Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 M K 0
K 2 M 0
2
I K M 0
1 1
2
I αM 0
1
ω
Dr Asif Israr - Institute of Space Technology
DUNKERLEY’S METHOD
3
1
I αM 0
ω 2
ω . . .
0 0 . 1 αn1 αn2 . αnn 0 0 . mn
1
ω2 α11 1
m α12m2 . α1nmn
1
2 α22m2
0
0 . α2nmn
ω
. . . .
1
αn1m1 αn2m2 . 2 αnnmn
ω
1 1 1
, 2 , ...... 2
ω1 ω2
2
ωn
Dr Asif Israr - Institute of Space Technology
DUNKERLEY’S METHOD
6
1 1 1 1 1 1
2 , 2 2 , ...... 2 2
ω 2
ω ω ω ω ω
1 2 n
n n 1
1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 ...... 2 2 ... 0
ω ω ω ω ω
1 2 n
Comparing this Eqn. with the earlier one
n n 1
1 1
2 α11m1 α22 m2 ... αnnmn 2
ω ω
α11α22 m1m2 α11α33 m1m3 ... αnn mn ... 0
Dr Asif Israr - Institute of Space Technology
DUNKERLEY’S METHOD
7
1 1 1
2 2 ...... 2 α11m1 α22m2 ... αnnmn
ω1 ω2 ωn
1
2 α11m1 α22m2 ... αnnmn
ω1
1
2 α11m1 α22m2 ... αnnmn
ω1
1 1 1 1
2 2 ...... 2
ω1
2
ω1n ω2n ωnn
K
Obtain the approximate fundamental m
natural frequency of the system shown in x1
the figure using Dunkerley’s method K
m
x2
K
m
x3
Dunkerley’s formula
1
2 α11m1 α22m2 ... αnnmn
ω1
OR
1 1 1 1
......
ω12 ω1n
2
ω22n ωnn
2
m
x2
m
K eq K
ω2n
2
K eq springs are in series
K m 2
K K
m ω2n
2
ω3n
2
x3 2m 3m
Dr Asif Israr - Institute of Space Technology
PROBLEM 1: DUNKERLEY’S METHOD
14
1 1 1 1
2 2 2
K
ω1
2
ω1n ω2n ω3n
m
x1
1 m 2m 3m 6m
K 2
ω1 K K K K
m
x2
ω1 0.40 K/m
K
m
x3
Dr Asif Israr - Institute of Space Technology
PROBLEM 1: DUNKERLEY’S METHOD
15
m1 m2
1 2
180 120
m1 = 100 kg, m2 = 50 kg
m1 m2
1 2
180 120
1.944 10 -3
9 10-3
α11 α22
EI EI
1
α11m1 α22 m2
ω 2
1
ω1 1.245 rad/s
m1 m2 m3
1 2 3
A B
y1 y3
y2
m1 m2 m3
1 2 3
A B
y1 y3
y2
m gy i i
ω2 i 1
n
ii
m y
i 1
2
K
m = 1kg, K = 1000 N/m 2 2m
x2
K
3 m
x3
1
α11 α21 α12 α31 α13
2K
2K
3 5
1 2m
x1 α22 α32 α23 α33
2K 2K
K
2 2m y1 α11m1g α12m2g α13m3 g
x2
mg 5mg 5g
K
y1 2 2 1
3 m 2K 2K 2000
x3
1
α11 α21 α12 α31 α13
2K
2K
1 2m 3 5
x1 α22 α32 α23 α33
2K 2K
K
2 2m y 2 α21m1g α22m2g α23m3 g
x2
K mg 11mg 11g
y2 2 6 3
3 m 2K 2K 2000
x3
1
α11 α21 α12 α31 α13
2K
2K
1 2m 3 5
x1 α22 α32 α23 α33
2K 2K
K
2 2m y 3 α31m1g α32m2g α33m3 g
x2
K mg 13mg 13g
y3 2 6 5
3 m 2K 2K 2000
x3
m gy i i
ω2 i 1
n
ii
m y
i 1
2
5 11 13 2
2 2 2 g
ω
2 2000 2000 2000
2 2 2
5 11 13 2
2 2 2 g
2000 2000 2000
ω 12.41 rad/s
m1 m2
1 2
A B
160 80 180
a
b
l
Wbx 2 2 2
l x b for 0 x a
6EIl
y
Wa(l - x) 2 2
6EIl
a x 2lx for a x l
For the given problem deflection at loads can be obtained by
superposition of deflections due to each load acting separately
Dr Asif Israr - Institute of Space Technology
PROBLEM 2: RAYLEIGH’S METHOD
27
b
l
y1'
9.81 20 0.18 0.16 0.42 2
0.162 0.182
0.265
6EI 0.42 EI
y'2
9.81 20 0.18 0.24 0.42 2
0.242 0.182
0.29
6EI 0.42 EI
Dr Asif Israr - Institute of Space Technology
PROBLEM 2: RAYLEIGH’S METHOD
28
W x
y1''
9.81 40 0.16 0.26 0.42 2
0.262 0.162
0.538
6EI 0.42 EI
y'2'
9.81 40 0.16 0.18 0.42 2
0.182 0.162
0.53
6EI 0.42 EI
x W Wa(l - x) 2
y a x2 2lx for a x l
6EIl
b
y''
9.81 40 0.26 0.16
0.42 2
0.16 0.26
2 0.538
2
6EI 0.42
1
EI
y ''
9.81 40 0.16 0.42 - 0.24
0.16 2
0.242 2 0.42 0.24
0.53
6EI 0.42
2
EI
0.803
y1 y y
'
1
''
1
EI One can also find flexibility influence
0.82 co-efficient to solve the problem
y2 y y
'
2
''
2
EI
n
m gy i i
9.8140 0.803 20 0.82
ω2 ω
i 1 2
40 0.8032 20 0.822
n
ii
m y
i 1
2
ω 1541.9 rad/s