You are on page 1of 71

PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT EFFECTIVENESS IN MODULAR LEARNING

TO GRADEV - MAGSAYSAY PUPILS OF BULAWEN ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL YEAR 2020 – 2021

A THESIS

Presented to the Faculty of the

College of Teacher Education

PRESIDENT RAMON MAGSAYSAY STATE UNIVERSITY

Iba, Zambales

by:

LOIWEZA C. ABAGA

ELVIRA A. CUESTA

JONALYN R. NONATURA

JEVELYN A. TURINGAN

January 2021
Republic of the Philippines
President Ramon Magsaysay State University
(Formerly Ramon Magsaysay Technological University)
Iba, Zambales, Philippines 2201

PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT EFFECTIVENESS IN MODULAR LEARNING


TO GRADE V - MAGSAYSAY PUPILS OF BULAWEN ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL YEAR 2020 – 2021

The study hereto attached entitled, prepared and submitted by

LOIWEZA C. ABAGA, ELVIRA A. CUESTA, JONALYN R. NONATURA


AND JEVELYN A. TURINGAN

Who are hereby recommended for oral defense.

TERESA V. APAGALANG, MAEd.


Adviser

Approved by the Committee of Oral Examiners:

BABY S. ABAGON, Ed.D.


Chairperson

REY E. DALUSONG, MAEd KATHERINE B. PARANGAT,


Ed.D.
Member Member

Accepted and approved as a requirement for the Degree


Bachelor in Elementary Education

Approved:

LILIAN F.UY, Ed.D.


Date of Oral Defense Dean, College of Teacher Education

ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The researchers would like to extend their profound gratitude and appreciation to

those people who devoted much time, talent and ideas or all the accomplishments of this

study Teresa V. Apagalang MAEd, their thesis adviser, for her patience and support

endowed to the researchers as the critic of the study and guidance during the preparation

to make this study successful.

Dr. Zenvi Ann M. Macalinao, their Research instructor, for her encouragement

and guidance to the researchers and for imparting her knowledge and suggestions for this

study.

Dr. Lilian F. Uy, Dean of the College of Teacher Education, for her valuable

support and encouragement to finish this study.

Dr. Baby S. Abagon, Chairperson of the Panel of Examiners together with the

Members, Dr. Katherine B. Parangat and Mr. Rey E. Dalusong for their intellectual

comments and amelfish time to provide suggestions and recommendations in order to

improve this study,

Dr. Romeo M. Alip, School Division Superintendent of Iba, District and Mrs.

Josephine A. Acupan, Principal of Bulawen Elementary School for allowing them to

conduct the study,

Their families and loved ones, especially to their beloved parents for their

unconditional love, support, sacrifices, and Most of all, to the Almighty God, for all the

blessings, knowledge, and wisdom bestowed upon the researchers.

The Researchers

iii
ABSTRACT

This study aimed to relate the Parental Involvement Effectiveness in Modular

Learning to Grade V – Magsaysay Pupils of Bulawen Elementary School for the School

Year 2020-2021.

This study employed descriptive method of research with the questionnaire as the

main instrument in gathering data from the twenty- six respondents’ which are the

parents of the grade V pupils of the Bulawen Elementary School situated in Palauig,

Zambales.

The results revealed that most of the respondents were typically female with an

average age between thirty-six and above, in terms of parental responsibility most of

them are the parents of the grade V- pupils and almost all belongs to high school

graduate. In terms of socio-economic status, the majority belongs to lower-middle and

the respondents almost spend two to three hours in teaching their children, most of the

respondents have two to three children.

The study also revealed that there is no significant difference on the level of

parental involvement in modular learning to the respondents when grouped according to

profile variables.

The researcher recommend that the method and the strategy suggested by the

parents to school to further improve the modular learning are reduction of activities from

modules, more example for each subject, home

iv
visitation once a week, provision of colored printed modules, immediate information

given by teacher on what to answer in modules, online consultation with student,

responsiveness of teachers through the use of social media platform, and leniency of

teacher in the submission of students’ outputs. The proposed solutions of parents to

identify the challenges in the modular learning are reduce/lessen activities in the

modules, take out the necessary exercises, online learning ( a zoom meeting with the

whole class with the teacher going through the modules with the students, answering the

questions, and learning the topics together), simplify the modules, consistent instructions

in the modules and as much as possible, limit group activities, give each student ample

time to complete in the module, and give more example and explanation to each by the

given activity.

In conclusion, the study was able to determine the level of parental involvement of

the participants in terms of reading, writing and parenting. The result of this study may

serve as a springboard for the future improvements of the schools' existing programs and

guidelines on the level of parental involvement in modular learning.


vi v

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
COVER PAGE i

APPROVAL SHEET ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii

ABSTRACT iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS vi

LIST OF TABLES viii

LIST OF FIGURES ix

CHAPTER I

I. INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study 1

Rationale 3

Significance of the Study 4

Statement of the Problem 5

Scope and Limitations of the Study 6

CHAPTER II

II. FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY


Review of Literature and Related Studies 7

Foreign Literature 7

Local Literature 9

Theoretical Framework 14
vi
Conceptual Framework 16

Null Hypothesis 18

Definition of Terms 18
CHAPTER III
III. METHODOLOGY
Research Design 20

Research Locale 21

Research Instruments 22

Sampling Technique 23

Statistical Instrument of Data 23

CHAPTER IV
IV. RESEARCH AND DISCUSSION

Profile of the Parent Respondent 26

Summary of the Perception of Grade V-Magsaysay Pupils Parents Respondent 37

Analysis of Variance on the Difference in the Perception on the level of 38

Parental Involvement in Modular Learning when Grouped According to

Profile Variables

CHAPTER V
V. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings 55

Conclusions 58

Recommendations 60
vi
BIBLIOGRAPHY 62

CURRICULUM VITAE 67
APPENDICES 76

vii

LIST OF TABLES

Title Page
Distribution of survey questionnaire to the parents of Grade V- Magsaysay 21
pupils of Bulawen Elementary School.

Likert Scale on the Level of Parental Involvement in Modular Learning to 23


Grade V- Magsaysay pupils of Bulawen Elementary School Year 2020-2021

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to Age 26

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to Sex 27

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to 28


Parent/ Guardian

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to 28


Highest Educational Attainment

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to 32


Socio-Economic Status

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to 32


Time-Spend

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to 33


Number of Children

Mean Rating on the Perception of the respondents on the Modular Learning in 34


terms of Reading

Mean Rating on the Perception of the Respondents on the Modular Learning 36


in terms of Writing

Mean Rating on the Perception of the Respondents on the Modular Learning 37


in terms of Parenting

Summary of Mean Rating on the Perception of the Respondents on the 38


Modular Learning
Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the 39
Respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Age
Profile Variable

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the 41


Respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Sex
Profile Variable

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the 42


Respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Parent/
Guardian Profile Variable

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the 43


Respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Highest
Educational Attainment Profile Variable

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the 45


Respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Socio –
Economic Status Profile Variable

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the 46


Respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Time –
Spend Profile Variable

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the 48


Respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Number
of Children Profile Variable

viii
LISTS OF FIGURES

No. Title Page


Conceptual Paradigm of the Study 16
1
Map of Zambales showing the location of the locale of the 24
2 study

ix

CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

Background

Parents have always played a crucial role in their children’s emotional and

intellectual development. They serve as their children’s first teachers, and give

them the stepping stones they need to adapt to life in school. As the coronavirus

pandemic puts face-to-face learning to a halt, parents find themselves at the

frontlines of education once more. One of the iterations of blended learning

combines online distance learning and modular distance learning, wherein printed

modules and other learning materials are set to be delivered by local government

units and schools to the students’ homes. Parents will then guide their children so

that they can complete their lessons at home. Parental involvement refers to the

amount of participation a parent has when it comes to schooling and her child's

life. Some schools foster healthy parental involvement through events and

volunteer opportunities, but sometimes it's up to the parents to involve themselves

with their children's education. You can ensure that your child receives the benefits

from parental involvements by staying up to date on what is happening in the

classroom, helping your child with school opportunities and knowing correct

safety procedure for the school.

