Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preview
Preview
PROGRAM
by
W
IE
NANCY CALSOLARO SMULSKY, EdD, Faculty Mentor and Chair
Doctor of Philosophy
Capella University
May, 2016
ProQuest Number: 10124218
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.
W
IE
EV
ProQuest 10124218
Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.
This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
© Myriam Jean Cadet, 2016
W
IE
EV
PR
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between readiness to learn and self-efficacy
completed the 45-item Test of Online Learning Success (ToOLS) and 10-item General
Self Efficacy (GSE) scales via Survey Monkey. Knowles’ (1980) adult learning theory
and Bandura’s (1986) social learning theory provided the theoretical foundation for the
W
scores in online learning environments among newly enrolled nursing students in an
online BSN completion program? Spearman’s rank correlation analyzed the data using
IE
the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0. Results indicated
that, as a group, the newly enrolled BSN students had positive self-perception of
EV
readiness to learn and positive self-efficacy for online learning. The correlation between
self-efficacy scores from the GSE and four (computer skills, independent learning, need
PR
for online learning, and academic skills) of the five self-perception readiness to learn
subscales from the ToOLS were statistically significant (p < .05). This study will aid
online degree programs to screen potential learners before enrollment to help them assess
environment.
Dedication
I would like to dedicate this PhD dissertation to God; my son Isaac Demezier; my
mother Marie Denise P.; my aunts, Urcilda Cadet, Altagrace D. P., and Carline P; and
my Uncle Frank P. for their encouragements, prayers, and for teaching me to be patient,
focused, and to have faith. Thanks for taking care of my son Isaac for all these years. I
am grateful for the help and support provided to him during this process. Without your
I would like to thank my girlfriend Anne Marie Louis DNP-(c) for her words of
W
encouragement and support.
IE
EV
PR
iii
Acknowledgments
Hawthorne, and Dr. Sabet for their help and support during all these years. In addition, I
would like to thank Dr. Miller for her understanding and support.
I would like to give a special thanks to Dr. Ramos, Dr. Rilley M, Dr. Georges, Dr.
Dyer, Dr. Roush, Dr. Robinson, Dr. Kablan, Dr. Dickson, Dr. Whitlow, Dr. Leslie,
Dr. Moore, Dr. Savant, Dr. Lashley H., Marcia Brown MS, Dr. Reilly, and Olukayode
Dosunmu PhD-(c) for their help and support in this dissertation process. Without your
W
precious help and support, this dream may not come true.
IE
EV
PR
iv
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments iv
List of Figures ix
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1
W
Research Questions 9
IE
Rationale, Relevance, and Significance of the Study 9
Theoretical Framework 19
Chapter 2 Summary 40
CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY 42
Introduction to Chapter 3 42
Research Design 43
v
Target Population, Sampling Method, and Related Procedures 46
Instrumentation 48
Data Collection 49
Operationalization of Variables 50
Validity 53
Expected Findings 56
Ethical Issues 57
W
Chapter 3 Summary 60
Introduction 62
EV
Description of the Sample 62
Detailed Analysis 63
Chapter 4 Summary 73
Introduction 75
Limitations 82
vi
Recommendations for Further Research 84
Conclusion 85
REFERENCES 87
W
IE
EV
PR
vii
List of Tables
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for the GSE and ToOLS for Newly Enrolled Nursing
Students in an Online BSN Completion Program 70
Table 2. Reliabilities and Spearman Correlations for the GSE With ToOLS 73
W
IE
EV
PR
viii
List of Figures
W
IE
EV
PR
ix
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
learners that must be present prior to enrolling in an online learning program. Thus,
progress during their studies. Examining the relationship between online learning
readiness and self-efficacy would likely assist faculty to more appropriately support
students as well as mentor them during the online learning process. Self-perception of
W
readiness-to-learn relates to a learner’s social roles (Knowles, 1980); while self-efficacy
IE
is an evaluation of a learner’s self-judgment or capacity to accomplish a desired task
distinct pedagogical context for students’ learning. In support, Gilmore and Lyons
(2012) suggested that in order to assess online baccalaureate nursing (BSN) students’
readiness to learn, online nursing degree programs should incorporate student self-
readiness to learn scores and self-efficacy scores in online learning would help BSN
1
To date, few research studies have examined the relationship between readiness to
