Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An overview
Meeting 1
Anjar Priyono, PhD.
Operations Management
© 2014
© 2014
Pearson
Pearson
Education,
Education,
Inc.Inc. 1-1
Operations Management
at Hard Rock Cafe
▶ Planning
▶ Organizing
▶ Staffing
▶ Leading
▶ Controlling
Figure 1.4
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 - 16
Operations for
Goods and Services
▶ Manufacturers produce tangible product,
services often intangible
▶ Operations activities often very similar
▶ Distinction not always clear
▶ Few pure services
Important Note!
Production is a measure of output only
and not a measure of efficiency
Figure 1.7
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 - 31
Productivity and the
Service Sector
1. Typically labor intensive
2. Frequently focused on unique individual
attributes or desires
3. Often an intellectual task performed by
professionals
4. Often difficult to mechanize and automate
5. Often difficult to evaluate for quality
Meeting 2
Anjar Priyono, PhD.
Operations Management
© 2014
© 2014
Pearson
Pearson
Education,
Education,
Inc.Inc. 2-1
Boeing’s Global
Supply-Chain Strategy
© 2014
© 2014
Pearson
Pearson
Education,
Education,
Inc.Inc. 2-2
Reasons to Globalize
Functional Area
Missions
Finance/
Marketing Operations Accounting
Low cost
quality
Trade off theory: yang dapat diterapkan adalah mass production memproduksi
dalam skala massal dan produknya standardized (sama).
Hal ini karena biaya rendah hanya dapat dicapai dengan memproduksi barang yg
©sama dalam
2014 Pearson volume
Education, Inc. besar terjadi trade off antara differentiation vs low cost.
2 - 27
Sandcone model/cumulative
model • Firms can accumulated
compative advantage, and
adopt them simultaneously.
• Qualitas tidak hanya
sekedar produk akhir, tetapi
juga proses produksi.
• The competitive
advantages do not
necessarily in conflict
• Rather they can be
Requriement to adopt sandconme model: combined.
•You must adopt quality program at your company first, it is the foundation of
developing other compitive advantage. Quality here means not only
product’s quality, but also process quality.
•Low cost must be given the lowest priority to be developed as a competitive
advantage. Why? Because when firms have adopted quality program, the
cost will reduced automatically due to lower product defects, lower
inventory cost, lower product rejects, lower scraps etc.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 28
Sandcone model/cumulative model: yang dapat diterapkan adalah mass
customization memproduksi dalam skala massal dan masing-masing produk
memiliki keunikan (terdiferensiasi).
Sales
3D printers
Figure 2.5
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 30
Product Life Cycle
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Figure 2.5
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 31
1st generation of Kijang 2nd
3nd
generation of Kijang
(1970s) generation of Kijang
(1990s)—Super Kijang (2000s)—Kijang Capsule
4nd
generation of Kijang Current generation of Kijang—it is
(late 2000s)—Kijang Innova now become Innova---Innova
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 32
Strategies for products/services at
declining stage
▶ Eliminating the products/services
▶ Make different product/introduce new products.
▶ There are some firms maintaining existing products
although it is in declining stage.
