PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI

FAKULTAS ILMU KOMPUTER UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

Kampus Salemba – Jl. Salemba Raya No. 4 Jakarta 10430
Phone: 021-3106014, Fax: 021-3102774, mti@cs.ui.ac.id

COURSE SYLLABUS
Course No: CSIE802061
Unit: 3 SKS
Course Title: IT Governance (Tata Kelola TI)
Schedule: Wednesday, 19.00-21.30 (150 minutes)
Lecturer: Yudho Giri Sucahyo, Ph.D, CISA, CISM
(yudho@cs.ui.ac.id)
Tutor: Muhammad Kasfu Hammi, S.Komp, MTI, CISA, CISM,
CGEIT*, CRISC* (kasfu@cs.ui.ac.id)
Language: Bahasa Indonesia and English
Course Objectives
Kuliah ini memperkenalkan konsep dan kerangka kerja tatakelola teknologi
informasi (IT governance) yang dibutuhkan suatu organisasi untuk memastikan bahwa
penerapan teknologi informasi (TI) dapat: selaras dengan strategi bisnis/organisasi,
memberikan manfaat bagi bisnis/organisasi, risikonya terkendali, kinerjanya
disempurnakan berdasarkan pengukuran, dan sumber dayanya digunakan secara optimal.
Setelah lulus dari kuliah ini mahasiswa diharapkan dapat mengevaluasi penerapan
tatakelola TI di suatu organisasi dan dapat menyusun rencana penerapan/penyempurnaan
tatakelola TI secara tepat sasaran.
Grading:
Participation 5% Final Exam 25%
Quiz 1,2 20% Project Assignment 25%
Mid Exam 25%
Main Textbooks:
• P. Weill and J. Ross, IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision
Rights for Superior Results, Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
• W. Van Grembergen and S. De Haes, Enterprise Governance of Information
Technology, Springer, 2009.
• ITGI Documents, Australian Standard, Ministry of Communication and IT
Republic of Indonesia.
• CISA Review Manual 2012/2013/2014/2015/2016/2017

Other Readings:
• There may be other reading materials from various publications assigned to this
class as we see fit.

Course Syllabus 1
Topics and Schedule:
Below is a list of lecture topics, scheduled for the weeks indicated; this is a guide only,
and is subject to change without notice. Readings are indicated in the fourth column. It is
recommended that this reading be completed prior to attending the lecture each week.

Week Date Lecture Topic Readings

1 29 Jan ITG-01-Introduction to IT Governance ITGI Board
Briefing on IT
Governance
2 5 Feb ITG-02-Governance on IT Decision Making Weill & Ross
Forming Group for Case Studies and Proj (2004)
Assignments
3 12 Feb ITG-03-IT Governance: Archetypes for Weill & Ross
Allocating Decision Rights (2004)
ITG-04-Mechanisms for Implementing IT
Governance
4 19 Feb ITG-06-CoBIT 4.1 CoBIT 4.1 –
(Australia) ISACA [MKH]
Weill & Ross
(2004)
5 28 Feb Guest Lecture
(Friday) (together with RiskMgt)

6 4 Mar ITG-07-Enterprise Governance of IT in Weill & Ross

Practice (2004)
7 11 Mar Quiz 1 AS-8015, PUTK
ITG-08-National IT Governance Standard TIKN-2007
8 18 Mar Mid Exam (W1-W7)
9 27 Mar ITG-09 IT Value Governance Val-IT
(Friday) ITG-11-IT Balanced Scorecard IT BSC
10 1 Apr ITG-05-ITSM ISO20000, ITIL
[MKH]
11 8 Apr ITG-06A-CoBIT 5, CoBIT 2019 CoBIT 5, CoBIT
2019 – ISACA
[MKH]
12 15 Apr Quiz 2
Guest Lecture
13 22 Apr ITG-10-IT Risk Management – Risk-IT Risk-IT
(online)
14 29 Apr Group 1,2,3 Presentation [MKH]
15 6 May Group 4,5,6 Presentation [MKH]
16 13 May Final Exam

Course Syllabus 2
 STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP

Saya/kami yang bertandatangan di bawah ini menyatakan bahwa makalah/tugas terlampir adalah
murni hasil pekerjaan saya/kami sendiri. Tidak ada pekerjaan orang lain yang saya/kami gunakan
tanpa menyebutkan sumbernya.

Materi ini tidak/belum pernah disajikan/digunakan sebagai bahan untuk makalah/tugas pada mata
ajaran lain, kecuali saya/kami menyatakan dengan jelas bahwa saya/kami menggunakannya.

Saya/kami memahami bahwa tugas yang saya/kami kumpulkan ini dapat diperbanyak dan atau
dikomunikasikan untuk tujuan mendeteksi adanya plagiarisme.

Nama Mahasiswa :
Nomor Mahasiswa :
Kelas :
Mata Ajaran :
Judul Makalah/Tugas :

Hari, Tanggal :
Nama Pengajar :
Tandatangan :
(Dibuat oleh seluruh anggota kelompok)

Course Syllabus 3
ACADEMIC HONESTY STATEMENT
taken from: http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA542/index.htm

Academic misconduct will not be tolerated in this class. Academic misconduct may be
defined as "any activity which tends to compromise the academic integrity of the
institution, or subvert the educational process". I expect complete honesty in the
completion of tests and assignments. It is my understanding that the student's signature
on any test or assignment means that the student neither gave nor received unauthorized
aid. Beyond cheating on quizzes or exams, academic misconduct also includes the
submission of plagiarized work for an academic requirement. Plagiarism is "the
representation of another's works or ideas as one's own; it includes the unacknowledged
word for word use and/or paraphrasing of another person's work, and/or the inappropriate
unacknowledged use of another person's ideas". Thus each argument made in the research
papers which is not completely the student's own, must be footnoted or otherwise
referenced to indicate its source.

"Plagiarism, or presenting another's works or ideas as one's own, is a form of stealing.

The instructor reserves the right to examine any source used by the student before giving
a grade on a paper, and to give and "incomplete" in the course if necessary, to allow time
to obtain sources. Students should be prepared to show source material to the instructor
for the purpose of verifying information. Academic dishonesty will not be tolerated.

Academic dishonesty includes the following offenses:

1. Claiming as your own work a paper written by another student.
2. Turning in a paper that contains paraphrases of someone else's ideas but does not give
proper credit to that person for those ideas.
3. Turning in a paper that is largely a restatement in your own words of a paper written
by someone else, even if you give credit to that person for those ideas. The thesis and
organizing principles of a paper must be your own.
4. Turning in a paper that uses the exact words of another author without using quotation
marks, even if proper credit is given in a citation, or that changes the words only slightly
and claims them to be paraphrases.
5. Turning in the same paper, even in a different version, for two different courses
without the permission of both professors involved.
6. Using any external source (notes, books, other students, etc.) for assistance during an
in-class exam, unless given permission to do so by the professor."
---- Source: Kendra Stewart et al., Columbia College

Violations of academic integrity must have consequences. Consequently, students who

cheat (behaviors cited in point 1 and 6 or similar behavior) may receive at least an E in
the course; other forms of dishonesty, similar to those covered in points 2 through 5 may
result in at least a 0 for the assignment.

Course Syllabus 4