FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, MALAYSIA

RUBRIC ARTICLE REVIEW

PRINCIPLES OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP
ENT530

ENT530:APRIL 2020
 FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, MALAYSIA
Course Name: Principles of Entrepreneurship
Course Code: ENT530
Criteria Unacceptable
0-5
Article Selection There was no source cited
within the article.
(20%) Article was not up to date or
attached to the review.
Topic was inappropriate for
this assignment.
Introduction Does not adequately convey
(20%) topic. Does not describe
subtopic to be reviewed
Purpose of the writing are
unclear
Commentary and Opinion/argument is not
argument stated. Review
(20%) demonstrates a poor level of
critical evaluation and
thinking about evidence
presented in the article.
Conclusion Does not summarize points
(20%) with the thesis
idea/statement.
ENT530:APRIL 2020
ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRICS
Name:
Fair
6-10
The validity of the source
was questionable.
The date and author was
not given.
Article was not up to date or
attached to the review.
Peripherally related to the
content specified.
Conveys topic, but not key
question (s). Describe
subtopics to reviewed.
Purpose of the writing are
stated
Opinion/argument has no
support. Review
demonstrate a fair level of
critical evaluation and
thinking about the evidence
presented in the article.
Review of key conclusions.
Some integration with the
thesis statement.
Lecturer’s Name:
Group:
Good
11-15
The source was reliable
The article was up-to-date,
within the time-frame
specified and attached to
the review. Topic
moderately related to the
content specified
All material clearly related
to subtopic, main topic
and logically organized.
Content and purpose of
the writing are clear
Opinion/argument on topic
has some outside support.
Review demonstrates a
good level of critical
evaluation and thinking
about evidence presented
in the article.
Conclusion sums up
almost all of the research
into a competent
Excellent Marks
16-20 obtained
The source was reliable
The author and date of the
article were cited. The
article was up to date, within
the time-frame specified.
Topic clearly related to the
content
All material clearly related to
subtopic, main topic. Strong
organisation and integration
of material within subtopic.
Content and purpose of the
writing are clear.
Opinion/argument is fully
supported by evidence.
Review demonstrates
outstanding level of critical
evaluation and thinking
about evidence presented in
the article.
Conclusion sums up all the
research into one concise
and complete summation.
 summations.
Writing style and Sentences were somewhat Sentences were correctly Sentences were correctly Sentences were well written
language varied, and inappropriate constructed constructed and well- and expressed
(20%) with minimal grammatical articulated
errors

ENT530:APRIL 2020