Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTEMPORARY
WORLD
NEWSPAPER RESOURCES
The phenomenon of globalization is not new, as it has been affecting people and societies for
more than two centuries. The old globalization, represented by the colonialist expansion in
Europe and sea trade among nations, had important economic and social consequences, both
positive and negative, on the new territories, as well as on the European society itself. More
recently, however, in the decades at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries, we are faced with
a new globalization, deep and fast, that covers now practically every aspect of human life. The
phenomenon of globalization is not new, as it has been affecting people and societies for more
than two centuries. The old globalization, represented by the colonialist expansion in Europe
and sea trade among nations, had important economic and social consequences, both positive
and negative, on the new territories, as well as on the European society itself. More recently,
however, in the decades at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries, we are faced with a new
globalization, deep and fast, that covers now practically every aspect of human life.
2. OP-ED (PhilStar)
These concept of “clusters’ means that countries cannot afford to have a policy of attracting only
single firms to invest; but, must look for ways to attract clusters of factories or financial firms or
service firms. Even within a country, globalization will make regional inequalities worse.
As the rich became richer, their wealth was supposed to start “trickling down” to the poor so that
ultimately everyone would benefit from the rich accumulating more wealth. This theory has
never worked. Income inequality has reached a level unprecedented in human history.
There was a time when the same “trickle down” theory was believed to be applicable to nations.
As certain nations became richer, they were expected to share their wealth with the poorer
countries of the world. This was the dream of many organizations like the United Nations.
Instead, the rich Western nations continued to further enrich themselves by economic
exploitation of the poor countries. The Third World countries were developed solely as sources
of raw materials and markets for the goods and services of the Western imperial powers. Japan
joined the Axis powers during the Second World War primarily because Imperial Japan needed
to secure reliable sources of raw materials and markets for its industrialization.
Today, China – the new economic giant – is following the same imperial pattern of the past
powers. Its Belt and Road initiatives are primarily aimed at securing reliable sources of raw
materials and markets for its economy. The primary objective is to continue the economic growth
of China.
China and Japan were once heavily protected economies until they were able to build an
industrial and financial base that could compete with the rest of the world. Now they are
suddenly champions of open markets and globalization.
The United States and the United Kingdom were once champions of globalization and open
markets. But now that they are losing their competitive edge, these two countries have elected
governments that are advocating protectionism.
Perceptions about globalization will remain mixed because its effects will continue to be mixed.
Globalization and technological change will enhance the economies of scale that will result in
more geographic concentration of wealth and talent. The Alibabas and Amazons will increase
their dominance in the service industries which will further decimate locally based businesses.
There are those who will insist that the exponential growth of technological change makes
globalization inevitable. Perhaps that is true, but the process of change will be a costly and
chaotic period. This is what history teaches us. The Industrial Revolution gave birth to the class
wars and Marxist revolutions of the 20th century. The economic and social changes resulted in
the rise of populist leaders and dictators that led to two World Wars and a Cold War.
I once read two contrasting articles on the same topic. The title of one was “Globalization at Warp
Speed”; and the other one was “The End of Globalization.” The future reality will probably be
somewhere in the middle of these two titles. Hopefully, the period of change will not be as violent
as similar periods in history.
3. OP-ED (Convolutional Neural Network)
Source: CNN - Updated 0006 GMT (0806 HKT) August 26, 2020
Our brains have established methods for recognizing people as close friends or acquaintances,
and "the closest ties are built on a substantial investment of time and trust — both of which may
be challenged by the current pandemic," said Andrea Courtney, a postdoctoral research fellow
in psychology at Stanford University in California, who wasn't involved in a newly released review
on social bonds.
How humans develop and maintain relationships with friends and family is similar to the
behaviors of societies in our evolutionary history and those of other primates, according to
the review published Tuesday in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical
and Physical Sciences.
Urbanization and globalization represent civilizational progress and they are highly intertwined
with the decrease in the cost of moving people, goods, money, information, reducing
transportation costs more broadly. They also allowed for the development of the ‘knowledge
creation society’ of today, which is centered around global metropolises. However, this reduction
of transportation costs also has facilitated the international spread of viruses, bringing infectious
diseases to all of humankind. The current crisis has manifested this inconvenient truth.
We examine the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic until mid-May from a spatial economics
perspective. First, we show that the initial outbreak centered around the megalopolis (i.e. a
compound of metropolises) in the eastern US and the megalopolis centered in the EU. Next, we
examine the causes of such a concentration of COVID-19 infections in the two megalopolises.
Finally, we discuss the possible impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the future direction of
globalization.
One word that I would raise for the word Globalization is the word,
“Unification”; for it promotes and uphold the word, interconnectedness within the
scope of the different societies in our world globally in terms of the people,
finances, technology, culture and the like, with the building blocks of our hearts as
individual or as groups to place this word , specifically this time where all the
societies, countries are calling for the unification within to fight against, the Corona
Virus Pandemic we have facing right now, and I truly know for sure, that we can
I stand by saying Yes, I optimistically feel part of the globalization. In our own
scope of the individual human level wherein I apply the standard quality of life
throughout the world globally to interconnect through the bond of being in the
diverse economic, civic, political, religious, ideological, class, racial, gender and
moves and exchanges what I have and what the other countries hold that promotes
and increases the interactions between the globe while upholding it in my hands,
over the world and increases the part of the cultural extent, between the financial
exchanges between companies, producing and sending off the goods, increases
about the world globally within the scopes that benefits us to be more aware
globally like current issues, value, economics and the like where it promotes our
mind opener with the technology advancements, knowing the current issues;
values and the knowledge to have an application to it, in terms of building the
marketing, people, products and goods being exported and imported, With the
profession I am fighting for like being a nurse or any profession we have, would
morally bring us closer to the state with the other members of the said scope if we
do have the awareness of being a global citizen not just in our country but to be a