Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OVERVIEW
The previous lesson established that writing academic
papers goes hand in hand with research. Research must be
done so you can find credible sources to support your claims in
your paper. Ever since Google and Wikipedia have become
readily accessible, hundreds of resources have become
available, too. This is where critical reading comes into play.
You have to be able to scrutinize the valuable and not so
valuable sources if you want to write academic papers.
OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson, you should be able to:
explain what critical reading is;
annotate, outline, summarize and question the writer’s claim in a
text;
define fallacy and identify the kinds of fallacy;
evaluate whether an argument is sound logical or not;
analyze a text by applying the different ways in reading critically; and
critique a text by pointing out the different logical fallacies.
TOPIC OUTLINE
Reading Texts Critically
• Reading Critically
• Thinking Critically
• Fact and Opinion
• Fallacy
• Propaganda
PRE-TEST
Directions: Match Column A to Column B. Write your answer in the space provided.
You can map out your answers by writing words/phrases that you associate with critical
reading, active, and process of discovery. Write as many words as you can.
Understanding Involve
Processing
Thinking Visualizing Working On-going
Capture Review
LET’S UNDERSTAND!
Do you believe and agree with the statements after reading them? Would you question their
veracity? How you react after reading the statements?
If you question the validity of the statements by asking the person to give the basis for his/her
assertions, then you are one step closer to becoming a critical reader.
Critical reading involves scrutinizing any information that you read or hear. Critical reading
means not easily believing information offered to you by a text. “Read not to contradict and
confute; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and
consider” as Francis Bacon stated in The essays.
Critical reading is an active is an active process of discovery because when you read
critically, you are not just receiving information but also making an interaction with the writer. The
interaction happens when you question the writer’s claims and assertions and when you comment
on the writer’s ideas.
Ramage, Bean, and Johnson (2006) identified the following requirements in critical thinking:
The ability to pose problematic questions
The ability to analyze a problem in all its dimensions—to define its key terms,
determine its cause, understand its history, appreciate its human dimension and its
connection to one’s own personal experience, and appreciate what makes it
problematic or complex
The ability to find, gather, and interpret date; facts, and other information relevant to
the problem
The ability to imagine alternative solutions to the problem, to see different ways in
which the question might be answered and different perspectives fo viewing it
The ability to imagine alternative solutions to the problem, to see different ways in
which the question might be answered and different perspectives for viewing it
The ability to analize competing approaches and answers, to construct arguments for
and against alternatives, and to choose the best solution in the light of values,
objectives, and other criteria that you determine and articulate
The ability to write an effective argument justifying your choice while acknowledge
counter-arguments
The following are some suggested ways to help you become a critical reader:
1. Annotate what you read.
One of the ways to interact with
the writer is to write on the text. You can
underline, circle, or highlight words,
phrases, or sentences that contain
important details, or you can write
marginal notes asking questions or
commenting on the ideas of the writer.
There are no clear and definite guidelines
to annotating a text; you can create your
own style. For instance, you can circle
unfamiliar words or underline ideas that
you think are questionable. You can use
this sample as your guide.
These four suggested ways in reading critically are not isolated processes that are
independent of each other; they are overlapping processes that you can use simultaneously as
you engage in a dialogue with the writer of the text.
Critical Readers are those who can evaluate an author’s support for a point and determine
whether that support is solid or not.
1. Glittering Generalities- uses words of praise for product or person; nice words like goodness or
patriotism.
4. Plain Folks- Appeals to regular people and their values such as health, family and patriotism.
5. Bandwagon- An appeal to be part of the group
7. Card-stacking- Manipulating information to make a product appear better than it is, often by
unfair comparison or omitting facts.
Now, we will look at some common errors in reasoning – also known as FALLACIES - a
mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument. It is the use of invalid or otherwise
faulty reasoning, or "wrong moves" in the construction of an argument.
4. Straw Man - occurs when someone takes another person's argument or point, distorts it
or exaggerates it in some kind of extreme way, and then attacks the
extreme distortion, as if that is really the claim the first person is
making.
Example: Parent: No dessert until you finish your chicken and vegetables!
Child: You only love me when I eat.
