Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: JULIAN J. BOMMER & AMR S. ELNASHAI (1999) DISPLACEMENT SPECTRA FOR SEISMIC DESIGN, Journal of
Earthquake Engineering, 3:1, 1-32, DOI: 10.1080/13632469909350338
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the
publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations
or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any
opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the
views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be
independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses,
actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever
caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1999) 1-32
@ Imperial College Press
Displacement-based seismic design and assessment of structures require the reiiable def-
inition of displacement spectra for a wide range of periods and damping levels. T h e
displacement spectra derived from acceleration spectra in existing seismic codes do not
provide a suitable answer and there are no existing frequency-dependent attenuation
relationships derived specifically for this purpose. Using a carefully processed dat aset of
European strong motion records, attenuation relationships have been derived for hori-
zontal displacement response spectral ordinates. The results have been simplified into
a parametric form that allows the straightforward construction of displacement design
spectra for rock, stiff soil and soft soil sites a t distances of up to 50 km from earthquakes
with magnitudes' between 5.5 and 7.5, for six damping levels and up to response peri-
ods of 3.0 seconds. Results from recent studies linking levels of ductility to equivalent
damping, using a complex hysteretic model and the same strong motion databank, are
also reported.
I. Preamble
1.1. Force- based and displacement-based seismic design
Conventional seismic design, as employed in codes of practice, is entirely force-
based, with a final check on structural displacements. The reasons for this situation
are more historical than scientific. Force- based design is suited to design for ac-
tions that are permanently applied and where members are designed to resist the
effects of these actions at levels of stress constrained by their force resistance at the
plastic limit. The deformations corresponding to the plastic member capacity are
not normally excessive, and evaluating them is not an onerous task. Since seismic
design was developed as an extension to primary load design, it followed the same
procedure, noting though that inelastic deformations may be utilised to absorb
quantifiable levels of energy, leading to reduction in the forces for which structures
are'designed. This led to the creation of the response modification (or behaviour)
factor; this all-embracing parameter purports to account for over-strength, ductility,
energy absorption and dissipation as well as the structural capacity to re-distribute
2 J . J . Bommer & A. S. ELnashai
actions from inelastic highly stressed regions to other less stressed locations in the
structure. Problems of evaluating behaviour factors that are generally applicable
to various structural systems, materials, configurations and input mot ions are well
documented and the inherent weakness in code-specified factors is widely accepted.
In force-based design, the primary input to.the process is a set of forces, with a
check on the level of deformation corresponding to the attainment of values of be-
haviour factors equal to or higher than the design value. In contrast, displacement-
based design inverts the process. Here, the primary design quantity is a target
displacement. If the level of damping of an equivalent linear (substitute) system is
known, corresponding to the target displacement, then the period of vibration of the
required structure may be readily available from a displacement spectrum. Armed
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
with the knowledge of the required period of vibration, the designer can dimension
the structure with the stiffness, strength and ductility that ensure the realisation
of the target displacement. Moreover, control of the equivalent damping, through
inelastic deformations, is availed of. This process replaces the 'elastic acceleration
spectrum' and its derivatives with the 'displacement spectrum' as the centre-piece
of the design process. Since damage of structures subjected to earthquakes is cer-
tainly expressed in deformations (strains at fibres, curvatures at sections, rotations
at members and drift at storey levels), displacement-based approaches are concep-
tually more appealing.
The origins of displacement-based design may be traced to work published as
early as the 1960s,where comments on the displacements of inelastic systems and
their relationship to their elastic counterparts were made [e.g., Muto et al., 1960,
as reported by Moehle, 19921. However, it was the work of Sozen and his associates
that developed the concept of a substitute structure [e.g., Gulkan and Sozen, 1974;
Shibata and Sozen, 19761. The substitute structure is a single degree of freedom
elastic system, the characteristics of which represent the inelastic system (Fig. 1).
% s , 6
Fig. 1. Characteristics of substitute sructwe.
Dijplacenaent Spectm for Seismic Design 3
The secant stiffness K, is that at the deformational limit state (LS) under consider-
ation, and may be used to evaluate an equivalent period T,.The hysteretic energy
absorption characteristics of the substitute structure may be accounted for by eval-
uating the level of viscous damping that results in the same response displacement
amplitude as that of the inelastic system. The concept of substitute structure there-
fore enables the use of an elastic displacement spectrum in design, while availing of
the displacement capacity of an inelastic system.
