Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Explain how attachment theory underpins social and emotional development for
children from 0-3 years old. Explain how a child’s experience either limits or supports the
development of their social & emotional skills.
Attachment theories explore the relationship that a child forms within the first year of
2012). The theory of Attachment originated from the influential research carried out by
theorist John Bowlby (1958). His theory was based on the understanding that people
needed comfort and love, especially in childhood (Bowlby, 1969). Socially competent
children have quality role modelling, secure attachments and plentiful play
comfortable they feel around adults or strangers. A secure attachment acts as the
primary source of a child’s security, self-esteem, self-control and social skills (Nagel,
2012). The type of attachment a child experiences will impact on the development of
emotional skills and the impact that they have on children aged 0-3. Bowlby explored
that children who felt understood and cared for would also develop a strong sense of
self and resilience.If a child feels safe and secure they will explore the environment they
are in and learn from the experiences that they encounter (Nagel, 2012). This relationship
act as a model for all future relationships, so disruptions can have severe consequences
on emotional and social development (Bowlby, 1969). A positive, secure relationship will
promote more time for social engagement, better emotional regulation and an increased
ability to understand and express feelings (Cozolino, 2013). Bowlby (1958) explored the
ages of 0-5 years, calling them the critical period for attachment. If an attachment has
not formed during this period the child is highly likely to suffer from irreversible
!1
aggression (Bowlby, 1958). Bowlby explores the idea that love is needed during brain
development to promote positive implications that are carried with the child through
their life. Cozolino (2013) explored the discovery of mirror neurons, and how a caregiver
relies on these systems to stay emotionally attuned to their children. Ainsworth (1970)
identified three main styles of attachment that appear as a result of early childhood
Secure children have an understanding that their attachment figure will be available to
meet all of their needs (Ainsworth, 1970). This secure relationship provides a safe base for
them turn to in times of distress (Main, & Solomon, 1990). The insecure avoidant
attachment style will find children becoming independent of their caregiver as their
needs are likely not to be acknowledged (Ainsworth, 1967). Finally, insecure ambivalent
children show dependent, clingy behaviours and who can be difficult to sooth when
distressed (Ainsworth, 1967). During the first few months of an infants life they are
capable of finding secure attachments with multiple family members (Nagel, 2012). At
approximately six months of age, the child will begin to demonstrate one main bond
with their primary caregiver, becoming distressed or anxious when separated from them
(Nagel, 2012). Nagel (2012) highlights that this is a normal experiences and is a very
important emotional milestone. This separation anxiety reaches its highest point
anywhere between ten and eighteen months and can continue until around age two
(Nagel, 2012). The following year is an opportunity to establish further attachment points
and seek greater contact as a means of security (Nagel, 2012). A secure attachment style
base for the development of their social and emotional skills. Children are biologically
!2
programmed to seek closeness (Nagel, 2012). This need for love and a stable relationship
between child and caregiver emerges as a primary task during the first years of an
infants life (Toth & Manly, 2018). The base that is formed through these attachments
provides the child with a sense of safety that allows them to explore the settings they are
in, leaving them feeling in control and their brain is in a state of neuroplasticity.
Through this play, children come to understand the concept of empathy and what is
aspect of not only emotional development but social development as well (Nagel, 2012).
Nagel (2012) defined empathy as the ability to feel an emotion that is similar to one
experienced by someone else. In the early stages of an infants life they are able to
empathy requires an understanding that oneself is distinct and different from other
people, and so cannot begin to fully develop until age two (Nagel, 2012). The ability to
emotions (Nagel, 2012). Toth and Manly (2018) express that early caregiving experiences
influence the quality of current as well as future relationships. Children who are loved
and whose needs are met are more likely to develop positive expectations of
relationships in regards to trust and the availability of love (Toth & Manly, 2018). During
the first few months of a child’s life the caregiver assists in regulating emotions by
controlling the situations and over stimulation the child is exposed to (Nagel, 2012).
Around roughly six months of age, the infant will demonstrate emotional regulation by
turning away from unpleasant stimuli on their own accord (Nagel, 2012). As a child ages
they develop greater independence with enhanced movement and language skills,
creating their own strategies for avoiding unpleasant situations (Nagel, 2012). Positive
however, are provided with this secure base, in turn, causing them to be exposed to less
When a child is not provided a safe and secure attachment they are often
unable to socially or emotionally regulate themselves. It has been proven that neglect of
a child, or failing to provide the basic need of love and security can result in a cascade
2014). Children who are exposed to criticism, coldness, indifference to needs, physical or
verbal control and a lack of structure are associated with poor emotional regulation
(Nagel, 2012). As these children grow and mature, research has shown that absence of
nurture within development can have long term drastic consequences (Nagel, 2012). This
was supported by Young and Widom (2014) who also explored that children who are left
without the feeling of being loved or cared for have been found to show specific deficits
(Young & Widom, 2014). Young and Widom (2014) carried out a study that explored the
impact of mental health and its relationship with attachment in childhood. The results
suggests that children who do not form a secure attachment have a higher chance of
developing mental illnesses later in life, due to feeling worthless or unwanted (Young &
Widom, 2014). This was supported by Zeanah and Humphreys (2018) who explained that
the most prevalent outcome of absent secure attachment was mental health problems.
