Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Unique Guide for the Development of the Practical Component of
the Course: Course: Integral Pedagogical Practice – Code 518018

1. General Information of the Practical Component

Learning strategy: Project-Based Learning

Course type: Methodological
Evaluation moment: Intermediate
Highest score of the component: 175 points
Number of activities of the practical component registered in this guide: 1
With the development of this component students are expected to achieve
the following learning outcomes:

Develop a reflective analysis of common situations in educational contexts using a

simulated scenario.

2. General Activity Description of the Practical Component.

Scenarios of the practical component: In situ (practice)

Activity type: Individual
Activity number: 1
Highest score of the activity: 175 points
The activity starts on: Wednesday, May The activity ends on: Sunday, May 14,
3, 2023 2023
The resources required for the development of this activity are the
following:
- Email
- Virtual campus
- Pedagogical and Educational Practice Simulator
- Formats of the traceability of pedagogical and educational practice
The activity consists of:

1. Development of the Pedagogical Practices Simulator activity.

The Pedagogical Practices Simulator is an academic tool that allows undergraduate

students to propose and carry out simulated pedagogical and didactic practices,
leveraged in problem situations, to strengthen the competencies of the training of

1
graduates that they can then apply in their field practices in different learning
environments.
To access the simulator, the student must:
- Access the resource from the highlighted link:
- Practical component - Unit 3- Phase 4:

- Play the instructional video found in the indicated button and follow the step by
step for the development of the activity.

2
- Each student must enter to the simulations and develop the activities proposed
ineach of the following scenarios:

- Problem statement analysis

- Reading simulation instructions and output options
- Simulation development (make decisions to solve the problem and select the one
you consider most appropriate in the range of possible options)
- Use the research toolbox.
- Browse the simulator and make use of the normative and theoretical tools that
will help you make decisions.
- Include enough argumentation to validate the decision taken. Cite the authors in
APA style.

- Upload to the drive the format: Anexo 1. F-7-6-12- Formato de asistencia de

estudiantes a prácticas pedagógicas of attendance to the place of practice with
the 64 hours generated for this course with the respective signatures of the
teacher holder of the Educational Institution.

3
For the development of the practical component consider that:
In the Initial Information Environment, you must: check the course agenda to
develop the task according to the schedule.

In the Learning Environment, you must: Read the contents of unit 3 and comment on
your partner’s work in the respective forum.

In the Evaluation Environment, you must: upload the final document in the space
Unit 3 –Phase 4- Development of the practical component.

Evidences of individual work:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

A ZIP file with:

a) The screenshot and evidence of the simulator development.

b) The Anexo 1. F-7-6-12 format with the 64 hours signed.

Evidences of collaborative work:

No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences

For Individual evidence, consider the following:

• Before submitting the requested product, student should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with Choose an option. style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual
campus.

4
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric Template (Copy and paste this rubric according to the
number of activities to evaluate in this guide)

Activity type: Individual

Activity number: 4
Evaluation moment: Intermediate
The highest score possible is 175 points
Criteria Performance levels
First evaluation High level: The student develops the simulated activity
criterion: according to the parameters and context needs.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 30 points
Depth in the and 15 points
descriptions of the
situation. Average level: The student develops the simulated activity
Coherence of the with a shallow analysis.
arguments. If your work is at this level, you can get between 14 points
and 5 points
This criterion
represents 30 Low level: The student does not develop the
points of the total practical environment activity.
of 175 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 4 points
the activity. and 0 points

5
Second evaluation High level: The student includes deep descriptions with
criterion: appropriate authors that support the arguments.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 30 points
Pertinence and and 15 points
argumentations in
the simulator. Average level: The student includes descriptions with
inappropriate and/ or shallow arguments when it is required.
This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 14 points
represents 30 and 15 points
points of the total
of 175 points of Low level: The student did not develop the simulated activity.
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 4
points and 0 points
Third evaluation High level: The student completes the F-7-6-12 form with the
criterion: 64 hours, the required descriptions, and signatures
If your work is at this level, you can get between 35 points
Completeness of the and 20 points
required forms and
the practice hours. Average level: The student does not complete the F-7-6-12
form with the 64 hours, the required descriptions, and
This criterion signatures.
represents 35 If your work is at this level, you can get between 19 points
points of the total and 8 points
of 175 points of
the activity. Low level: The student does not deliver the required form
within the practice hours.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 7
points and 0 points
Fourth evaluation High level: The student has a good performance in the
criterion: educative institution selected for the practice. It is evident the
commitment, responsibility, and accomplishment of the
Performance in the requested activities.
practice place. If your work is at this level, you can get between 80 points
and 60 points
This criterion
represents 80 Average level: The student has an average performance in the
points of the total educational institution selected for the practice. It is required
of 175 points of more commitment and responsibility for the accomplishment of
the activity. the requested activities.

6
If your work is at this level, you can get between 59 points
and 11 points

Low level: The students do not have any performance in the

educative institution.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 10
points and 0 points