According to Garcia and Thornton (2014) current research shows that the

involvement of family in learning helps to improve student performance, reduce

absenteeism and restore parents' confidence in their children's education. Learners

with parents or caregivers who are involved in learners’ education, earn higher
grades and test scores, have better social skills and show improved behavior.

Which is something that we as a community and the world at large are in need of,

as it would highly contribute in reducing crime and poverty. Ideally it would help

to have a greater percentage of parental involvement in their children’s education.

The study looks at parental involvement in depth by focusing on the concept of

parental involvement, its benefits, the disadvantages of not involving parents and

how parents can be involved. Clinton & Hattie (2013) states that conceptualization

of parental involvement refers to a situation where parents are directly involved in

the education of their children, they involve themselves and are involved by the

school and teachers in the learning process of their children, and they fulfil their

duties as parents in making sure that the learner is assisted in the process of

learning as much as they possibly can. It does not just refer to parents enquiring

about the performance of a learner in schools, but also in them taking a role in

communicating with their children with the aim of having a healthy relationship

with them, so that the process of encouraging, mentoring, leading and inspiring

may be genuine. Parents can be involved in their children's learning through

becoming part of school boards, being concerned about their children's academic

performance, showing dedication in their children's learning through availing

themselves during parents meeting, in order to gain a better understanding of the

performance of their children.


Rationale

The researchers recognized the importance of level of parental involvement in

modular learning to Grade V – Magsaysay pupils. This study is geared toward the level

of parental involvement in modular learning. The researchers find it necessary to

determine the modular learning to Grade V - Magsaysay pupils to support the module

learning and give students access to education. Bower & Griffin (2011) states that

parental involvement has many positive effects on students other than academics,

including increased motivation, self-esteem, and self-reliance, which may lead to

academic success regardless of economic background. Conversely, research affirms that

inadequate or no parental involvement contributes to low student achievement and

engagement. In essence, parents, siblings, and other significant relatives can create rich

learning environments to enhance children’s academic development.

Significance of the Study

The role of parents and guardians in their children’s education is vital. Research

has proven beyond dispute that effectively engaging parents and families in the education

of their children has a positive influence on the success of the learners. The researchers

conducted the study about the level of parental involvement in Modular Learning.

The data gathered in this study would be beneficial to the following group of

people or entities.

Pupils. This will give a great help to the pupils for them on how they learn on the level

of parental involvement in the Modular Learning, they can use internet to gain more
knowledge about their activities to become ready and prepared. This study would

enlighten the students to understand the importance of parents who played a crucial and

significant role in their education.

Teachers. This research will help them to understand the family of their students and

their situation, and more effective communication be presumed to be better

communication with parents, a deeper understanding with both the homes and the

community.

Parents. As their child’s most important teacher, this research will help them to lead and

coordinate parental involvement activities in modular learning to overcome obstacles

between the home and school and described the role of parental involvement as a way of

encouraging more parents to become involved in a variety shops for parents to inform

them of the school curriculum and remind them of aspects of the school.

Future Researchers. This research will be helpful reference for the future researchers

would plan to make a similar research study. It will encourage researchers to look

stronger evidence and will deepen the study that benefit on what has been stated on this

research.

Statement of the Problem

This study was aimed to describe the Parental Involvement effectiveness in

Modular Learning to Grade V - Magsaysay Pupils of Bulawen Elementary School .

Specifically, this study sought to finds answers to the following questions:


1. What is the profile of the parents-respondents in terms of?

1.1 Age:

1.2 Sex;

1.3 Parent/ Guardian

1.4 Highest Educational attainment;

1.5 Socio-Economic status;

1.6 Time-spend;

1.7 Number of children;

2. How is the parental- involvement effectiveness in Modular learning be described

in terms of:

2.1 Reading

2.2 Writing

2.3 Parenting

3. Is there a significant difference on the perception of the respondents on the parental

involvement effectiveness in modular learning of Grade V- Magsaysay pupils when

grouped according to profile variables?


Chapter 2

Framework of the Study

Review of Related Literature and Studies

Foreign Literature

In PISA 2015, parental involvement is one of the contextual elements which

accompany the assessment of student performance. Specifically, the questionnaire for

parents, which on this occasion has been used in 18 countries, and the other contextual

questionnaires applied to school principals, teaching staff and students, contribute to the

achievement of the principal objectives of PISA, that is: “Providing indicators on the

effectiveness, equity and efficiency of education systems, setting benchmarks for

international comparison, and monitoring trends over time are the most important goals

of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)” (OECD, 2016).

Nevertheless, several of the contextual questionnaires, including that provided for the

parents, are optional and not all countries have applied them, which means that in this

sense the information is incomplete. On the other hand, currently, the contextual

assessment design of PISA responds to a modular structure which includes the “four

major areas” on which PISA informs those in charge of educational policies. These are:

the results, student backgrounds, the teaching and learning processes, and the school and

government policies. Within this structure there is a model called parental involvement

(module 14) in the area of the school policies (OECD, 2016) There is also strong support
from international research showing the positive influence of parental involvement over

academic achievement, as has been demonstrated in a variety of meta-analyses across

different populations and educational levels (Castro et al., 2015; Jeynes, 2016; Ma et al.,

2016). Moreover, although there is a wide range of parental involvement definitions,

some more general and others more specifics, there is a consensus among research results

about the positive influence of parental involvement over child academic achievement.

For example, in the meta-synthesis of Wilder (2014), where nine meta-analyses are

analyzed, this influence was consistent throughout the studies, regardless the different

definitions and measures used. However, most of the studies on parental involvement in

education hail from anglophone countries and are based on cross-sectional and

correlational designs (Garbacz et al., 2017) while in Latin America research remains

scarce. In a recent systematic review of the literature on parental involvement in

education in Latin America, only one Mexican study from 1998 was found which was

also heavily influenced by interventions from the United States (Roth Eichin and Volante

Beach, 2018). Chile has acknowledged the importance of collaborative relationships

between families and schools developing a National Policy for Fathers, Mothers and

Legal Guardians Participation in the Educational System (Política de Participación de

Padres, Madres y Apoderados/as en el Sistema Educativo) in 2002 which was recently

updated in 2017 (Ministerio de Educación, Gobierno de Chile, 2017). Since the

publication of this policy various local initiatives have sprouted in the country seeking to

strengthen school family relations (Saracostti-Schwartzman, 2013). Nevertheless, the

majority of research in the country has thus far been of a qualitative nature with a focus

on describing relations between family members and their schools, and identifying
tensions between these two spheres (Gubbins, 2011). Thus, this study seeks to advance

the analysis of the effects of parental involvement in school on the academic achievement

of Chilean students. The study aims to analyse how different parental involvement

profiles (based on the main forms of parental involvement identified in literature)

influence children’s academic achieved. Parental involvement can take a wide variety of

forms, among them, communication between family and school, supporting learning

activities at home and involvement in school activities have been highlighted (Schueler et

al., 2017).

Local Literature

Parental involvement in children’s education is an integral component of young

children’s academic achievement. In the Philippines, a developing country with high

rates of poverty and input deficit in basic education, school dropout rates are high

especially among the poor. Given that many children from disadvantaged backgrounds do

not get enough support (PIDS, 2012) and many parents are not equipped with skills to

support their children’s education, it is essential to investigate how Filipino parents can

help and contribute to their children’s academic success. In response to the lack of

parental involvement literature situated in the Philippine context, the present study

employed a phenomenological approach to explore and examine the experiences of low-

income parents regarding their involvement in their children’s education. This study is

guided by the following research questions: (a) What is the meaning and nature of

parental involvement among low-income Filipino families? (b) What factors facilitate or

hinder parental involvement, and (c) Will any pattern emerge from the data to describe

the relations between parental involvement and children’s academic outcome? Data
analysis showed that Filipino parents believe that helping their children with schoolwork,

motivating them, and providing structure at home help their children succeed in school,

consistent with the extant literature on parental involvement. However, responses

regarding academic socialization, communicating with teachers, and volunteering in

school reflect cultural beliefs and practices in the Philippines related to traditional

parenting, extreme poverty. Results from this study expand the extant research on

parental involvement, which is mostly Western-based, and further our understanding of

the generalizability of existing theories on parental involvement. Findings have

implications for how Filipino parents and educators can support the academic success of

children. Finally, this study can help inform educators and school programmers on how

to help parents support their children’s education.

