Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hypothesis Testing Prakhar Shourya Jain DM21A160

    Uploaded by

    prakhar jain
    18 views2 pages
    The document discusses performing t-tests to analyze if two car models, Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32, are meeting their specifications for mileage and top speed. For Rocinante 36, the t-test results fail to reject the null hypothesis that it meets specifications of 22 km/ltr mileage and 140 km/hr top speed. For Marengo 32 as well, the t-test fails to reject the null hypothesis that it meets specifications of 15 km/ltr mileage and 210 km/hr top speed. Making a type 2 error of concluding a car meets specifications when it does not would be more costly, as the company would have to refund customers and re-engineer the cars.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Hypothesis_Testing_Prakhar_Shourya_Jain_DM21A160

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses performing t-tests to analyze if two car models, Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32, are meeting their specifications for mileage and top speed. For Rocinante 36, the t-test results fail to reject the null hypothesis that it meets specifications of 22 km/ltr mileage and 140 km/hr top speed. For Marengo 32 as well, the t-test fails to reject the null hypothesis that it meets specifications of 15 km/ltr mileage and 210 km/hr top speed. Making a type 2 error of concluding a car meets specifications when it does not would be more costly, as the company would have to refund customers and re-engineer the cars.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    18 views2 pages

    Hypothesis Testing Prakhar Shourya Jain DM21A160

    Uploaded by

    prakhar jain
    The document discusses performing t-tests to analyze if two car models, Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32, are meeting their specifications for mileage and top speed. For Rocinante 36, the t-test results fail to reject the null hypothesis that it meets specifications of 22 km/ltr mileage and 140 km/hr top speed. For Marengo 32 as well, the t-test fails to reject the null hypothesis that it meets specifications of 15 km/ltr mileage and 210 km/hr top speed. Making a type 2 error of concluding a car meets specifications when it does not would be more costly, as the company would have to refund customers and re-engineer the cars.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Q1

    Ans:

    Rocinante 36
    Null Hypothesis (H0) - Rocinante 36 is performing as per the specification given
    H0: Mileage = 22 km/ltr and Top Speed = 140 km/hour

    Alternate Hypothesis(H1) - Rocinante 36 is not performing as per the specification given


    H1: Mileage <> 22 km/ltr and Top Speed <> 140 km/hour

    Marengo 32
    Null Hypothesis (H0) - Marengo 32 is performing as per the specification given H0: Mileage = 15
    km/l and Top Speed = 210 km/hour
    Alternate Hypothesis(H1) - Marengo 32 is not performing as per the specification given H1:
    Mileage <> 15 km/l and Top Speed <> 210 km/hour

    Q2
    Ans:

    Rocinante 36
    As the samples size we have is less than 30, we will be going with the t-test with significant
    value (alpha) as 0.05.

    Rocinante 36
    Mileage (km/ltr) Top speed (km/hr)
    Mileage Top speed
    (km/ltr) (km/hr)
    Mean 21.6195 Mean 140.97
    Variance 0.859868158 Variance 29.14010526
    Observations 20 Observations 20
    Hypothesized Mean 22 Hypothesized Mean 140
    df 19 df 19
    t Stat -1.835074607 t Stat 0.803602305
    P(T<=t) two-tail 0.082200247 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.431566151
    t Critical two-tail 2.093024054 t Critical two-tail 2.093024054

    So, from this we are failed to reject the Null Hypothesis as the P value of both is greater than
    0.05.
    Marengo 32
    As the samples size we have is less than 30, we will be going with the t-test with significant
    value (alpha) as 0.05.

    Marengo 32
    Mileage (km/ltr) Top speed (km/hr)
    Mileage Top speed
    (km/ltr) (km/hr)
    Mean 15.1605 Mean 211.05
    Variance 0.210499737 Variance 26.48473684
    Observations 20 Observations 20
    Hypothesized Mean 15 Hypothesized Mean 210
    df 19 df 19
    t Stat 1.564459252 t Stat 0.912444517
    P(T<=t) two-tail 0.134212987 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.372967671
    t Critical two-tail 2.093024054 t Critical two-tail 2.093024054

    So, from this we are failed to reject the Null Hypothesis as the P value of both is greater than
    0.05.

    Q3
    Ans: Type 2 error will be more expensive as they must give back the money to the customer
    since the promised specification was not achieved and they must again reengineer the cars
    which requires funding and also, they will lose customer.

    You might also like