Karthick-Velusamy A2

karthick-Velusamy A2
by Karthick Velusamy
Submission date: 13-Jul-2021 11:44PM (UTC+0100)

Submission ID: 157765186
File name: 10044-2010_13752082_15153389_karthick-Velusamy_A2.docx (145.31K)
Word count: 3680
Character count: 20382
Buildi
Better,
Submitted By:
Submitted To:
Karthick
Velusamy Mark Corpsey
Stud I d: Leeds Beckett
77244546
University
18
15
6
Citation Needed
Citation Needed
6
7
2
6
Citation Needed
5
11
11
16
14
Citation Needed
Citation Needed
Citation Needed
5
5
3
19
2
2
13
Citation Needed
Citation Needed
Citation Needed
Awk. 3
1
3
Citation Needed
Citation Needed
1 1
Citation Needed
Citation Needed 3
Citation Needed
Citation Needed
4
4
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
10
17
12
2
21. VILLEGAS, C. Z. P., 2015. Analays is of cemex strategy. International Business
and Economy Conferenc, Volume 7, pp. 7-27.
ORIGINALITY REPORT
28 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
17%
INTERNET SOURCES
5%
PUBLICATIONS
16%
STUDENT PAPERS
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Leeds Beckett University

1
Student Paper
12%
2
www.omicsonline.org
Internet Source
3%
3
www.Cemex.com
Internet Source
3%
Arturo Torres Vargas, Javier Jasso Villazul.
4
"chapter 18 Learning and Innovation in
Multinational Companies from Emerging
2%
Economies", IGI Global, 2016
Publication
5
www.worldcement.com
Internet Source
2%
6
en.wikipedia.org
Internet Source
1%
Gül Berna Özcan, Adrian E. Coronado
7
Mondragon, G. Harindranath. "Strategic entry
and operational integration of emerging
1%
market firms: The case of Cemex, Beko and
8 Tata Steel in the UK", Journal of Business
Research, 2018
Publication
9
10
cemexen.gcs-web.com
Internet Source 1%
11
Submitted to DeVry University Onlline
Student Paper 1%
myassignmenthelp.com
Internet Source <1 %
<1 %
Jaap Sok, Peter van Horne, Miranda
Meuwissen. "The impact of the fipronil crisis
12 on the financial performance of Dutch
laying hen farms", Research Square, 2020
Publication
13
<1 %
Submitted to Aston University
Student Paper
14
<1 %
cbaweb2a.bus.utk.edu
Internet Source
15
<1 %
www.streetinsider.com
Internet Source
16
<1 %
essaygazebo.com
Internet Source
17
<1 %
www.sec.gov
Internet Source
Submitted to La Trobe University

Student Paper
<1 %
18
docplayer.net
19
www.ibef.org
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude matches Off
Exclude bibliography Off
GRADEMARK REPORT
FINAL GRADE
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
34
Critically evaluate and apply concepts, tools and
techniques of strategic management.
Your exec summary isnt one. This would

summarise the whole report. Yours is instead
more of an abstract.
/100
Your paper would have been better to highlight
the strategy of CEMEX instead you have hinted at it
in different paragraphs. Better to be clear on the
strategy and use this as the foundation for
building the paper.
There is a lack of a structure in the paper and no

highlighting of what are the key points.
M&A clearly an important strategy. I dont need

you to simply report them I want you to analyse
them for fit etc, did they buy the right companies
in the right target markets?
You have used SWOT - This is context driven but

you have not provided this aspect.
Critically analyse and evaluate the relationship

between strategic objectives/intent and
operational/resource planning in terms of
successful strategic implementation
The detail on the financial strength is descriptive,

you are reporting info. We need more analysis.
You have the start of this on p7 'The year 2020' -
this needed to be explored more.
Evaluate the impact of organisation culture,

Politics, stake-holder influence, social
responsibility and ethical issues on strategy
formulation and the strategic decision making
process.
You have highlighted the importance of

innovation but not how it is measured or
prioritised.
The recommendations are very generic. It does

not link clearly back into relevant evidence and
are not assessed using a framework like SAF to
look at suitability, acceptability and feasibility.
Your citation are weak.
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
QM
Citation Needed
Cite Source:
Please use the link below to find links to information regarding specific citation styles:
http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
QM
Citation Needed
Cite Source:
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
QM
Citation Needed
Cite Source:
PAGE 6
QM
Citation Needed
Cite Source:
QM Citation Needed
Cite Source:
QM Citation Needed
Cite Source:
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
QM
Citation Needed
Cite Source:
QM
Citation Needed
Cite Source:
QM
Citation Needed
Cite Source:
QM
Awk.
Awkward:
The expression or construction is cumbersome or difficult to read. Consider rewriting.
PAGE 10
Comment 1
do we?
QM Citation Needed
Cite Source:
QM Citation Needed
Cite Source:
QM Citation Needed
Cite Source:
QM Citation Needed
Cite Source:
QM Citation Needed
Cite Source:
PAGE 11
QM
Citation Needed
Cite Source:
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
RUBRIC: CORPES-MASTER2017
0 / 90
CRITERION 1 (33%) 0 / 90
Critically evaluate and apply concepts, tools and techniques of strategic management.
DISTINCTION DISTINCTION (80)