5. Ad Hominem - means “against the man,” and this type of fallacy is sometimes called
name calling or the personal attack fallacy. This type of fallacy occurs
when someone attacks the person instead of attacking his or her
argument.
Examples: Person 1: I am for raising the minimum wage in our state.
Person 2: She is for raising the minimum wage, but she is not smart
enough to even run a business.
6. Appeal to Emotion – When a writer or speaker uses emotion-based language to try to
persuade the reader or listener of a certain belief or position.
Example: Grocery store commercial that shows a happy family sitting around the
table at Thanksgiving.
7. Equivocation – When an argument is presented in an ambiguous, double-sided way,
making the argument misleading. Also known as “doublespeak”
fallacy.
Example: Noisy children are a real headache. Two aspirin will make a headache go
away. Therefore, two aspirin will make noisy children go away.
LET’S DO THIS!
Directions: Match Column A to Column B. Write your answer in the space provided.
B. Critical Reading
C. Critical Readers
D. Opinion
E. Glittering Generalities
F. Fallacy
G. Equivocation
H. Fact
I. Propaganda
J. Circular Reasoning
K. Testimonial
Prepared by:
JOANE GUTANG
GERALDINE C. RAMIRO
REFERENCES
Saqueton, G. M. and Uychoco, M.T.A. (2016). English for
academic and professionalpurposes. Sampaloc, Manila: Rex Book
Store, Inc.
Logical Fallacies
Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IawIjqOJBU8
MOREH ACADEMY
RIGHTEOUSNESS AND EXCELLENCE
Blk 52, Lot 31, Purok 2, A. Bonifacio Avenue, corRicahuerta St., Upper BicutanTaguig City
Tel. Nos.: 839-0135; 838-9077 Email: morehacademy2002@yahoo.com.ph
INTRODUCTION:
The previous lesson established that writing academic papers goes hand in hand with research.
Research must be done so you can find credible sources to support your claims in your paper. Ever
since Google and Wikipedia have become readily accessible, hundreds of resources have become
available, too. This is where critical reading comes into play. You have to be able to scrutinize the
valuable and not so valuable sources if you want to write academic papers.
OBJECTIVE/S:
At the end of the lesson, you should be able to:
explain what critical reading is;
annotate, outline, summarize and question the writer’s claim in a
text;
define fallacy and identify the kinds of fallacy;
evaluate whether an argument is sound logical or not;
analyze a text by applying the different ways in reading critically; and
critique a text by pointing out the different logical fallacies.
ACTIVITIES/EXERCISES:
How does it feel to be a critical reader? Knowing the different flaws in logic and being able to apply
them in evaluating texts, in a way, give you power to evaluate the things that you heard or read and
not make unqualified statements as well. Before going to the nest lesson, take this assignment to
gauge how much you have learned.
Directions: Answer each of the questions in one paragraph. Each paragraph is worth ten points.
Your answer will be graded using the rubric below.
LEVEL DESCRIPTION VALU
E
Well written and very
organized. Excellent
grammar mechanics.
9-10
Clear and concise
OUTSTANDING
statements.
Excellent effort and
presentation with detail.
Demonstrates a thorough
understanding of the topic.
Writes fairly clear.
Good grammar mechanics.
FAIR Good presentation and
7-8
organization.
Sufficient effort and detail.
Minimal effort.
Good grammar mechanics.
GOOD 6
Fair presentation.
Few supporting details.
Somewhat unclear.
Shows little effort.
Poor grammar mechanics.
POOR 4-5
Confusing and choppy,
incomplete sentences.
No organization of
thoughts.
Lacking effort.
Very poor grammar
VERY POOR mechanics. 1-3
Very unclear.
Does not address topic.
Limited attempt.
6. Give at least five logical fallacies and give an example for each.
The Straw Man Fallacy
Example:
Guy 1: I often listen to rap music.
Guy 2: So you hate rap music
-Retrieved from
https://wordpressstorageaccount.blob.core.windows.net/wp-media/wp-
content/uploads/sites/679/2018/07/10-POINT-RUBRIC.pdf
Checked by:
_____________________________
Teacher`s Signature
Date: __________________________