MANGALDAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Mangaldan, Pangasinan
S.Y. 2021 – 2022
Senior High School Department
ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES

Name: _________________________________________________ Section: ________________________

Name of Teacher: ______________________________________ Date of Submission: _____________
Quarter No.: FIRST QUARTER Week No.: 7

WORKSHEET NO. 7
Writing A Critique or A Review

A. Most Essential Learning Competency:

The learner writes an objective/balanced review or critique of a work of art, an event or a
program
CS_E 11/12A-EAPP-Id-f-18.

Objectives:
At the end of the lesson, students must be able to:
 identify the forms and structures of writing art criticism;
 apply the IBC technique; and
 write a balanced/objective review or critique of pieces of work.

LET’S START

A critique is a genre of academic writing that briefly summarizes and critically evaluates
a work or concept. Critiques can be used to convey a balanced view on a variety of works
such as creative works (novels, exhibits, films, images, poetry), research (monographs, journal
articles, systematic review, theories), media (news reports, feature articles), and events or
programs.

Remember that a critique should be accessible to the audience or readers. Therefore,

it is very helpful for them to be provided with background information. In this manner, the
writer should have a vast knowledge on a particular work or at least have researched on it.
Critiques are an important rhetorical pattern in academic writing as they present a
balanced view of things. Critiques, however, are based not only on personal perspective
but should be grounded on actual observations. Here are some tips in developing your
critique.

REMEMBER THIS:
 1. Critique should provide readers or audience an overview of a work or a
concept. Therefore, it is your job to provide sufficient information such as the
central ideas of a book, concept, event /program, or movie to be critiqued.
2. Relating your critique to greater realities will also help as you ground your critique on
the wider scheme of things. For example, what subject/theme does the movie,
concept, book, or event address? Are there questions that people constantly ask
that this particular subject/theme you are reviewing can answer?

DISCOVER:

In this section of the lesson, you will be provided with instructions on how to do reviews.
What makes a review or critique very interesting is how logical the ideas are when presented
to the readers. In general, a critique or review should be organized in the following
manner:

1. Introduction
2. Body
3. Conclusion

TAKE THIS ONE!

Do a product review. The product may be a gadget, a piece of clothing or

garment, or a popular item used among the young generation. Or you may choose one
from the listed below o f w h i c h are some of the trending issues, events, news articles,
movies and mobile apps that people have talked about.. Fill out the table by answering the
questions in the second column. Do this in your notebook.

1. ABS-CBN franchise issue

2. Bird Box movie
3. Mobile Legends
4. Wattpad
5. BL Series
6. Avengers: Endgame
7. Covid-19
8. Community Quarantine
9. Paintings of Richard Gomez
10.Hello, Love, Goodbye
 Parts of a
Guide Questions Answers
Review

What is the product

about?
Introduction
What are its features?

How does the

product compare
Body
with its counterparts
or other brands?

Will you recommend

consumers to
Conclusion
purchase the item?
Why or why not?

Basically, the I-B-C structure guides you to a logical critique or review. However, it
is very important to keep in mind that before you start writing, have a thorough
understanding of the work or product that will be critiqued. Here are some tips to
consider:

1. Study the work under discussion.

2. Make notes on key parts of the work.
3. Develop understanding of the main argument or purpose being expressed in the work.
4. Consider how the work relates to a broader issue or context.

In the next lessons, you will be guided further on what to write in each part of the
review. You will also be presented samples and you will be asked to answer some questions.

So, before proceeding to the next lessons, think carefully of the movie, film, work of
art, sports, dance, songs, product, and events or program that you will be reviewing. Write
your answer in the box below and start doing Tips 1 and 2.

Name or title of the movie, film, work of art, sports, dance, songs, product, and events or
program you chose:
___________________________________________________________________________________

If you have finally picked one, then, you are ready to proceed to the next lessons.
Keep in mind that you have to have a rich background of your topic. You can do that by
researching printed and online sources. Keep important notes. You will need them in the next
lessons. Remember to keep your references for your citations later on. Also, for your online
sources, make sure that you copy and save the links because you will be needing them
when you compile and create the reference list.

DEEPEN

In this lesson, you will be guided to write your own introduction, body and conclusion.
Study the sample activities and answer the questions for you to be able to get familiar with the
parts of a review or a critique.