Theoretical Framework

Jean Piaget proposed a theory of cognitive development in children and

emphasized the constructive role of experience with peers and family members. The

basic assumption of his theory was that young children are active learners with a constant

drive to match their internal constructions (their own view of the real world) and external

constructions (the external realities they face with in their surroundings) (Piaget, 1981).

Children, as agents in his term, continually rework and revise-assimilate and

accommodate their internal constructions with each new experience (Prior & Gerard,

2007). Other people and the social milieu are important elements influencing the

children’s environment. Within this environment social interaction and context are

“indissociable” from their cognitive development. Children assimilate new learning and

accommodate their own incorrect views of the world more quickly if they are more
actively involved with people and things in their surroundings. In this regard, children

learn best when they have opportunities to interact with their environments, and

particularly with their parents who are a vital part of children’s environments (Athey,

2007). For example, parent involvement activities such as practicing interactive

homework creates opportunities for children to interact meaningfully with their parents

such that children construct their own knowledge within both a social and physical

environment through this process (Bailey, Silvern, Brabham, & Ross, 2004). As a

consequence, Piaget’s social development theory supports the idea that parent

involvement is a crucial factor in children’s development and achievement.

Conceptual Framework

This study was based on the concept to find out the level of parental involvement

in Modular Learning of Grade V - Magsaysay pupils of Bulawen Elementary School.

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT


1. Socio-demographic profile
of respondents in terms of:
1.1 Age

1.2 Sex
A. Data Gathering
1.3 Parents/Guardian Device

1.4 Highest Educational Test To determine the Level


attainment Questionnaire of Parental
1.5 Socio-economic status
B. Statistical Tool
Involvement in
Frequency Modular Learning to
1.6 Time –spend
1.7 Number of children Percentage Grade V- Magsaysay
Weighted Pupils of Bulawen
2. Level of Parental Mean Elementary School
Involvement in Modular Analysis of Year 2020-2021
Learning in terms of:
Variance
2.1Reading (ANOVA)
Likert Scale
2.2Writing

2.3 Parenting
Figure 1 Paradigm of the Study
The input box, includes the profile of the Grade V- Magsaysay pupils such as

Age, Gender and the First Grade Average. It is also include the effectiveness of Modular

Learning in terms of Module, Parents and Pupils.

For the process box, it includes the data gathering process using Questionnaire,

and different statistical tools like frequency, percentage, weighted mean, ANOVA

(Analysis of variance) and likert scale.

While the output box, it is to determine the parental involvement effectiveness in

modular learning to Grade v – Magsaysay Pupils of Bulawen Elementary School.

Null Hypothesis

There is no significant difference on the parental involvement effectiveness in

modular learning to the respondents when grouped according to profile variables.

Definition of Terms

This section presents the operational and conceptual definition of terms as a

reference for clarity of ideas.

Bulawen Elementary School. In this study, it refers to the school in Zambales where

Grade V Magsaysay pupils are enrolled.

Module. In this study, it refers to the printed materials provided by the teachers to the

pupils of Bulawen Elementary School with a particular topic and activities per subject

based on the most learning competencies to be done at a specified time.


Modular Learning. In this study, it refers to a form of distance learning that uses Self-

Learning Modules (SLM) based on the most essential learning competencies provided by

the school.

Parent. In this study, it refers to the respondents who played an active role in facilitating

and guiding their children while spending time in terms of reading, writing and through

the modular learning approach.

Parenting. In this study it refers to the task and responsibility of an individual who

played a significant role in helping his or her child/children in dealing with the modular

learning approach.

Parental involvement. In this study, it refers to the parents’ engagement or support in

their child’s learning at home using printed modules.

Pupil. In this study, it refers to the grade V students of Bulawen Elementary School

engaged in modular learning approach.

Reading. In this study, it refers to the parents’ reading comprehension/understanding in

modules given by the teachers.

Respondents. In this study, it refers to the parents of the grade V students in Bulawen

Elementary School.

Socio-economic status. In this study, it refers to of education, income and occupation of

the parents of the grade V students in Bulawen Elementary School.


Time- Spend. In this study, it refers to the time spend by the parents in guiding their

child in answering modules.

Writing. In this study, it refers to the ability of the parents to write the paragraph, essays
and etc.
Chapter 3

Methodology

Research Design

This study used the descriptive survey design to assess socio demographic

characteristics such as age, sex, parent/guardian, highest educational attainment, socio-

economic status, time-spend, and number of children.

The purpose of this is to contribute to a better understanding of how researchers

make decisions about the parental involvement effectiveness of modular learning.

Descriptive research is the research design in which data is collected in a qualitative

manner and analyzed using quantitative procedures (Nassaji, 2015). Descriptive research

refers to the scientific methodology in which observation of the sampled population is

carried out in its natural surrounding. Descriptive research methodology intends to find

out ‘what’ related to a phenomenon. In this method, data are collected qualitatively and

analyzed through a quantitative method. Data is collected through methods like survey,

interview, correlation study, observation study, or content analysis. Moreover, the

observer does not intervene in this observation process or influence any of the variables

of the study (Lambert and Lambert, 2012).

Descriptive Research is devoted to the gathering of information about

prevailing conditions or situations for the purpose of description and interpretation. This

type research method is not simply amassing and tabulating facts but includes proper

analyses, interpretation, comparisons, identification of trends and relationships.


Under the Descriptive Research Method, the Survey Method, which is otherwise

known as normative survey was utilized. With the survey method, the researcher was

able to have a correlation of the study which investigates the relationships between

variables.

The descriptive survey research method is the most appropriate method to use

because it deals with survey and description of facts and presents conditions existing

relative to age and gender.

Table 1

Distribution of Survey Questionnaire to the Parents of Grade V

Magsaysay Pupils of Bulawen Elementary School.

Respondents Male Female TOTAL


Grade V - Magsaysay pupils’ 2 24 26
parents/ guardians

Respondents

Through probability sampling, the respondents were chosen. The subjects of the

study are the Grade V – Magsaysay Pupils of Bulawen Elementary School. After

choosing the respondents, each of them were given a survey questionnaire.

Research Locale The study was conducted in all Grade V- Magsaysay pupils in

Bulawen Elementary School. Figure 2 shows the map of Bulawen Elementary School,

reflecting the location where the needed data is gathered. Bulawen Elementary School is
a school in the province of Zambales, Region III- Central Luzon, in the municipality of

Palauig. It was established on January 01, 1916. At present, Bulawen Elementary School

is led by Mrs. Josephine Acupan.

Figure 2

Map of Bulawen Elementary School

Research Instruments

The survey questions were the main instrument used in gathering data in this

study. The survey questionnaires used by the researchers was adopted and modified

based from the overall goals of the parents of Grade V - Magsaysay pupils of Bulawen

Elementary School standard. It was submitted to the adviser and experts for checking and

validation. The survey questionnaire follows a Likert scale with the following legend.
Table 2

Likert Scale on the Level of Parental Involvement in Modular


Learning to Grade V- Magsaysay pupils of Bulawen Elementary
School Year 2020-2021

Value Response
4 Strongly Effective
3 Effective
2 Not Effective
1 Strongly Not Effective

Sampling Technique

The researchers had chosen the respondents through random sampling technique.

Researchers will use parents of all the Grade V – Magsaysay Pupils of Bulawen

Elementary School.

Statistical Treatment of Data

Statistical treatment of data is essential in order to make of the data in the right

form. Raw data collection is only one aspect of any experiment, the organization of data

is equally important so that appropriate conclusions can be drawn. This statistical

treatment of data is all about.

