You are on page 1of 56

Individual and Collective

Dr. Araceli Hernandez


differences
MGMT 54-616

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


B= f (person, situation)

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


2.1. Individual differences

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Abilities
• Personality
• Type A vs B
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Abilities
• Core self-evaluation
Physical Abilities
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
The capacity to do tasks demanding stamina, dexterity,
strength, and similar characteristics.
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Positive or negative affect Intellectual Abilities
• Proactive personality • The abilities needed to perform mental activities.
• Machiavelism
• General Mental Ability (GMA) is a measure of
• Narcissism overall intelligence.
• Risk taking
• Personality
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences • General mental
• Abilities ability or GMA is an
individual’s innate
• Core self-evaluation
Number
Aptitude
cognitive intelligence
• Locus of control
Verbal • Overall, GMA is the
• Self-esteem
Memory
Comprehension
single best predictor
• Self-efficacy of performance, but
• Self-monitoring Intellectual varies depending on
job requirements
• Positive or negative affect Ability
Spatial Perceptual
• Does not predict Job
• Visualization
Proactive personality Speed
satisfaction
• Machiavelism
• GMA also relates to
• Narcissism economic, physical,

Deductive Inductive
Risk taking Reasoning Reasoning and subjective well-
being
• Personality
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
Measured by Wonderlic test
• Abilities
• 1. Look at the row of numbers below. What number should come
Core self-evaluation
next?
• Locus of control 27 9 3 1 1/3 1/9 ?
• Self-esteem 2. In a typical city in the Southern Hemisphere, which of the
following months sees the most snowfall?
• Self-efficacy January, February, December, April, August, November
• Self-monitoring 3. Assume the first 2 statements are true. Is the final one true, false
• or not certain:
Positive or negative affect
The boy plays for the Tigers. All the players on the Tigers wear
• Proactive personalitywhite sneakers. The boy wears white sneakers.
• Machiavelism 4. A train travels 20 feet in 1/5 seconds At this exact speed, how
• Narcissism many feet will it travel in three seconds?

• Risk taking 5. Which three choices are needed to create the figure on the left?
Only pieces of the same color may overlap.
• Personality
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Abilities
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Positive or negative affect
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
• Personality

https://www.crownhouse.co.uk/assets/look-inside/9781904424659.pdf
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Core self-evaluation
• Personality
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Genes
Self-monitoring Environment
• Positive or negative affect
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism


Risk taking
Intelligence (9 types) Personality
• Type A vs. B
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Core self-evaluation
• Personality
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy Big 5
• Self-monitoring
• Positive or negative affect
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking


Intelligence (9 types)
Type A vs. B
MBTI
Big five personality traits

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Core self-evaluation
• Personality
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Strong
Self-efficacy situation Weak situation
• Self-monitoring
• Positive or negative affect
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
• Intelligence (9 types)
• Type A vs. B
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Type A vs. B
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Positive or negative affect
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
• Intelligence (9 types)
ersonality
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Skill and ability
• Personality
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Positive or negative affect
• Personality
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• .
• .
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Positive or negative affect
• Personality
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• . Self-esteem
• .
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
Self- efficacy
• Positive or negative affect
• Personality
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
• Intelligence (9 types)
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
• Intelligence (9 types)
• Personality
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
• Intelligence (9 types)
• Personality
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
• Intelligence (9 types)
• Personality
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Proactive personality
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
• Intelligence (9 types)
• Personality
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Individual differences
• Core self-evaluation
• Locus of control
• Self-esteem
• Self-efficacy
• Self-monitoring
• Machiavelism
• Narcissism
• Risk taking
• Intelligence (9 types)
• Personality
2.2. Collective differences

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences
Values:
Enduring beliefs that a specific mode of conduct
or end state of existence is personally or socially
preferable to an opposite or converse mode of
conduct or end state of existence
Attributes of Values:
 Content Attribute – that the mode of conduct or end-state is important
 Intensity Attribute – just how important that content is
Value System
 A person’s values rank ordered by intensity
 Tends to be relatively constant and consistent
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences
Importance of values:

• Provide understanding of the attitudes, motivation,


and behaviors
• Influence our perception of the world around us
• Represent interpretations of “right” and “wrong”
• Imply that some behaviors or outcomes are
preferred over others
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Hofstede

Individualism vs. Masculinity vs.