Writing the Introduction

Typically, the introduction is short (less than 10% of the entire review). These are tips
in crafting your introduction.

1. Name the work being reviewed as well as the date it was created and the name of
author or creator.
2. Describe the main argument or purpose of the work.
3. Explain the context in which the work was created. This could include the social or
political context, the place of the work in a creative or academic tradition, or the
relationship between the work and the creator’s life experience
4. Have a concluding sentence that signals what your evaluation will be. For example, it
may indicate whether it is positive, negative, or mixed evaluation.

Read the sample introduction below and answer the questions that follow.

Example:

News discourse is a rich area in language studies that has attracted attention among
scholars both old and new. Departing from merely examining printed texts, the present era
of globalized technologies poses serious challenges for the analysis of news discourse, given
that producers of news employ different modalities to deliver their messages. In addition,
the growing mobilities of individuals (geographical, virtual, and social) raise interesting
questions on the suitable frameworks available for researchers to fully understanding different
aspects of news discourse. Given the present scenario, this book elucidates the challenges
of studying news discourse.
 Presented in nine chapters, the book conveniently deals with specific aspects of
the topic, giving readers a manageable resource for study. Chapter 1 overviews the
book, starting with definitions of news discourse, then outlining the different
approaches (sociolinguistic, corpus linguistic, critical discourse analytic, to name a few)
and methods of collecting data. Included in this section is the importance of studying
discourse, which may spark interest among beginning scholars and readers unfamiliar
with the area (Valdez, 2014).

Questions:

1. Why was the review conducted in the first place? _________________________

2. What are some features of the book?

a.

b.

c.

d.

Activity 1: Show-Me More

Directions: Based on the prompts and information you gathered from sources
about the topic you picked. Fill out the table below and draft the introduction of
your review. Remember to go back to the tips in writing an introduction listed in the
previous page. If the spaces in the table are not enough, you may use separate sheet
for your answers. (Do this in your notebook.)

Features Notes (Gathered information)

Recent developments
in the world and in the
country or even in the
community where you
belong.

General features of the

material, work, film, etc.
 Another major part of the critique in the introduction is a brief summary of the
event, book, concept, or object being critiqued. In this part, specific descriptions are
needed for the reader to have an overview of the central features of the topic. (See
paragraph 2 of the sample introduction in the previous page)

Activity 2: It’s Your Time to Shine

Directions: With the input from the previous activities, draft the introduction for your
critique. Make sure to seek feedback from your friends and teacher for improvement.
Use a separate sheet in writing your draft. (Do this in your notebook.)

Writing the Body of a Review

After providing an overview in the introduction part, it is important to provide

informed insights on the central features. This is the part that connects the
introduction and the body of your review. The body of a review comprises 70% of
the entire review. This is because details and insights will be elaborated and
explained in this part. The informed insights should focus on highlights of the work or
product. For example, weakness or strengths should be based on what is observable
and comparable to other items of the same class.

Some expressions below will help you in presenting strengths and weaknesses.

Illustrating Strengths

Given its features, X may be the best among the competition because…

X does not only provide (enumerate common features found in other counterparts)
but also (enumerate unique features)

Illustrating Weaknesses

However, X may not be a wise choice if you intend to … (Cite specific activities of
features needed by a specific user or audience.)

In certain cases, X lacks some interesting points such as … (Cite specific features or
qualities.)

X may not appeal to certain users or audience as it … (Cite specific features or

qualities.)
 Consider the following sample statements.

Sample 1:

The smartphone has an eight megapixel camera supported by both

Bluetooth technology and wireless applications. These features are standard
among modern phones, so that the higher price is not justified.

Sample 2:

The movie is worth seeing because it features not only talented actors
but also tells an excellent story filled with unexpected twists.

Activity 1: Tell-Me More

Directions: This is for your own review of a product or a work. Fill out the table
using the guide questions. You may use separate sheet for your answers. (Do this in
your notebook.)

Guide Questions Responses

What are the essential

features?

What are the strengths of

the features?

What are the weaknesses

of the features?

Explore

Identifying the strengths or weaknesses of a particular work or product is

actually part of the process called critical evaluation. Critical evaluation should give
a systematic and detailed assessment of the different elements of the work,
evaluating how well the creator was able to achieve the purpose of the work
or product. For example, you would assess the plot structure, characterization
and setting of a novel; an assessment of a painting would look at composition,
brush strokes, color, and light; a critique of a research project would look at the
subject selection, design of the experiment, analysis of data and conclusions.

