Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CASE STUDY
Judy, 19 tahun, telah berpacaran selama 6 bulan. Mereka melakukan
hubungan seksual dan bercakap mengenai kontrasepsi dengan malu-malu.
Pacarnya berfikir kondom sulit digunakan dan malu ketika membelinya.
Judy memutuskan untuk menggunakan pil KB. Dokter menganjurkan untuk
menggunakan keduanya (pil KB dan kondom) untuk mencegah kehamilan
dan penyakit menular seksual (PMS). Judy sangat takut hamil seperti teman
sekolahnya yang hamil diusia 17 tahun. Judy tidak khawatir akan PMS
karena ia kenal baik pacarnya dan hanya melakukan hubungan seksual
dengan pacarnya tersebut. Enam bulan kemudian, Judy mengalami keluhan
keputihan dan mengetahui bahwa pacarnya juga tidur dengan gadis lain di
kampusnya. Ia pun menjadi sangat marah
A. WHAT ARE HEALTH BEHAVIOURS?
3 types of health-related behaviour: Health behaviours :
• A health behaviour • Health-impairing habits
a behaviour aimed to prevent disease ‘behavioural pathogens’
• An illness behaviour • Health protective behaviours
A behaviour aimed to seek remedy ‘behavioural immunogens’
• A sick role behaviour Matarazzo (1984)
Any activity aimed at getting well
Kasl and Cobb (1966)
Generally health behaviours are regarded as behaviours that are related to the
health status of the individual
WHY STUDY HEALTH BEHAVIOUR
BEHAVIOUR AND LONGEVITY
BEHAVIOR AND MORTALITY
B. THE ROLE OF HEALTH BELIEF
• Knowledge does play a role 4 key approaches to health beliefs:
in how we behave ▪ Role of individual beliefs
• Health beliefs as the key ▪ Stage models
predictors of behaviour
▪ Social cognition models
• Knowledge alone cannot
predict or change behaviour ▪ Integrated models
and that we need to
understand the ways in
which people think about
their behaviour.
INDIVIDUAL BELIEF
There are 4 sets of individual beliefs that related to health behavior:
1. Attribution theory
2. Risk perception
3. Motivation and self-determination theory
4. Self-efficacy
1. Attribution Theory
• The origins: “Individuals are motivated to see their social world as
predictable and controllable; Heider (1958) → there is a need to
understand causality
• Kelley (1971), attributions about causality were structured according
to causal schemata made up of the following criteria:
• Distinctiveness
determines the extent to which the cause of a
• Consensus behaviour is regarded as a product of a
• Consistency over time characteristic internal to the individual or
external to them
• Consistency over modality
Redefined dimensions of attribution:
• Internal vs external Health locus of control
• Stable vs unstable
• Global vs specific
• Controllable vs uncontrollable
Adjustment to serious
between stages as
illness/accident an individual
changes their
Change model
behaviour.
Health Action
Processs Approach
The Stages Of Change Model (SOC) Prochaska and DiClemente (1982)
• Describing the processes involved in eliciting and maintaining change
Components If applied to smoking cessation
Pre- not intending to make any changes. I am happy being a smoker and intend to
contemplation continue smoking
• do not always occur in a linear fashion, dynamic and not ‘all or nothing
The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) Schwarzer (1992)
The distinction:
• Motivation stage (self-
efficacy, outcome
expectancies, threat
appraisal)
• Action phase (volitional,
situational, behavioral
factor)
D. SOCIAL COGNITION MODELS
• Examine the predictors and precursors to health behaviours and take a continuum
approach to behaviour and behaviour change.
• attempt to place the individual within the context both of other people and the
broader social world,
• Behaviour is governed by:
Past
Behaviour Specific Plan