Power distance
Collectivism Femininity

Uncertainty Long term vs. Indulgence vs.


avoidance Short term Restrain

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Hofstede

Individualism vs.
Collectivism

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Hofstede

Power distance

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Hofstede

Masculinity vs.
Femininity

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Hofstede

Uncertainty
avoidance

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Hofstede

Long term vs.


Short term

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Hofstede

Indulgence vs.
Restrain

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe
Performance Future
Assertiveness
orientation orientation

Humane Institutional In-group


orientation Collectivism Collectivism

Gender Uncertainty
Power distance
egalitarianism avoidance

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe
Performance
orientation

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe

Assertiveness

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe
Future
orientation

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe

Humane
orientation

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe

Institutional
Collectivism

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe

In-group
Collectivism

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe

Gender
egalitarianism

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe

Power distance

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe

Uncertainty
avoidance

https://globeproject.com/
Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences (Culture)
• Globe Leadership preferences

https://globeproject.com/
• Rokeach
Collective differences

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Collective differences
• Rokeach
People in same occupations or categories tend
to hold similar values, but values vary between
groups

Value differences make it difficult for groups to


negotiate and may create conflict
2.3. Diversity

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Diversity

2018 U.S, Demographics


African Asian, 5.9 Other, 2.0
American,
13.4
Hispanic, White, 60.4
18.3

White Hispanic African American Asian Other


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Diversity
• Protected categories: Legislation

• Race
• Color
• Religion
• Sex
• National origin
• Age
• Ability
• Pregnancy
https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/
Diversity

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


• Race and ethnicity - Contentious issue: differences exist, but could be more culture
based than race based.
• Gender - Few differences between men and women that affect job performance.
• Sexual orientation - No reason to believe there are differences in performance.
Possible impact on other workers if biases exist. Domestic partner benefits are
important considerations.
• Gender identity – relatively new issue. Consider logistic issues.
• Age - Older workers bring experience, judgment, a strong work ethic, and
commitment to quality.
• Tenure - People with job tenure (seniority at a job) are more productive, absent less
frequently, have lower turnover, and are more satisfied.
• Religion - May impact the workplace in areas of dress, grooming and scheduling
• Disabilities - equal or better in performance, turnover, absenteeism and accident
rates. More loyal, but still higher unemployment.
Generational diversity

Mencl, J., & Lester, S. W. (2014).

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Diversity management

• Surface-level diversity
• Demographics
• Can lead employees to perceive one another through stereotypes and assumptions.

• Deep level diversity


• Individual and collective differences shape preferences for rewards, communication
styles, reactions to leaders, negotiation styles…
Diversity management

Harrison et al., (2002)

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Benefits and problems of diversity

Benefits Problems
Increases the pool of applicants Resistance, biases and stereotypes
Improves reputation Lack of cohesiveness
Helps in marketing efforts Communication problems
Promotes creativity and innovation Interpersonal conflicts
Increases problem solving abilities Slow decision making

Challenge – harness the wealth of being different


Risk - falling pray of prejudice and stereotypes
Stock market response to diversity

Hernandez (2015))

Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Diversity management

• Attracting, Selecting, Developing, and


Retaining the Diverse Employees

• Working with diversity inside the organization

• Effective diversity programs


Northwest Missouri State University / MGMT 54-616 / Dr. Araceli Hernández
Diversity management

• Diversity training
• Engagement
• Hiring tests
• Contact
• Performance rating
• Social accountability
• Grievance procedures

You might also like