Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Activity Description
Apply the approaches to classroom investigation in teaching for applying in a specific case
study in an educational context.
Which of the procedures discussed in that chapter would be most appropriate for
gathering information from the issue you found in the critical incident and case
analysis, simulator: teaching journal, lesson reports, surveys and questionnaires,
audio and video recording, or observation? What are the advantages and
disadvantages of the procedure you selected?
Choose one of the technological toosl, a blog, a web page or so fourth to design the
e-portfolio. These are the contents: (Present the components in a tidy and easy to
navigate)
1
Evidence of your skills and competency as a language teacher
_ Student evaluations.
_ Notes or cards of appreciation from past students (only if you have this)
_ An account of procedures used for teaching large classes and for using group work
- A description of the most effective activity you developed with the students.
- List the digital resources you use with the student (kahoot .etc)
-A report on how you think you have developed since you began teaching
- final conclusions about how this course support your teacher development plan.
- Investigation chart
- Critical incident
2
- Case analysis
✓ Check the references in the learning environment and focus on Unit 3 needed
for this task.
✓ Read carefully the activity guide Task 5
Deliver a pdf document with a cover page considering APA style format, cover page,
professional development plan and the teaching e- portfolio link.
Provide feedback to those partners who are active in the forum and post the required
tasks.
3
2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidence to Submit
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
4
High level: The student selects the appropriate procedures
First evaluation that can be used to help teachers investigate classroom
criterion: teaching. The answers respond a depth evidence.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 22 points
The student and 25 points
responds the
investigation Average level: The student selects the appropriated
questions. procedures that can be used to help teachers investigate
classroom teaching. However, the answers do not respond
depth evidence.
5
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points and 12 points
The student If your work is at level, you can get between 45 points
demonstrates and 50 points
commitment in the
practice scenery Average level: The student demonstrates the ability to use
the knowledge and skills for the course learning outcomes, but
and activities in the
the practice is limited, because complies with some of the
course.
activities in the scenery or virtual course.