Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Objective
1. Explain the problem of allocating physical resources to multiple activities
of the project.
2. Identify the problem of PM in finding the best trade-offs among
resources, particularly time.
3. Define the basic approaches to addressing the constrained resources
allocation problem.
4. Differentiate resource loading, allocation, and leveling methods and
concepts.
5. Describe heuristic methods for the multi-project scheduling problem.
Chapter Outline
9.1 The Introduction
I. Fast Tracking
Another way to expedite a project is known as “fast-tracking.”
72
It refers to overlapping the design and build phases of a
project
Because design is usually completed before construction
starts, overlapping the two activities will result in shortening
the project duration.
73
Each of the human resources used in the project is listed,
followed by the name of the activities in which the resource is
used.
The total hours of work for each resource called for by the
action plan are shown together with the amount planned for
each activity.
B. Figure 9-4 The AOA Network of table 8-2
Because the project action plan is the source of information
on activity precedencies, durations, and resources
requirements, it is the primary input for both the project
schedule and its budget.
C. Figure 9-5 Modified AOA diagram showing activity slack and
resource usage (from Figure 9-4).
It shows the “calendarized” AOA diagram, similar to the
familiar Gantt chart. Resource demands can now be summed
by time period across all activities.
D. Figure 9-6
The PM must be aware of the ebbs and flows of usage for
each input resource throughout the life of the project.
74
PMs often apply risk management techniques to resources known to be
scarce, but neglect to consider the more common resources that usually
cause the problems.
Two fundamental approaches to constrained resource allocation problems:
i. Heuristic approaches - employ rules of thumb that have
been found to work reasonably well in similar situations.
ii. Optimization approaches - seek the best solutions but are
far more limited in their ability to handle complex situations
and large problems.
I. Heuristic Methods
75
II. Optimizing Method
A. Optimizing is a process to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of the PMs
B. This method is to improve the design robustness of the
decoupling layout and frequency allocation of power train
maintaining systems.
C. The interval optimization results can meet the decoupling layout
requirement from the view point of engineering.
D. The goal of optimization method is to find an optimal or near-
optimal solution with low computational effort.
E. To achieve the best design relative to a set of prioritized criteria
or constraints. These include maximizing factors such as
productivity, strength, reliability, longevity, efficiency and
utilization.
76
B. The most commonly applied rules are AOA and AON.
C. All these are commercially available for customers and
several different software.
a. Resources Scheduling Method- In calculating
activity priority with the minimum value of d (ij)
where d(ij) increase in project duration resulting
activity j follows activity.
b. Minimum Late Finish- Rules assigns prioritize
the activities base on activity finish at times as
determined.
c. Greatest Resources Demand- A method that
assign prioritize base on the total resources
requirements.
d. Greatest resource Utilization-It gives priority
to the combination activity result in maximum
resource utilization during scheduling period.
e. Most Possible Job- Is given to the set of
activities that result greatest number of activities
that scheduled any period of time.
77
o There is no possible way of accomplishing a project without
exceeding the given budget.
o Project workloads and due dates are set by the sales group,
not by the nature of the projects and the level of resources
needed.
o Project due dates are set unrealistically short as an “incentive”
for people to work harder and faster.
To deal with the strong optimistic bias in many project schedules, let us
consider just a few of the things that tend to create it.
i. Thoughtless optimism Some PMs, apparently with a strong
need to deny that lateness could be their fault, deal with every
problem faced by their projects as strict exceptions, acts of
chance that cannot be forecast and hence need not be the
subject of planning.
ii. Capacity should be set to equal demand Some senior
managers refuse to recognize that projects are not assembly
lines and are not subject to standard operations management
line of balance methods.
iii. The “Student Syndrome” This phrase is Goldratt’s name for
his view that students always want more time to complete a
project. Given more time, they delay starting the project until
the last possible moment.
iv. Multitasking to reduce idle time Consider a situation where
there are two projects, A and B, each with three sequential
activities and with you as the only resource required by both
projects. Each activity requires 10 days.
v. Complexity of networks makes no difference.
vi. People need a reason to work hard Senior managers of our
acquaintance have been known to argue that project
workers—and they include project managers in that
category— “always” have enough slack time in their activity
duration estimates to make sure that they can complete the
activities on time and “without too much sweat.”
vii. Game playing- This is possibly the most common cause of
late projects. It is certainly a major cause of frustration for
anyone involved in a project.
78
I. Do Early Finishes and Late Finishes Cancel Out? So What?
A. The early and late activity completions being cancel out is one
of the tacit assumptions of probabilistic networks. This
assumption might be sensible were it not for the matters listed
in the previous subsection.
B. Goldratt writes about the phenomenon (1997, Chapter 13 and
elsewhere), and a few others have also briefly discussed the
matter there is a mild debate as to the reason for this
deplorable condition.
79
Chapter Summary
The project crashing results in a high direct cost to the project, but also gives
clear identification for optimal time cost. In project management, direct cost
is the basis for crashed cost calculation. Project crashing serves the
purpose of effective time management.
Fast-tracking seems to be a reasonable way to expedite construction
projects, as well as other types of projects when the early “build” or “carry
out” steps are fairly routine and well understood.
The Resources Allocator problem, one cannot save time—one can only
spend more or less of it.
The relationship between progress, time, and resource availability/usage is
the major focus of this chapter.
Time Limited: The project must be finished by a certain time, using as few
resources as possible. But it is time, not resource usage that is critical. •
Resource Limited: The project must be finished as soon as possible, but
without exceeding some specific level of resource usage or some general
resource constraint.
Project Management in Practice Benefit/Cost Analysis Saves Chicago’s
Deep Tunnel Project. This report updates an initial benefit-cost analysis of
the water conveyance tunnels at the center of the Bay Delta Conservation
Plan (BDCP). We find the tunnels are not economically justified, because
the costs of the tunnels are roughly 2.5 times larger than their benefits.
Resource loading describes the amounts of individual resources an existing
schedule requires during specific time periods.
Resource leveling aims to minimize the period-by-period variations in
resource loading by shifting tasks within their slack allowances.
The criteria for measuring schedule effectiveness are those applied to job-
shops, and several approaches to resource-constrained multiple project
scheduling use the job-shop model.
To deal with the strong optimistic bias in many project schedules, let us
consider the following things that tend to create it: (1) Thoughtless optimism;
(2) Capacity should be set to equal
Heuristic approach offers a quick solution that is easy to understand and
implement while Optimization approach produces the best possible solution
to a given planning and scheduling problem
Constrained resource scheduling refers to the failure of a supplier to
produce or deliver the assignment of the resource to another activity, and
loss or theft of a resource.
Usually, the multi-project problem involves determining how to allocate
resources to, and set a completion time for a new project that is added to
an existing set of ongoing projects.
80
Assessment
A. Fill in the blanks.
1. Another way to expedite a project is known as _______.
2. If all three variables – time, cost, specifications – are fixed, the system is
_______.
3. _______ describes the amounts of individual resources an existing schedule
requires during specific time periods.
4. A _______ task requires a fixed amount of time and known quantities of
resources.
5. “One cannot save time – one can only spend more or _______ of it.”
B. Identification.
1. It aims to minimize the period-by-period variations in resource loading by
shifting tasks within their slack allowances.
2. It is particular concern to industrial firms because of the high cost of making
resources available.
3. It often considered the most important of the criteria, is the time past a project’s
due date or delivery date when the project is completed.
4. Realistic approaches that may identify feasible solutions to the problem. They
usually use simple priority rules.
5. It can be used to obtain solutions to certain types of multiproject scheduling
problems.
81