International strategy
Cost Reduction
(eg, Harley-Davidson
U.S. Steel)
• Import/export or
license existing
product
Low
Low High
Local Responsiveness
(Quick Response and/or Differentiation)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 35
Global Operations Strategy
Options High
Figure 2.9
Cost Reduction
International
strategy
(eg, Harley-Davidson
U.S. Steel)
• Import/export or
license existing
product
Low
Low High
Local Responsiveness
(Quick Response and/or Differentiation)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 36
Global Operations Strategy
Options High
Figure 2.9
Global strategy
(eg, Caterpillar
Texas Instruments
Cost Reduction
Otis Elevator)
International
• Standardize product
strategy
(eg, Harley-Davidson
• Economies of scale
U.S. Steel)
• Import/export or
• Cross-cultural
license existing
product
learning
Low
Low High
Local Responsiveness
(Quick Response and/or Differentiation)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 37
Global Operations Strategy
Options High Global strategy
(eg, Caterpillar Figure 2.9
Texas Instruments
Otis Elevator)
• Standardize product
• Economies of scale
• Cross-cultural learning
Cost Reduction
International
strategy
(eg, Harley-Davidson
U.S. Steel)
• Import/export or
license existing
product
Low
Low High
Local Responsiveness
(Quick Response and/or Differentiation)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 38
Global Operations Strategy
Options High Global strategy
(eg, Caterpillar Figure 2.9
Multidomestic
Texas Instruments
Otis Elevator)
strategy
(eg, Heinz,
• Standardize product
• Economies of scale
McDonald’s
The
• Cross-cultural Body Shop
learning
Cost Reduction
ventures, subsidiaries
• Import/export or
license existing
product
Low
Low High
Local Responsiveness
(Quick Response and/or Differentiation)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 39
Global Operations Strategy
Options High Global strategy
(eg, Caterpillar Figure 2.9
Texas Instruments
Otis Elevator)
• Standardize product
• Economies of scale
• Cross-cultural learning
Cost Reduction
International Multidomestic
strategy strategy
(eg, Harley-Davidson (eg, Heinz, McDonald’s
U.S. Steel) The Body Shop
Hard Rock Cafe)
• Import/export or • Use existing domestic
license existing model globally
product • Franchise, joint
ventures,
subsidiaries
Low
Low High
Local Responsiveness
(Quick Response and/or Differentiation)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 40
Global Operations Strategy
Options High Global strategy
Figure 2.9
Transnational
(eg, Caterpillar
Texas Instruments
Otis Elevator) strategy
• (eg,
StandardizeCoca-Cola,
product Nestlé)
• Economies of scale
• Cross-cultural learning
• Move material,
Cost Reduction
learning
International Multidomestic
strategy strategy
(eg, Harley-Davidson (eg, Heinz, McDonald’s
U.S. Steel) The Body Shop
Hard Rock Cafe)
• Import/export or • Use existing domestic
license existing model globally
product • Franchise, joint
ventures,
subsidiaries
Low
Low High
Local Responsiveness
(Quick Response and/or Differentiation)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 42
Managing Quality
6
Anjar Priyono, PhD.
Operations Management
Department of Management
Universitas Islam Indonesia
Total Total
Cost Cost
External Failure
Internal Failure
Prevention
Appraisal
Quality Improvement
4. Act 1. Plan
Implement Identify the
the plan, pattern and
document make a plan
3. Check 2. Do
Is the plan Test the
working? plan
Relationship to quality:
► Attempt to minimize inventory; inventory
becomes zero if possible.
► 'Pull' system of production scheduling
including supply management
► JIT cuts the cost of quality
► JIT improves quality
► Better quality means less inventory and better,
easier-to-employ JIT system
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 6 - 26
6. Taguchi Concepts
► Engineering and experimental design
methods to improve product and
process design
► Identify key component and process
variables affecting product variation
► Taguchi Concepts
► Quality robustness
► Target-oriented quality
► Quality loss function
Frequency
Conformance-oriented
quality keeps products
within 3 standard
deviations
Lower Targe Upper
t
Specification Figure 6.5
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 6 - 30
7. TQM Tools
► Tools for Generating Ideas
► Check Sheet
► Scatter Diagram
► Cause-and-Effect Diagram
► Tools to Organize the Data
► Pareto Chart
► Flowchart (Process Diagram)
Defect 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
/// / / / / /// /
B
// / / / // ///
C
/ // // ////
Figure 6.6
Absenteeism
Figure 6.6
Number of
defect product
increases
- Lack of motivation
- Fatigue
- Lack of skills
- Lazy
Manpower Machinery
Figure 6.6
Percent
Quality of raw materials
Process variation
A B C D E
Figure 6.6
Figure 6.6
Target 600 ml
value
Lower control limit 590 ml
Time
Figure 6.6
Machine
Manpower (hoop &
(shooter) Figure 6.7
backboard)
70 – – 100
– 93
60 – – 88
54
Frequency (number)
50 –
Cumulative percent
– 72
40 –
30 – Number of
occurrences
20 –
10 – 12
0 –
4 3 2
Room svcCheck-in Pool hours Minibar Misc.
72% 16% 5% 4% 3%
Causes and percent of the total
8
80%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11
9 10
20%
Figure 6.8