Various contributions were made towards the development of displacement-
based seismic design since the early work mentioned above. However, it was in
the 1990s that formal proposals were made to implement the emerging ideas into a
design procedure, the earliest of which is that by Moehle and his co-workers [e.g., Qi
and Moehle, 1991; Moehle, 19921. A complete and workable procedure for seismic
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
design of structures that sets aside forces and relies entirely on displacement as the
primary design quantity is that proposed by Kowalsky et at. [I9951 for single de-
gree of freedom systems (such as bridge piers). A concurrent paper on multi-degree
of freedom systems is due to Calvi and Kingsley [1995].The steps comprising the
design process for SDOF systems, for simplicity, are given below:
(i) A target displacement for the structure is selected, based on the type of struc-
ture and the governing limit states.
(ii) Knowing the yield and ultimate (or some other limit state) displacement, and
the material and structural system as well as the characteristics of site and
expected. earthquake, a value of equivalent damping is determined.
(iii) Displacement spectra representative of the seismwt ectonic environment are
consulted, the input to which are the target displacement and the equivalent
damping. The output is an effective period of vibration.
(iv) The structure is dimensioned to give an effective period, taking into account re-
duced stiffness consistent with the level of deformation, equal to that obtained
from the displacement spectra.
(v) If the effective period is not sufficiently close to the required period, return to'
step (ii) above and repeat until convergence.
It is clear from the above that whereas displacement-based design is certainly the
logical framework for seismic design, since the primary source of seismic energy dis-
sipation is inelastic deformations, it imposes new requirements for verifiable design,
as described below. It is important, however, to note that the procedure outlined
above is by no means the only framework for the application of displacement-based
design. Alternatives exist [e.g. Fajfar, 19981, where a proposal is made to develop
inelastic capacity spectra for use in displacement-based design. The capacity spec-
trum approach, proposed by Reeman et 01. [1975],comprises a plot of accelera-
tion spectral response versus its displacement counterpart. The load-deformation
cunre of the structure under consideration, obtained from ppsh-over analysis, is
then super-posed on the combined force-versus-displacement response spectrum,
4 J. J. Bommer & A. S. Elntlshat
an exploration of the period ranges within which the spectral ordinates may be
considered reliable. In the second stage, a reduced dataset of European strong mo-
tion records, individually processed to obtain the most reliable information possible,
is assembled and new regression analyses are run. The spectra obtained horn the
new attenuation equations are evaluated and conclusions are drawn regarding the
best methods through which to obtain displacement spectra for design. Finally, sim-
plified spectral shapes in a linearised form are derived and shown to be completely
described by a limited number of parameters. The proposed shapes and values are
suited to codified seismic design of new structures and assessment of existing ones.
To complement the above linearised spectra, simple relationships relating in-
elastic energy 'dissipation through ductile response and equivalent damping, from
the work of Borzi et 01. [I9981 are reported. These relationships have been de-
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
rived using the same dataset alluded to above, after applying the same procedure
for individual record filtering and correction. This completes the requirement of
application of displacement-based seismic design and assessment.
of the secant stiffness a t collapse being 40% of that a t yield). This correlates well
with the measured periods a t twice the design acceleration given above, noting that
for three structures the collapse acceleration was close to twice the design value.
Similar observations were made for the other two structures, with the core-
frame system exhibiting lower drift at collapse (triggered by local criteria) and
hence shorter periods. Therefore, a wide range of low to medium rise RC'buildings
have effective periods (at maximum ductility) below 3.0 seconds. High rise RC
structures will not necessarily have higher displacement response. This is because
they will exhibit higher mode response, thus reducing the amplitude of maximum
displacement. Moreover, drift limits will govern the design; thus they are likely to
have wall systems that will also delimit their displacements.
The response of structures hit by the Northridge earthquake of 17 January 1995
was studied by Naeim [1997].Below are short notes on some of the characteris-
tics and response of the buildings alongside analysis of their response periods, as
determined from discrete Fourier transforms of the acceleration response:
(i) A 10-storey RC wall structure located about 20 km from the source, and
founded on alluvium, was subjected to 0.34 g ground acceleration. T h e o b
served response period was about 0.6 seconds. This is typical of stiff RC wall
structures.
'
(ii) A 6-storey steel moment frame with concrete caissons founded on alluvium and
located about 20 k m from the source exhibited a dominant response period
of 1.4 seconds when subjected to a ground acceleration of 0.13 g. Had the
acceleration been higher, it is likely that this period would have been above
2.0 seconds.
