Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ICEF2009-14054
Falko Langbein / Miba Gleitlager GmbH Matthias Loidl / Miba Gleitlager GmbH
Alexander Eberhard / Miba Gleitlager GmbH Robert Mergen / Miba Gleitlager GmbH
tribological behaviors without using lead in copper, new alloys Design features
•Number of test equipments: 8
on the basis of brass and bronze are being developed. These •Sample dimensions: L/W/H = 90/17,5/≤10mm
materials can achieve a wide range of hardness requirements •Maximum bending moment: ± 15 Nm
•Maximum swinging angle: ± 12°
via specifically tailored post processing routines and can •Test frequency: 25Hz
NOMENCLATURE 0 Cycles
In terms of the casting process, the main limiting factor is To fulfill the future demands of the engine builders in the
the required high deformation degrees of the as cast material area of high performance steel-aluminum bearings, Miba
during subsequent post processing. As the final lining decided to start comprehensive development work in the field
thickness is normally only a few tenth of a millimeter, the post of new 7000 series alloys. Major attention has been turned on
processing is based on strong mechanical thickness reductions rising the re-crystallization temperature and thus the strength
by cold-rolling. Cold-rolling is a consequence of the high of the lining material by using matrix hardening and lowering
contents of low-melting point soft phases such as tin. The or eliminating all together the soft phase constituents.
metallurgical process window is limited by means of useable To keep up with the tribological performance, the
cooling and solidification rates and common casting introduction of new combinations of surface coatings with the
thicknesses vary between 8 to 20 mm. new linings is being approached.
130
120
Table 1: Tensile properties
110
Alloy Tensile properties
100
Rp0,2 Rm A5
[MPa] [MPa] [%]
90
AlSn20 56 100 30
80
AlSn+
AlSn+ 106 146 16
70
AlSn20Cu AlZn4,5 72 155 24
60 AlSn40
PbBz Al-HIPO 259 293 14
50
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Min. Seizure Load [MPa] Optical micrographs of the AlZn4,5 and the Al-HIPO
prefab materials are shown in figures 4a and 4b. The standard
Figure 3: Performance target alloy is fully re-crystallized and its microstructure shows
equiaxial grains, while after the same treatment, the re-
Figure 3 shows the performance target area of the new crystallization of the Al-HIPO has not started and a cold-
aluminum bearing alloy considering fatigue strength and worked microstructure still remains. This clearly emphasizes
seizure load. As a result of the demanding situation to ban the outstanding tensile properties of the new alloy.
hazardous elements respectively lead, a high leaded low
strength copper based bronze alloy was taken as benchmark for
the fatigue strength. The latest developed serial aluminum-tin
based alloy was considered for the minimum seizure
performance benchmark.
To quantify the lining performance solely, the presented
diagram only reflects the bi-metal versions of the bearings.
Additional coatings are not considered.
Figure 4a: AlZn4,5 Figure 4b: Al-HIPO
DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Beside the strength properties, aluminum based prefab
The development processes were carried out after material needs a sufficient elongation level prior to roll-
substantial theoretical investigations and were partly made at bonding onto steel. Otherwise, the high deformation degrees
partner companies and own industrial production equipment. during the compound formation with steel are not feasible and
This is of great advantage when implementing new materials consequently a high bonding-strength cannot be achieved.
on existing production equipment at industrial scale. Compared to the standard materials the new developed alloy
shows an adequate elongation value which is around the latest
On the basis of earlier developments with new alloy types, developed aluminum-tin bearing alloy (see also table 1,
profound theoretical investigations [7-9] have been done and AlSn+).
finally showed up the high potential of rare earth elements in
combination with Zirconium micro alloying especially with From the prefab material Al-HIPO, a large number of bi-
regard to mechanical strength and thermal stability. After metal strips have been produced under various industrial scale
using mechanical properties as a first performance criterion, process parameters including different roll-bonding settings
the alloy test matrix was limited for subsequent seizure load and diffusion heat treatments. Using industrial scale
testing, which continuously reduced the number of alloy production equipment gives the opportunity to check
variants. For improved tribological properties finally a variety consequently the machine capability while processing new
of surface coatings were taken into account. materials. Figure 5 shows the compound material of the final
variant.
