Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHEMICAL LABORATORY
MATRIC NO : 2021124045
GROUP : AS2292A
OBJECTIVE
2. To determine the concentration of a Calcium in tap water and 1:1 ratio (tap water:
distilled water) with calibration method.
INTRODUCTION
AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) is an analysis technique that uses light absorption to
determine the concentration of trace metals in various samples. Today, the technique is used all
over the world as an important analysis tool in a variety of industries. AAS is widely used in the
medical field for blood and soft tissue analysis, as well as in pharmaceutical research and
production. AAS is also used extensively in the trace analysis of metals in water. AAS functions
as atomization. AAS detects the presence of gas-phase atoms by measuring light absorption.
Because analyte atoms or ions must be vaporized in a flame or graphite furnace because samples
are usually liquids or solids. The AAS is a device that measures the amount of radiation
absorption of energy by a ground-state atom in a flame during these energy transitions. The light
source for the atomic absorption apparatus is a hollow cathode lamp with a cathode made of the
same metal as the metal being interpreted, in this case calcium.
METHODOLOGY
1. From standard 100 ppm stock solutions, a series of standard solutions with the following
concentrations were prepared: 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 ppm.
2. Then, 5 mL of an unknown solution was divided evenly among six 100 mL volumetric
flasks. Before taking solution measurements, an empty water (deionized water) was run.
3. Following that, the absorption of a standard solution series of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 ppm was
determined.
4. The absorption of an unknown calcium solution was then determined. The absorption of
tap water was then measured. The absorption ratio of 1: 1 (tap water: distilled water) was
then determined.
5. Finally, the calcium concentration in an unknown calcium solution (tap water, 1: 1 tap
water to distilled water ratio) was calculated using the calibration curve (Absorption
versus standard calcium concentration).
0.8
0.753
0.7
0.6
ABSORBANCE
0.5 0.488
0.4 0.417
0.351
0.3 0.28 0.3
0.2 0.193
0.1 0.109
0 0.002
0 2 4 6 8 10 1:1 (tap Tap Unknown
water: Water
distilled
water)
CONCENTRATION OF CA SOLUTION IN PPM
Calibration curve method
Formula: y = m𝑥 + c
y = 0.0413x + 0.019
y = absorbance, m = gradient, c = y-intercept. 𝑥 = concentration
We need to find the value of 𝑥.
1 0 0 X+0 0.423
2 1 1 X+1 0.461
3 2 2 X+2 0.511
4 3 3 X+3 0.574
5 4 4 X+4 0.581
6 5 5 X+5 0.600
0.7
0.6 0.6
0.574 0.581
0.5 0.511
0.461
ABSORBANCE
0.4 0.423
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
VOLUME OF STANDARD ADDED (mL)
Standard addition method
By using formula:-
𝑏𝐶𝑠
𝐶𝑥 =
𝑚𝑉𝑥
The value of the absorbance was calculated using the calibration curve method when the quantity
of calcium, Ca in standard solution, ppm is 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 1: 1 (tap water: distilled water), tap
water, and unknown are 0.0002, 0.193, 0.280, 0.351, 0.417, 0.753, 0.488, and 0.300,
respectively. Thus, a calibration curve technique graph might be created using these data. The
concentration can then be calculated using the formula y = mx + c, where x is the concentration.
Ca concentration in 1: 1 (tap water: distilled water) is 17.7723 parts per million, Ca
concentration in tap water is 13.3559 parts per million, and Ca content in unknown solution is
6.8039 parts per million. For the standard addition method, the data for standard concentration
(ppm) is equal to the volume of standard added (mL) starting at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, with
absorbance values of 0.423, 0.461, 0.511, 0.574, 0.581, and 0.600, respectively. As a result, the
conventional addition technique graph has been created using this entire set of data. The
𝑏𝐶𝑠
concentration can then be calculated using the formula 𝐶𝑥 = 𝑚𝑉𝑥. The 𝐶𝑥 were 2.308 ppm,
4.616 ppm, 6.924 ppm, 9.232 ppm, and 11.5401 for 1 mL, 2 mL, 3 mL, 4 mL, and 5 mL standard
added, respectively. While conducting this experiment, there are some precautions that can be
taken. To begin, wear safety goggles while preparing and evaluating the samples in this
experiment to avoid any eye injuries. Next, inspect the entire gas system, including the hose lines
that connect the AAS to the gas cylinders, for flexibility, cracks, and holes before running the
experiment. Finally, look for excessive carbon buildup across the entire gas burner system.
CONCLUSION
Subsequently, the atomic absorption spectrometry experiment has been done successfully, and
the objectives of this experiment were met, which have been to determine the unknown
concentration of calcium in an unknown calcium solution using standard addition methods and
standard calibration curves. Using the calibration curve method, these experiments successfully
determined the calcium concentration in tap water and 1: 1 (tap water: distilled water). It has
been proved that the calibration curve method has a higher concentration than for the standard
addition method. Likewise, as the absorbance increases, so will the volume and the
concentration. As a byproduct, this hypothesis is accepted.
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS (Pre-Lab Assignment)
V2 = 2 mL V2 = 8 mL
V2 = 4 mL V2 = 10 mL
2. In the standard addition method, you will have to prepare a series of solution in which
you add increments of standard solution (100 ppm) to sample aliquots of same volume (to
a 5 mL of samples). The volumes of the added standards in the six 100 mL volumetric
flasks are 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mL respectively, then dilute to mark. Calculate the
concentration of the added standard in each flask.
For V2 = 0 mL For V2 = 6 mL
REFERENCES
1) Walter Slavin, Glen R. Carnrick & S. Roy Koirtyohann (1988) Background Correction in
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS), C R C Critical Reviews in Analytical
Chemistry, 19:2, 95-134
2) Akram, S., Najam, R., Rizwani, G.H. and Abbas, S.A., 2015. Determination of heavy
metal contents by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) in some medicinal plants from
Pakistani and Malaysian origin. Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 28(5).
3) Ali Bazzi, Bette Kreuz, and Jeffrey Fischer
Journal of Chemical Education 2004 81 (7), 1042