Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: Integral Pedagogical Practice
Code: 518018

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Phase 5 - Final proposal

1. Activity Description

Type of activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Final
Highest score of the activity: 125 points
The activity starts on: Monday, May The activity ends on: Sunday, May 28,
15, 2023 2023
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:

At the end of the activity, the student will be able to formulate a preliminary research
project based on the selection of specific issues and phenomena in the English
language learning processes in correspondence with the pedagogical practice.

The activity consists of:

1. Read the contents of unit 3.

2. Considering the experience acquired in the development of the practice, the

previous research about methodologies and techniques for the learning English
process, the student’s needs, and the characteristics of the context. Go to the
content: Bell, J., & Waters, S. (2014). Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for
First-Time Researchers (Vol. 6th ed). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education-
Chapter 2. Planning a project and completing the following information in a PDF
document organized in APA style.

o Title (include the specific population and the concrete topic)

o Objectives (Principal and specific)
o Researchable question.
o Type of research (qualitative or quantitative) and the methodology.
o Literature review (minimum five authors- 600 words).
o Divide this chapter with the principal categories and concepts of your
proposal; cite the information in APA style 7th version.

1
 o Data collection and analysis techniques (described the techniques and
tools you will use for your analysis)
o Possible solutions: describe the possible solutions you can suggest
according to the literature review and the practice experience for the
identified problems.
o Final reflection of the practice. Include a final reflection of 300 words
minimum of the positive aspects of your practice process and the aspects
you consider could have been better, compare the theories with your own
experiences and justify your arguments with examples and evidence.
o References

For the development of the activity consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must: check the course agenda and
interact in the web conferences.

In the Learning Environment, you must: read all the contents of Unit 3 and interact in
the forum called Unit 3- Phase 5- Final proposal

In the Evaluation Environment, you must: upload your final work in the spacecalled
Unit 3- Phase 5- Final proposal

Evidences of individual work:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

The individual evidence to be submitted is: A PDF file with the following products:

1. The final proposal of the research project.

Evidences of collaborative work:

The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:

Share the proposal with your partners in the forum and make meaningful comments
about their work.

2
2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Individual evidences, consider the following:

• Make sure that your proposal is coherent with the process of your practice
and your previous research.
• Think about the specific needs of the students and the characteristics of the
context.
• Be creative when including innovative possible solutions to the selected
problem.
• Share with your partners’ ideas and reflections, learn together.
• Carefully read the contents of the unit 3.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric Template

3
Type of activity: Individual
Evaluation moment: Final
The highest score in this activity is 125 points
First evaluation High level: The student makes the proposal considering the
criterion: context needs and its characteristics.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
Pertinence of the and 20 points
proposal according
to the context Average level: The student makes a proposal that needs more
needs and its coherence with the context needs and its characteristics.
characteristics. If your work is at this level, you can get between 7 points
and 14 points
This criterion
represents 20 Low level: The student makes a proposal that does not consider
points of the total the context needs and its characteristics or did not do the
of 125 points of proposal.
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points and 6 points
Second evaluation High level: The student includes in the proposal deep and
criterion: pertinent content. The literature review and description of key
concepts and experiences are appropriate and wide.
Depth in the If your work is at this level, you can get between 25 points
descriptions. and 30 points
Accuracy in the
arguments. Average level: The student delivers a proposal, which is not
Adequate use of deep enough. The literature review and description of key
grammatical concepts and experiences are shallow.
resources. If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points
and 24 points
This criterion
represents 30 Low level: The student does not include descriptions, key
points of the total concepts, literature review, and/or experiences or the student
of 125 points of does not deliver the proposal.
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points and 7 points
Third evaluation High level: The student delivers a document with the citing and
criterion: the organization in APA style; the use of grammar and spelling
is accurate.

4
Use adequately the If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points
spelling and and 10 points
grammar rules of
the English Average level: The student delivers a document that is not
Language. Organize entirely organized in APA style. There are relevant grammar and
the document and spelling mistakes.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
cites in APA style.
and 5 points

This criterion Low level: The student does not upload the proposal.
represents 10 If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points of the total points and 4 points
of 125 points of
the activity.
Fourth evaluation High level: The student has a good performance in the
criterion: educative institution selected for the practice. It is evident the
commitment, responsibility, and accomplishment of the
Perform responsibly requested activities.
the practice in the If your work is at this level, you can get between 60 points
educational place. and 50 points

This criterion Average level: The student has a medium performance in the
represents 60 educational institution selected for the practice. It is required
points of the total more commitment and responsibility for the accomplishment of
of 125 points of the requested activities.
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 49 points
and 9 points

Low level: The students do not have any performance in the

educative institution.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points and 8 points