Squid Game 5

COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION AND.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SQUID GAME
Villanueva, Thaddeus Jadion

Baluyot, Bryan Paul F.
Lajara, Rico
Manalad, J-Mark
A Thesis
In partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science
College of Communication and Information Technology
President Ramon Magsaysay State University
Iba, Zambales
JULY 2022
1
COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Republic of the Philippines

PRESIDENT RAMON MAGSAYSAY STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Communication and Information Technology
Iba, Zambales
APPROVAL SHEET
This, study entitled “SQUIDGAME” prepared and submitted by Thaddeus

Jadion Villanueva, Bryan Paul F. Baluyot, RicoLajara and J- Mark Manalad in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN
COMPUTER SIENCE are hereby recommended for oral examination.
ENGR. CARL ANGELO PAMPLONA

Adviser
________________________________________________________________
Approved by the Panel of the Oral Examiners on July 12, 2022 with a grade of ________.
ENGR. MELOJEAN C. MARAVE DR. GEOFFREY S. SEPILLO

Subject Instructor Member
MR. DANIEL A. BACHILLAR, MSCS MR. DARWIN M. MORAÑA

Member Member
________________________________________________________________
Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE.
___________________ __________________________
Date Signed MENCHIE A. DELA CRUZ, PhD
Dean, CCIT
2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The researchers would like to extend their profound gratitude and appreciation to those
people who devoted much time, talent and ideas or all the accomplishments of this study.
Engr. Carl Angelo Pamplona, their thesis adviser, for his patience and support
endowed to the researchers as the critic of the study and guidance during the preparation
to make this study successful.
Engr. Melojean Marave, their Research instructor, for her encouragement and
guidance to the researchers and for imparting her knowledge and suggestions for this
study.
Menchie A. Dela Cruz, PhD, Dean of the College of Communication and
Information Technology, for her valuable support and encouragement to finish this
study.
Dr. Geoffrey S. Sepillo, Mr. Daniel A. Bachillar, MSCS, and Mr. Darwin M.
Moraña, as members for their intellectual comments and provide suggestions and
recommendations in order to improve this study,
Mrs.Myrna S. Pangan, Principal of Polytechnic College of Botolan, for allowing
and guiding the researchers to distribute the questionnaires to the student respondents.
All the respondents of this study, First Year students of the Polytechnic College of
Botolan, Botolan Zambales, for their honest response and mutual cooperation.
3
Their families and loved ones, especially to their beloved parents for their
unconditional love, support, sacrifices, and Most of all, to the Almighty God, for all the
blessings, knowledge, and wisdom bestowed upon the researchers.
The Researchers
TJV
BFB
RL
JM
4
ABSTRACT
The Squid Game has the Flipmatch and Puzzle game that has categories and time
level, the goal of the game is to find its match while spending time of the chosen time
level. The proposed mobile game application is an interactive game that is great for
developing the quality and thinking skills of the players and will also help students in
improving their knowledge and skills in making an interactive game for their future
research.
This study is aimed to develop a mobile game application that is designed to help
students in gaming and thinking skills. The information for the study was gathered
through a survey questionnaire that was distributed to the First year students of
Polytechnic College of Botolan. It is sought to determine the quality of the application
using ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Software Quality Metrics in terms of compatibility, usability,
maintainability, portability, functionality, and performance efficiency. The researcher is
using qualitative approach for this study. Random sampling will be the researcher’s
method to conduct a survey to the respective respondents. With the type of research
design utilized, the researchers were able to observe and provide analyzable data that will
be a useful tool in developing their researcher adopted surveys. The study was conducted
at Polytechnic College of Botolan, First year students: 24 Female and 25 Male with the
total of 30 students as the respondents.
The overall evaluation on the software quality by the students has computed
average weighted mean is interpreted as Very Good. The overall evaluation on the level
5
of acceptability by the
COLLEGE OF students has computed
COMMUNICATION average weighted
AND INFORMATION mean is interpreted as
TECHNOLOGY
Highly Acceptable.
The researchers recommend the implementation of “Squid Game” as a tool for
schools is recommended, The implementation of “Squid Game” as a tool for schools is
recommended, maintain the application accuracy and consistency of the task, enhanced
functionality through system completeness and develop performance through developing
user-friendliness of the system and further enhance the performance of the required
functions at different hardware specification and software environment.
