Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BY
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, ENUGU CAMPUS
MAY 2009
2
TITLE PAGE
BY
CERTIFICATION
This work has been certified as meeting the requirement for the Award of Masters
of Business Administration (MBA) in Accountancy. The project committee certifies
that, this is the original work of the candidate who bears full responsibility for the
content of the work.
External Examiner
4
DEDICATION
I dedicated this work to the memory of my late parents, mostly to my mother late
(Mrs.) Agnes O. Isu who laid the foundation for my education and to my husband
Mr. Ukagu Robert Enang who have been a source of inspiration to me.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost my gratitude goes to the Almighty God, redeemer for his
protection and kind gestures without which it would not have been possible for me
attainable in my life.
To my supervisor, Dr. (Mrs.) R. Okafor, a woman endowed with many gifts, a big
thank you for her understanding, support and teaching throughout the period of
5
writing this work. I also thank my accounting lectures for their support in ensuring
I appreciate the efforts of my siblings, for their encouragement, I say thank you.
study for their in depth help and guide to the completion of this work.
I meticulously thank all who have contributed in one way or the other because
ABSTRACT
The theme of this study considered the impact and efficiency of cost control
system in corporate profitability (a case of the Nigerian Breweries Aba, Aba State).
In the management set- up, cost control is used as an indispensable tool, which aid
organization to attain their corporate objectives of profit maximization. This study
reveals the cost structure in manufacturing type, cost control adopted to
minimize waste of resources. Critically, the opinions of those that occupy the key
positions of the organization such as the chief accountant, the logistic manager,
technical officers etc were sorted and it was of immense help to this study. For the
achievement of the objectives of this research, data were collected by use of oral
interview and questionnaires. Data collected were subjected through analysis using
simple percentage, frequency and histogram distribution while the stated
hypothesis were tested using chi-square (X2 ) to ascertain its reliability and
objectivity. The result of the research shows that the organizations adopt cost
control measures and this control accords management the opportunity to achieve
corporate performance and profitability. The management should emphasize more
on the training of employees on the application and measures of cost control and
enlighten them on the relationship, which exits between cost control and
profitability. Finally, the organization should try an embrace the technological and
economic trends in the society in order to have a vital edge over its profitability.
6
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title page……………………………………………………………………. i.
Certification page…………………………………………………………..ii
Dedication page…………………………………………………………….iii
Acknowledgement……………………………………………………….…iv
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………v
Lists of table and Figures…………………………………………vi- viii
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the study
1.2 Statement of the problem
1.3 Research questions
1.4 Objective of the study
1.5 Scope of the study
1.6 Research Hypothesis
1.7 Significance of the study
1.8 Definitions of terms
References
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 An overview of cost control
2.2 The relativeness of cost and cost control
2.3 The concepts of cost control and cost reduction
2.3.1 Approaches to cost reduction
2.3.2 Major difficulties with cost reduction
2.3.3 The techniques and methods of cost reduction
2.3.3b Methods of reducing labour costs
2.4 Classification of costs
2.5 Cost structure
9
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION
5.1 Summary of findings
5.2 Recommendations
5.3 Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendices
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
each minute of the day. All our daily expenses are been
others.
organizational goals
comprises of:
• Service to customers.
development a priority.
community.
12
performance.
flow analysis.
margin
corporate profitability.
profitability?
an organization?
company.
into:
profitability of an organization.
standard.
that actual results are in line with the set standard; so that
the activity.
industry(s).
profitability.
REFERENCES
Publishers.
Meigs, W. B et at (1977), Accounting: The basis for business
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
These are:
control.
i. Labour
ii. Materials
iii. Sales
23
iv. Overheads
v. Energy
c. Reduced output
strategic planning.
to cost units.
Energy/Power: Faulty designs result in excessive use of
management.
benefit.
economic resources.
below:
Cost = Usage X Price i.e
and services.
and overheads), for effective cost control i.e cost saving and
response.
