You are on page 1of 3

MODULE 21: STUDENTS' (Wingfield, 1994 quoted by

DIVERSITY IN MOTIVATION Ormrod, 2004)

B.
Introduction: Students who, by  Elementary students tend to
themselves are already as diverse, attribute their successes to
also differ in motivation. This effort and hard work.
diversity in motivation may be  By adolescence, however,
traced to differences in age, students attribute success
developmental stage, and gender, and failure more to an ability
socio-economic, cultural that is fairly stable and
background. How these factors uncontrollable. Effort becomes
influence student’s motivation is the a sign of low ability (Nicholls,
concern? 1990: Paris & Cunningham,
1996 quoted by Ormrod, 2004
A.
 Young children often want to
C.
gain teachers; approval to be
 There are different
motivated while the older ones
motivational patterns for
are typically more interested
students belonging to ethnic
in gaining the approval of
communities, Students form
peers. (Juvonen and Weiner,
Asian-American families may
1993 quoted by Ormrod,
feel more pressured to
2004).
perform well in school.
 Student often become less
 Students’ cultural background
intrinsically motivated as they
can influence their
progress through the school
attributions. For instance,
year. (Harter, 1992 quoted by
students of Asian background
Ormrod, p.507) Learning goals
are more likely to attribute
may go by the wayside as
academic achievement to
performance goals become
unstable factors like effort and
more prevalent and as a
attribute appropriate or
result, students will begin to
inappropriate behaviors to
exhibit preference for easy
temporary situational factors
rather than challenging tasks.
that students brought up in
(Harter 1992: Igoe and
mainstream Western culture,
Sullivan, 1991 quoted by
(Lillard, 1997; Peak, 1993
Ormrod, 2004)
quoted by Ormrod 2004)
 Increasingly, student will
value activities that will have
D.
usefulness for them in their
 Females are more likely than
personal and professional
males to have a high need for
lives, and subjects that are
affiliation Block, 1983 by
not directly applicable will
Ormrod p.508.
decrease I n popularity,
 Females are also more especially if their past efforts
concerned about doing well in have been repeatedly met with
school. They work harder on failure.( Deshler &
assignments, earn higher Schumaker, 1998; Jacobsen,
grades and are more likely to Lowery, & DuCette, 1986;
graduate from high school. Seligman, 1975)
(Halpern, 1992; McCall, 1994  Students who have difficulty
quoted by Ormrod, 2004) getting along with their
 We typically find more boys classmates (e.g. those with
than girls among our emotional and behavioral
“underachieving” builds disorder) may inappropriately
students. attribute their social failures
to factors beyond their
E. control. (Heward, 1996 quoted
 Students from low-income by Ormrod, 2004)
families are among those most
likely to be at risk of failing
and dropping out of school. A ABSTRACTION/GENERALIZATION
pattern of failure may start
Our student’s motivation may
quite early for many lower-
vary on account of age, gender,
income students especially if
cultural, socioeconomic background
they have not had the early
and special education needs, our
experiences upon which
class is a conglomerate of students
school learning often builds.
with varying ages and gender and
F. most especially cultural background
and socioeconomic status. Our
 Students with special
students’ motivational drives reflect
educational needs show the
the elements of the culture in which
greatest diversity in
they grow up-their family, their
motivation. Some students
friends, school, church and books.
who are gifted may have high
To motivate all of them for learning,
intrinsic motivation to learn
it is best to employ differentiated
classroom subject matter ,
approaches. “Different folks,
yet they may become easily
different strokes. “What is medicine
bored if class activities don’t
for one may be poison for another.
challenge their abilities
(Friedel, 1993; Turnbull et al, Two principles to consider
1999 quoted by Ormrod, 2004 regarding social and cultural
 Students with specific or influences on motivation are:
general academic difficulties
1. Students are most likely to
(e.g. those with learning
model the behaviors they
disabilities, those with mental
believe are relevant to their
retardation) may shows signs
situations
of learned helplessness with
regard to classroom tasks,
2. Student develop greater
efficacy for a task when they Factor A- Intelligence and
see others like themselves Special Abilities-------50-60%
performing the task
successfully (Ormrod,2004) Factor B- Industry, Effort and
What conclusion can be Effective Study Methods-----
derived from the two 30-40%
principles? “Students need Factor C- Chance and
models who are similar to Environmental Factors------
themselves in terms of race, 10-15%
cultural background,
socioeconomic status, gender, Later in college… the
and (if applicable) disability proportions may change as
(Ormrod, 2004) such:

Then it must be good to Factor A- Intelligence and


expose our students to Special
models of their age and Abilities---------------------------
to models who come -30-40%
from similar cultural, Factor B- Industry, Effort and
socioeconomic Effective Study
backgrounds. Methods-------------50-60%
Factor C- Chance and
Do we have limit Environmental
ourselves to live Factors-------------------------
models? Not 10-15%
necessarily. We can
make our students Compare this with the
individuals who were in research findings in Activity B
situation similar to above. Do they job or do they
them. contradict each other? What is
your stand?
SYNAPSE STRENGTHENERS
1. From the Survival Kit
prepared by the Guidance
Office of St. Louis University,
success or achievement
depends not only on ability
and hard work but also on
effective methods of study,
Very roughly, the differences
between individuals in their
capacity for work and study
are determined by:

You might also like