There are many techniques involved in statistics that treat data in the required

manner. Statistical treatment of data is essential in all experiments, whether social

scientific or any other form. Statistical treatment of data greatly depends on the kind of

experiment and the desired result of the experiment.


This used frequency percentage, and making. This would explain in the following.

A. Frequency - The numbers of respondents that have the same answer.

B. Percentage - Is a number or ratio that represents a fraction of 100. Formula:

(100)

C. Weighted Mean - This will be used to determine the mean of the respondents’

profile variables such as age, gender and monthly family income.

D. Ranking – is the relationship between a set of items such that for any two

items, first either ‘ranked lower than” ranked equal the second.

E. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). This will be used in determining the

significance difference of more than two variables.

Decision Rule 1 If the computed significant value is greater or higher (>) 0.05

Alpha level of significance, accept the null hypothesis and reject the alternative

hypothesis.

Decision Rule 2 If the computed significant value is less than (<) 0.05 Alpha

level of significance, reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative

hypothesis.
28
Chapter 4

RESEARCH AND DISCUSSION

This chapter presents and analyzes the gathered data so as to provide clear

understanding on the questions as stated in chapter 1.

The purpose of this chapter is to introduce and examine the outcome of the parent

involvement survey as it related to the research questions presented in chapter one.

Demographic information will be given, followed by a summary of the parent responses

to the survey questions. Numbers and percentages from the returned surveys will be

presented for each created variable. Descriptions of survey information will be presented

in a format consistent with the questions asked by the researcher.

1. Profile of Respondents

1.1. Age

Table 3
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to Age

Age Frequency Percent


25-30 years old 1 3.85
31-35 years old 12 46.15
36 and above years old 13 50.00
Total 26 100.00
Mean 35.29 years old
29
Table 3 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of the respondent’s profile

according to their age.

Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents, there

are 13 or 50 %, who belong to 36 and above age group. It was followed by 12 or 46.15 %

parents/guardian who are at 31-35 age group; 1 or 3.85 % who belongs to the age bracket

25-30 age group. The mean age was 35.29.

Such knowledge can also help you maximize the benefits of your age, such as

having more experience as an older parent or more energy as a young parent, while

taking steps to overcome any weaknesses that might influence your parenting style and

the healthy development of your children. (Chung, 2020)

Most older parents suggested that their greatest advantage was being more

emotionally prepared to be a parent. Some said that being older made them more self-

aware, confident, resilient, self-actualized, better able to offer support, and more capable

of communicating with a child. (Cherry, 2020)

1.2. Sex

Table 4
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to Sex

Sex Frequency Percent


Female 25 96.15
Male 1 3.85
Total 26 100.00
30
Table 4 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of respondent’s profile
according to sex.

Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents, there

are 25 or 96.15 % who are female and 1 or 3.85 % on male. This result shows that most

of the respondents are female.

Mothers have the potential to play the most important role of educator in a child’s

early life and as children get older they are still at the heart of their children’s education.

(De Burca J., 2013)

1.3. Parent/Guardian

Table 5

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to Parent/


Guardian

Parent/ Guardian Frequency Percent


Guardian 6 23.08
Parent 20 76.92
Total 26 100.00

Table 5 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of the respondents’


profile as to Parent/ Guardian

Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents,

there are 20 or 76.92 % who belongs to parent and 6 or 23.08 % on guardian.

Table 5 revealed that most of the respondents in terms of parental responsibility

are the parents of grade V pupils.

Parents have been known to be a child’s first teacher from the moment a child is

born and as they mature into adults, the traditional role of parents involve teaching,
31
guiding, and raising children to become strong standing members of their communities.

As children begin formal schooling, most parents allow the school to take on a major

part of their formal education. Where formal education is concerned, parents are more

of providers. Ensuring that children have the needed provision and support to access

education and learning, except in cases where parents have taken the full responsibility

of home-schooling their children (Ceka & Murati, 2016; Emerson et al., 2012). Since

the pandemic started, parents are now taking on a more support-oriented role by

supporting their children as they take on assignments and home project.

LaRocque, et al., (2011) expounds that parents' response and participation in

modular teaching are affected by a variety of factors including their educational

attainment, self-esteem, motivation. comfort level, language skills, and even the socio

demographic profile. Educators should intend to make parental involvement more

familiar and more meaningful. This will promote the involvement of parents. To

encourage parents to enhance their capacity to help their children get the best possible

education, it is important to note parental involvement as a process rather than a one-

time occasion Home and school collaboration must be active to provide uninterrupted

learning for the students amid the pandemic. Basic orientation, systematic support, and

regular conference must be in place to assist the parents in delivering instruction to the

children. To add, more grounded communication and connection are needed to have a

solid foundation of the actors in the educative cycle and to relay constructive feedback

on the children's progress regarding the learning intervention designed by the education

authorities, However, this modality, modular distance learning. encounters various

challenges, particularly in the Philippine setting.


32

1.4 Highest Educational Attainment

Table 6

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to Highest


Educational Attainment

Highest Educational
Frequency Percent
Attainment
College Graduate 5 19.23
College Undergraduate 4 15.38
High School Graduate 17 65.38
Total 26 100.00

Table 6 frequency and percentage distribution of the respondents’ profile as to

highest educational attainment.

Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents,

there are 17 or 65.38 % who belongs to high school graduate, 5 or 19.23 % who belongs

to college graduate, and 4 or 15.38 % on college the impact of the remaining parent

undergraduate.

Amoroso & Bajo (2014) states that through guidance and reminders, parents help

their kids organize their time and support their desires to learn new things in and out of

school. Further, the education that children received is very much dependent on the

education that their parents received when they were children. Research showed that the

education of the parents has impact on the education of their children for children
33
experienced literacy primarily as a social process during their preschool years. Parents

having the biggest influence at this early stage in their children ‘s lives can teach them the

value of education at this early age. One of the reasons why it strongly affects their

children ‘s education is because parents who have gone beyond a high school education

are found to be more involved with their infants and children than those who did not

finish high school. Those who are less educated parents are most likely have unmanaged

stress in their lives, and this stress intervened their ability and opportunity to socialize

with their child. Parents who have finished high school and gone on to receive additional

schooling understand the pressures and stresses of school and are more ready to handle

the children when they go through school.

1.5 Socio – Economic Status

Table 7

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to Socio –


Economic Status

Socio - Economic Status Frequency Percent


Lower Middle 24 92.31
Upper Lower 1 3.85
Upper Middle 1 3.85
Total 26 100.00

Table 7 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of the respondents’

profile as to socio – economic status.


34
Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents, there

are 24 or 92.31 % who belongs to lower middle status, while 1 or 3.85% both were

belong in upper lower and upper middle status.

The American Psychological Association (APA) defines socioeconomic status as

“the social standing or class of an individual or group” (APA 2018). Socio-Economic

Status has been commonly used as a latent construct for measuring family background

(Bofah and Hannula 2017). However, among empirical studies, there is no consensus on

how to best operationalize the concept. In many studies, the measurement of Socio-

Economic Status does not receive much attention, with very limited discussion over why

certain indicators were used rather than others (Bornstein and Bradley 2014).

1.6 Time – Spend

Table 8

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to

Time – Spend

Time - Spend Frequency Percent


1 hour and below 7 26.92
2-3 hours 11 42.31
4 hours and above 8 30.77
Total 26 100.00
Mean 2.71 hours

Table 8 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of the respondents’


profile as to time – spend.
35
Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents,

there are 11 or 42.31 % who spends 2-3 hours, 8 or 30.77 % who spends 4 hours and

above and 7 or 26.92 % who spend 1 hour and below. The mean time-spend was 2.71.