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE................................................................................................................................ i
APPROVAL SHEET.................................................................................................ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.........................................................................................iii
ABSTRACT.............................................................................................................iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………vi
LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………….………....ix
LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………... xi
LIST OF NOTATIONS………………………………………………………………….xii
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Project Context.....................................................................................................................1
Purpose and Description......................................................................................................2
Objectives ...........................................................................................................................3
Scope and Limitations..........................................................................................................3
Definition of Terms..............................................................................................................4
CHAPTER 2. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE/ SYSTEMS
Technical Background.........................................................................................................5
Review of Related Literature, Studies/ Systems..................................................................6
Synthesis............................................................................................................................11
7
CHAPTERCOLLEGE
3. METHODOLOGY
OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Requirement Analysis........................................................................................................13
Requirement Documentation.............................................................................................14
Design of Software, System, Product and or Processes………………………………….16
Development and Testing………………………………….…………………………….19
Data Analysis Plan and Statistics……………………………………………………..….21
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Compatibility………...………………...24
Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Usability.…………………………........24
Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Reliability……………………………...25
Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Maintainability………………………...27
Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Portability……………….......................28
Evaluation of the Level of Acceptability in terms of Functionality…...………………...29
Evaluation of the Level of Acceptability in terms of Performance…...………………...30
CHAPTER 5 RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings……………………………………………………………………32
Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………...33
Recommendations……………………………………………………………………….33
REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………34
APPENDICES
Appendix A Relevant Source Code...................................................................................38
Appendix B Evaluation Tool or Test Documents..............................................................49
8
Appendix CCOLLEGE
Users’ Guide..................................................................................................50
OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Appendix D Screen Layouts .............................................................................................51
Appendix E Test Results....................................................................................................52
Appendix F Copy of Request Letter/ MOA/ MOU ..........................................................53
Appendix G Curriculum Vitae ..........................................................................................54
9
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title Page
1 Distribution of Survey Questionnaire to the ……………………. 21
selected user of the proposed game entitled
“Squid Game”.
2 Respondents Evaluation on the Software Quality ……………… 24
of the “Squid Game” in terms of Compatibility
of the “Squid Game” in terms of Usability
4 Respondents Evaluation on the Software Quality ……………... 25
of the “Squid Game” in terms of Reliability
5 Respondents Evaluation on the Software Quality ………………. 27
of the “Squid Game” in terms of Maintainability
of the “Squid Game” in terms of Portability
7 Respondents Evaluation on the Level of Acceptability ………... 29
of the “Squid Game” in terms of Functionality
8 Respondents Evaluation on the Level of Acceptability ………… 30
of the “Squid Game” in terms of Performance
10
LIST OF FIGURES
11
Figure Title
COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Page
1 Data Flow Diagram……………………………………………. 13
2 Conceptual Framework………………….…………………….. 16
3 System Architecture………………………………………….... 17
4 Block Diagram………………………………………………… 18
5 Iterative Model………………………………………………… 19
12
LIST OF NOTATIONS
ISO/IEC International Organization for Standardization and International

