Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Main Sections Details /5: First Speaker of The Affirmative Team

    Uploaded by

    Ye Un Park
    16 views7 pages
    The document appears to be a rubric for evaluating participants in a debate competition. It provides grading criteria for various sections of the debate, including introductions, arguments, rebuttals, cross-examinations, and conclusions. Speakers are assessed on their understanding of the topic, use of facts and research, logical explanations, eye contact, voice, and ability to maintain composure while answering challenging questions. The best speakers clearly explain their position, support it with evidence, and rebut the opposing arguments in a respectful manner.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Debate Teacher

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document appears to be a rubric for evaluating participants in a debate competition. It provides grading criteria for various sections of the debate, including introductions, arguments, rebuttals, cross-examinations, and conclusions. Speakers are assessed on their understanding of the topic, use of facts and research, logical explanations, eye contact, voice, and ability to maintain composure while answering challenging questions. The best speakers clearly explain their position, support it with evidence, and rebut the opposing arguments in a respectful manner.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    16 views7 pages

    Main Sections Details /5: First Speaker of The Affirmative Team

    Uploaded by

    Ye Un Park
    The document appears to be a rubric for evaluating participants in a debate competition. It provides grading criteria for various sections of the debate, including introductions, arguments, rebuttals, cross-examinations, and conclusions. Speakers are assessed on their understanding of the topic, use of facts and research, logical explanations, eye contact, voice, and ability to maintain composure while answering challenging questions. The best speakers clearly explain their position, support it with evidence, and rebut the opposing arguments in a respectful manner.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 7

    Topic: _____________________________________________

    Main Sections Details /5

    Voice

    Eye Contact

    Introduction Introduced the topic


    (/25) Introduced the keywords

    Introduced each team member

    Clear topic statement


    (Understands the topic)
    Research
    (Provided facts)
    Explanation
    1 (Provided logical and clear explanations)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)
    Eye Contact + Voice

    ARGUMENT Clear topic statement


    (Understands the topic)
    (/25) x2
    Research
    (Provided facts)
    Explanation
    2 (Provided logical and clear explanations)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)
    Eye Contact + Voice

    Greeted the audience


    Conclusion Summed up their arguments
    (/15)
    Eye Contact + Voice
    LOGICAL ANSWERS
    CROSS EXAMINATION
    ANSWERS CONFIDENCE
    (/10)
    Peer Point ( / ) TOTAL
    / /

    COMMENT SCORE:

    First Speaker of the Affirmative Team (For): ________________ and ________________

    Ms Yenni
    Topic: _____________________________________________

    First Speaker of the Negative Team (Against): ________________ and ________________

    Main Sections Details /5


    Voice
    Eye Contact
    Introduced the topic + keywords
    Introduction Introduced team members

    Question: Asked Challenging/Concise Questions


    Cross Examination Answer: Able to provide logical reasoning
    Answer: Able to maintain composure
    Found logical flaws
    Rebuttal Logical reasoning (NOT AN ARGUMENT)
    Explanation + counterargument

    Clear topic statement


    (Understands the topic)
    Research
    (Provided facts)
    Explanation
    1 (Provided logical and clear explanations)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)
    Eye Contact + Voice
    ARGUMENT
    Clear topic statement
    (Understands the topic)
    Research
    (Provided facts)
    Explanation
    2 (Provided logical and clear explanations)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)
    Eye Contact + Voice

    Greeted the audience


    Summed up their arguments
    Conclusion Eye Contact + Voice
    Peer Point ( / ) TOTAL
    / /

    COMMENT SCORE:

    Ms Yenni
    Topic: _____________________________________________
    nd
    2 Speaker of the AFFIRMATIVE Team (FOR): ________________ and ________________

    Main Sections Details /5


    Voice
    Eye Contact
    Introduced the topic
    Introduction Introduced the keywords

    Question: Asked Challenging/Concise Questions


    Cross Examination Answer: Able to provide logical reasoning
    Answer: Able to maintain composure
    Found logical flaws
    Rebuttal Logical reasoning (NOT AN ARGUMENT)
    Explanation + counterargument

