Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Every day we have to make decisions, as simple as which route to take in going to school. The
decisions we make normally depend on some conditions or premises or information given. For
example, if it rains, then you will not walk going to school or not go to class at all. We also
encounter a lot of conditional statements or “if –then’s” in advertisements, instructions,
arguments, and ordinary conversations. Hence, it is important to understand the conditional and
the many forms it takes and statements which are not equivalent to a given conditional.
q if p. q is necessary for p.
Exercises 3.1
1. Give five (5) equivalent statements for the following:
a) If you care for the environment, then you should recycle.
b) All animals are friendly.
c) No insect is useless.
Answer:1.) If you care for the environment, then you should recycle.
Not p or q------- If you are not should not recycle or you care for the environment.
Q or not p-------- It is recycling, or the environment.
If not q then not p------ If you should not recycle, then you are not care for the
environment.
2.) All animals are friendly.
P= It is animals
Q= It is friendly
q if p: If friendly if it is animal.
p only if q = It is an animal if is friendly.
p is sufficient for q = Being an animal is sufficient for friendly.
q is necessary for = Friendly is necessary for it to be an animal.
All p are q = All animals are friendly.
3.) No insect is useless.
q if p = If not useless it is an insect.
P only if q = It is an insect it is not useless
P is sufficient for q = useless is not necessary for it to one insect.
P is sufficient for q = Being insect is not sufficient to be useless.
All p are q = all insect are not useless.
2. Using the equivalent form “~p ∨ q” of the conditional, determine the negations
p q p→q q→p ~p → ~q ~q → ~p
T T T T T T
T F F T T F
F T T F F T
F F T T T T
p → q ⇔ ~q → ~p
q → p ⇔ ~p → ~q
Definition : Given the conditional p → q, we call
1. ~p → ~q the contrapositive of p → q ;
2. q → p the converse of p → q;
3. ~p → ~q the inverse of p → q.
Remark: From the above truth table, we have seen that the conditional is equivalent to its
contrapositive and not equivalent to its converse and inverse.
Exercises 3.2
1. Which of the following statements is/are equivalent to
“All Filipinos are law-abiding.”
A. If you are a Filipino, then you are law-abiding.
B. If you are not a Filipino, then you are not law-abiding.
C. If you are not law-abiding, then you are not a Filipino.
D. If you are law-abiding, then you are a Filipino.
E. You are law-abiding if you are a Filipino.
F. You are law-abiding only if you are a Filipino
Answer:
A. Not p or q
B. q or not p
C. If not q then not p
D. If q then p
E. q if p
F. q if only p
2. Which of the following statements is/are NOT equivalent to
“No gorilla is playful.”
A. If you are playful, then you are a gorilla.
B. If you are a gorilla, then you are not playful.
C. Either you are playful or you are a gorilla.
D. If you are not a gorilla, then you are playful
E. If you are playful then you are not a gorilla.
F. You are not playful only if you are a gorilla.
Answer:
A. q if p
B. p only if q
C. p sufficient for q
D. q is necessary for p
E. All p are q
F. Either not p or q