REDUCTION
planned cost levels, are too high, even though costs control
and all levels within the organization from the shop floor
to them.
centre.
products or processes.
thinking.
are unavailable.
j. Some fixed costs are available in the short-term (e.g.
REDUCTION
other equipment.
following methods.
materials.
in operational processes.
might involve.
competitive.
following methods:
before.
greater effort.
reduced by:
37
study are
performance.
and equipment.
paying workers.
i. Organization analysis
office layout"
of forms.
vi. Collection and use of work measurement data to
and overheads.
all the direct material cost, indirect labour cost and all
relationship to production.
department of an organization.
These are:
For the fact, that fixed cost (FC) does not changed because
Volume
Volume
me
Figure 2.1 Fixed cost Figure 2.2 Fixed cost
operation.
level.
Graphically depict
44
Cost
Volume of output
Variable region
Cost
Fixed region
Volume of output
Figure 2.4. Semi variable cost
45
(TVC)
controllable.
control.
(2008:38)
Viz:
a. Responsibility accounting
b. Marginal costing
c. Standard costing
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING
i. Cost centre
manager.
50
profitability is at stake.
MARGINAL COSTING
cost units and fixed costs of the period are written off in full
Contribution
Direct Material X
Direct Labour X
Prime Cost X
Manufacturing Overhead XX
sales/output.
overheads.
made.
-
54
DISADVANTAGES
costing. The principle does not only tend to lower the worth
capital.
STANDARD COSTING
conditions.
55
product or services.
methods
activity.
into stock.
exception.
future cost.
LIMITATIONS
practice.
established standards.
organizational objective.
accounting period.
60
Feedback
Re-planning
in preparing budgets.
BENEFITS OF BUDGETING
planned target.
budget my control.
LIMITATION OF BUDGETING
managerial performance.
conditions.
BUDGETARY CONTROL
among others:
be achieved.
standard.
can be compared.
minimizing waste.
the future. The budget is a plan for the future and as such
improve profitability.
CORPORATE PROFITABILITY
volume.
force.
customers.
business operation.
CONTROL
standard cost and actual cost. It's the end result for setting
variance analysis.
standard set.
variances as follows:
deviation occurs.
profitability.
STAR lager beer rolled off the bottling lines in its Lagos
Nigeria and the most modem in the world. Thus, from its
69
operational staff.
REFERENCE
Britain:Pitman.
31/01/2009.
http://www.astm.orgcitedon 15/08/2007.
http://www.manufacturing.comlbackground cited on
05/03/2009
http://www.nbplc.comlourcompanyprofile cited on
05/03/2009.
Press.
Owerri.
Cincinnati.
72
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
of chi-square.
1. Primary Data
2. Secondary Data
PRIMARY DATA
instruments.
SECONDARY DATA
profitability.
corporate profitability.
of cost control.
the respondents felt at ease and relax to give their best to the
staff of the areas of study was drawn from the various hierarchies
n = N
1 + N (e) 2
I = Theoretical constant
e = 9% or 0.09
Therefore,
n = 100
1 + 100(0.09)2
n = 55.248 = n = 55
77
using percentage:
(1976:77).
figures.
questionnaire.
null hypothesis-
(E row) (E column)
Grand Total
frequency.
weighted. E
DF = (r –1) (c -1).
concern.
REFERENCES
CHAPTER FOUR
questions.
TABLE 4.1-1
Table 4.1.2
1 Below yr1 18 33
2 1-5yrs 20 36
Total 55 100
Table 4.1.3
Table 4.2.1
1 Yes 53 96.4
2 No 2 3.
Total 55 100
Y - axis (%)
100
96.4%
80
60
40
20 3.6%
0 X - aixis
Yes No
Figure 1: A Histogram distribution
response.
Table 4.2.2
Y – axis
100
96.4%
80
60
40
24%
12%
20
0 X - aixis
Most Fairly Inefficiently
efficiently efficiently
88
response.