A critical evaluation does not simply highlight negative impressions. It should

deconstruct the work and identify both strengths and weaknesses. It should examine
the work and evaluate its success, in light of its purpose.

Here are examples of critical questions that could help your assessment.
 1. Who is the creator? Is the work presented objectively or subjectively?
2. What are the aims of the work? Were the aims achieved?
3. What techniques, styles, media were used in the work? Are they effective
in portraying the purpose?
4. What assumptions underlie the work? Do they affect its validity?
5. What type of evidence or persuasion are used? Has evidence
been interpreted fairly?
6. How is the work structure? Does it favor a particular interpretation or
point of view? Is it effective?
7. Does the work enhance understanding of key ideas or theories? Does the
work engage (or fail to engage) with key concepts or other works in its
discipline?

This evaluation is written in formal academic style and logically presented.

Group your ideas into paragraphs. Start with broad impressions first and then
move into details of the technical elements. For shorter critiques, you may discuss
the strengths of the works, and then the weaknesses. In longer critiques, you may
wish to discuss the positive and negative of each key critical questions in individual
paragraphs.

To support the evaluation, provide evidence from the work itself, such as a
quote, example, or research-based facts. You can also cite evidences from
related sources. Explain how this evidence supports your evaluation of the work.

Activity 1: Support Me

Directions: Given the following ideas, write a sentence that uses a citation to
strengthen specific claims. (Do this in your notebook.)

1. Claim/Comment: The movie is good for younger audiences.

Cited Information: Torres (1990) emphasized positive values as an indicator of
favorable viewership for younger audiences.

Revised sentence:

2. Claim/Comment: the car can sustain higher speed for several hours.
Cited information: As seen in several lab tests, the car is not only efficient in
fuel consumption but it is quite fast compared to its competitors (Santos,
2009).

Revised
sentence:
 Writing the Conclusion

This part usually is a very brief paragraph. It has two parts. The first part
summarizes the strengths and weaknesses. The second part includes points for
readers to consider before reading the book, watching the film, attending the
event, or purchasing the item. Also part of the conclusion, in some circumstances, is
the recommendations for improvement on the work which must be expressed with
tact. Consider the samples below:

Sample 1:

Taken as a whole, the book can be a helpful resource for teachers planning
to integrate technology in their classrooms. In addition, the sample lessons
provided ion the appendices consider different material conditions of schools
which may be reality in some settings. Since Estacio (2009) views that
technology use in the education may depend on the condition of
education institutions, the lessons in the book are a welcome addition to
the growing number of resources in different context for teachers.

Sample 2:

Considering the pros and cons of the computer system, users may want to
check other options that bear the same features, as other companies provide
top of the line features for their premium offerings but with lower price
points.

Activity 1: What Can You Say?

Directions: Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow.
This is taken from Valdez (2014). Use separate sheet for your answers. (Do this in your
notebook.)

The book is a valuable resource as it provides interesting theoretical and

methodological means for analyzing news discourse. For instance, analyzing
the combination of images and texts allows greater understanding of values
encoded in the news. In addition, the book adequately discusses means for
addressing methodological problems in analyzing data in different forms of
media. Moreover, since the book draws on different perspectives, readers will
find a range of options to work with when confronting their own data. To
illustrate, news may not only be seen on the national/international scene
but also in specific locales. Therefore, this can help in making sense of one’s
data through adequate examples.
 The book is intended as suitable introduction for graduate students and
researchers interested in exploring the complexities of news discourse, as it
provides input, a list of readings and additional activities for research. It also
integrates several theoretical and methodological perspectives, giving
readers a free hand on deciding which approach to employ in analyzing
their own data. Overall, this book, which is part of the Continuum series
of books covering areas of discourse, is a valuable contribution for the
enrichment of scholarship concerning news discourse.

Guide Questions:

1. Is the recommendation of the book positive or negative? Cite specific

information to support your answer.

2. What consideration did the author mention for the readers to consider in
reading the book?

Activity 2: It’s Your Turn

Directions: Prepare a draft for the conclusion of your review. Fill out the table
below to help you in writing your draft. Use another sheet for your answers. (Do this in
your notebook.)