(iii) A 20-storey RC structure (frame in one direction, walls in the orthogonal
direction) was subjected to a ground acceleration of 0.32 g, measured a t 19 km
from the source. T h e fundamental period was 2.5 seconds whilst the second
mode period was 0.8 seconds.
(iv) A Fstorey RC moment hame structure founded on piles in alluvium and 1 e
cated at 7 irm horn the source was subjected to a ground acceleration of
DispLucement Spectm for Seismic Design 7
The determination of the shape and amplitude of the displacement design spectra
is the objective of this paper. It is known that the spectral ordinates for all damping
Fig. 2. Acceleration (top) and displacement (bottom) spectra New Zealand Code (19921 for
highest hazard/ordinq importance.
levels increase with period from zero to some maximum value and then descend to
converge at the value of the peak ground displacement (PGD) at long periods.
The most simple and straightforward solution is to convert the acceleration
spectra (SA) from seismic design codes using the pseudwpectral relationship:
PSD = SA [$I 2
where T is the response period. The displacement spectra obtained in this way from
22 seismic codes from around the world [IAEE, 1992; Paz, 19941 have been examined
and in nearly all cases the PSD ordinates increase indefinitely with period, either
linearly, as in the case of the codes of Japan and New Zealand (Fig. 2), or even
. parabolically, as in the case of the USA code (Fig. 3). It is clear therefore that
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
none of these spectra are suitable for use in displacement-based design without
modificatiori.
Period (sec)
Period (scc)
Fig. 3. Acceleration (top) and displacement (bottom) spectra. UBC [1992] for highest hazard
and ordinary importance.
Displacement Spectra f i r Seismic Design 9
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
Period (sec)
The two exceptions to this trend of continuously increasing ordinates are the
codes from France (Fig. 4) and Romania (Fig. 5). The PSD spectra obtained by
conversion of the SA spectra in EC8 are similar in shape to those obtained from
the French code except that for all three site classes the plateau begins at a period
of 3.0 seconds.
Another limitation of current code spectra for direct use in displacement-bsed
design is the fact that spectra are required for a wide range of damping values.
Although some codes present spectra for three or four damping ratios, such as the
Indian and Portuguese codes, most present only one elastic spectrum which usually
corresponds, implicitly or explicitly, to a damping ratio of 5,% of critical. Many
codes incorporate other damping values implicitly into the behaviour factors, thus
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
Period (sec)
Fig. 5. Acceleration (top) and displacement (bottom) spectra. Romanian Code [1991]for highest
hazard and ordinary importance.
making it impossible to obtain elastic spectra for damping values other than 5%.
The French and Spanish codes both include the following equation to obtain a
correction factor for different damping ratios c:
In the French code the maximum value of the damping ratio is limited to 30%. In
EC8 the correction factor is defined by the equation:
q= ,/I
2+t
(2.3)
Ln EC8 the minimum permissible value of r ) is 0.7, which means that the largest
damping ratio that can be accommodated is 12.3%.
Displacement Spectra for Seismic Design 11
A final point worthy of mention on the EC8 spectra is that the code. provides a
formula for the prediction of the PGD as a function of the effective peak acceleration
a,. This implies that for any damping ratio higher than 9%, -the displacement
spectra actually has to rise from the long-period plateau to converge with the PGD,
which would not be expected.
It is clear from the foregoing that none of the current code spectra are suitable
for use in displacement-based seismic design. The PSD from the Romanian code,
which corresponds to the particular and special tectonics of that country, is only
defined for a damping ratio of 5%. The EC8 spectra are currently limited to too
narrow a range of damping ratios and do not converge at longer periods. The PSD
from the French code for different damping levels also remain parallel at longer
periods and do not converge to PGD, although these seem to be the most suitable
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
of the existing spectra. Therefore, there is clearly scope to explore more suitable
criteria to define the shape and amplitude of displacement response spectra for
analysis, design and assessment.
Soil Site
0 0 -5 1 1.5 2
Period (sec) Period (sec)
0 0.5 f 1.5 2
Period (sec) Period (sec)
Fig. 6(b) Displacement spectra for 1\3, = 7 from acceleration spectra (solid) and direct displace
ments (dashed).
ordinates for a range of damping levels and also for as wide a period range as
possible.
less than 360 m/s are classified as soft (S); intermediate sites are classified as stiff
soil (A).
