Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: Diseño de Sistemas
Code: 301309

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Step 2 Basic concepts and principles of
system designs
1. Activity Description
Type of activity: Collaborative

Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 1

Highest score of the activity: 175 points

The activity starts on: Monday, The activity ends on: Sunday,
September 6, 2021 Octo b er 1 7, 2021

With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:

Apply the concepts of information system designs to meet requirements in different

contexts.

The activity consists of:

The system academic college has the following organizational structure:

1
The activity consists of:

The system academic college has the following organizational structure:

The school has a systematization performed in EXCEL but wants to automate a little
better so it requires a group of engineers to perform the systematization of the
school. To do this, you have hired your small group in order to perform:

1. Data design.

2. Architectural design.

3. Interface design.

4. Design at the component level.

5. Deployment design.

6. Context diagram design.

7. Program design language.

In order to build the above it is very important that engineers can establish:

1. Requirements.

2. Stakeholders

3. System processes for proper operation.

For the development of the activity consider that:

For the development of the activity please note that:

In the Initial Information environment, you must:

1. Be attentive to the academic year agenda at the beginning and end of the
activity.

2. The programming of the synchronous meeting (webconference) as an

explanation for the development of the activity and to give clarity to the
doubts presented.

2
In the Learning environment you must:

1. Review the syllabus of the academic year.

2. Review bibliographic contents and references.

3. Review and develop the activities proposed according to the curriculum.

In the Evaluation environment, you must:

Upload document must contain:

a) Cover page

b) Introduction

c) Goals

d) Development of the proposed activity

e) Conclusions

f) Bibliography

The document must comply in its structure with APA standards.

It is very important to keep in mind that in the bibliography the indentation applied
is different from that of the paragraphs in the document.

Evidences of individual work:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

1. Each student shall submit at least 4 significant contributions for the

construction of the activity in the period established for this purpose.

2. Each student shall comment on the contributions submitted by his/her

peers.

Evidences of collaborative work:

The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:

3
The group must decide who will be in charge of uploading a single document in the
evaluation environment for this purpose under the name Step-2-Group, in PDF
format, placing there the consolidated contributions made by the colleagues.

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Collaborative evidences, consider the following:

1. All members of the group must participate with their contributions in the
development of the activity.

2. In each group they must choose a single member who will be responsible for
delivering the requested product in the environment indicated by the teacher.

3. Before delivering the requested product, you should check that it meets all
the requirements indicated in this activity guide.

4. Only members of the group who have participated with contributions during
the time spent for the activity should be included as authors of the delivered
product.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.

Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.

In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 -
13 de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

4
The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation,

the score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being
derived.

b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score

obtained will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Collaborative

Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 1

The highest score in this activity is 175 points

First evaluation High level: Follow guidelines applying written work delivery
criterion: rules, organized structure, document name, and document
Organization and delivery format.
delivery of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 20
expected points and 25 points
product. Medium Level: There are at most two (2) missing conditions
This criterion in relation to guidelines applying written work delivery rules,
represents 25 organized structure, document name, and document delivery
points out of the format.
total of 175 If your work is at this level, you can get between 10
points of the points and 19 points
activity.
Low level: Does not follow the proposed guidelines for the
delivery of the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 9 points

Second High level: The rules are correctly applied in the document
evaluation
If your work is at this level, you can get between 20
criterion: points and 25 points

5
Correctly apply Medium Level: Partially applies the standards to the final
APA standards in document
final document If your work is at this level, you can get between 10
This criterion points and 19 points
represents 25
Low level: Does not comply with apa standards.
points of the
total If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 9 points

Third evaluation High level: Actively participates in the construction of

criterion: collaborative activity
Collaborative If your work is at this level, you can get between 20
work points and 25 points
This criterion Medium Level: Although it is aware of the activity, it does
represents 25 not make a significant contribution to the work.
points out of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 10
total of 175 points and 19 points
points of activity
Low level: He does not support his colleagues in the
construction of collaborative activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 9 points

Fourth evaluation High level: Actively participates presenting at least 4

criterion: significant contributions.
Individual If your work is at this level, you can get between 80
Participation points and 100 points
This criterion Medium Level: There are contributions, but they are not
represents 100 significant in the construction of the work. He conceives the
points out of the contributions of the companions.
total of 175
If your work is at this level, you can get between 50
points of activity
points and 79 points
Low level: Does not meet the minimum of significant
contributions.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 49 points