Zeanah and Humphreys (2018) also explored how this unmet desire for love may impact
children socially. They stated that adolescents, who experienced this neglect during
childhood, are more likely to develop academic problems, delinquency and issues in
social relationships. Attachment and security provide a base for children to enhance
!4
their emotional and social skills, however, a negative impact on this can cause issues
relationship building throughout a child’s life. The theory of Attachment derived from
the research carried out by John Bowlby, who came to the conclusion that comfort and
love is a basic human need (Bowlby, 1969). The relationships built during. infancy model
the relationships that develop in a child’s future. This supports the importance of early
attachment and the negative impact that disruptions can have on social and emotional
skill development (Bowlby, 1969). Positive relationships form a secure attachment type
that will ensure that the child can effectively engage socially and regulation their
emotions (Cozolino, 2013). Those children who are unable to find safety in a relationship
find it difficult to recognise, understand and express emotions (Young & Widom, 2014).
This can spiral into experiencing social delays, deficits in empathy and a decreased
ability to express prosocial behaviour (Young & Widom, 2014). Overall, attachment
underpins the social and emotional development of children between the ages zero and
!5
References
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated
Behrens, K. Y., Hesse, E., & Main, M. (2007). Mothers' attachment status as determined by the
Bowlby J. (1969). Attachment. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Loss. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the childs tie to his mother. International Journal of
Cozolino, L. (2013). The Social Neuroscience of Education; Optimizing attachment & earning
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented
during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M.T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti & E.M.
Nagel, M.C. (2012) In the beginning: the brain, early development and learning. Camberwell,
!6
Toth, S., & Manly, J. (2018). Developmental Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect:
10.1111/cdep.12317
Young, J., & Widom, C. (2014). Long-term effects of child abuse and neglect on emotion
processing in adulthood. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(8), 1369-1381. doi: 10.1016/
j.chiabu.2014.03.008
Zeanah, C., & Humphreys, K. (2018). Child Abuse and Neglect. Journal Of The American
2018.06.007
!7
PART B: Analysis of Play Scenario
Using the running record, the CASEL social and emotional competencies and the
ACARA personal and social learning continuum, analyse the social and emotional
abilities of both of the pre-primary children as they play in the home corner.
Development in the social and emotional domains ensures that students are able to progress in
both their learning and skill development (Miyamoto, Huerta, & Kubacka, 2015). Measuring social and
emotional capability is valuable to providing educators with the opportunities to improve the
learning and environments the students are exposed to (Miyamoto et al., 2015).
Self-Awareness
The ability to identify one’s own emotions and thoughts and the impact they have on behaviour,
promoting accurate evaluation of strengths and limitations based on confidence and optimism.
Megan: Megan shows limited self-awareness in this play through, however, this is only one
scenario. She is able to express her personal preference which is seen when she states, “I want
to give it to her,” and, “I want to be the mum…” Megan is very capable of identifying what she
wants, although, she is unable to identify or understand why she wants these outcomes. It is
normal for a student at age five to be at this stage as they are only just beginning to explore
emotions and empathy fully, the foundation for self awareness are forming nicely.
- understand themselves as learners: 1a (select tasks they can do in different learning contexts)
Sarah: Through Sarah’s interactions it is clear that she is comfortable to express herself and the
experiences that she faces. This sequence of events shows Sarah providing her opinion and
reasoning to support her feelings. When Sarah said, “No… You were the mum yesterday,” she is
first of all expressing that she isn’t happy and possibly frustrated, as well as presenting cause for
these feelings. The underlying message of this dialogue is that Sarah is aware of what she likes
and what she wants and that she is well on her way in the development of her self-awareness.
- recognise personal qualities and achievements: 1b (identify their likes and dislikes, needs
and wants, and explore what influences these)
!8
- understand themselves as learners: 1a (select tasks they can do in different learning contexts)
Social Awareness
Capability of one to empathise with others, coming to understand social and ethical standards
for behaviour and recognising resources available for support and guidance.
Megan: Megan shows her ability to recognise Sarah’s emotions and feelings on two occasions,
when she first enters the play and at ‘feeding time.’ When she enters the home corner Megan is
able to hear the firmness in Sarah’s voice when she says, “Don’t touch her, she’s sleeping.”
Through recognising this Megan is able to understand that if she does try to handle the doll
Sarah may get upset. Similarly, when Megan wants to feed the baby, she notices the sternness in
Sarah’s voice and so poses a question to Sarah about what she can do to be involved.