Two additional accelerograms were incorporated into the dataset, the first of
which was the record from the temporary Gemona station of the Ms 6.1 Riuli
(Italy) earthquake of 15 September 1976. According to RoveUi et ol. (19911 the
station was located on massive Mesozoic limestones, suggesting that the appropriate
classification would be rock (R). However, information from a borehole 100 m from
the recording site confirms that the correct classification would be stiff soil (A)
[S. Tolis, personal communication, 19973. The source distance for this record has
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
Fig. 7. Magnitudedistance distribution of dataset w.r.t. to site classes R (top), A (middle) and
S (bottom),
16 J. J. Bommer 0 A. S. Elnashai
The reduced dataset consisted of 189 accelerogams, but a further six accelero-
grams were eliminated since they were only available as filtered by other agencies,
and hence could not be included in the uniform processing of the records. The fi-
nal dataset thus consisted of 183 accelerograms from 43 shallow earthquakes. For
three of the recording stations, each of which contributed only one record, the
site classification is unknown. For the remaining 180 accelerograms the distribu-
t ion amongst the three site classifications R:A:S as percentages is 25:sI:%, which
compares favourably to the distribution of the original dataset of Ambraseys et
a[. 119961 which is 26:54:20. The distribution of the dataset in magnitude-distance
space is shown in Fig.7.
In the study by Ambraseys et al. [I9961all of the accelerograrns were processed
using an elliptical filter with a lower cut-off frequency of 0.20 Hz. A number of the
stronger accelerograms from the reduced dataset were processed with a straight
baseline and also filtered with cut-ofi at periods of 15, 10,7 and 5 seconds (frequen-
cies of 0.067, 0.10, 0.143 and 0.20 Hz) and both the acceleration and displacement
spectra generated. As can be seen from Fig. 8, the processing usually has very little
effect on the acceleration spectra and then only at periods of about 4.0 seconds and
greater. Indeed, for SA ordinates up to 2.0 seconds, it would seem that filtering is
not actually necessary. However, the SD ordinates show a very high sensitivity to
the applied filter at long periods. In general, the SD spectra are almost identical
for periods up to 2 seconds, regardless of the processing, but beyond 3 seconds the
divergence can be very considerable. Since the long-period response ordinates are of
particular interest, it is clear that special attention must be given to the processing
of each record.
It is difficult to establish a single optimum filter for the digitised accelerograms
because the variation of signal-to- noise ratios is very large. An interesting example
are the recordings from Procisa Nuova of an aftershock of the Irpinia (southern
Italy) earthquake of November 1980: the ground shaking at the site was recorded
simultaneously on an analogue SMA-1 accelerograph and a digital DSA-1 accelero-
graph. The S M A - 1 record was digitised both automatically +nd manually. The
DSA-1 recording was filtered with a cut-off a t 5 seconds (up to 3 seconds the SD
Displacement Spectm far Seismic Dtsign 17
ordinates are almost unchanged by the filter limits) and the corresponding spectrum
was assumed to be free of noise. It was found that an almost identical displacement
spectrum could be obtained horn the automatically digitised SMA-1record if it
was filtered with a cut-off at 2.4 seconds. For the manually digitised record it was
not possible to obtain a displacement spectrum that matched that of the DSA-1
record beyond a period of about 0.6 seconds. However, these recordings were gen-
erated by a very small earthquake with very weak long-period radiation: for the
stronger records in the dataset, digitised in a similar fashion, the absolute noise
level is probably similar but the signal-to-noise ratio would be considerably better.
1 10
Period (sec)
0 3 6 9 12 15
Period (sec)
Fig. 8(a) Acceleration and displacement spectra for the Tabas [I9781 earthquake (5% damping)
with different filtering and correction.
18 J . J . Bommer & A. S. Elnashai
1
Period (sec)
Period (sec)
Fig. 8(b) Acceleration and displacement spectra for the Corinth [I9811 earthquake (5% damping)
with different filtering and correction.
One possibility for identifying the optimum filter cutsff for an accelerogam is
from the Fourier spectra of the record and the fixed trace, but the latter is not
available for the majority of the records. The procedure adopted for this dtudy was
simply to ater each record starting with a cut-off at 10 seconds and then inspect
the velocity and displacement timehistories found by double integration. The long-
period cut-off was then successively decreased until the velocity and displacement
time-histories appeared to be physically reasonable and further decreases in the
fdter cut-off did not significantly enhance them. Some example of the filtered time-
histories and their associated displacement response spectra are shown in Fig. 9.