According to Sari et al (2020) states that during the Covid-19 pandemic, children

tend to be fussy because they don't go to school and feel missing their friends and

teachers. Based on the results of research on the parents’ involvement in distance learning

in the aspect of taking time to accompany children, getting the highest percentage

compared to other aspects is 1.08%. Since the implementation of work from home,

parents spend more time with their children. This makes it easy for parents to take the

time to assist children in learning and playing. Many parents agree that they are the ones

who help their children’s complete tasks from school. The influence of the role of parents

on the application of distance learning during the Covid-19 pandemic is very high. This is

in line with Lilawati's research (2020) which states that the influence of parents as a

motivator to foster children's

motivation and interest in learning is the most visible.

1.6 Number of Children

Table 9

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile as to Number of

Children

Number of Children Frequency Percent


4 Children and above 3 11.54
2-3 Children 22 84.62
Only 1 1 3.85
36
Total 26 100.00
Mean 2.67 or 3 children

Table 9 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of the respondents’

profile as to number of children.

Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents,

there are 22 or 84.62 % who have 2-3 children, 3 or 11.545 who have 4 children and

above and 1 or 3.85 % who only have 1. The mean number of children was 2.67 or 3.

Parents with multiple children across the age groups we examined were more

likely than those with one or more children within one age group (i.e., only children who

are ages zero to 5) to indicate a moderate or great need for nearly every learning support

we asked about—from more time in their schedule to spend with their children to

instructional materials from their schools or child care centers It may be that parents with

children across multiple age groups have more difficulty juggling the different types of

schoolwork and expectations of their children. However, at the same time, parents of

multiple children across age ranges generally had more children in the household than

their counterparts with children in only one age group, which could increase their needs

regardless of their children's ages. (Kaufman et. al, 2020)

2. Parental Involvement Effective in Modular Learning

2.1 Reading

Table 10

Mean Rating on the Perception of the respondents on the Modular Learning in

terms of Reading
37

Descriptive
A. Reading AWM Rank
Rating
1. I read aloud to my children and Strongly
3.38 3
encourage them to do so to me. Effective
2. I understand carefully the modules before Strongly
3.35 4
instructing my child to answer activities. Effective
3. In module, I make the instructions clear
Strongly
so that my child can understand what he/she 3.46 1.5
Effective
read.
4. I feel confident to support my child to Strongly
3.46 1.5
enjoy reading. Effective
5. I and my child read or share stories with
3.23 Effective 5
other family members about modules.
Strongly
Overall Weighted Mean 3.38  
Effective

Table 10 shows mean rating on the perception of the respondents on the modular

learning in terms of reading.

The respondents gave the highest rating of 3.46 (strongly effective, rank 1.5) to

the statement 3, “In module, I make the instructions clear so that my child can understand

what he/she read”, and the statement 4, “I feel confident to support my child to enjoy

reading”. The statement 1, “I read aloud to my children and encourage them to do so to

me” (strongly effective, rank 3). The statement 2, “I understand carefully the modules

before instructing my child to answer activities” (strongly effective, rank 4). The

statement 5, “I and my child read or share stories with other family members about

modules” got the lowest rating of 3.23 (effective, rank 5). Overall, reading with a mean

rating of 3.38 was perceived strongly effective in perception of the respondents on the

modular learning.

The results show that the parental models most linked to high achievement are

those focusing on general supervision of the children's learning activities. The strongest
38
associations are found when the families have high academic expectations for their

children, develop and maintain communication with them about school activities, and

help them to develop reading habits. (Elsevier Ltd, 2015)

2.2 Writing

Table 11

Mean Rating on the Perception of the respondents on the Modular Learning in

terms of Writing

Descriptive
B. Writing AWM Rank
Rating
1. I can write a good academic paragraph. 3.15 Effective 5
2. I review my child’s notes, handouts, and
Strongly
assignment requirements before beginning 3.58 1
Effective
to write suggestions and answer.
3. I revise my child’s own writing to
3.19 Effective 4
improve his/her development in writing.
4. I can effectively brainstorm my child to Strongly
3.35 2
gather ideas before writing. Effective
5. I can use appropriate spelling,
3.23 Effective 3
capitalization, and punctuation.
Strongly
Overall Weighted Mean 3.30  
Effective

The respondents gave the highest rating 3.58 (strongly effective, rank 1) to the

statement 2, “I review my child’s notes, handouts, and assignment requirements before

beginning to write suggestions and answer”. The statement 1, “I can write a good

academic paragraph” got the lowest rating of 3.15 (effective, rank 5). Overall, writing
39
with a mean rating of 3.30 was perceived strongly effective in the perception of the

respondents on the modular learning.

Parents also trained an interaction sequence for effectively praising and making

suggestions concerning their children’s texts. Over 10 weeks, teachers asked students to

write four stories as home assignment. While children in the waiting list composed texts

alone, children in the intervention group composed texts with their parents. When

compared to children in the waiting list, those in the intervention group improved in some

transcription measures and wrote longer and better texts. These findings indicate that

parental involvement in writing is important and seems effective in fostering children’s

writing skills. (Alves R. A., & Limpo, T. 2015)

2.3 Parenting

Table 12

Mean Rating on the Perception of the respondents on the Modular Learning in

terms of Parenting

Descriptive
C. Parenting AWM Rank
Rating
1. I keep my child informed regularly of Strongly
3.35 5
how he/she is being graded Effective
2. I provide access to a variety of
Strongly
information resources that are current and 3.38 4
Effective
in good condition.
3. I inform my child to know the Strongly
3.42 3
expectations for learning I all classes. Effective
4. I and my child work as a team in Strongly
3.46 2
learning. Effective
5. I have goals and plan for improving my Strongly
3.58 1
child’s learning. Effective
40
Strongly
Overall Weighted Mean 3.44  
Effective

Table 12 shows that the respondents gave the highest rating of 3.58 (strongly

effective, rank 1) to the statement 5, “I have goals and plan for improving my child’s

learning”. The statement 1, “I keep my child informed regularly of how he/she is being

graded” got the lowest rating of 3.35 (strongly effective, rank 5). Overall, parenting with

a mean rating of 3.44 was perceived strongly effective in the perception of the

respondents on the modular learning.

Goodall and Montgomery (2014) consider parental engagement as active and

meaningful involvement in children’s learning. Such learning can take place in a variety

of settings including early learning and childcare settings, schools, the community,

through family learning and learning at home. Parental engagement represents a greater

‘commitment, ownership of action’ than parental involvement within educational settings

such as early learning and childcare settings or schools.

Table 13

Summary of Mean Rating on the Perception of the respondents on the Modular

Learning

Descriptive
  AWM Rank
Rating
Strongly
A. Reading 3.38 2
Effective
Strongly
B. Writing 3.30 3
Effective
Strongly
C. Parenting 3.44 1
Effective
41
Strongly
Overall Weighted Mean 3.37  
Effective

Among the indicators, parenting ranked 1st with a rating of 3.44, followed by

Reading (3.38, 2nd), and writing ranked 3rd with a rating of 3.30. The parents perceived

that parental involvement which is strongly effective (3.37) affected the perception of the

respondents on the modular learning.

According to Lebaste (2020), Parents now have the important task of

ensuring that their children receive quality education without compromising their safety.

Although education takes a major hit as classrooms are forced to close their doors to

eager students, countless parents are stepping up to support their children who are

adjusting to the new set-up for the in coming school year.

Reading and writing work in similar ways. Reading improves your writing

style and flow. Writers learn to perfect their craft by taking inspiration from other writers.

It’s impossible to be a good writer if you don’t read. Acclaimed author Stephen King is

said to carry a book with him wherever he goes. He even reads while eating. Another

vital role of reading skills in communication is perfecting your oratory skills. Reading

teaches you new words and perspectives. It helps strengthen language and sharpens

sentence structure. It gives you a better command over the language. (Harappa Diaries,

2020)

Table 14

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the

respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Age Profile

Variable
42

Decision/
Source of Variations df F Sig.
Interpretation
Between Groups 2 0.33 0.72
Accept Ho
Reading Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 0.30 0.74
Accept Ho
Writing Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 1.22 0.31
Accept Ho
Parenting Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    

The table 14 shows the analysis of variance on significant difference on

perception of the respondents on the modular learning. when grouped according to age

profile variables.