    Clear topic statement


    (Understands the topic)
    Research
    (Provided facts)
    Explanation
    1 (Provided logical and clear explanations)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)
    Eye Contact + Voice
    ARGUMENT
    Clear topic statement
    (Understands the topic)
    Research
    (Provided facts)
    Explanation
    2 (Provided logical and clear explanations)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)
    Eye Contact + Voice

    Greeted the audience


    Summed up their arguments
    Conclusion Eye Contact + Voice
    Peer Point ( / ) TOTAL
    / /

    COMMENT SCORE:

    2nd Speaker of the Negative Team (Against): ________________ and ________________

    Ms Yenni
    Topic: _____________________________________________
    Main Sections Details /5
    Voice
    Eye Contact
    Introduced the topic
    Introduction Introduced the keywords

    Question: Asked Challenging/Concise Questions


    Cross Examination Answer: Able to provide logical reasoning
    Answer: Able to maintain composure
    Found logical flaws
    Rebuttal Logical reasoning (NOT AN ARGUMENT)
    Explanation + counterargument

    Stated how many points/arguments

    Clear topic statement


    (Understands the topic)
    Research
    (Provided facts)
    Explanation
    1 (Provided logical and clear explanations)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)
    Eye Contact + Voice

    Clear topic statement


    (Understands the topic)
    Argument Research
    (Provided facts)
    Explanation
    2 (Provided logical and clear explanations)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)
    Eye Contact + Voice

    Greeted the audience


    Summed up their arguments
    Conclusion Eye Contact + Voice
    Peer Point ( / ) TOTAL
    / /

    COMMENT SCORE:

    3rd Speaker of the AFFIRMATIVE Team (Against): ________________ and ________________

    Ms Yenni
    Topic: _____________________________________________
    Main Sections Details /5
    Voice
    Eye Contact
    Introduction Introduced the topic

    Question: Asked Challenging/Concise Questions


    Cross Examination Answer: Able to provide logical reasoning
    Answer: Able to maintain composure

    1 Found a logical flaw


    Explanation + counterargument
    Logical reasoning (NOT AN ARGUMENT)

    Rebuttal 2 Found a logical flaw


    Explanation + counterargument
    Logical reasoning (NOT AN ARGUMENT)

    Eye Contact + Voice

    Clear topic statement of 1st speaker

    Restated Research with Explanation


    (No new argument)
    1
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)

    Clear topic statement of 2nd speaker


    Summary Restated Research with Explanation
    2 (No new argument)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)

    Eye Contact + Voice

    Greeted the audience

    Summed up their arguments


    Conclusion
    Eye Contact + Voice
    Peer Point ( / ) TOTAL
    / /
    COMMENT SCORE:

    3rd Speaker of the Negative Team (Against): ________________ and ________________

    Ms Yenni
    Topic: _____________________________________________
    Main Sections Details /5

    Ms Yenni
    Topic: _____________________________________________
    Voice
    Eye Contact
    Introduction Introduced the topic

    Question: Asked Challenging/Concise Questions


    Cross Examination Answer: Able to provide logical reasoning
    Answer: Able to maintain composure

    1 Found a logical flaw


    Explanation + counterargument
    Logical reasoning (NOT AN ARGUMENT)

    Rebuttal 2 Found a logical flaw


    Explanation + counterargument
    Logical reasoning (NOT AN ARGUMENT)

    Eye Contact + Voice

    Clear topic statement of 1st speaker

    Restated Research with Explanation


    (No new argument)
    1
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)

    Clear topic statement of 2nd speaker


    Summary Restated Research with Explanation
    2 (No new argument)
    Conclusion
    (Clear summing up of their argument)

    Eye Contact + Voice

    Greeted the audience

    Summed up their arguments


    Conclusion
    Eye Contact + Voice
    Peer Point ( / ) TOTAL
    / /
    COMMENT SCORE:

    Ms Yenni

    You might also like