Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: Pedagogical Mediation in Language Learning
Code: 523001

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Phase 5

Reflections on the results as a basis for new planning

1. Activity Description

Type of Activity: Individual

Evaluation Moment: Final
Highest Activity Score: 125 points
The activity starts on: The activity ends on: Wednesday,
Thursday, November 23, 2023. December 06, 2023.
With this activity, the following learning outcomes are expected:

Students will be able to analyze their own language learning and pedagogical practices
through data collection of their and their students’ contexts, characteristics, emotions,
attitudes, beliefs, and assumptions about language learning, to consider those aspects
during their pedagogical mediation improvement processes.

The activity consists of:

1. Enter the forum and answer there the following questions:

a. What results did you obtain with the development of your proposal and what
was its impact?
b. Which were the most meaningful changes in your pedagogical practices?
c. What reflections derived from the implementation of your proposal led you to
introduce modifications in your pedagogical practices?
d. What were the main difficulties you went through? and how did you overcome
them?

e. Did you reach the purposes you intended to achieve with the proposal?

1
 f. Do you want to introduce new changes to your pedagogical practices, according
to the results of this experience?

2. Prepare your final report in which you describe the results and impact of the
process so far; the most meaningful changes in your pedagogical practices; the
main reflections derived from the bibliographic references of the course and the
implementation of your proposal; the main difficulties you went through and how
you overcome them; conclusions and recommendations, and a self- evaluation
related to the resignification of your pedagogical practices during the process.

Include your final report in the virtual portfolio and share it in the collaborative forum
and the Evaluation Environment.

Keep in mind for the development of the activity:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must: check the agenda and interact in the
web conferences.

In the Learning Environment, you must: read and check all the contents of the
course, and socialize the activities in the forum titled Phase 5: Reflections on the
results as a basis for new planning.

In the Evaluation Environment, you must: Upload your final work in the space for
Phase 5: Reflections on the results as a basis for new planning.

Share the URL of the virtual portfolio in the Learning Evaluation Environment
Collaborative Evidence:

The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:

1. Answer the questions set in point 1 of the guide, share the URL of your virtual
portfolio and generate an academic dialogue about your partners' answers and
reports.

2
2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to submit.

For Individual evidence, consider the following:

• In your final report include bibliographic citations and references in APA

format.
• Choose if you want to present your report in a document, a video, a
presentation, a documentary, a graphic, a story, a cartoon, etc.
• Do not think of how to teach content, think of your students (or future
students) and be empathic.
• Be creative and think of learning as a life experience beyond the
classroom.
• Consider emotions as vital for pedagogical mediation.
• Passion is the fuel for creation, so your action plan must passionate you to
work in this and other courses in the master’s program.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA Format.

In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) "Plagiarism is to present as your
work all or part of a written report, task or document of the invention carried out
by another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference" and
paragraph f) "To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University ". (Acuerdo 029 -
13 de Diciembre de 2013, Artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

3
 a) In the case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation,
the score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being
derived.
In the case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric

Type of Activity: Individual

Evaluation Moment: Final

Highest Activity Score: 125 points

First Evaluation High Level: The student prepares a complete and well-
Criterion: presented report, about the results and impact of his/her
proposal. The report evidences a deep reflection during all
Report about the the process and it articulates theory and practice. The
results and report includes photographs, videos, graphics or other
impact of the visual and hearing aids. and impact of his/her proposal,
proposal. but it does not evidence reflection or it does not refer to
the bibliographic references of the course. The report does
This criterion not include visual and hearing aids.
represents 20
points of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 18
total of 125 points and 20 points
points of the
activity. Average Level: The student prepares a report about the
results and impact of his/her proposal, but it does not
evidence a deep reflection and/or it refers to few
bibliographic references of the course. The report includes
some visual and hearing aids.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 11

points and 17 points.