The computed significant values for reading (0.72), writing (0.74), and

parenting (0.31) Alpha Level of significance, therefore the null hypothesis is Accepted.

Hence, there is no significant difference on the respondent’s perception on the factors

affecting the level of parental involvement in modular learning in terms of age factor

when grouped according to reading, writing and parenting.

According to the study of Sapungan & Sapungan (2014), Learners whose parents are

involved, are active and ready to learn, they learn to be punctual from young age, they

learn to be persistent as the parents would be continuously enquiring about their progress

and they would not want to disappoint them. Taking responsibility becomes a part of the
43
nature of such children as they plan ahead and are able to do their work according to their

schedule, which is the quality of being organized.

Table 15

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference Perception of the

respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Sex Profile

Variable

Decision/
Source of Variations df F Sig.
Interpretation
Between Groups 1 0.97 0.33
Accept Ho
Reading Within Groups 24    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 1 1.18 0.29
Accept Ho
Writing Within Groups 24    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 1 0.11 0.74
Accept Ho
Parenting Within Groups 24    
Not Significant
Total 25    

Table 15 shows the analysis of variance on significant difference on

perception of the respondents on the modular learning when grouped according to sex

profile variables.

The computed significant values for reading (0.33), writing (0.29) and parenting

(0.74) Alpha Level of significance, therefore the null hypothesis is Accepted. Hence,

there is no significant difference on the respondent’s perception on the factors affecting

the level of parental involvement in modular learning in terms of sex factor when

grouped according to reading, writing and parenting.


44

According to the studies of Duursma (2014), Kim and Hill (2015), Baker (2018),

mothers were engaged in their children's education more frequently than fathers. A

survey indicated that 92.1 million household populations in the Philippines, 50.4 percent

were males and 49.6 percent were female. This resulted in a sex ratio of 102 males per

100 females. The sex ratio in 2000 was 101 males per 100 females PSA, (2012). This is

in contrary to the present study where there were more female guardians (195 or 73.58%)

than male (70 or 26.52%).

Table 16

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the

respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Parent/

Guardian Profile Variable

Decision/
Source of Variations df F Sig.
Interpretation
Between Groups 1 0.40 0.53
Accept Ho
Reading Within Groups 24    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 1 2.67 0.12
Accept Ho
Writing Within Groups 24    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 1 0.87 0.36
Accept Ho
Parenting Within Groups 24    
Not Significant
Total 25    

Table 16 shows the analysis of variance on significant difference on perception of

the respondents on the modular learning when grouped according to parent/guardian

profile variables.
45
The computed significant values for reading (0.53), writing (0.12) and parenting

(0.36) Alpha Level of significance, therefore the null hypothesis is Accepted. Hence,

there is no significant difference on the respondent’s perception on the factors affecting

the level of parental involvement in modular learning in terms of parent/guardian factor

when grouped according to reading, writing and parenting.

The role of parents during the Covid-19 pandemic in general is to become

educators, mentors and supervisors as well as providers of a sense of security and

comfort when children are at home. The condition when children gather with family has a

higher intensity than just activities at home during the pandemic. Based on the research

results, it was found that the percentage of children's play and learning activity

management at home only reached 0.9%. This shows that there are limitations for parents

in providing play and learning activities to children at home during the pandemic period

which can have an impact on the emergence of children’s boredom at home. These

findings are in line with Gloria's research (2020) which states that activities carried out

only at home will cause boredom and make children fussy, so that the readiness of

parents is very important in dealing with fussy children, of course starting from the

ability of parents to deal with their own boredom.

Table 17

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the

respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Highest

Educational Attainment Profile Variable


46
Decision/
Source of Variations df F Sig.
Interpretation
Between Groups 2 0.56 0.58
Accept Ho
Reading Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 1.83 0.18
Accept Ho
Writing Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 0.58 0.57
Accept Ho
Parenting Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    

Table 17 shows the analysis of variance on significant difference on perception of

the respondents of the respondents on the modular learning when grouped according to

highest educational attainment profile variables.

The computed significant values for reading (0.58), writing (0.18) and

parenting (0.57) Alpha Level of significance, therefore the null hypothesis is Accepted.

Hence, there is no significant difference on the respondent’s perception on the factors

affecting the level of parental involvement in modular learning in terms of highest

educational attainment factor when grouped according to reading, writing and parenting.

According to the study of Pamela and Kean (2010), In Kenyan situation, financial

constraints, education level of the parent and the marital status of the parents are the key

determinant of student motivation to study. For instance, Pamela and Kean stated that

those students whose parents had a tertiary level of education performed, significantly

better in tests of science, reading and mathematical ability than do those whose parents

had only basic schooling. Thus, across these three disciplines, the average grades

achieved by students with well-educated parents ranged from 7% higher than those
47
achieved by students with poorly educated parents in developing countries to 45% higher

in most developed countries. This therefore, shows that parents education has some

influences on the students' beliefs and behaviors, leading to positive outcomes for

children and youth. A study conducted by Kamar (2008) revealed that parents of

moderate to high income and educational background held beliefs and expectations that

were closer than those of low-income families to the actual performance of their children,

Low-income families instead had high expectations and performance beliefs that did not

correlate well with their children's actual school performance.

Table 18
Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the

respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Socio –

Economic Status Profile Variable

Decision/
Source of Variations df F Sig.
Interpretation
Between Groups 2 0.10 0.90
Accept Ho
Reading Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 2.99 0.07
Accept Ho
Writing Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 1.44 0.26
Accept Ho
Parenting Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
48
Table 18 shows the analysis of variance on significant difference on perception of

the respondents on the modular learning when grouped according to socio-economic

status profile variables.

The computed significant values for reading (0.90), writing (0.07) and

parenting (0.26) Alpha Level of significance, therefore the null hypothesis is Accepted.

Hence, there is no significant difference on the respondent’s perception on the factors

affecting the level of parental involvement in modular learning in terms of socio-

economic status factor when grouped according to reading, writing and parenting.

In study of McIntosh (2008), he concluded that in Canada, children who came from

lower income households, having divorced or separated parents, would actually perform

better than average scores if they came from homes that had positive attitudes and that

strongly supported their children. This was supported by another study on Children and

Youth in Canada that was carried out by Ryan (2000) who reported that there was a

significant effect of family background variables, parental support, and teacher support

on a child's educational achievement.

Table 19

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the

respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Time – Spend

Profile Variable
Decision/
Source of Variations df F Sig.
Interpretation
Between Groups 2 0.83 0.45
Accept Ho
Reading Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 1.01 0.38
Accept Ho
Writing Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 0.99 0.39
Accept Ho
Parenting Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    

Table 19 shows the analysis of variance on significant difference on

of parental involvement in modular learning in terms of time-spend factor when grouped

according to reading, writing and parenting.

The computed significant values for reading (0.45), writing (0.38) and parenting

(0.39) Alpha Level of significance, therefore the null hypothesis is Accepted. Hence,

there is no significant difference on the respondent’s perception on the factors affecting

the level

The amount of time that parents spend with their children is determined by many

factors, and working hours outside the home are only one of them. Choices, parenting

norms, family size, and relationship ideals – for men and women, parents and children –

matter a lot.

Further McIntosh (2008) in his study concluded that in Canada, children who came

from lower income households, having divorced or separated parents, would actually
perform better than average scores if they came from homes that had positive attitudes

and that strongly supported their children. This was supported by another study on

Children and Youth in Canada that was carried out by Ryan (2000) who reported that

there was a significant effect of family background variables, parental support, and

teacher support on a child's educational achievement.

of the respondents on the modular learning when grouped according to time-spend profile

variables.

Several academic studies have dissected the data from the US in an attempt to

disentangle the relative importance of different underlying factors. The conclusion from

these studies is that the reason why we see an increase in the amount of time that

American parents spend with kids is that many families, particularly those who are well-

off, have been able to undergo changes in their routines and the allocation of tasks and

time within the household, in order to spend more time with their children. Parents have

been able to undergo ‘behavioral changes’ that have more than compensated for

‘structural changes’ that could have pushed in the opposite direction. (Ospina, 2020).

