Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: Integral pedagogical practice
Code: 518018

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Phase 3 Application of lesson plans

Activity Description
Type of activity: Individual
Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
Highest score of the activity: 165 points
The activity starts on: Thursday, The activity ends on:
March 24, 2022 Tuesday,May 03, 2022
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:

At the end of the activity, the student will be able to apply lesson plans for the
English language learning considering the analysis of categories that influence the
phenomena identified in the practice environment.

The activity consists of:

1. Read the contents of the unit 3:

Loughran, J. J. (1999). Researching Teaching: Methodologies and Practices for

Understanding Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
https://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.a
spx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=83004&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site

Su, Y. (2018). A Review of Language Learning Strategy Research. Theory and

Practice in Language Studies,8(5), 522-527:
https://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login
.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=130529156&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site

2. Think about the three methodologies you selected in the phase 2 and other
methods and techniques you consider appropriate for the characteristics of the
group and the identified needs. Plan two lessons and complete the “Lesson Plan
Template –Integral Pedagogical Practice Course- 518018” (one per each lesson).
Make sure you complete the information with deep and accurate descriptions. Cite
the information of the methodologies in APA style.
1
2. Create minimum two resources for every lesson. Use some of the following
websites: Educaplay, Quizlet, genially, webadora, Hot Potatoes, JClic.

3. Apply the lessons in the educational institution where you are developing your
practice. Complete the lesson template with the results and reflections.
Register the applications of the lessons in the format F-7-6-12.

4. Create a google classroom and upload the worksheets and resources of the
phase 2 and phase 3. Consider the institution needs for the organization of the
classroom. Watch the following tutorial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCNImsWUxZA

For the development of the activity consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must: check the course agenda and
interact in the web conferences.

In the Learning Environment, you must: read all the contents of Unit 3 and interact
in the forum called Unit 3- Phase 3: Application of lesson plans

In the Evaluation Environment, you must: Upload your final work in the space called
Unit 3- Phase 3: Application of lesson plans.

Evidences of individual work:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

A PDF document with the following products:

1. The two lesson plan templates.

2. The link of the google classroom with the worksheets, lessons and resources
uploaded.
3. References.

Evidences of collaborative work:

The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:

2
 Share the link of your workshop website and the rubric in the forum and give
feedback to your partners’ works.

1. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Individual evidences, consider the following:

• Make sure that your activities include important elements of the selected
methodology.
• Think about the specific needs of the students and the characteristics of the
context.
• Be creative when including technological resecures for the English language
learning process.
• Share with your partners’ ideas and reflections, learn together.
• Carefully read the contents of the course.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3
2. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
The highest score in this activity is 165 points
First Evaluation High Level: The student creates activities considering the
Criterion: purpose of the lesson, the methodologies, and students’ needs.

Propose lessons If your work is at this level, you can get between 25 points
with coherent and and 30 points
pertinent activities
considering Average Level: The created lessons need more coherence with
appropriate the purpose, the methodologies, the level of the students and
methodologies, and their needs.
the needs of the
students. If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
and 15 points
This criterion
represents 30 Low level: The lessons don´t have a coherence with the
points of the total purpose, the level of the students and their needs.
of 165 points of
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point
and 3 points

Second Evaluation High Level: The student creates appropriate and innovative
Criterion: resources with the use of ICT for the proposed lessons.

Create appropriate If your work is at this level, you can get between 25 points
and innovative and 30 points
resources with the
use of the ICT Average Level: The created resources for the lessons are not
so appropriate or they are insufficient.
This criterion
represents 30 If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
points of the total and 15 points
of 165 points of
the activity. Low level: The student did not create resources for the lessons.

4
 If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point
and 3 points

Third Evaluation High Level: The student applied the created lessons in the
Criterion: educational institution place of the practice. The systemization
of the results is deep and pertinent.
Accomplish and
systematize the If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
application of the and 30 points
lesson plans in the
educational place Average Level: The student applied partially the created
selected for the lessons in the educational institution place of the practice. The
development of systemization of the results is shallow.
practice.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
This criterion and 20 points
represents 30
points of the total Low level: The student did not apply the lessons in the
of 165 points of educational institution place of the practice.
the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point
and 3 points

Fourth Evaluation High Level: The student created a pertinent and organized
Criterion: google classroom with appropriate content according to the
context and all the suggested content.
Create a google
classroom with If your work is at this level, you can get between 25 points
appropriate content and 30 points
and quality
Average Level: The google classroom created by the student
This criterion needs more content and a better quality.
represents 30
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
of 165 points of and 15 points
the activity.
Low level: The student did not create the google classroom

5
 If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point
and 3 points

Fifth Evaluation High Level: The student has a good performance in the
Criterion: educative institution selected for the practice. It is evident the
commitment, responsibility, and accomplishment of the
Perform responsibly requested activities.
the practice in the
educational place If your work is at this level, you can get between 30 points
and 45 points
This criterion
represents 45 Average Level: The student has an average performance in the
points of the total educational institution selected for the practice. It is required
of 165 points of more commitment and responsibility for the accomplishment of
the activity. the requested activities.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points

and 20 points

Low level: The students does not have any performance in the
educative institution

If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point

and 3 points