learn and self-efficacy in online learning (Dray, Lowenthal, Miszkiewicz, Ruiz-Primo, &
Marczynski, 2011). This gap in the research literature about the relationship between
these two variables is a significant omission in the current educational knowledge for
nursing, which warrants greater empirical attention. This chapter provides an overview
research question, rationale, relevance and significance, nature of the study, definition of
W
Background, Context, and Theoretical Framework
IE
This section gives an overview of online learners’ perceived readiness-to-learn
and self-efficacy with a focus on newly enrolled student nurses in a Bachelor of Science
EV
in Nursing (BSN) distance-learning program. This background is deemed relevant and
necessary due to current literature supporting the need for learners’ prior assessment of
PR
their preparedness to enroll in online learning (Hung et al., 2010; Pillay, Irving, & Tones,
2007; Watkins, Leigh, & Triner, 2004). The context of this study builds on prior research
evidence relating to online learning and further extends those findings to ascertain the
relationship between the variables readiness-to-learn and self-efficacy (Dray et al., 2011).
In this section, the theoretical framework is discussed briefly, and then more fully in
Chapter 2.
Background
2
In response to a call from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2014 to have 80% of
the United States to meet this goal (McEwen, White, Pullis, & Krawtz, 2014). As a
result, there is a growing trend for online nursing education. It is estimated that at least
50% of traditional students will enroll in at least one online course during their program
Despite the growth in the number of online learning degree programs, attrition
remains a challenging problem (Hart, 2012). Attrition rates are found to be higher in
online learning when compared to the traditional educational setting (Bowden, 2008;
W
Hart, 2012; Ward-Smith, Schmer, Peterson, & Hart, 2013). Student attrition relating to
IE
their lack of persistence to complete online degree programs is a major challenge facing
many colleges (Hart, 2012). Therefore, the examination of the relationship between
EV
readiness-to-learn and self-efficacy in online learning is crucial in assisting students to
assess their readiness to learn and establishing a baseline to measure their progress during
PR
their studies. This information would be useful for faculty in their facilitation of nursing
insight into the preparedness of newly enrolled BSN students for the challenges of online
degree nursing programs. However, the review of literature to date has also indicated
that prior researches have not examined the relationship between self-perception of
focus on just one of these variables, but never both. For example, Blankenship and
3
Atkinson (2010) examined the difference between rural and urban undergraduate online
learners’ self-efficacy to determine if there was any difference between these groups.
They administered Mcvay’s (2000) Online Readiness Survey to 176 research participants
to-face communication” (Blankenship & Atkinson, 2010, p. 50) could predict online
learners’ performance.
Motivation plays a vital role in online learning education and performance (Huitt,
2011). Helping online learners to assess their preparedness for online learning
W
environments may increase their motivation to persist in their studies. Huitt (2011)
IE
defined motivation as internal (intrinsic) factors or external (extrinsic) factors that affect
one’s personal belief or desire to gain knowledge. When learners are not intrinsically
PR
motivated, learning might be compromised (Pintrich & Schunk, 2002). Research has
them to have a better understanding of students’ preparedness at the start of their courses
(Mancuso-Murphy, 2007). Furthermore, students being aware of factors that affect their
readiness to learn and self-efficacy prior to enrolling in online learning may be the
catalyst for them to develop the necessary level of motivation needed to achieve their
learning goals.
4
Learners need to develop their readiness-to-learn in order to meet the challenges
of online learning such as autonomy, motivation, and responsibilities to carry out the
responsibilities for online learning success must be provided to BSN students (Zsohar &
Smith, 2008). Some studies have found that self-efficacy is crucial when students
attempt to perform a task in online learning environments (Lauder et al., 2008; Tan &
Alpert, 2013). In fact, students with higher grades had greater readiness-to-learn and
self-efficacy than students with lower grades; their readiness for online learning was
measured with a valid Online Learning Readiness Scale (Hung et al., 2010).
