IPP IELTS – AIM 6+

CYCLE 02 | LESSON 01
WRITING LESSON 01
TREND CHARTS WITH FUTURE PREDICTIONS – TABLES
+ 50=>10: The figure decreased by 40. = The figure underwent a decline OF 40.
+ 50=>10: The figure declined to 10. = There was a fall TO 10.
+ DECLINE IN? There is a decline in the number of students.
There is a decline in young population.
+ peak (at) => verb / reached a peak of [noun]

Writing Task 1 – In-class Topic:

The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the
population aged 65 = the elderly population and above in three countries. Summarize the information
by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Country 1988 2000 2030
Canada – will increase 16.32 % 20.67 % 26.35 %
Germany – will increase 20.45 % 25.32 % 30.42 %
Rank first
UK – will increase 14.23 % 14.89 % 20.35 %
The lowest percentage of
the elderly

INTRODUCTION:
The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the
population aged 65 = the elderly population and above in three countries – 1988 - 2030.
 The table compares the proportion of the elderly in three different countries between 1988
and 2030.
 The table compares the past data and future projections for the elderly population in three
different countries between 1988 and 2030.

OVERVIEW:
1. [trend] Overall, the proportion of people aged over 65 in the three given countries will all increase
SIGNIFICANTLY.
2. [comparison] German elderly population will always rank first in the chart, while the UK will
continue to have the lowest percentage of aging population. =

Page 1 of 3
 IPP IELTS – AIM 6+
CYCLE 02 | LESSON 01
Germany will continue its LEADING POSITION with the largest aging population, as opposed to the
lowest figure for the UK.

BODY PAR 01 – GERMANY & THE UK

S1. Germany: 1988 – 20.45% => rose significantly to 25.32% in 2000.
In 1988, 20.45% of Germany poplulation was the elderly people, followed by a significantly rose to
25.32% in 2000. The proportion of people over 65 population in Germany will continue to grow to
30.42% in 2030, which will make Germany continue to rank first among three countries.
S2. Germany: will continue to grow to 30.42% - Germany will continue to rank first
S3. The UK: increased insignificantly to 14.89% in 2000 => will rise more substantially to 20.35% -
luôn là the lowest figure
VERSION 01: The UK had its aging population increased insignificantly to 14.89% in 2000,
BEFORE A PREDICTED SUBSTAINTIAL RISE TO 20.35% IN 2030, making it the all-time
lowest figure in the given three years.
VERSION 02: The proportion of the elderly in the UK / increased insignificantly to 14.89% in 2000
and will rise more substantially to 20.35% in 2030, making it the all-time lowest figure in the given
three years.
VERSION 03: In 1988, 14.23% of the UK population was the elderly, followed by a slight increase
to 14.89% in 2000 and a more substantial one to 20.35% in 2030, making it the all-time lowest
figure in the given three years.
VERSION 04: The elderly / accounted for the smallest proportion in the UK, at 14.23% in 1988,
followed by a slight increase to 14.89% in 2000 and a more substantial one to 20.35% in 2030,
making it the all-time lowest figure in the given three years.

BODY PAR 02 – CANADA

WT2 – 01.08.2020 - TOPIC:

Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities, while
others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together. Discuss both views
and state your own opinion?
PAR 01 – THE BENEFITS OF MIXING students of PAR 02 – THE BENEFITS OF GROUPING students
varied levels into one class based on their academic performance/abilities
TOPIC SENTENCE: On the one hand, mixing students + benefit 01 - teachers: build lesson plans / TAILOR (V.)
of varied levels into classes can be beneficial. = On the TRAINING CURRIULUM to meet the needs of each

Page 2 of 3
 IPP IELTS – AIM 6+
CYCLE 02 | LESSON 01
one hand, the benefits of organizing mixed-level classes group of students => the difficulty levels of tasks / lessons
are undeniable. / FIT = SUITABLE FOR …… => [example] regarding
+ benefit 01: peer learning / learn from each other / foreign language class => grouping is important / students of
out-performing students support the less able ones / different foreign language command => cần nội dung khác
[hay] nhau [from basic conversations to more advanced skills =>
Firstly, in a diverse class, top students can support low- these cannot be provided in the same class]
achieving ones by answering their questions, giving feel more engaged in the lessons
explanations, and acting as facilitator alongside the + benefit 02 - students: stimulate competition in the
teacher. Such peer learning can either benefit high classroom => improved learning outcomes / educational
achievers, who can reinforce their knowledge through outcomes
the reiteration of the lessons to their peers.
+ benefit 02: high achievers act as role models =>
trigger a sense of competition in low-achieving students
=> motivate less able students to study harder
On the other hand, it would be beneficial for not only teachers but students as well to streamline
children based on their talents and academic records = streamlining students based on their abilities
is of GREAT BENEFIT to both teachers and students. There is no doubt that teachers can tailor their
training curriculum and tasks to meet the needs of each group of students by organizing and
dividing classes, which makes them suitable for the difficulty levels both tiers’ abilities to make
students more engaged in the classroom. as well as optimizes their performance so they might feel
more engaged in the lessons. For example, regarding a foreign language class, grouping students a
diverse class is so important for those learners, who have different levels, to address their
commands in this field. Such requirements can needs, which differ range from basic conversations
to more advanced skills. so these cannot be provided in the same class. As a result, this motivation
can trigger the competition between high achievers, leading to improved educational outcomes in
general. [motivation nào??????] In this way, more productive classes can benefit students most,
resulting in improved learning outcomes and optimizing learners’ performance.
 a multi-level class = a diverse class
 organizing and dividing classes = streamline students based on their talent and academic records =
ability-based schooling system
 students with lower abilities = lower-ability students= less able students >< high achievers = high-
achieving learners
 play the role of a facilitator alongside the teacher
 (receive) peer support
 reinforce their knowledge through the reiteration of the lessons to their peers.
 tailor lessons and classroom activities / suitable difficulty levels
 meet both tiers’ needs in a mixed-ability class
 feel engaged / a more productive classroom
 tailor training programs
 optimize students’ performance / realize their full potential

Page 3 of 3