Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By :
Name : Alwi Bachtiar
Student Number : 20188421
Department : Computer of Engineering
DONGSEO UNIVERSITY
(47011) 47, Jurye-ro, Sasang-gu, Busan, Korea
1
2
Table of Contents
Table of Contents..............................................................................................................i
CHAPTER 1.....................................................................................................................1
OPENING.....................................................................................................................1
1.1 Understanding of Copyright........................................................................1
CHAPTER II....................................................................................................................2
APPLE VERSUS SAMSUNG.....................................................................................2
2.1. Smartphone...................................................................................................2
2.2. Samsung and Apple......................................................................................2
2.3. The Procces of Apple Lawsuit.....................................................................3
CHAPTER III..................................................................................................................5
CLOSING.....................................................................................................................5
3. 1 The Conclusion.............................................................................................5
BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................6
i
ii
CHAPTER 1
OPENING
1
CHAPTER II
APPLE VERSUS SAMSUNG
2.1. Smartphone
Smartphones are the new breed of mobile phone that have multiple similar to
those you might expect from a regular computer. Apple’s iPhone is the most
popular for example, with over 100 million handsets sold by 2011, but
competitors like Samsung are catching up fast. Almost every mobile phone you
can buy now will have some sort of smartphone capability.
2.2. Samsung and Apple
Both Samsung and Apple are the best company in department Smartphone. they
are always launching a new product every years. but at 2011, apple sued samsung,
the case is remarkable for several reason, not least because Samsung is one of
Apple component supplier : the Korean manufactures everything from DRAM
and SSDs for MacBook Pros to the A4 and A5 processors in the iPhone, iPod
Touch, Apple TV, and iPad. that relationship doesn’t seem to have softened
Apples tone: the company complaint frankly says “ instead of pursuising
independent product development, samsung has choosen to symphatically copy
apple’s innovative technology, special user interface and elegant and special
product and packaging desaign, in infringement of Apple’s valuable intellectual
property rights.
2
this figure back and forth over the years. with Samsung moaning it down to $930
million and the $548 million in may 2015, this the figure it has now agreed to pay.
The world’s top smartphone rivals have been in court over patents since 2011,
when Apple filed a lawsuit alleging that Samsung’s smartphones and tablets
“slavishly” copied its products. Samsung was found liable in a 2012 trial, but a
disagreement over the amount to be paid led to a retrial over damages.
Arguments in the retrial ended last Friday.
Samsung previously paid Apple $399 million to compensate Apple for
infringement of some of the patents at issue in the case. If the verdict is upheld on
appeal, Samsung will be required to make an additional payment to Apple of
nearly $140 million. On the other hand, Samsung lost every part of its case against
Apple the jury ruled that none of the Apple devices in the case infringe Samsung's
patents, including patents that are part of the 3G networking standard. The only
major decisions that went to Samsung were related to the iPad — the jury didn't
think Samsung's tablets copied the iPad's design. Perhaps most importantly, the
jury ruled that many of Samsung's infringements were "willful" — that is, the
company deliberately copied Apple's patents. That's how they got to that $1.051
billion damage award; they punished Samsung for doing it on purpose.
There is no way to interpret this as anything but a sweeping, definitive victory for
Apple.
3
The company spent most of the past month telling the jury that the iPhone was a
revolution five years in the making, and that Samsung had taken just three months
to copy it, without bearing any of the costs or risks involved. The jury clearly
agreed and most importantly, the jury agreed that all of Apple's patents are valid,
even after Samsung spent hours trying to demonstrate previous art.
4
CHAPTER III
CLOSING
3. 1 The Conclusion
1. if you want to do some research for your device and you are doing with a
journal. and that journal already success, you must aske with the creator.
2. more carefully in imitate a product already famous.
3. always get a permission first, if you want to take a piece of part that
product, otherwise you will get to sued.
5
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/24/business/apple-samsung-patent-
trial.html
2. https://www.theverge.com/2015/12/4/9848348/samsung-apple-patent-548-
million-payment
3. https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/27/17510908/apple-samsung-settle-
patent-battle-over-copying-iphone
4. https://techterms.com/definition/copyright