RESULTS
140
130
Bearing alloy
STRESS [M Pa]
120
Steel
110
Interface
Al-HIPO
100
AlZn4,5
Figure 5: Al-HIPO as finished bi-metal compound AlSn+
CuPb
90
Figure 6 shows the results of the final diffusion heat 1E+5 1E+6 1E+7 1E+8
treatment tests of the compounds in comparison to the LOAD CYCLES TO RUPTURE
aluminum benchmark alloys related to hardness changes. The
Figure 7: Alternate bending fatigue test results
major disadvantage of standard aluminum based bearing
alloys, namely the softening by re-crystallization after the final
The authors see here a rising influence of the bonding
annealing has been overcome. The hardness decrease of the
strength between steel and lining alloy. In contrast to the
Al-HIPO bearing alloy is by factor 5 to 10 smaller compared
hardness testing the bending test also load the bonding
the other alloys.
interface. The influences on the bonding strength of roll-
bonded steel-aluminum compounds are still not completely
55-60 HV1 65-70 HV1 90-95 HV1
100%
understood [11]. Besides rolling parameters such as rolling
force, speed, temperature and the surface activation processes,
80%
material parameters e.g. different longitudinal elongation
(steel / lining alloy) during roll-bonding affect the bonding
60%
strength. The Miba experience showed, that aluminum linings
After Roll-bonding
After diffusion HT with high hardness values prior to roll-bonding resulted in a
40%
small difference in longitudinal elongation and consequently in
a slightly reduced bonding strength. It is assumed that this is
20%
caused by a decreased relative movement of the surfaces
instantly prior to the compound formation.
0%
AlSn+ AlZn4,5 Al-HIPO
Nevertheless it is quite exceptional for the new Al-HIPO
Final hardness [%] material to achieve such high fatigue strength values which
can compete with high leaded bronze lining alloys.
Figure 6: Decrease of hardness after final diffusion heat
treatment 150
Target area 'New high strength
140
aluminum based bearing alloy'
It is well know, that there is more or less a linear
Fatigue Strength at 2*10^6 LC [MPa]
130
dependence between the hardness of aluminum-tin lining
120
alloys and the tin content [10], the higher the tin content the
110
lower the lining hardness. This dependency is also valid for the
100
alternate bending fatigue strength. For the Al-HIPO lining this
relation has not been found. Although the lining hardness is 90
nearly twice that of the standard AlZn4,5 alloy the fatigue 80 AlSn+
AlSn20Cu
strength shows around 15% performance increase at 2*106 70
PbBz
load cycles (see figure 7). 60 Al-HIPO bi-metal
Al-HIPO + coating
50
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Min. Seizure Load [MPa]
Tests with new Synthec®-based coatings as well as new Numerous small scale casting trials were performed in
galvanic layers that are currently under development are still close cooperation with the Austrian Foundry Institute (ÖGI) as
in progress. The authors expect to further improve the well as on an industrial scale. In addition a small experimental
tribological performance of the new aluminum alloy. casting device, the so called Micro Plant was developed and
eventually installed at the ÖGI to simulate the casting
CONCLUSIONS condition (especially quenching and compound formation) of
the big scale production routine. The focus of this work was
Comprehensive development work has been done by the mainly on bronze rather than on brass materials.
authors on the field of aluminum based lining materials with
the objective to provide a new aluminum bearing type that can DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
cope with the demands of future generations of engines.
First developments were done under the premise to reach a
By using a combined rare earth and zirconium micro- minimum seizure resistance of standard leaded bronze and a
alloying system the critical re-crystallization barrier was fatigue limit required for the demand of the engine builders of
fatigue load of 150 MPa were set as the goals to reach. 190
STRESS [MPa]
CuSn5Zn1
bearing test rigs. The results of the different variants in respect CuSn4Zn1
160
to their seizure and fatigue properties can be seen in the CuSn8Zn1
CuPb10Sn10
140
Seizure Load Testing
Bi-Metal Bearings with Lining Material of Cu-Basis 130
Test program FN095.12.01: Load step program with statistic load
Bearing d/w = 48 / 21 mm; Clearance 1,4 o/oo; Speed 12,6 m/s; Oil type SAE10 / 120°C / 1,1 l/min
CuPb22Sn2
120
100 92 1E+5 1E+6 1E+7 1E+8
88
90 LOAD CYCLES TO RUPTURE
79
80 76
Figure 11: Comparison of different CuSnZn based alloys in
Seizure Load ( MPa )
70
70
60 58
58 58
terms of fatigue properties
51
50 43 47
40
40 37 38 38
30 30 28
34
CURRENT RESTRICTIONS AND NEW CHANGES
20 24 24 24
21 21 20 21
18 19
10
Full scale development testing was performed at MIBA’s
0
Strip casting plant on the basis of the material family defined
CuSn4Zn1_PP1
CuSn4Zn1_PP2
CuSn4Zn1_PP3
CuSn8Zn1_PP1
CuSn8Zn1_PP2
CuSn8Zn1_PP3
CuSn5Zn1_PP1
CuSn5Zn1_PP2
CuSn5Zn1_PP3
200
180
160
Hardness [HB
140
2,5/62,5/10]
120
100
rolled
400
80
450
59
500 55
50
Temperature [°C] 550 43
35
17
9 Rolling degree [%]
cast
80-100
160-180
100-120
180-200
120-140 140-160 Figure 15: Steel backed CuSn5Zn1+ with sputter layer and
Figure 13: Re-crystallization diagram of CuSn5Zn1+ Synthec® coating
REFERENCES