Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: DISEÑO DE SISTEMAS
Code: 301309

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Step 1 - Identification of stakeholder

and environments of virtual course

1. Activity Description

Type of activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Initial

Highest score of the activity: 25 points

The activity starts on: Tuesday, The activity ends on: Monday,
October 19, 2021 November 1, 2021

With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:

1. Identify the environments and elements of each environment that makes up

the virtual course.

2. Recognize the agenda of the course and the activities that make up it.

3. Identify the actors of the academic year.

4. Apply concepts acquired as actors, use case, requirements and requirements

in an information system.

The activity consists of:

1. Perform by means of a mental map the recognition of the syllabus of the

course system design.

2. Perform through a mental map the recognition of the course environments

and the elements that make up it.

3. Identify the peers who make up your small group

1
 Partner’s Name CEAD Skype (If has it)

4. Remembering a little system analysis, answer the following questions:

a. What is a requirement?

b. What is a use case?

c. What is a stakeholder?

d. Which is a prototype?

For the development of the activity consider that:

For the development of the activity please note that:

In the Initial Information environment, you must:

1. Review and keep an eye on the academic year agenda.

2. Make a brief presentation at the general course forum.

3. Be aware of the scheduled dates for the academic year.

In the Learning environment you must:

1. Review the syllabus of the academic year.

2. Review bibliographic contents and references.

3. Review and develop the activities proposed according to the curriculum.

In the Evaluation environment, you must:

Upload document must contain:

1. Cover page

2. Introduction

2
 3. Goals

4. Development of the proposed activity

5. Conclusions

6. Bibliography

The document must comply in its structure with APA standards.

It is very important to keep in mind that in the bibliography the indentation applied
is different from that of the paragraphs in the document.

Evidences of individual work:

Upload only document in the evaluation environment for this purpose with the name
Step-1-Recognition-Name_Last_name-Nrodegroup, in PDF format, solving the
activities proposed in the guide.

Evidences of collaborative work:

No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For independently prepared evidence, consider the following guidelines:

1. All members of the group should feedback the publication(s) made by

the groupmates.

2. In this activity, each student is responsible for the presentation of the

activity.

3. Before delivering the requested product you should check that it meets
all the requirements indicated in this activity guide.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.

Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.

3
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 -
13 de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation,

the score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being
derived.

b) b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score

obtained will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Initial
The highest score in this activity is 25 points
First evaluation High level: Follow guidelines applying written work delivery
criterion: rules, organized structure, document name, and document
Organization and delivery format.
delivery of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 6
expected points and 8 points
product. Medium Level: There are at most two (2) missing
This criterion conditions in relation to guidelines applying written work
represents 8 delivery rules, organized structure, document name, and
points out of the document delivery format.

4
total of 25 points If your work is at this level, you can get between 3
of the activity. points and 5 points
Low level: Does not follow the proposed guidelines for the
delivery of the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 2 points
High Level: Presents your fully updated profile with
photography and student information.
Second If your work is at this level, you can get between 3
evaluation points and 4 points
criterion: Medium Level: Described in the profile, but without posting
Profile update photo.
This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 2
represents 4 points and 3 points
points out of the Low level: Does not update your profile in the academic
total of 25 points year.
of activity If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 2 points

High Level: Presents all the proposed points as described in

Third evaluation the guide
criterion:
If your work is at this level, you can get between 10
Solution of the points and 13 points
points proposed
Medium Level: Presents the points proposed in the guide
in the activity
but there is a lack of information
guide
If your work is at this level, you can get between 5
This criterion
points and 9 points
represents 13
Low level: Does not comply with the development of
points out of the
proposed activities or presents unreadable information
total of 25 points
of activity If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 4 points