Accomplishment Report on School Monitoring, Evaluation, and Adjustments

(SMEA) Review
SY 2019-2020

I. Background/Rationale

Shared governance is clearly defined in Republic Act 9155 as the

management model in the delivery of basic education. It specifies the functional
areas to be shared by the various level of management as well as their differentiated
roles. The evolving roles of the schools are consistent with the national educational
policies, plans, and standards. The monitoring and evaluation is for the provision of
objective information that can inform decision-making for continuous improvement in:

 Organizational Performance for efficient and effective fulfillment of the division

mandate, and
 Delivery of education services to achieve the desired output and sustainability
of Education outcomes.

II. Objectives

1. Provide immediate feedback on the efficacy and weaknesses of

program implementation at the school level vis-à-vis SIP and AIP
implementation;

2. Respond to technical and training needs of teachers; and

3. Identify enhancements to educational policies and guidelines.

III. Accomplishment Narrative Report

The SMEA Review in school was conducted last March 12, 2020 for Calendar
Year 2020. The School Head through the Master Teachers and School Planning
Officer presented the Key Result Areas (KRAs) on ACCESS, QUALITY, and
GOVERNANCE with the corresponding Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in
graphical, tabular and textual Powerpoint Presentation for easy understanding in the
 delivery of data elements. Present during the presentation were the School
Governance Council (SGC), the General Parent-Teachers Association (GPTA)
Board of Directors, the School Planning Team (SPT), LGU Representative,
Barangay Officials, teachers and stakeholders. The following data below specify
what transpired during the review proper with the corresponding possible solutions
and recommendations of the stakeholders to the issues, concerns, gaps and
problems reflected in the presentation. Each of these identified gaps was dealt with
appropriate treatment conducted as resolution formulated collaboratively by the
stakeholders and the school.

1. Drop-out Rate
Target: 0%
Accomplishment: 97.64%
Gap/s: 2.36%
Stakeholders Recommendations:
 Intensify Home Visitation and Teacher-Parent Conference
 Strategize quarterly monitoring and make-up classes for
SARDOs

2. Literacy Level
Target: 0% Frustration Level
Accomplishment: not qualified
Gap/s: 27% or 102 students under Frustration level
Stakeholders Recommendations:
 Provision of Interactive Reading materials
 Tapping assistance from stakeholders to act as a Reading-
Buddy
 Mobilization of Parents Consultation, Tutorial and Mentoring
Program from School Clubs
 Strategize reading intervention programs

3. Nutritional Status
Target: 0% Severely Wasted Students
Accomplishment: not qualified
Gap/s: 26%
Stakeholders Recommendations:
 Utilization of Gulayan sa Paaralan Products
 Optimizing Fund-Raising Activities to support Feeding Program
 Tapping assistance from DSWD and or NGOs, Business
Sector, OFW and alumni support
 Mobilization of Parents Consultation, Tutorial and Mentoring
Program from School Clubs
4. INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION
Target: 100 of Teachers %
Accomplishment: 88.2 % or 45 out of 50 teachers
Gap/s: 1.8 or 6 teachers were not given TA and have not been
observed
Stakeholders Recommendations:
 Operationalize Technical Assistance Plan
 Strictly adhere to monthly supervisory plan by sticking to
schedules
 Intensify Mobilization of Master Teachers

5. LR PORTAL
Target: 100 of Teachers %
Accomplishment: 88.2 %
Gap/s: 1.8 or 6 Teachers; 3 of whom are unenrolled yet and the other
3 are newly hired ones
Stakeholders Recommendations:
 Empower and mobilize Grade Level Chairpersons to provide
technical assistance to teachers under their care
 Strictly adhere to monthly supervisory plan by sticking to
schedules
 Set and formulate schedule for LR Portal enrollment for each
grade level

6. WinS or WASH in School

Target: 3-star
Accomplishment: 2-star
Gap/s: Need to achieve 3-star
Stakeholders Recommendations:
 Provision of Faucets to every school building
 Installation of Gutter for Rainwater Catchment with Filter
System
 Optimization of Fund-Raising and Solicitation Activities
 Tapping skilled parents or alumni for the construction
 Requesting sponsorship on equipment and other tools from
LGU, NGOs and other private agencies, business sector,
alumni and other stakeholders

7. LIS Issues
Target: 100% of students
Accomplishment: 99.81
Gap/s: 0.19 or 3 students have issues in LIS
Stakeholders Recommendations:
 Conduct monthly tracking and monitoring of learners’ record to
class adviser
 Instruct School Planning Officer to strategize monitoring and
tracking approach in LIS records
 8. SBM Level of Practice
Target: Level 3 accreditation
Accomplishment: Level 2 Accreditation
Gap/s: Need to achieve Level 3 Accreditation
Stakeholders Recommendations:
 Organizing Documentation approach and updating data per
principle
 Optimization of efficient methods and communication among
stakeholders
 Strategizing Schedule preparation dates to provide focus on
specific concerns
 Maximizing Capacity-Building to stakeholders
 Promoting accountability and transparency between and
among school and stakeholders.

IV. Treatment Conducted

1. Drop-out Rate
 In order to address the gap, through Project LAMPUS,
Teachers intensified Home Visitation to students through by-
grade level set schedule
 Parent-Teacher Conference is intensified

2. Literacy Level

 Project GRASP was implemented and regularly monitored.

 Contextualized Reading materials crafted by alumni and retired
teachers were being provided by Language Teachers to
enhance reading skills of students
 Stakeholders like volunteer teachers served as partner in the
conduct of Reading activity.
 BLGU Education Committee officials played as counterpart in
the implementation of the reading program

3. Nutritional Status

 Gulayan sa Paaralan income was taken as one of the

outsourcing funds for Project SNACKS for Supplemental
Feeding
 Fund-Raising and Outsourcing Activities to support Feeding
Program were optimized in tandem with the PTA
 Assistance from donations stakeholders and or NGOs,
Business Sector, OFW and alumni support was tapped to
support and sustain Project SNACKS.
4. INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION
 Master Teachers/ Grade Level Chairs are mobilized to conduct
and or provide technical assistance to teachers under their
care
 Monthly supervisory plan was strictly followed

5. LR PORTAL
 School Planning Officer and ICT Coordinator provided
technical assistance to Class Advisers in resolving LR Portal
problems
 Regular coordination and updating between Class Advisers
and LR or ICT Coordinator was initiated

6. LIS Issues
 School Planning Officer coordinated with the Division Planning
personnel in resolving LIS issues
 Monitoring and Coordination between the SPO and Class
Advisers was done quarterly.

7. WinS or WASH in School

 Repair and replacements of broken faucets were done in all

handwashing areas and comfort rooms as one of the activities
under Project AYOS.
 Installation of Water tanks thru GPTA Project
 Spearheaded by General Parent-Teacher Association Board of
Directors with the School Nurse, solicitation activity was
optimized to support and sustain Project SNACKS activities.
 Skilled parents, in cooperation with alumni association, were
tapped in the repair and replacements of faucets and water
pipe lines.

8. SBM Level of Practice

 Online repository and storage of SBM documents were

created.
 Organization of genuine data were done and was verified by
stakeholders.
 Open and transparent two-way communication between the
school and stakeholders is being observed in school
undertakings.
V. Pictorial (pls see attached document)

Prepared by:

REY S. VISTAL
Teacher- I/ SGC Secretary

Noted:

WILLY C. DUMPIT, PhD, FRIEdr

School Head