DNA that is not bound to any type
of carrier) may be transferred into the cell by adding DNA to the medium and
temporarily increasing the porosity of the membrane, for example by electroporation.
When working with larger cells, naked DNA can also be microinjected into a cell using
a specialized needle. Other methods use vectors to transport DNA across the
membrane. Vectors for transformation/transfection include vesicles made of lipids or
other polymers that surround DNA; various types of particles that carry DNA on their
surface; and infectious viruses and bacteria that naturally transfer their own DNA into a
host cell, but which have been engineered to transfer any DNA molecule of interest.
Usually the foreign DNA is a complete expression unit that includes its own cis-
regulators (e.g. promoter) as well as the gene that is to be transcribed.
Furthermore, to produce multicellular organisms in which all cells are transgenic and
the transgene is stably inherited, the cell that was originally transformed must be either
a gamete or must develop into tissues that produce gametes. Transgenic gametes can
eventually be mated to produce homozygous, transgenic offspring. The presence of the
transgene in the offspring is typically confirmed using PCR or Southern blotting, and the
expression of the transgene can be measured using reverse-transcription PCR (RT-
PCR), RNA blotting, and Western (protein blotting).
With almost 870 million people estimated to suffer from chronic hunger
worldwide, undernourishment represents a major problem that severely affects
people in developing countries. In addition to undernourishment, micronutrient
deficiency alone can be a cause of serious illness and death. Large portions of
the world population rely on a single, starch-rich crop as their primary energy
source, and these staple crops are generally not rich sources of micronutrients.
As a result, physical and mental health problems related to micronutrient
deficiencies are estimated to affect around two billion people worldwide. The
situation is expected to get worse in parallel with the expanding world
population. Improving the nutritional quality of staple crops seems to be an
effective and straightforward solution to the problem.
Two primary methods currently exist for introducing transgenic DNA into plant genomes
in a functional manner. For plants known as dicots (broad-leaved plants such as
soybean, tomato, and cotton), transformation is usually brought about by use of a
bacterium, Agro-bacterium tumefaciens. Agrobacterium naturally infects a wide range of
plants and it does so by inserting some of its own DNA directly into the DNA of the
plant. By taking out the undesired traits associated with Agrobacterium infection and
inserting a gene(s) of interest into the Agrobacterium DNA that will ultimately be
incorporated into the plant's DNA, any desired gene can be transferred into a dicot's
DNA following bacterial infection. The cells containing the new gene subsequently can
be identified and grown using plant cell culture technology into a whole plant that now
contains the new transgene incorporated into its DNA. Plants known as monocots
(grass species such as maize, wheat, and rice) are not readily infected
by Agrobacterium so the external DNA that is to be transferred into the plant's genome
is coated on the surface of small tungsten balls and the balls are physically shot into
plant cells. Some of the DNA comes off of the balls and is incorporated into the DNA of
the recipient plant. Those cells can also be identified and grown into a whole plant that
contains the foreign DNA.
The ability to easily incorporate genetic material from virtually any organism into many
different crop plants has reached the stage of commercial applicability. About 50% of
the maize, soybeans, and cotton grown in the United States in 1999 had been modified
using recombinant technologies. The major technical limitation on the application of
recombinant DNA technology to improving plants is insufficient understanding of exactly
which genes control agriculturally important traits and how they act to do so.
The study of genes involves the rapidly developing field of genomics, which refers to
determining the DNA sequence and identifying the location and function of all the genes
in an organism. It appears that many traits are conserved between species, i.e., the
same gene confers the same trait in different species. Thus, a gene for salt tolerance in
bacteria may confer salt tolerance if it is transferred and expressed in rice or wheat. The
advent of large scale sequencing of entire genomes of organisms as diverse as
bacteria, fungi, plants, and animals, is leading to the identification of the complete
complement of genes found in many different organisms. This is dramatically enhancing
the rate at which an understanding of the function of different genes is being achieved.
From the standpoint of agricultural biotechnology, advances in gen-omics will lead to a
rapid increase in the number of useful traits that will be available to enhance crop plants
in the future.
Biofertilizer
A biofertilizer is a substance which contains living micro-organisms which, when applied to seeds,
plant surfaces, or soil, colonize the rhizosphere or the interior of the plant and promotes growth by
increasing the supply or availability of primary nutrients to the host plant.
Biopesticide
Biopesticides, a contraction of 'biological pesticides', include several types of pest management
intervention: through predatory, parasitic, or chemical relationships. The term has been associated
historically with [biological control] – and by implication – the manipulation of living organisms.
Cell culture is the process by which human, animal, or insect cells are
grown in a favorable artificial environment. The cells may be derived
from multicellular eukaryotes, already established cell lines, or
established cell strains. In the mid-1900s animal cell culture became a
common laboratory technique, but the concept of maintaining live cell
lines separated from their original tissue source was discovered in the
19th century. Animal cell culture is now one of the major tools used in
the life sciences in areas of research that have a potential for
economic value and commercialization. The development of basic
culture media has enabled scientists to work with a wide variety of
cells under controlled conditions; this has played an important role in
advancing our understanding of cell growth and differentiation,
identification of growth factors, and understanding of mechanisms
underlying the normal functions of various cell types. New
technologies have also been applied to investigate high cell density
bioreactor and culture conditions.
Many products of biotechnology (such as viral vaccines) are
fundamentally dependent on mass culturing of animal cell lines.
Although many simpler proteins are being produced
using rDNA in bacterial cultures, more complex proteins that are
glycosylated (carbohydrate-modified) currently have to be made in
animal cells. At present, cell culture research is aimed at investigating
the influence of culture conditions on viability, productivity, and the
constancy of post-translational modifications such as glycosylation,
which are important for biological activity of recombinant proteins.
Biologicals produced by recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology in
animal cell cultures include anticancer agents, enzymes,
immunobiologicals (interleukins, lymphokines, monoclonal antibodies),
and hormones.