Displacement Spectm. far Seismic 'Design 19
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
0 ' 5 10 15 20
Time (sec)
0 3 6 9 12 15
Period (sec)
Fig. 9(a) Filtered t ime-histor ies and displacement spectrum for record ITSOL (dotted line shows
filter cutoff).
20 J . J . Bommer 0 A. S. Elnashai
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
0 10 15 20 25 30
Time (sec)
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
30
20
10
0
-1 0
-20
-30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (sec)
IS
Time (sec)
6 9
Period (sec)
Fig. 9(b) Filtered timehistories and displacement spectrum for record KALlT (dotted line shows
filter cutoff).
Dtsplacement Spectrn for Seismic Design 21
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Time (sec)
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
80
40
0
-40
-80
0 5 10 I5 20 25 30 35 40
Time (sec)
10 IS 20 25 30 35 40
Time (sec)
3 6 9 12
Period (sec)
Fig. 9(c) Filtered time-histories and displacement spectrum for record TABAL (dotted line shows
filter cutoff).
5. European Attenuation Relationships for Displacement
Response Spectra
Regression analyses were performed on the horizontal displacement spectral ordi-
nates for damping ratios of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% of critical. The regression
model used for SD ordinates (cm) was the same as that employed by Ambraseys
et ol. I19961 for acceleration spectral ordinates:
where
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
Number of records available for regression for each soil type at different periods.
average shape of the spectra; secondly, the apparent amplification of the average
response spectra for lower damping levels, with respect to the 30% damped spectra,
appear to be approximately constant regardless of the magnitude, distance and site
classification. These observations have been used to derive a simplified approach
to constructing displacement response spectra for design, presented in the next
section.
Regression analysis was also performed on the larger values of peak ground
displacement (in cm) from each record, using the same attenuation model as in
Eq. (5.I), resulting in the following equation:
TA TB
M, Rock Stiff Soft Rock Stiff Soft
Inspection of the predicted spectral ordinates shows that the shape of the spec-
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
tra is strongly influenced by magnitude and site classification, but far less so by
distance. It was found that the decrease of the spectral ordinates with distance is
reasonably constant acrossthe period range and similar for all three site categories,
hence simple reduction factors could de found. The 30% damped spectra for dis-
tances up to 50 km from the source can be obtained by simply multiplying the
ordinates by the appropriate factor Fd taken from Table 3.
The next stage was to establish the amplification factors to be applied to the
control ordinates in order to obtain the displacement spectra for damping levels
from 5 to 25% of critical. These factors FE are presented in Table 4. Therefore,
using the values presented in Tables 1-4, and interpolating where necessary, it is a
W I " ' I " ' I " ' I " " I " " I " I
Fig. 13. Derived vs. Iinearised displacement spectra (stiff soil M, = 6 , d = 15 km).
1.5 2
Period (sec)
Fig. 14. Derived vs. liaearised displacement spectra (soft soil Ms = 6, d = 15 km).
Lhplacemmt Spectm for Seismic Design 27
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
Period (sec)
Fig. 16. Derived vs. linearised dispIacement spectra (stiff sail, M, = 7 , d = 15 km).
28 J. J. Bommer & A. S. Elncrshai
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
Period (sec)
Fig. 17. Derived vs. linearised displacement spectra (soft soil, 1LI, = 7, d = 15 km).
simple matter to construct design displacement spectra for rock, stiff soil and soft
soil sites for magnitudes between 5.5 and 7.5 and distances up to 50 km.
Figures 12-17 compare the spectra obtained from the attenuation relationships,
'
smoothed by successive passes of a a-9-a running average, with the design spectra
for the corresponding situations. In some cases, particularly at short distances, the
design spectra are conservative at long periods for the lower damping ratios, but
the approximation is generally very good.
One limitation of these design spectra is that they are defined only up to pe-
riods of 3.0 seconds, although as it has been shown this covers the majority of
applications. Certain assumptions can be made in order to extrapolate the spectra
to longer periods knowing that the ordinates for all six damping levels will con-
verge to the value of PGD predicted by Eq. (5.3) at long periods. Inspection of the
spectra born the records filtered at longer cut-ofs suggests that the spectra will
generally converge, even for large magnitudes and soft soil, at periods no greater
than 8-9 seconds. For smaller magnitudes and stiffer sites it is reasonable to assume
convergence between 5 and 6 seconds.