Electrotechnical Commission
PCB Polytechnic College of Botolan
PRMSU President Ramon Magsaysay State University
13
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Project Context
Though this widespread of technology, the computer has been improve where it
incorporates with the in demand nowadays are the tablets, touchpads, and mini pads.
Most of these tablets are powered Android OS system that is use to be able to execute the
android programs. In years, there are several versions of operating system which are now
used to execute the tablets, smartphones and android phones.
Android is the most popular mobile platform in the world. Android development
is becoming an increasingly popular field. For developers who want to target a huge,
diverse audience, The in demand use of computer system software has been implemented
from PC, mobile and even other means of technology and Applications / Games are now
invading it. In years, Games are also being implemented by the use of the World Wide
Web. Programmers and developers continuously discover and develop new faces, styles
of games or apps which most of the people were looking forward in it. In line with this,
several android applications are being developed running to the tablets. Most are for
gaming, application system, knowledge base system and data processing.
Squid game is a kind of game that make the gamers addicted of it. It is hard to
win the game for people with ordinary people. So, they keep trying. Teenagers want to
get more points as compared to their mates that make them addicted to it. People with
fewer social activities also become an addict of it for many reasons. On the contrary,
1
positive psychological
COLLEGE OF effects of this game
COMMUNICATION on the mental
AND INFORMATION status of the gamer will
TECHNOLOGY
improved the
thinking ability of the gamer, improves their response time toward any matter and
increase decision-making and deep learning ability of the player.
Purpose and Description
The purpose of this study is to develop and design an interactive game app. This
project has one main goal – to meet the player’s satisfaction. The researchers should be
able to meet the standard by giving effective solutions for the existing problems. The
system will be a user friendly and usable so that it can be access by Polytechnic College
of Botolan first year students and help them learn vibrant and interesting material
supported by images and videos that will enhance their quality and thinking skills.
This study ensure that the design project will benefit the following:
Gamers. They will be able to enhance their gaming skills and their creative thinking
skills.
Researchers. The researchers can use this software as the basis for their future research.
President Ramon Magsaysay State University. This institution of the researchers
benefited due to another research will be added in the collection books at the campus
library and contributed as references for the future researchers.
Objectives
To understand this study, we as the researchers conducted an interview in the
establishment of Polytechnic College of Botolan to gather data and information that we
will include in our proposed system. We as the researcher proclaim that are said that
2
system will COLLEGE
benefit the establishment toAND
OF COMMUNICATION become more and
INFORMATION have a good and satisfying
TECHNOLOGY
service to students.
Specifically, it seeks the following objectives:
1. Identify the evaluation of students on the Software Quality of Squid Game in
terms of the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Software Quality Metrics:
1.1 Compatibility;
1.2 Usability;
1.3 Reliability;
1.4 Maintainability; and
1.5 Portability.
2. Identify the evaluation of students on the Level of Acceptability of Squid Game
in terms of the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Software Quality Metrics:
2.1 Functionality; and
2.2 Performance Efficiency.
Scope and Limitations of the Study
The Squid game system was designed for the First year students of Polytechnic
College of Botolan that is created as Android based operating system compatibility. The
mobile game application have a two types of game, categories and the time level. It is a
memory testing game. The mobile game application does not accessible to World Wide
Web. It is not applicable for IOS users.
3
Definition of Terms
Compatibility. It refers to the efficient performance of the application without negatively
affecting any other application when it comes to its software quality.
Functionality. It refers to the accuracy and consistency of the application when it comes
to level of acceptability.
Functional Suitability. It refers to the specified task and objectives covers the
application when it comes to its software quality.
Maintainability. It refers to the effectiveness and efficiency use without defects of the
application when it comes to its software quality.
Movement. It refers to the process of moving of the players inside the game.
Performance. It refers to the capability of the application in completing task when it
comes to the level of acceptability.
Performance Efficiency. It refers to the response, processing time and throughput rates
of an application, when performing its functions when it comes to software quality.
Portability. It refers to the software quality of being easy to carry and adaptable for
different or evolving hardware, software or other operational or usage environments of
the application.
4
Reliability. COLLEGE
It refers OF
to COMMUNICATION
the software quality of the application
AND INFORMATION when it comes to the
TECHNOLOGY
operational and accessibility when required for use.
Usability. It refers to the attributes of the application that make it easy to operate and
control.
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE/ SYSTEMS
This chapter presents the review of related literature and studies that is significant
in the development of the present study.
Technical Background
This chapter discusses concepts and conducted studies related to the phenomenon
of Squid Game. The literature reviewed here provided the researcher insights into the
subject matter of the present study. It also provided the researcher information and
materials needed in the formulation and development of the data-gathering instrument.
This review consists of books, articles, documents that focus on the same subject matter