- appreciate diverse perspectives: 1b (acknowledge that people hold many points of view)
- contribute to civil society: 1a (shows awareness for the feelings and interests of others)
Sarah: Sarah shows limited ability to empathise with Megan throughout this play scenario. She
does not seem to take into consideration Megan’s feelings and the fact that she wants to be
involved. Sarah only involves Megan in the play when Megan initiates the conversation. For
example, “Would you like a cup of tea?” and “Can I give the milk to her?” are both questioned
asked by Megan and the only times that Sarah includes her in the play. This demonstrates that
she shows little interest in Megans interests or feelings throughout the specific scenario.
- appreciate diverse perspectives: 1a (shows awareness for the feelings and interests of others)
- contribute to civil society: 1a (shows awareness for the feelings and interests of others)
- understand relationships: 1a (shows awareness for the feelings and interests of others)
The potential to make choices about one’s behaviour and interactions. This allows for and
Megan: Megan shows that she is able to make responsible decisions when she chooses to give
Sarah the opportunity to take the main role as ‘mum.’ Megan initially wanted to take the lead in
!9
the scenario, however after Sarah stated, “No, she’s my baby today and I want to give her the
bottle,” Megan was able to take a back seat and accept that everyone deserves to have a turn.
She took into consideration the feelings that Sarah may begin to experience if she had refused to
give the bottle up. The development of forward thinking will benefit Megan throughout her life.
Sarah: Sarah showed that she is capable of making positive decisions when she suggested to
Megan that she be a friend of the ‘mum’ in the play scenario. During this time she was able to
make a constructive choice that benefited the social interaction that was occurring. The ability
to make a decision and put forward an idea instantly shows that she is able to take into
consideration what others may be feeling. In the scenario Megan could possibly have felt left
out of the play as she had no obvious role, however, Sarah solved this problem moving toward
* Although neither situation requires a decision to be made based on safety or ethical standards,
both students are presenting the foundations for this to be able to develop later in their lives.
Self-Management
The ability to successfully regulate ones emotions when exposed to different situations
Megan: Throughout the play scenario Megan is positioned to experience many emotions in
which she has to regulate in order to continue enjoying the situation. When Sarah insists that
Megan cannot be the ‘mum,’ Megan is able to control the emotions that she is feeling and in
turn asks, “…who else can I be?” In this example, instead of becoming upset, Megan makes a
choice based on the fact that she would like to continue to participate in the play. She accepts
that Sarah would like to take the ‘mum’ role, expressing that she would still like to be involved.
- develop self-discipline and set goals: 1a (make a choice to participate in a class activity)
- work independently and show initiative: shows some 1b (attempt tasks independently)
- become confident, resilient and adaptable: 1a (identify people and situations with which they
feel a sense of familiarity or belonging)
Sarah: Sarah does not explicitly state her emotions, however, she is able to deal with them in a
positive way throughout the play with Megan. When Megan is hesitant to give Sarah the bottle
!10
during feeding time, Sarah could have easily made a big deal about it. Instead she explains that
she would like to be the ‘mum’ in a calm way, exploring that Megan was “the mum yesterday.”
Sarah also shows that she can manage herself when she beings to play independently, showing
that she play and experience within herself as well as with her peers.
- develop self-discipline and set goals: 1a (make a choice to participate in a class activity)
- become confident, resilient and adaptable: 1a (identify people and situations with which they
feel a sense of familiarity or belonging)
The capacity to be able to establish and maintain positive relationships as a result of being able
Megan: When Megan noticed Sarah playing she was able to seamlessly join in and involve.
herself and Sarah. Megan’s first interaction with Sarah was, “Would you like a cup of tea?” This
explores that she understood the scenario that was being played out and was able to make a
positive impact through joining. She was able to understand what Sarah wanted and was able to
respond to this by agreeing and consulting Sarah about what Sarah wanted her to do.
- negotiate and resolve conflict: 1a (respond to the feelings, needs and interests of others)
- develop leadership skills: 1a (respond to the feelings, needs and interests of others)
Sarah: Sarah is able to communicate effetely to Megan, showing an understanding of what she
wants, and an explanation as to why Sarah disagrees with this. Sarah is able to create new
opportunities for Megan to be involved, helping Megan feel included and that she is being
acknowledged. Sarah provides Megan with the idea that she the, “friend and … push [the] baby
when we go for a walk.” This is Sarah making effective, rapid decisions that benefit the play
!11
- communicate effectively: 1a (respond to the feelings, needs and interests of others)
- make decisions: 1b (identify options when making decisions to meet the needs of others)
- negotiate and resolve conflict: 1a (respond to the feelings, needs and interests of others)
- develop leadership skills: 1a (respond to the feelings, needs and interests of others)
!12
References
curriculum.edu.au/media/1078/general-capabilities-personal-and-social-
capability-learning-continuum.pdf
Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) (2017). Core
2017/01/Comptencies.pdf
Miyamoto, K., Huerta, M. C., & Kubacka, K. (2015). Fostering Social and Emotional
50(2), 147–159.https://doi-org.ipacez.nd.edu.au/10.1111/ejed.12118
!13