The document outlines a rubric for evaluating student presentations on selling an idea with a story. It evaluates students based on three criteria: the storytelling components of their idea (35%), the delivery of their presentation (35%), and their use of a storytelling template (20%). It also awards 10% for timely submission that meets the 2-3 minute timeframe. The rubric describes what is required for satisfactory, needs improvement, and poor scores on each criteria.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating student presentations on selling an idea with a story. It evaluates students based on three criteria: the storytelling components of their idea (35%), the delivery of their presentation (35%), and their use of a storytelling template (20%). It also awards 10% for timely submission that meets the 2-3 minute timeframe. The rubric describes what is required for satisfactory, needs improvement, and poor scores on each criteria.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating student presentations on selling an idea with a story. It evaluates students based on three criteria: the storytelling components of their idea (35%), the delivery of their presentation (35%), and their use of a storytelling template (20%). It also awards 10% for timely submission that meets the 2-3 minute timeframe. The rubric describes what is required for satisfactory, needs improvement, and poor scores on each criteria.
Possible Points Discussion Criteria Satisfactory Needs Improvement Poor Score
The student’s “Big Idea” was The student’s “Big Idea” was The student’s “Big conveyed with a story which had conveyed with a story which Idea” showed a lack of Story-telling a clear hook, context, challenge, had had most of the story- the story-telling 35% Components conflict, resolution, lesson and telling components: a hook, components. recommended action. context, challenge, conflict, resolution, lesson and recommended action. Delivery of the story-telling The delivery of the story- The delivery of the presentation was well thought telling presentation was presentation showed 35% Story-telling out and organized. Presenter mediocre. The presenter’s little effort was put into Delivery was articulate, engaging, and delivery sequence was a trying to “sell” their dressed professionally. challenging to follow, they idea. The presenter showed little emotion and/or was hard to understand weren’t dressed and they seemed very professionally. unengaged both in demeanor and appearance. Story-telling template was filled Story-telling template was Story-telling template out in its entirety and its evident partially filled out and was was not used or 20% Story-telling the story was well thought out in difficult to read. uploaded. Template advance of the recording. Document was easy to read. Assignment was turned in on Assignment was turned in Assignment was turned time and kept to the 2-3 minute late and/or the presentation in late and the 10% Timeliness presentation mark. fell a little below or beyond presentation went far the 2-3 minute mark below or beyond the 2- 3 minute mark. 35 Max Points