4
 Low level: The student prepares a report about the
results and impact of his/her proposal, but it does not
evidence reflection or it does not refer to the bibliographic
references of the course. The report does not include
visual and hearing aids.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 1

point and 10 points.
Second High Level: The student describes in detail the most
Evaluation meaningful changes in his/her pedagogical practices, and
Criterion: he/she articulates the reflections to the bibliographic
references of the course.
Description of
the most If your work is at this level, you can get between 12
meaningful points and 15 points
changes in
pedagogical Average Level: The student describes some of the
practices. changes in his/her pedagogical practices, and he/she
articulates the reflections to some of the bibliographic
This criterion references of the course.
represents 15
points of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 8
total of 125 points and 11 points
points of the
activity. Low level: The student is confusing to describe the
changes in his/her pedagogical practices or he/she does
not articulate the reflections to the bibliographic
references of the course.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 1

point and 7 points
Third Evaluation High Level: The student describes the main reflections
Criterion: derived from the implementation of the proposal. The
reflections achieve a certain abstraction or theorization.
Reflections about
the If your work is at this level, you can get between 12
implementation points and 15 points
of the proposal.

5
This criterion Average Level: The student describes reflections derived
represents 15 from the implementation of the proposal, but the reflections
points of the total do not achieve a certain abstraction or theorization.
of 125 points of
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 8
points and 11 points

Low level: The student describes some reflections, but they

are not derived from the implementation of the proposal.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 1

point and 7 points
Fourth Evaluation High Level: The student describes the main difficulties
Criterion: he/she went through and how he/she overcame them from
a pedagogical point of view.
Description of If your work is at this level, you can get between 8
difficulties and points and 10 points.
their overcoming
Average Level: The student describes the main difficulties
This criterion he/she went through but does not explain how he/she
represents 10 overcame them from a pedagogical point of view.
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 4
of 125 points of points and 7 points.
the activity.
Low level: The student is confusing to describe the main
difficulties he/she went through and does not explain how
he/she overcame them from a pedagogical point of view.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 1

point and 3 points.

6
 High Level: The report includes meaningful conclusions and
recommendations that evidence comprehension about the
pedagogical mediation process.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 18
points and 20 points
Fifth Evaluation Average Level: The report includes conclusions and
Criterion: recommendations, but they partially evidence
Conclusions and comprehension about the pedagogical mediation process.
recommendations.
This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 11
represents 20 points and 17 points.
points of the total
of 125 points of Low level: The report includes conclusions, but they do not
the activity. evidence comprehension about the pedagogical mediation.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 1

point and 10 points.
High Level: The report presents a self-evaluation related to
the resignification of pedagogical practices during the
Sixth Evaluation process. It includes reflections on the effects of the
Criterion: proposal, as a basis for new planning.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 12
Self-evaluation points and 15 points
related to the
resignification of Average Level: The report presents a self-evaluation
pedagogical related to the resignification of pedagogical practices during
practices the process, but it does not include reflections on the effects
of the proposal, as a basis for new planning.
This criterion
represents 15 If your work is at this level, you can get between 8
points of the total points and 11 points
of 125 points of
the activity Low level: The report presents a self-evaluation, but it is
not related to the resignification of pedagogical practices
during the process.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 1

point and 7 points

7
Seventh High Level: The student socializes in the Evaluation
Evaluation Environment the URL of the virtual portfolio where he/she
Criterion: includes his/her report. The URL is accessible.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 8
Socialization of the points and 10 points
final product in the
virtual portfolio Average Level: The student socializes in the Evaluation
and in the Environment the URL of the virtual portfolio where he/she
Evaluation includes his/her report, but the activities in the portfolio are
Environment. incomplete or not well-structured.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 4
This criterion points and 7 points
represents 10
points of the total Low level: The student does not socialize the final product in
of 125 points of the virtual portfolio or the Evaluation Environment, or sends
the activity. the final product outside the virtual portfolio.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
point and 3 points
High Level: The student enters the forum, answers to the
questions on time, and generates academic dialogue about
his/her partners’ answers.
Eighth Evaluation
Criterion: If your work is at this level, you can get between 18
points and 20 points.
Participation in
the forum and Average Level: The student enters the forum to share the
academic answers to the questions in the last three days. He/she
discussion. makes superficial comments about his/her partners’
This criterion answers.
represents 20
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 11
of 125 points of points and 17 points
the activity.
Low level: The student does not enter the forum or enters
the forum just to socialize his/her work.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 1

point and 10 points

8
9