W
Mancuso-Murphy (2007) suggested that online nursing degree programs should
IE
incorporate self-assessment questionnaires for learners prior to engaging in online
program designed for RN to BSN online nursing students. The program purpose was to
help improve retention rates in the transition to online learning. The results of this study
indicated that attrition rate fell from 20% to 2%. Carruth et al. (2010) also has found
that nursing students were not prepared for online learning. In particular, there was a
asynchronous course activities, and using emerging health care technologies” (p. 687).
Context
5
Carr (2000) reported that online learning retention rates and completion rates
were lower than in traditional courses. Online learning attrition rates were found to be
related to lack of preparation among learners (Carruth et al., 2010). This problem
students need to prepare for the rigor of online courses. Thus, as suggested by Mancuso-
Murphy (2007), online learners in preparing for their entry into online learning must
Theoretical Framework
Two theories, Knowles (1970, 1980) adult learning theory and Bandura’s (1986,
W
1982) social cognitive theory, have been employed to provide the framework for this
IE
research study. Evidence has shown that both theories have had a great impact on adult
education. Adult learning theory explains the characteristics of adult learners, while
EV
social cognitive theory focuses on adult behaviors and the facilitation of learning.
Knowles’ adult learning theory (1970, 1980) outlines six assumptions of his
PR
andragogy model that describes learning in adults. These assumptions are: (a) need to
know, (b) self-concept, (c) prior experience, (d) readiness to learn, (e) learning
orientation, and (f) motivation to learn. Before adult learners learn something
meaningful, they need to know its purpose. The maturity that adult learners face in
moving from dependent learners toward independent, self-directed learners typify the
term of self-concept. Knowles (1970, 1980) further theorizes that adult learners learn
differently than children, as adult learner have been learning for a long time and have life
experiences to bring into the learning process. Adult learners are ready to learn because
6
they have experienced a need to learn in order to cope with real life stressors. Knowles
(1970) posits that adult learners are inherently motivated, and as such, they enter the
assumptions have been employed by online nurse educators to guide their assessment of
Bandura (1986) outlined the following four concepts affecting learners’ self-efficacy: (a)
mastery experiences, (b) vicarious experiences, (c) verbal persuasion, and (d)
W
psychological state. Mastery experiences are learners’ positive or negative personal
IE
experiences encountered with success or failure, thus resulting in a strong or weak sense
that support the former’s successful completion of the program. Verbal persuasion
PR
relates to the coaching and encouragement given to learners when enrolling in online
may face when they enroll in online courses. Learners with diminished self-efficacy may
not be able to face the challenges in accomplishing a desired task in a given situation.
Learners who possess a strong sense of self-efficacy and the desire to accomplish a
specific task are likely to experience increased rates of success (Bandura, 1986).
7
capabilities when accomplishing a task (Pintrich & Schunk, 2002). A more in-depth
learn and self-efficacy have not fully examined the relationship between the variables.
Both variables play an important role in learners’ beliefs and judgments of accomplishing
a task, tackling problems, and identifying goals in life situations (Bandura, 1986; Hung et
al., 2010; Knowles, 1980). However, research studying the relationship between online
W
learners' perceived readiness-to-learn and self-efficacy is limited (Tsai, Chuang, Liang, &
IE
Tsai, 2011; Watkins & Corry 2004). Evidence suggests that orientation programs should
provide the necessary support needed for online learner retention and the development of
EV
learner’s ability to assess online readiness prior to starting courses (Gilmore & Lyons,
2012). It is not known as to what degree online BSN students perceive their readiness to
PR
learn and self-efficacy for online learning. Examining the relationship between these
enrolled nursing students in an online BSN program to determine if those students were
8
Research Question
to-learn scores and self-efficacy scores in online learning environments among newly
and self-efficacy scores in online learning environments among newly enrolled nursing
W
H1. There is a relationship between self-perception of readiness-to-learn scores
IE
and self-efficacy scores in online learning environments among newly enrolled nursing
have examined these variables, very few have looked at the relationship between them
(Bryer, Peterson-Graziose, & Nikolaidou, 2015; Phillips, Turnbull, & He, 2015). Byrer
predictors for attrition rates among baccalaureate nursing students. Both readiness-to-
learn and self-efficacy variables are important characteristics for online learners. This
9
research study extended the understanding of the preparedness of nursing students on
entering an online nursing degree program and dealing effectively with the challenges.