Table 20

Analysis of Variance to Test the Significant Difference on Perception of the

respondents on the Modular Learning When Grouped According to Number of

Children Profile Variable


Decision/
Source of Variations df F Sig.
Interpretation
Between Groups 2 3.31 0.05
Accept Ho
Reading Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 2.16 0.14
Accept Ho
Writing Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    
Between Groups 2 3.10 0.06
Accept Ho
Parenting Within Groups 23    
Not Significant
Total 25    

Table 20 shows the analysis of variance on significant difference on perception of

the respondents on the modular learning when grouped according to number of children

profile variables.

The computed significant values for reading (0.05), writing (0.14) and parenting

(0.06) Alpha Level of significance, therefore the null hypothesis is Accepted. Hence,

there is no significant difference on the respondent’s perception on the factors affecting

the level of parental involvement in modular learning in terms of number of children

factor when grouped according to reading, writing and parenting.

Studies of permanent family characteristics have examined both the share of the

variation in an outcome that can be attributed to the family as well as the impact of

specific family characteristics on outcomes. In the literature on sibling correlations,

researchers often estimate a linear model with a family effect and then analyze estimates

of the variance components. Results indicate that at least half of the variation in

educational attainment and adult IQ is due to factors shared by siblings (Björklund and
Salvanes 2011; Björklund and Jäntti 2012). Although this fraction is sizable, these shared

factors include the family environment in addition to shared genes, neighborhoods, and

schools. Importantly for this study, sibling correlations for adult outcomes fail to isolate

the role of time-dependent family factors. Other strands of the literature on permanent

family characteristics have focused on the effect of specific characteristics, like parent’s

educational attainment or race, and find that many of these play a substantial role in

children’s outcomes.
Chapter 5

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary of the results of the research investigation, the

conclusions arrived at and the recommendations drawn by the researcher.

Summary of the Findings

The present study determine the Parental involvement effectiveness of modular

learning to Grade V Magsaysay pupils of Bulawen Elementary School. The parental

involvement effectiveness of modular learning includes (a) Reading; (b) Writing; and (c)

Parenting.

The result may benefit the school as this study provides an information that

parents are involve in modular learning. The study made some recommendations the

future studies in education in parental involvement in modular learning.

The respondents are parents/ guardian of Grade V- Magsaysay pupils of Bulawen

Elementary School. The research study was conducted during the 1 st semester of the

school year 2020-2021. The study employed a descriptive research method and used a

survey questionnaire as main instrument for data gathering. The research instrument has a

15 specific number of questions that was scored on a 4-point scale from 4 (Strongly

effective) to 1 (Not strongly effective). The statistical treatment of this study utilized

descriptive statistical tool such as percentage and mean, ANOVA was used ad inferential

statistics. All data which were obtained from the instrument were tallied.
1. Profile of the parents-respondents.

1.1 Age; Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s

Parents/Guardian respondents, mostly were in 13 or 50 %, who

belong to 36 and above age group. It was followed by 12 or 46.15

% parents/guardian who are at 31-35 age group; 1 or 3.85 % who

belongs to the age bracket 25-30 age group. The mean age was 35

1.2 Sex; Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s

Parents/Guardian respondents, most of the respondents were

female with a 25 or 96.15 % and 1 or 3.85 % on male.

1.3 Parent/ Guardian; Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s

Parents/Guardian respondents, majority are parents with a 20 or

76.92 % and 6 or 23.08 % on guardian.

1.4 Highest Educational attainment; Out of the 26 total Grade V-

Magsaysay Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents, mostly were

high school graduate with 17 or 65.38 %, 5 or 19.23 % who

belongs to college graduate, and 4 or 15.38 % on college the

impact of the remaining parent are undergraduate.

1.5 Socio-Economic status; Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay

Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents, mostly belongs to lower

middle status with a 24 or 92.31 % while 1 or 3.85% both were

belong in upper lower and upper middle status.

1.6 Time-spend; Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay Pupil’s

Parents/Guardian respondents, majority spends 2-3 hours with 11


or 42.31 %, 8 or 30.77 % who spends 4 hours and above and 7 or

26.92 % who spend 1 hour and below. The mean time-spend was

2.71.

1.7 Number of children; Out of the 26 total Grade V-Magsaysay

Pupil’s Parents/Guardian respondents, mostly have 2-3 children

with 22 or 84.62 %, 3 or 11.545 who have 4 children and above

and 1 or 3.85 % who only have 1. The mean number of children

was 2.67 or 3.

2. Parental- involvement effectiveness in Modular learning

1.1 Reading

Out of the twenty-six (26) respondents, the highest rating is at 3.46

(strongly effective, rank 1.5) to the statement 3, “In module, I make the instructions

clear so that my child can understand what he/she read”, and the statement 4, “I feel

confident to support my child to enjoy reading”. The statement 1, “I read aloud to my

children and encourage them to do so to me” (strongly effective, rank 3). The

statement 2, “I understand carefully the modules before instructing my child to

answer activities” (strongly effective, rank 4). The statement 5, “I and my child read

or share stories with other family members about modules” got the lowest rating of

3.23 (effective, rank 5). Overall, reading with a mean rating of 3.38 was perceived

strongly effective in Level of parental involvement in modular learning.


1.2 Writing

Out of the twenty-six (26) respondents, the highest rating is at 3.58 (strongly

effective, rank 1) to the statement 2, “I review my child’s notes, handouts, and

assignment requirements before beginning to write suggestions and answer”. The

statement 1, “I can write a good academic paragraph” got the lowest rating of 3.15

(effective, rank 5). Overall, writing with a mean rating of 3.30 was perceived strongly

effective in the level of parental involvement in modular learning.

1.2 Parenting

Out of the twenty-six (26) respondents, the highest rating is at 3.58

(strongly effective, rank 1) to the statement 5, “I have goals and plan for

improving my child’s learning”. The statement 1, “I keep my child informed

regularly of how he/she is being graded” got the lowest rating of 3.35 (strongly

effective, rank 5). Overall, parenting with a mean rating of 3.44 was perceived

strongly effective in the level of parental involvement in modular learning.

3. Test of significant difference on the perception of the respondents on the

level of parental involvement in modular learning of Grade V- Magsaysay

pupils when grouped according to profile variables.

3.1 Age Profile Variable

3.2 Sex Profile Variable

3.3
Conclusion:

Based on the findings in the study, the researchers concluded that:

1. The results revealed that most of the respondents were typically female with an

average age between thirty-six and above, in terms of parental responsibility most

of them are the parents of the grade V- pupils and almost all belongs to high

school graduate. In terms of socio-economic status, the majority belongs to lower-

middle and the respondents almost spend two to three hours in teaching their

children, most of the respondents have two to three children.


2. The level of parental- involvement in modular learning, in reading, out of the

twenty-six (26) respondents, the highest rating is at 3.46 (strongly effective, rank

1.5) to the statement 3, “In module, I make the instructions clear so that my child

can understand what he/she read”, and the statement 4, “I feel confident to

support my child to enjoy reading”. The statement 1, “I read aloud to my children

and encourage them to do so to me” (strongly effective, rank 3). The statement 2,

“I understand carefully the modules before instructing my child to answer

activities” (strongly effective, rank 4). The statement 5, “I and my child read or

share stories with other family members about modules” got the lowest rating of

3.23 (effective, rank 5). Overall, reading with a mean rating of 3.38 was perceived

strongly effective in Level of parental involvement in modular learning. In

Writing, out of the twenty-six (26) respondents, the highest rating is at 3.58

(strongly effective, rank 1) to the statement 2, “I review my child’s notes,

handouts, and assignment requirements before beginning to write suggestions and

answer”. The statement 1, “I can write a good academic paragraph” got the lowest

rating of 3.1 (effective, rank 5). Overall, writing with a mean rating of 3.30 was

perceived strongly effective in the level of parental involvement in modular

learning. In parenting, out of the twenty-six (26) respondents, the highest rating is

at 3.58 (strongly effective, rank 1) to the statement 5, “I have goals and plan for

improving my child’s learning”. The statement 1, “I keep my child informed

regularly of how he/she is being graded” got the lowest rating of 3.35 (strongly

effective, rank 5). Overall, parenting with a mean rating of 3.44 was perceived

strongly effective in the level of parental involvement in modular learning.