7. * ~ u c t i l i t ~ - ~ a Relationships
m~in~ and Residual Inelastic
Displacements
The dataset used above was employed in a study by Boni et al. [1998],alongside
the same attenuation model described above. Two structural response models were
Displacement Spectm for Seismic Design 29
the elastic response spectra of Sec. 5 of this paper, for periods of up to 3.0 seconds.
Borzi et al. (19981 utilised a procedure based on spectral intensities to evaluate
median damping ratios for longer period structures. The resulting values are on
the whole lower than those given above. If a more accurate period-dependent value
of equivalent damping is sought, the complete set of attenuation relationships are
given in Borzi et al. [1998].Nil entries in Table 5 indicate that structures with
highly degrading response ( K 3 = -20% and -30%K,) would not have ductility
capacity of four or more.
The design procedure based on displacement results in a structure with stiffness,
strength and ductility characteristics that satisfy the requirements of the displace-
ment spectrum used. It is important to note that the solution is not unique, and
other structural systems with different response characteristics may also satisfy the
design premise. Due to the asymmetric nature of natural earthquake records, there
is a possibility that the structure will have a residual irrecoverable inelastic dis-
placement. This issue was studied by Boni et al. [I9981 for subsets of the strong
motion records mentioned above. It was observed that for magnitude six at a dis-
tance of 10 km on soft ground, the residual displacement of a degrading system
(K3= -20%Ky) is 18%, 32%.and 43% of the maximum displacement for ductility
factors 2, 3 and 4, respectively. This observation may lead to the requirement to
increase the strength of the structure, to reduce the ductility demand hence the
residual displacement. For non-degrading systems, this issue is of significantly less
in Europe have been derived. Although the attenuation relationships can be used
directly to construct displacement spectra for design, a simple parametric presen-
tation has been formulated. Taking just six d u e s from Tables 1-4, displacement
design spectra can be constructed for all sites (except exceptionally soft soils) for
the range of magnitudes and distances of greatest engineering interest. These spec-
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014
tra cover response periods up to 3 seconds and damping ratios between 5% and 30%
of critical, which covers the majority of engineering applications of displacement-
based seismic design and assessment. To complete the requirements of the design
procedure, recent work on deriving attenuation relationships for inelastic displace-
ment response and its relationship with the damped elastic response of substitute
structures is briefly reported. Finally, the issue of irrecoverable displacements of
ductile structures is mentioned, and approximate limits are given for the median
value of residual displacement as a percentage of maximum response displacement.
The simplified design spectra and ductility-damping relationships are recom-
'
mended for use in displacement-based design. The spectra can be extrapolated
beyond 3 seconds, using the attenuation relationship for PGD, with caution. As
more digital accelerograms in Europe become available, such as those from the
1997 Umbria-Marche earthquakes in Italy, it will be possible to extend the atten-
uation relationships, and hence the design spectra, to longer periods, applicable
mainly to special structures.
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to a number of people who have assisted with different
aspects of the development of this work. Thanks are due to Professor D.Papasta-
matiou of the National Technical University of Athens, for supplying the accelero-
gram from Aegion, and Professor E. Faccioli and Dr. S. Tolis of the Politecnico di
Milano, for supplying the Gemona accelerogram. Dr. Tolis also went to consider-
able length to determine the site characteristics for the Gemona record. The work
on residual displacements was motivated by earlier work carried out by Professor
K. Kawashima of Tokyo Institute of Technology and discussed with one of the au-
thors in April 1998.
At Impenal College, George Chlimintias undertook the painstaking task of
processing the strong motion accelerograms and also in performing the regres
sions together with Dohyung Lee. Dr. K. Simpson provided very considerable as-
sistance with accessing the data and performing the regression analyses. Petros
Konstantakos, Stephen Scott, Alejandro Martha and Barbara Boni assisted with
Dasplacement Spectra for Seismic Design 31
parts of the analysis and the preparation of a number of illustrations and spectral
plots. The authors would also like to acknowledge the important contribution made
by Professor N. N. Ambraseys in the form of re-evaluated source, path and site
parameters for the European strong motion dataset, and Dr. S.K. Sarma for use of
his regression program.
This work is supported financially by the European Union project Innovative
Concepts for the Seismic Design of New and Existing Structures (ICONS).
References
Ambraseys, N. N., Simpson, K. A. and Bommer, J. J. (19961 "Prediction of horizontal
Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen] at 02:38 30 October 2014