The following section addresses the rationale, relevance and significance of the study.
Rationale
The need for this study about BSN online learners has emerged from empirical
and self-efficacy for students to succeed (Mancuso-Murphy, 2007; Zsohar & Smith,
2008). Therefore, this research study is important to faculty in order for them to be able
to address issues of attrition and persistence of online BSN students (Hart, 2014). The
W
review of literature has indicated that very little research has sought to determine whether
IE
a relationship existed between readiness-to-learn and self-efficacy in online learning
(Parnell & Carraher, 2003; Watkins & Corry, 2004). Given the challenges of online
EV
learning, there is a need for additional research to ascertain how prepared are online
learners prior to enrolling in learning environments in order to ensure their success (Hsiu-
PR
Fen & Gwo-Guang, 2006). Although existing studies have identified the need for
self-efficacy, they however have failed to address the need for learners’ perceived
This research study, however, extended the knowledge on learners’ readiness and
assessment of learners. The main purpose for focusing on post-secondary education was
10
to gather key information that would be used to prepare learners for entry into their
professional lives (Thompson, Licklider, & Jungst, 2003). The research findings might
help nurse educators understand the potential strengths and weaknesses of nursing
students entering online nursing degree programs, as well as provide students with the
guidance to make vocational adjustments that support their success in the role of nursing
student.
Relevance
This research study focused specifically on online nursing education, and the
value of nurse educators using the findings to support their students’ learning. This
W
research was meant to help nurse educators teaching RN-BSN completion programs to
IE
identify nursing students needing additional support to succeed in the online learning
environment that requires independent learning, time, and skills. Some newly enrolled
EV
BSN students may not be prepared, or later find once enrolled that the online learning
environment does not fit their learning styles. This research would help adult learners
PR
assess their readiness-to-learn and self-efficacy in online learning, which would ensure
that they possess the necessary characteristics and behaviors needed for success in online
learn or self-efficacy in online learning, research evidence indicates that both variables
together are important characteristics for online learners. Data findings identifying a
online learning, could help educators support the needs of unprepared learners to face
11
Significance
This research would begin to fill a gap in the literature about the relationship
2003). It has become crucial to examine the relationship between these variables since a
need exists for newly enrolled online BSN students to be able to assess their readiness-to-
of the online environment for autonomous learning. The new knowledge from the
findings of this research would help to advance existing theories and research on adult
learning theory, social learning theory, readiness to learn, and self-efficacy in online
W
learning. This research would bridge the gap between what is known about each variable
IE
and what is unknown about the relationship between the two variables. This is intended
to encourage further research that provides additional insight into how to better prepare
EV
online learners for a lifelong learning process.
PR
controlled or manipulated, but their association was examined through statistical analysis.
According to Creswell (2013), quantitative studies put emphasis on testing theories, use
used numbers rather than words to gather and analyze data via an online survey process.
This quantitative methodology was most suited for measuring natural attitudes and
12
behaviors such as readiness of students and self-efficacy by quantifying them as
numerical data to allow for statistical analysis (Burns & Grove, 2009). A correlational
design was appropriate for this study since the purpose of the research was to examine
learning.
perceived readiness to learn and self-efficacy prior to starting their online courses. The
combined Self-Assessment Tools of Online Learning Success (ToOLS) and General Self-
Efficacy Scale (GSE) survey for this study had two sections. The first survey was the
W
ToOLS, a scale with a 5-point Likert-type rating that measures learners’ self-perception
IE
of readiness-to-learn in online learning created by M.S. Kerr, Rynearson, and Kerr,
(2006). The second survey was the GSE scale, a 5-point Likert-type rating that measures
EV
self-efficacy in online learning (Luszczynska, Scholz, & Schwarzer, 2005). These two
Definitions of Terms
terminology of the research study is important as different terms may have different
13