Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 6.6 Drain Induced Barrier Lowering
Lecture 6.6 Drain Induced Barrier Lowering
Lowering
Lecture 6.6
• The source/drain junctions must be made sufficiently shallow (i.e., scaled properly)
as the channel lengths are reduced, to prevent DIBL.
• Secondly, the channel doping must be made sufficiently high to prevent the drain
from being able to control the source junction. This is achieved by performing what is
known as an anti-punchthrough implant in the channel.
• Sometimes, instead of such an implant throughout the channel (which can have
undesirable consequences such as raising the VT or the body effect), a localized
implant is done only near the source/drains.
These are known as halo or pocket implants. The higher doping reduces
the source/drain depletion widths and prevents their interaction.
(a) Delta doping (b) Halo Implants and (c) Pocket Implants
Figure 2.5: Advanced methods to prevent punchthrough using (a) delta doping, (b) halo, and (c) pocket implants.
• 1-D gradual channel approximation (GCA) assumes that the electric field components
parallel to the surface and perpendicular to the surface are effectively decoupled.
• The potential barrier is controlled by both the gate-to-source voltage VGS and
the drain to-source voltage VDS.
• If the drain voltage is increased, the potential barrier in the channel decreases, leading to
drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL).
• The reduction of the potential barrier eventually allows electron flow between the source
and the drain, even if the gate-to-source voltage is lower than the threshold voltage.
Here,
xC Subthreshold channel depth
Dn Electron diffusion coefficient
LB Length of the barrier region in the channel
r Reference potential.
Exponential dependence of the subthreshold current on both the gate and the drain
voltages.