TABLE 4.2.3
1 Yes 50 91
2 No 5 9
Total 55 100
60
40
20 9%
0 X - aixis
Yes No
Table 4.2.4
LOOK LIKE?
1 High 40 73
2 Moderate 12 22
3 Low 3 5
Total 55 100
confirms that the company’s profits are high when costs are
TABLE 4.2.5
1 Yes 55 100
2 No 0 0
Total 55 100
TABLE 4.2.6
1 True 40 73
2 False 15 27
Total 55 100
wife.
Y – axis
100
73%
80
60
40
27%
20
0 X - aixis
True False
A histogram distribution
TABLE 4.2.7
1 Yes 40 37
2 No 5 9
3 No idea 10 18
Total 55 100
cost.
93
TABLE 4.2.8
1 Greatly 36 65
2 Fairly 19 35
Total 55 100
80
65%
60
40 35%
20
0 X - aixis
True False
response.
TABLE 4.2.9
1 Yes 45 82
2 No 0 0
3 No idea 10 18
Total 55 100
Y – axis
100
82%
80
60
40 18%
20
0%
0 X - aixis
Yes No No idea
TABLE 4.2.10
1 Yes 40 73
2 No 15 27
Total 55 100
60
40 27%
20
0 X-axis
True False
Figure 7: Histogram distribution
97
response.
TABLE 4.2.11
1 Yes 48 87
2 No 0 0
3 No idea 7 13
Total 55 100
the company.
TABLE 4.2.12
1 Yes 55 100
2 No 0 0
Total 55 100
technology.
99
TABLE 4.2.13
1 True 46 84
2 False 9 16
Total 55 100
60
40
16%
20
X-axis
0
True False
A Histogram distribution
response.
TABLE 4.2.14
1 True 50 91
2 False 5 9
Total 55 100
TABLE 4.2.15
1 Yes 28 51
2 No 16 29
3 No idea 11 20
Total 55 100
No 5 (2.5) 0 (2.5) 5
Total 55 55 100
Note: The figure E1 and E2 are from table 4.2.3 and 4.2.5
The figures before the parenthesis represent the
Grand Total
E1 = 55 x 105
110 = 52.5
E2 = 55 x 5
110 = 2.5
103
Table 4.3.2
5.24
Therefore: (2 – 1) (2 – 1)
DF = 1(1) = 1
DECISION RULE.
Reject Ho > X2
CONCLUSION
organization.
Table 4.3.3
0ptions V1 V2 Total
No 2 (8.5) 15 (8.5) 17
Total 55 55 110
V3 = 55 X 93
110 = 46.5
V2 = 55 X 17
110 = 8.5
Table 4.3.2
Therefore: (2 – 1) (2 – 1)
DF = 1 (1) = 1
DECISION RULE
Reject Ho ≥ X2
CONCLUSION
rejects the Ho and accepts H1, which states that cost control
REFERENCES
Akachukwu C.O (2002), Statistical Analysis for Business, Val son
(WA) Ltd Enugu
Aham, A (1994),Data Collection and Analysis, Avan Global
publishers, Okigwe
108
CHAPTER FIVE
profit maximization,
making.
4. Cost control was seen as a good exercise or
performance.
company.
budgeted.
volume.
greater productivity.
work force.
5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
effective.
regular intervals.
CONCLUSION
effectual.
113
BIOGRAPHY
Adeniji, A.A (2008), An insight into: Management Accounting .
Publishers, Okigwe.
Ltd.
Britain Pitman.
Publishers.
Lucey, T. (2002), Costing Lexington Avenue New York.
Malz Adolph et at (1990), Cost Accounting Planning and Control New York:
South Western.
PVT Ltd.
APPENDIX A
SIGNIFICANCE
Degree of freedom
INTRODUCTION LETTER
Yours faithfully,
APPENDIX B
company?
(c) Inefficient
(b) No
(d)Low
(c) No idea
(c) No idea
(b) No
(c) No idea
organization?