The document is a rubric for assessing student presentations and discussions on an assigned ethics case in an Interdisciplinary Professional Ethics course at the University of Hail College of Nursing. It contains 10 items for evaluation, including identification of relevant facts and ethical issues in the case, presentation of arguments, use of ethical models, presentation of solutions, and facilitating a discussion with peers. For each item, students can receive a score between 0-2 based on poor, acceptable, or ideal performance. The total possible score is 20.
Original Description:
Original Title
RUBRIC FOR PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION WITH PEERS REQUIREMENT(1)
The document is a rubric for assessing student presentations and discussions on an assigned ethics case in an Interdisciplinary Professional Ethics course at the University of Hail College of Nursing. It contains 10 items for evaluation, including identification of relevant facts and ethical issues in the case, presentation of arguments, use of ethical models, presentation of solutions, and facilitating a discussion with peers. For each item, students can receive a score between 0-2 based on poor, acceptable, or ideal performance. The total possible score is 20.
The document is a rubric for assessing student presentations and discussions on an assigned ethics case in an Interdisciplinary Professional Ethics course at the University of Hail College of Nursing. It contains 10 items for evaluation, including identification of relevant facts and ethical issues in the case, presentation of arguments, use of ethical models, presentation of solutions, and facilitating a discussion with peers. For each item, students can receive a score between 0-2 based on poor, acceptable, or ideal performance. The total possible score is 20.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia المملكة العربية السعودية
Ministry of Education وزارة التعليم
University of Hail جامـعـة حـائل College of Nursing كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Presentation and Discussion with Peers
Assessment Task Assessment Score
□ Rubric for Presentation and Discussion with Peers 20%
Student Name: Student ID: Date: Overall Grade:
Assessment Rubric:
ITEM POOR ACCEPTABLE IDEAL CLO STUDENT’S
(0.0) (1.0) (2.0) GRADE 1) Did not identify Partially Comprehensively 1.3 Identification any of the identified some identified all of the of ethically ethically of the ethically ethically relevant relevant facts relevant facts relevant facts facts surrounding surrounding surrounding surrounding the assigned case. the assigned the assigned the assigned case. case. case. 2) Failed to Identified a Identified at least 1.3 Identification identify any single ethical two ethical issues of ethical ethical issues issue in the in the assigned issues in the in the assigned assigned case. case. assigned case. case. 3) Presentation Did not present Presented a Presented at least 1.3 of arguments any of the single two arguments in in the assigned arguments argument in the assigned case. case. present in the the assigned assigned case. case. 4) Utilization of Failed to utilize Utilized an Utilized at least 2.3 an ethical an ethical ethical two different decision- decision decision- ethical decision- making making model making model making models to model/s to to any of the to identify the identify the best identify the ethical issues best solution to solutions to at least best solution in the assigned an ethical issue two ethical issues to the ethical case. in the assigned in the assigned issue/s in the case. case. assigned case. 5) Presentation Failed to Presented a Presented solutions 2.3
Page 1 of 3
Accredited University by the ASIC on Accredited BSN Program by
March 27, 2017 AHPGS on February 15, 2018 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia المملكة العربية السعودية Ministry of Education وزارة التعليم University of Hail جامـعـة حـائل College of Nursing كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Presentation and Discussion with Peers
of the best identify the solution to a to at least two
solution to best solution single ethical ethical issues in the each of the to any of the issue in the assigned case. ethical issues ethical issues assigned case in the assigned in the assigned case. case. 6) Defending Did not defend Defended or Defended or 1.3 or rationalizing or rationalize rationalized the rationalized the the best the best best solution to best solution to at solution to solution to any a single ethical least two ethical each of the ethical issue in issue in the issues in the ethical issues the assigned assigned case assigned case by in the assigned case by by referencing referencing them case by referencing it it to a single to at least two referencing it to an ethical ethical different ethical to an ethical principle or principle or principles of codes. principle or code. code. code. 7) Presenting a Failed to Presented a Presented a 1.3 recommended recommend a recommended recommended course of course of course of course of action for action for the action for the action for the the best solution identified best identified best best solution identified at least solution to solution to any identified for a two ethical issues each of the of the ethical single ethical in the assigned ethical issues issues in the issue in the case. in the assigned assigned case. assigned case. case. 8) Eliciting peer Did not elicit Partially Comprehensively Not Applicable participation in peer elicited peer elicited peer answering participation in participation in participation in questions answering answering answering found at the questions questions questions found at end of the found at the found at the the end of the assigned case. end of the end of the assigned case. assigned case. assigned case. 9) Facilitate Failed to Facilitated Facilitated Not Applicable discussion of facilitate a discussion of discussion of answers to discussion of answers to two answers to all questions answers to any (2) of the questions found at found at the of the questions the end of the end of the questions found at the assigned case with Page 2 of 3
Accredited University by the ASIC on Accredited BSN Program by
March 27, 2017 AHPGS on February 15, 2018 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia المملكة العربية السعودية Ministry of Education وزارة التعليم University of Hail جامـعـة حـائل College of Nursing كلية التمريض
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ETHICS (NURS 523)
Rubric for Presentation and Discussion with Peers
assigned case. found at the end of the classmates.
end of the assigned case assigned case with with classmates. classmates. 10) Failed to Composed a Composed a well- Not applicable Composition of compose a fairly- structured power a well- well- structured point presentation structured, and structured, and power point free of grammatical grammatically grammatically presentation errors for the case correct power correct power with some analysis and point point grammatical discussion with presentation presentation errors for the peers. for the case for the case case analysis analysis and analysis and and discussion discussion with discussion with with peers. peers. peers. TOTAL GRADE FROM A PERFECT SCORE OF 20