(90)
DISTINCTION
The student will demonstrate an excellent grasp of the theories and concepts.
(70)
There will be clear understanding of the value of the concept/theory in this
situation. There will be abundant evidence of wide reading, research and good
critical evaluation of concepts/theories around the issues
MERIT
(60)
PASS
(50)
PASS
(40)
The student will demonstrate a good grasp of the concepts/theories. Most of the
relevant information is accurately presented and critically deployed with evidence
FAIL
of reading, research and critical evaluation of concepts/theories.
(30)
The work will have no major factual errors. The student will have demonstrated
adequate/some understanding of the theories and concepts. Fair/some evidence
FAIL
of reading, research and critical evaluation of concepts/theories is provided.
(20)
The work will have no major factual errors. The student will have demonstrated
adequate/some understanding of the theories and concepts. Fair/some evidence
FAIL
of reading, research and critical evaluation of concepts/theories is provided.
(10)
There will be major errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions. Significant aspects of
the theories/concepts will be missing or misunderstood. Poor or no evidence or
reading, research and critical evaluation of concepts/theories is provided.


CRITERION 2 (33%)
0 / 90
Critically analyse and evaluate the relationship between strategic objectives/intent and
operational/resource planning in terms of successful strategic implementation
DISTINCTION
All of the major issues and some less obvious ones will have been identified. The
(90)
analysis of the case organisation will be thorough and comprehensive, and there
will be an outstanding integration of theory and practice.
DISTINCTION
(80) MERIT (60)
PASS (50)
DISTINCTION
(70)
PASS (40)
FAIL
(30)
FAIL
(20)
All of the major issues will be identified. Analysis of the case will be thorough and
there will be good integration of theory and practice.
FAIL
(10) Most/some of the Mayor issues will be identified. Fair/superficial analysis of the
case organisation only identifying the obvious issues. There will be (some)
evidence of the ability to relate the theories and concepts to the case
CRITERION 3 (34%)
Most/some of the Mayor issues will be identified. Fair/superficial analysis of the
case organisation only identifying the obvious issues. There will be (some)
DISTINCTION evidence of the ability to relate the theories and concepts to the case
(90)
There will be little/no evidence that the theory/concepts have been applied to the
case organisation / situation being analysed. Analysis will be superficial, mostly
descriptive, with major issues being missed.
DISTINCTION There will be little/no evidence that the theory/concepts have been applied to the
(80) case organisation / situation being analysed. Analysis will be superficial, mostly
descriptive, with major issues being missed.
There will be little/no evidence that the theory/concepts have been applied to the
case organisation / situation being analysed. Analysis will be superficial, mostly
DISTINCTION descriptive, with major issues being missed.
(70)
0 / 90
Conclusions (for the poster) and recommendations (for the final report) will be
comprehensive, and clearly demonstrate the integration of theory and practice.
Conclusions (for the poser) and recommendations (for the final report) relating to
this will be appropriate, accurate, specific and justifiable - well supported by
evidence and critical analysis
MERIT
(60)
PASS (50)
Conclusions (for the poster) and recommendations (for the final report) will clearly
derive from the analysis and the application of concepts/theories; The Conclusions
(for the poser) and recommendations (for the final report) will be adequate,
PASS
supported by good evidence and critical analysis.
(40)
The Conclusions (for the poster) and recommendations (for the final report) made
will be practical. Consideration will have been given to the problems of
implementation. (Some) evidence and analysis is provided to support the
FAIL
Conclusions (for the poser) and recommendations (for the final report)s.
(30)
The Conclusions (for the poster) and recommendations (for the final report) made
will be practical. Consideration will have been given to the problems of
FAIL
implementation. (Some) evidence and analysis is provided to support the
(20)
Conclusions (for the poser) and recommendations (for the final report)s.
FAIL
vague, general, based on ‘common sense’. Poor or no evidence/analysis supports
(10)
the Conclusions (for the poser) and recommendations (for the final report)

Karthick-Velusamy A2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Karthick-Velusamy A2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

karthick-Velusamy A2

Submission date: 13-Jul-2021 11:44PM (UTC+0100)

Submitted to Leeds Beckett University

Submitted to La Trobe University

Your exec summary isnt one. This would

There is a lack of a structure in the paper and no

M&A clearly an important strategy. I dont need

You have used SWOT - This is context driven but

Critically analyse and evaluate the relationship

The detail on the ﬁnancial strength is descriptive,

Evaluate the impact of organisation culture,

You have highlighted the importance of

The recommendations are very generic. It does

Your citation are weak.

DISTINCTION DISTINCTION (80)

There will be major errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions. Signiﬁcant aspects of

There will be major errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions. Signiﬁcant aspects of

You might also like