Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Chapter 6 in Text
• Clause 17 in Handbook
Handbook Text
Conceptual Introduction
Composite Sections
Concrete vs. Steel
• Plain Concrete • Main Idea:
– Strong in Compression
– Weak in Tension – Use Concrete to carry Compression
– Use Structural Steel to carry Tension
• Structural Steel
– Strong in Tension This is the philosophy
– Weakk iin Compression
i of a “composite
composite section”
section
• Local Buckling
• Overall Buckling
• Lateral Torsional Buckling
1
Composite Beam Composite Action
A
concrete
Introductory
y Examples:
p
Example 1:
structural Steel
Given:
A simply supported beam has a 10 m
A
Composite Beam
span is subject to a factored load P at
mid-span. Cross-section is 100 mm
wide x 300 mm deep. Material is
c onc rete
Fy=300 MPa
Required:
– Calculate maximum load P based on
structural Steel Elastic Flexural Resistance
– Sketch the deformed configuration of
the beam under load P
Section A-A
2
Composite Action Composite Action
Example 2:
A
Assume we hhorizontally
i t ll slice
li the
th beam
b cross
Example
p 2-Solution for Single g Beam
section into two pieces (along the NA) For a single piece:
b ( h 2)
2
M = φS F = φ
rx (1/2 ) x y F y
1. What would be the maximum factored load P 6
that can be carried by a single beam? 100 ×150 2
= 0.90 × 300 × 10−6 = 101.25kNm
6
2. What would be the maximum factored load P M fx = M rx (1/2) ⇒ 2.5 P(1/2) = 101.25kNm ⇒ P(1/2) = 40.5kN
that can be carried by the system?
Resistance dropped to 25% of that
Sketch the deformed shape in both cases determined in Example 1
P
P/2 P/2
CVG4143 Composite Design 9 CVG4143 Composite Design 10
3
Composite Action Composite Action
5. Thee resistance
es sta ce of
o the
t e system
syste iss Q How can we recover the full
Q:
the sum of the resistances of the resistance attained in Example
two beams 1?
M rs = M rt + M rb = 2 M rt
= 2 ×101.25 = 202.5kNm A: By reconnecting both pieces
at the interface, we are able to
M fx = M rs ⇒ 2.5 P2(1/2) = 202.5kNm ⇒ P2(1/2) = 81kN recover
a) the full original capacity (if
The capacity of the system of sliced connection is fully effective) or
beams is twice that of a single
beam, but half that of the unsliced b) part of it (when connection is
beam in Example 1 partially effective)
CVG4143 Composite Design 13 CVG4143 Composite Design 14
4
Types of Composite
Composite Action
Sections
• To think about: 1. Solid Slabs (our focus)
Determine Effective
Effective Slab Width
Slab Width “b”
• The portion of the slab width that
can be considered to act with the Case 1: (central beam)
Slabs extending on both sides of steel
structural steel section is called beam, b = lesser of (Span/4, centre to
the effective slab width b centre distance between steel beams)
5
Definitions for determining Methods of connecting
Effective Slab width “b” solid slabs and steel
For central beam,, • Text Fig. 6.1 – P 156 (9th ed.)
Slab extends
from both sides
Centre
to centre
Distance clear distance to 1. End Welded Studs
Span adjacent beam
(most common-our focus)
flange width of
steel section b
Support
2. Channel Connectors
Support For edge beams,
Slab extends
from one side
6
Components of
Preliminaries
Composite Sections
Cr ‘ • It is of interest to calculate the
conc rete slab capacity of each of the three
Vh
components
Shear studs
Vh
structura l steel Tr – Compressive capacity
of concrete slab
7
The weakest link The ‘weakest link’
analogy analogy
• Each of the three rings has a
Cr ‘
conc rete
different capacity
conc rete sla b
Vh compressive
ca pac ity
Shear stud s
“Cr’ma x”
max C '
Vh
struc tura l steel Tr
r
• However, under any applied
Q
shear studs Qrr
load, all three rings are subject
section
sec tion
of of to the same load
zero m axim um
m omentt Struc tura l
m oments
Steel Se c tion
Tensile Capa c ity
“Tr m ax”
max T r
• Depending on the capacities of
the rings, there are three
conceivable failure scenarios
Loading
max Tr ≤ Qr
Cr ‘=Qr
8
Classification of Classification of
Composite Sections Composite Sections
(cont’d) (cont’d)
• Case 2: S16
S16-09
09 Cl.17.9.3 (b) • Case 3: S16-09 Cl.17.9.3 (c)
( )
[ max C 'r is the weakest link] [Qr is the weakest link]
max C 'r ≤ Qr Qr ≤ max C 'r
max C 'r ≤ max Tr Qr ≤ max Tr
Case 1-Compressive
Case 1- Internal Forces
Force
Internal Force Diagram Compressive force in concrete block
9
Case 1-Equilibrium of Case 1
Internal Forces Neutral Axis Depth
Note:
• Tensile Force (structural steel)
Concrete block depth a ≠ Neutral
Tr = φAs Fy Axis (NA) depth c
they are related through a = β1c
• External applied axial force = β1 = 0.97 − 0.0025 f c ' ≥ 0.67
net internal axial force=0
(Cl. 10.1.7 in A23.3-04)
0 = Tr − C 'r
10
Q: When to design When to design
according to the Case 1 according to the Case 1
Procedure? procedure?
• A: When steel section is the Given: f c' , Fy ,φc ,φ , As , d , b, t , Qr
weakest link, i.e. when
Required: Determine whether or not
max Tr ≤ max C 'r case 1 procedure should be used
max Tr ≤ Qr
Hint: put each of the two inequalities
above in a mathematical form,
suitable for design and/or computer
code (refer to your notes to do so)
When to design
Case 1 Procedure -
according to case 1
Summary
procedure?
Determine resistances 1. Calculate depth
p of concrete
α1 = 0.85 − 0.0015 f 'c ≥ 0.67 block
max C 'r = φc α1 f 'c bt
max Tr = φ As Fy 2. Calculate internal moment
arm
If
both of the following two
conditions are met g moment
3. Calculate resisting
max Tr ≤ Qr
max Tr ≤ max C 'r 4. Calculate horizontal shear
then force
go to procedure for case 1
CVG4143 Composite Design 43 CVG4143 Composite Design 44
11