Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Article Review Rubrics Oct2020

    Uploaded by

    AISHAH HUDA AHMAD DAUD
    7 views3 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views3 pages

    Article Review Rubrics Oct2020

    Uploaded by

    AISHAH HUDA AHMAD DAUD

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

    UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, MALAYSIA

    RUBRIC ARTICLE REVIEW


    PRINCIPLES OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP
    ENT530

    ENT530OCT2020/NFG
    FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT
    UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, MALAYSIA

    ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRICS


    (20%)

    Course Name: Principles of Entrepreneurship Name: Lecturer’s Name:

    Course Code: ENT530 Group:

    Criteria Unacceptable Fair Good Excellent Marks


    0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 obtained
    Article Selection There was no source cited The validity of the source The source was reliable The source was reliable
    within the article. was questionable. The article was up-to-date, The author and date of the
    (20%) Article was not up to date or The date and author were within the time-frame article were cited. The article
    attached to the review. Topic not given. specified and attached to was up to date, within the
    was inappropriate for this Article was not up to date or the review. Topic time-frame specified. Topic
    assignment. attached to the review. moderately related to the clearly related to the content
    Peripherally related to the content specified
    content specified.
    Introduction Does not adequately convey Conveys topic, but not key All material clearly related All material clearly related to
    (20%) topic. Does not describe question (s). Describe to subtopic, main topic and subtopic, main topic. Strong
    subtopic to be reviewed subtopics to reviewed. logically organized. organisation and integration
    Purpose of the writing are Purpose of the writing are Content and purpose of of material within subtopic.
    unclear stated the writing are clear Content and purpose of the
    writing are clear.
    Commentary and Opinion/argument is not Opinion/argument has no Opinion/argument on topic Opinion/argument is fully
    argument stated. Review demonstrates support. Review has some outside support. supported by evidence.
    (20%) a poor level of critical demonstrate a fair level of Review demonstrates a Review demonstrates
    evaluation and thinking critical evaluation and good level of critical outstanding level of critical
    about evidence presented in thinking about the evidence evaluation and thinking evaluation and thinking
    the article. presented in the article. about evidence presented about evidence presented in
    in the article. the article.

    ENT530OCT2020/NFG
    Criteria Unacceptable Fair Good Excellent Marks
    0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 obtained
    Conclusion Does not summarize points Review of key conclusions. Conclusion sums up Conclusion sums up all the
    (20%) with the thesis Some integration with the almost all of the research research into one concise
    idea/statement. thesis statement. into a competent and complete summation.
    summations.
    Writing style and Sentences were somewhat Sentences were correctly Sentences were correctly Sentences were well written
    language varied, and inappropriate constructed constructed and well- and expressed
    (20%) with minimal grammatical articulated
    errors

    ENT530OCT2020/NFG

    You might also like