3. There is no significant difference on the perception on the on the level of

parental involvement in modular learning to the respondents when grouped

according to profile variables.

Recommendations

Based from the findings and conclusion obtained in the study, the researcher

recommended the following:

1. Parents need to read to their children, assist in answering modules, limit the

use of social media when doing school activities, take their children to

interesting places and spent a good time in parenting, have some games to

avoid being boredness of their child .

2. Parents should monitor their child's homework and activities, when teachers,

parents and pupils work together to determine the parental involvement in

modular learning, the pupils will experience higher level of achievement.

3. Teacher should provide explicit directions, instructions and expectations as to

what parents should be doing at home to further or enhance their child's

education. They also need to make sure they show appreciation to parents for

their support.
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barger et. al (2019), The relation between parents’ involvement in children’s

schooling and children’s adjustment: A meta-analysis, Psychological

Bulletin. Retrieved from https://childandfamilyblog.com/parental-involvement-in-

education/

Bernardo, J. (2020). Modular Learning most preferred parents: DepEd. ABS-CBN

News. https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/07/30/20/modular-learning-most-preferred-

by-parents- DepEd.

Defazio, J. et. al (2010). Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol.

10, No. 2,. Retrieved from www.iupui.edu/~josotl

Evans S. et, al.(2021) Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Vol

21,No.1.Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journal/index.php/josotl/index


Falsario, M. J. (2011). Thinking Science I workbook on students’ achievement.

[Unpublished Master Thesis], Sultan Kudarat State University, Tacurong City,

Philippines. Gonzales, E. E. (2015). A Modular Approach Utilizing Decision

Tree in Teaching Integration Techniques in Calculus, Department of Arts,

Sciences and Teacher Education, City College of Calamba, Calamba City,

Laguna, Philippines.

FlipScience. (2020). 'Tagapagdaloy’: How Filipino parents can help ensure

successful modular distance learning. FlipScience - Top Philippine Science

News and Features for the Inquisitive Filipino. Retrieved from

https://www.flipscience.ph/news/features-news/tagapagdaloy- modular-distance-

learning/

Gould and Simhon (2018) Journal of Labor Economics National Bureau of Economic

Retrieved hhttps://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/02/190204085926.htm

Lara, Laura, and Mahia Saracostti. “Frontiers | Effect of Parental Involvement on

Children’s Academic Achievement in Chile | Psychology.” Frontiers,

Creative Commons Attribution License, 27 June 2019,

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01464/full.

Quinones, M. T. (2020). DepEd clarifies blended, distance learning modalities for SY

2020-2021. Philippine Information Agency. Retrieved from

https://pia.gov.ph/news/articles/1046619
Reyes, Y. D., & De Guia, R. G. (2017). Development of English worktext in English

101. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). Retrieved from

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8357/259b5c0183ff5f354a-85f91ab1199d5fcab2

Richards, J. (2013). Advantages and disadvantages of using instructional materials

In teaching ES Sejpal, K. (2013). Modular method of teaching. International

Journal for Research in Education, 2(2), 169-171.Selga, M. C. R. (2013).

Instructional materials development: A worktext in Science, Technology

and Society. LCCB Development Education Journal of Multidisciplinary

Sites-Elizalde, Maria Angeles.“Parental Involvement in Schools in Spain and

Germany: Evidence from PISA 2015 - ScienceDirect.” ScienceDirect.Com

Science, Health and Medical Journals, Full Text Articles and Books., Charo

Reparaz, 10 Sept. 2018,

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883035518308590

Training Institute, 6.Sadiq, S., & Zamir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of modular approach

in teaching at university level. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(17),


104. Retrieved from

http://www.academia.edu/download/37300040/Sadia__Dr_shazia

Tria, J. Z. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of

Education in the Philippines The New Normal. Research Gate.

Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341981898_

Lambert, V. A. and Lambert, C. E. (2012) ‘Qualitative Descriptive Research: An

Acceptable Design’, The Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing

Research, 16(4), pp. 255–256. Retrieved from

https://www.projectguru.in/a-comparison-of-descriptive-research-and-

experimental-research/

Ceka, A., & Murati, R. (2016). The Role of Parents in the Education of

Children. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(5), 61-64. Retrieved

from https://www.ukfiet.org/2020/how-parents-are-supporting-their-

childrens-learning-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-nigeria/

Philippine Information Agency. (2020, October 9). Teaching-learning modality

under the new normal. https://pia.gov.ph/features/articles/1055584


LaRocque, M., Kleiman, L, & Darling, S.M. (2011). Parental Involvement: The

Missing Link in School Achievement. Preventing School Failure:

Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(3), 115-122.

doi10.1080/10459880903472876

Amoroso, V. & Bajo, A. (2014). Philippine dropout rates rising since 2007.

Philippine Star. Retrieved June 15, 2015 from

http://www.philstar.com/campus/2014/06/12/1333995/ phl-dropout-rates

rising-2007.

A. Lilawati, “Peran Orang Tua dalam Mendukung Kegiatan Pembelajaran di

Rumah pada Masa Pandemi,” Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia

Dini, vol. 5. No. 1, pp. 549-558, 2020.

Goodall, J. and Montgomery, C. (2014), Parental Involvement to Parental

Engagement: A Continuum. Educational Review, Vol. 66, No. 4, 2 October

2014, pp399-410(12). Routledge. Retrieved from

https://education.gov.scot/improvement/research/what-is-parental-involvement-

and-parental-engagement/
Alves, R. A., & Limpo, T. (2015). Progress in written language bursts, pauses,

transcription, and written composition across schooling. Scientific Studies of

Reading, 19(5), 374–391. doi:10.1080/10888438.2015.1059838. Retrieved from

https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%

Selangan. (2015). The Reading Profile of Children in the Philippines. Literacy and

World Languages Article. Retrieved from

http://www.edutopia.org/discussion/reading-profile-children-philippines

Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E.,

and Gaviria, J. J. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic

achievement: a meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 14, 33–46. doi:

10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002.

Catalano, H., and Catalano, C. (2014). The importance of the school-family

relationship in the child’s intellectual and social development. Proc. Soc.

Behav. Sci. 128, 406–414. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.179

Garbacz, S. A., Herman, K. C., Thompson, A. M., and Reinke, W. M. (2017). Family

engagement in education and intervention: implementation and evaluation to


maximize family, school, and student outcomes. J. Sch. Psychol. 62, 1–10. doi:

10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.002

Ma, X., Shen, J., Krenn, H. Y., Hu, S., and Yuan, J. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of the

relationship between learning outcomes and parental involvement during

early childhood education and early elementary education. Educ.

Psychol. Rev. 28, 771–801. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9351-1

Sebastian, J., Moon, J.-M., and Cunningham, M. (2017). The Relationship of school-

based parental involvement with student achievement: a comparison of

principal and parent survey reports from PISA 2012. Educ. Stud. 43, 123–

146. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2016.1248900

Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS; 2012). Education for all:

Addressing problems in primary schooling, Development Research News,

30(6), 1-8. Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324497851_PARENTAL_INVOLVEM

ENT_IN_EDUCATION
Elia, M. S. (2015). Parenting practices of lower socioeconomic status parents of high

achieving students. Thomson, S. (2018). Achievement at school and socio-

economic background—an educational perspective. Npj Science of Learning,

3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0022-0

Ceka, A., & Murati, R. (2016). The Role of Parents in the Education of Children.

Journal of Education and Practice, 7(5), 61-64. How Parents are Supporting

their Children's Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Nigeria - The

Education and Development Forum (UKFIET)

https://www.ukfiet.org/2020/how-parents-are-supporting-their-childrens-learning

You might also like