Point for Recommendation Responses

What are the positive and

negative features of the
item?

What background knowledge is

needed for users to fully maximize
the use of item or enjoy the
event/movie?

Would you recommend it to other

people?

10
Gauge

Finally, it is time to complete your review. Here is a checklist that you may
consider in finalizing your review or critique.

Have I:

1. Mentioned the name of the work, the date of its creation and the name of
the creator?
2. Accurately summarized the work being critiqued?
3. Mainly focused on the critical evaluation of the work?
4. Systematically outlined an evaluation of each element of the work to
achieve the overall purpose?
5. Used evidence, from the work itself as well as other sources, to back and
illustrate my assessment of elements of the work?
6. Formed an overall evaluation of the work, based on critical reading?
7. Used a well-structured introduction, body, and conclusion?
8. Used correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation; clear presentation
and appropriate referencing style?

In the process of editing and reviewing your critique, it is best to ask feedback
from friends and teacher about your work. You can have them answer the
statements below. Or you may send your manuscript and have them comment on it.

1. I think the review is because _.

However, it may be good to improve the following points: .

2. I think the introduction but may

need some revisions such as .

3. I think the body is ______________ however _______________.

4. The conclusion is ________________________but ________________________.

5. Language use is ________________. However,________________________.

Grammar and mechanics are .
However, _________________________________________________________.

Sample Film Review

Amidst pacing problems, Heneral Luna manages to tell a compelling story –

allegorical and timely to present day – supported by a fantastic script, an
impassioned score, and inspired cinematography.

11
At first glance, one might mistake Heneral Luna as your run-of-the-mill historical
biopic that showcases a hero of yore whose bravery and passion unite his people
in the face of dastardly foreign invaders. Well, this is only partly correct. There
are invaders, Heneral Luna (John Arcilla) is indeed fiercely brave and madly
passionate, but there is no unity to be found amongst country men – only
infighting, personal interests, and politicking.

Directed by Jerrold Tarog and with a script co-written by him, Henry Hunt
Francia, and E.A. Rocha; Heneral Luna takes a different approach in telling the
story of how we lost the battle and got occupied by the Americans. Taking
cues from Oro, Plata, Mata; the movie deliberately puts the colonialists in the
periphery, making them merely a backdrop whose presence stirred the pot.
The real focus here is the tension, the inner turmoil that brewed in the ranks of
our so-called Filipino founding fathers. Heneral Luna is a tale of how a dissenting
voice can get swept away and ultimately perish under a wave of egos and
personal interest.

Carrying the weight of the story is the above stellar performance of John Arcilla
in the title role of General Antonio Luna. Arcilla plays with the whole spectrum
of emotions in his portrayal of the larger-than-life general. He is able to showcase
the fierce, boisterous, and volatile man the general has been historically known
to be, yet he is also able to flip the coin and show the passionate,
sympathetic, and battle-weary softer side of the character. Here’s a man who
rides head first screaming into battle just to rile up his troops’ morale, but at the
same time he is a one who can share warm moments and some banter with his
mother. He is an antihero – the Wolverine of the Filipino insurrection.

One prime example of just how dynamic Arcilla’s portrayal can be is during
this one scene involving a chicken vendor. Delivering virtually the same line of
dialogue on two separate moments, Arcilla is able to convey anger bordering on
madness at first and compassion nuanced with frustration soon after. It is truly
his performance that propels Heneral Luna (and, sadly, his alone).

There isn’t much to be said about the rest of the cast of movie, which is a pity
given that Heneral Luna assembles quite an ensemble. You’ve got names like
Joem Bascon, Alex Medina, Mon Confiado, Nonie Buencamino, Mylene Dizon,
and even Ronnie Lazaro; but sadly none of the other performances stand out.
Not that there are any weak performances, it’s just that none are able to keep up
with the gravitas of John Arcilla’s Luna. Mon Confiado’s Emilio Aguinaldo seems
more like a spineless weakling who hides behind his cohorts rather than a
respected political foil; while Ketchup Eusebio’s Capt. Janolino, the leader of
Luna’s killers, feels too forced as a villain scorned by the titular general. The
closest character who can keep up with Luna’s onscreen presence is his equally
proud contemporary, Heneral Mascardo (Lorenz Martinez) – whose refusal to
give in to Luna provides a tension- filled back-and-forth sequence in the middle
of the film. Unfortunately, because of some jagged pacing, tension such as is this
is not consistent throughout the movie.

12
This erratic pacing is felt most during the first act of Heneral Luna – where things
play out very much like an oral history. Used as plot device to serve as the
audience’s perspective, Arron Villaflor portrays journalist, Joven Hernando, who is
tasked to interview the general. This frame narrative leads to various snippets that
feature Luna’s patriotism: from an expertly-shot rowdy meeting with
Aguinaldo’s cabinet to earlier battles against the Americans. Oddly, these
scenes just feel lacking in connective tissue. Its pacing is too quick to really tie
the storytelling together and it doesn’t help either that some set pieces
looked too clean and glossed over – lacking the grit and weariness you’d
expect from a war movie. Couple this with efforts to add humor at some odd
moments throughout the film, and you’ve got a trifecta that hinders the movie
from fully immersing you.

Heneral Luna more than makes for these flaws though through its artistic
components – such as its beautiful score, well-crafted cinematography, and,
most especially, its fantastic rhythmic script.

Technically marvelous is the only way to describe the movie’s sound design –
from Luna’s table banging overpowering the raucous in a cabinet meeting, to
a guitar mini-concert midway the film, to the overall masterful score. You have to
give it to effort put in by Jerrold Tarog, who not only directed the movie but also
provided its music.

All sorts of appealing too is Heneral Luna‘s cinematography. One scene you have
to look out for is the flashback sequence to the general’s youth. This particular
scene employs one long take, seamlessly moving from different sets that pass
of as a childhood home, Europe, and other settings from different timelines. It is
a visual spectacle, innovative and masterful in its execution.

Most notable though among the movie’s artistry is its script. Poetic yet
conversational, Heneral Luna‘s script is filled to the brim with flowery lines of
dialogue as if lifted from a sonata. It’s not everyday that you get to hear lines
as beautifully crafted as “kailangan mong tumalon sa kawalan,” “digmaan ang
iyong asawa, ako lamang ay iyong querida,” and “para kayong mga birhen na
naniniwala sa pag-ibig ng puta.” Here is a script so elegant that it can even
make curse words sound so cultured, so tasteful.

Overall, Heneral Luna is not just a film but a wake-up call driving the ever
reminder that some things never change. Its message – we Filipinos are our
own worst enemies, lacking in resolve and torn by self-interests. It is a story
representative of not just our current and still chaotic political landscape but
of who we are and what we can do but don’t. Though it may not be perfect
in its execution, the film does its duty in leaving us with the question lingering
“Bayan o sarili?”

13
Performance Task No. 3 (50 pts.)

Directions: Print or cut out sample movie review from a newspaper. Write what
makes it a well-written review. Create your own standards for writing a good
review. You may include elements such as a detailed summary or the analysis of
the craftsmanship of the film. Think of other elements that are important and
percentage points for each element. Below is the rubric for evaluating your paper.

9-10pts 7-8pts 5-6pts 3-4pts 1-2pts

Summary Clearly Presents Presents Insufficient No explanation
(20%) presents author’s thesis author’s thesis, explanation of of author’s
author’s thesis and describes but may not author’s thesis, thesis, and/or
How well and describes his/her provide and/or no description of
does the his/ her strategies for sufficient insufficient strategies for
student strategies for supporting it. description of description of supporting
summarize supporting it. strategies for strategies for thesis.
the text? Describes supporting it. supporting thesis.
Clearly and organization and Poor or no
succinctly presentation of Describes Insufficient description of
describes text. organization and description of text’s text’s
organization presentation of organization and organization and
and text, but may presentation. presentation.
presentation of need more
text details
Overall Exhibits clarity, Exhibits clarity, Exhibits some Exhibit some Exhibit little or
Quality of complexity, and some depth clarity, though faulty logic, no evidence of
Analysis perceptiveness, about the topic, only minimal and/or effective thinking
(20%) originality, and but lacks the depth of thought stereotypical or about the topic
depth of thought qualities of about the topic. superficial (please note that
How well does about the topic. complexity, thinking about the there may be
the student perceptiveness, topic. effective thinking
analyze the Provides and originality Makes some in the
text? excellent exhibited in level attempt to Insufficient composition, but
evaluation of A. present the attempt to present not about the
text’s weaknesses weaknesses or the weaknesses or topic).
or strengths; Provides clear strengths of the strengths of the
evaluative evaluation of text; evaluative text; evaluative Poor to no
criteria are text’s criteria are used. criteria are attempt to
unique and weaknesses or unclear. present the
interesting. strengths; Places text in weaknesses or
evaluative context Insufficient attempt strengths of the
Uses creativity to criteria are to put text in text; no obvious
interpret text unique and context criteria for
(e.g., places it in interesting. evaluation.
interesting
context or Puts text in
compares / meaningful Poor to no
contrasts with context when attempt to put
other relevant interpreting it. text in context.
texts).

14
Support of Exhibits Exhibits control Exhibits some Exhibit insufficient Exhibit a
Analysis command of of focus, control of focus, control of focus, basic/elementar
(20%) focus, coherent organization, and organization organization (way y sense of
organization, development (all (structure may ramble, be organization
How well does and interesting of the subject be formulaic or repetitious, or (may be purely
the student development matter is be organized locked into a descriptive or
select, (with carefully relevant to the loosely around formula), and/or strictly
summarize chosen, topic, but is not the topic), and development (it formulaic), but
and/or insightful as insightfully development may be mostly ideas about the
paraphrase details, selected as a (may contain descriptive or lack topic are
supporting examples, response at level some poorly adequate support) generally
evidence from arguments, etc.) A) of the topic. chosen of the topic. undeveloped,
the text to of the topic. information, but illogical,
demonstrate major ideas are irrelevant, or
and support adequately inconsistent.
analysis supported).
REMINDERS
Organization Review is very Review is well
& Content well organized, organized,
(20%) containing an containing an
Please avoid erasures and write legibly. You may text,
introduction, introduction, teacher if you have further questions or clarifications about
body body
paragraphs,
and conclusion.
paragraphs,
and
REFERENCES
conclusion. Lacuata, rose Carmelle, (2015). Review: ‘Heneral Luna’ shows human sid
Paragraphs Retried on July 23, 2020 from http://news.abs-cbn.com
contain clear All paragraphs
topic sentences, contain topic shws-human-side-hero
focus on a single sentences, focus
issue, are on a single issue
coherent, and and are
organized coherently
according to an structured.
obvious pattern
of argument. Some use of
transitional
Effective use of expressions and
transitional other signposts
expressions and that make the
other signposts structure of the
that make the document clear.
structure of the
document clear. Student’s tone
and diction are
Student’s tone appropriate for
and diction the argument
enhance the being made
argument being about the text
made about the under review.
text under
review.

Grammar & Clear, concise Mostly clear,

Mechanics sentences. concise
(20%) sentences.
No grammatical
errors. May have some
minor
Citations are grammatical
included in the errors.
correct format.
Citations are
included in the
correct format;
may have minor
errors.

15
 Answer Key

Discover
Activity: Parts of a Review = Answers may vary

Deepen
Activity: Writing the Introduction

1. Sample answer = to elucidate the challenges of studying news discourse

2. Possible answers:
a. Definition of news discourse
b. Outline of different approaches
c. Methods of collecting data
d. Importance of studying discourse

Activity 1: Show-Me More= Answers may vary

Activity 2: It’s Your Time to Shine= Answers may vary
Activity 1: Tell-Me More= Answers may vary

Explore:
Activity 1: Support Me
1. Possible answers
a. The movie is good for younger audiences because of the positive values
highlighted in the story. Torres (1990) emphasized positive values as an
indicator of favorable viewership for younger generations.
b. The car can sustain higher speed for several hours. This is true based on
several lab tests conducted. The car is not only efficient in fuel consumption,
but it is quite fast compared to its competitors (Santos, 2019).

Activity 1: What Can You Say? (Possible answers)

1. The recommendation is positive.

a. The book is valuable resource.

b. The book discusses means of addressing methodological problems.
c. The book offers a range of options when confronting own ideas.
d. The book is recommended for graduate students and researchers.
e. The book integrates theoretical and methodological perspectives.
f. The book is valuable contribution for enrichment concerning news discourse.

2. Possible answers
a. The practical use of the book in the enrichment of scholarship concerning
news discourse
b. Serves as source of input concerning news discourse
c. The possible group of individuals who will be benefited by the book

Activity 2: It’s Your Turn= Answers may vary

16
17