or other concepts of the study.
System Technical Background
This chapter discussed the technicality of the entitled “Squid Game”. This system
is a software application or used to plan, implement and assess a specific learning
process. It is used for practice and a user interface that is operated by students.
These are the tools used on the system:
5
1. Csharp
COLLEGE or called C# Programming
OF COMMUNICATION Language.
AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
2. Adobe Photoshop
3. Unity game Engine 2D- for C# IDE and Game Build
4. Visual Studio Codes for Text Editor in C# Programming Language
5. Blender Tool for Animation
Review of Related Literature, Studies/ Systems
According to J. Lee and H. Jung (2019), Game-based learning is learning that
learners reach their learning goals through games that contain educational content
independently, without direct involvement by the instructor. Games naturally provide
learners with immersion and fun, creating an interesting learning environment and giving
them a natural and educational effect in the process of playing. Games for game-based
learning must have learning goals, have fun, and be motivated. In particular, recent
researches have shown that digital game-based learning provides continuous interest to
learners and strengthens motivation to induce active participation, thereby enhancing
learning perception along with natural review effects (W. Hwang et al.,2016). The
interaction effect of the game improved the logical thinking ability of learners not only in
the highlearning group but also in the low-learning group. Prensky has defined
generations that use the digital languages of computers, video games, and the Internet as
generations N or D, signaling the emergence of a different kind of generation from
previous generations. Unlike their predecessors, these generations are very familiar with
6
video and cyberspace.
COLLEGE OFEspecially for them,
COMMUNICATION ANDcomputer or online
INFORMATION games are more than just
TECHNOLOGY
entertainment or entertainment. Because of this, everyday life in cyberspace has a huge
impact on education and learning. Research on cognitive performance improvement by
game-based learning has been mainly conducted from healthy young adult samples.
Bruce D. Homer has been shown to be effective in training cognitive skills by proposing
custom video games to
support the development of high school students' executive functions showed that digital
games were effective for improving the attention of students for Brazilian elementary
school students ( Homer, 2018)
Android tablets, smartphones and touchpad are very in demand in today’s
generation. People are all having this kind of gadgets not just to personal and business but
it also lessen the boredom from work and daily stressful life. Enjoyment which might
carried from the use of this gadgets and maintaining to use as a stress and boredom
relievers. Games are one of the attractive features that the android tablets, smartphones
and touchpad have. The different version, styles and story of games makes the common
user curious to explore and enjoy from it. From the famous Facebook game CANDY
Crush, tablet games Plants versus Zombies, Temple run, Bubble Mania, and Angry Birds,
people get to explore and download games that might fits to their needs to lessen the
boredom. The group would like to develop an App to be able to provide a continuous
storyline program that will keep the user continuously playing from it. A story line
gaming apps which aims to gain scores from it, as the user interacts with the game. Since
7
player is been dealingOFwith
COLLEGE the interactiveAND
COMMUNICATION features, and graphics
INFORMATION might help to be able to
TECHNOLOGY
generate a good gaming output. Most of the gaming apps of today’s make use of the
scoring, making the cutest outfits and changing it, making challenging for the gamer to
think and create moves from it. .
Furthermore, student’s study time is reduced significantly because of the number
of activities high school or university students are expected to participate in. Therefore,
studying a periodic table, and trying to remember all the elements becomes boring and
repetitive, more so when trying to remember from textbooks. If students are unable to
learn and remember all the important details of the main topics, essential elements, the
periodic table, and chemical compounds, it will continually affect their future learning in
chemistry, making it difficult to continue learning, and pass yearly university entrance
exams. However, game-based learning has been used as a tool for centuries and is much
more attractive and interesting, and results in active learning rather than passive learning
through textbooks and theory (Saksrisathaporn & Maneewan, 2012). Currently, there are
only a few other resources that can help students learn chemistry by themselves. Game-
based learning is very close in meaning to a serious game, and a serious game has
become a hot topic in training and education as shown in the abundant academic research
since 2012 (Guillen, V and Aleson-Carbonell, M, 2012). Mostly, the digital game-based
learning available in the market does not focus on graphics or level designs. For example,
the Kagaku Chemistry Periodic Table of Elements only displays the 16th International
Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2019) table
8
on a scrollable screen
COLLEGE and includes buttons
OF COMMUNICATION for explanation
AND INFORMATION and a search window
TECHNOLOGY
(Freewarepocketpc, 2017). Also, mobile devices have become widely popular devices
because they are easy to use, portable and can support a variety of applications. In this
study, a smartphone game named “Chemistry Pop” was designed and developed. The
proposed game was designed to help students to learn chemistry with more interest and
enthusiasm. This mobile game aims to support science students to learn and remember
the essential elements in the periodic table with more interest and enthusiasm and to
increase
the resources that may help aid students in self-studying. The game is designed with
colorful graphics. The students can play a game and remember the essential elements in
the periodic table at the same time. They can also continue growing and improving these
memories at a higher level of education. The game consists of three stages, each stage
plays differently and has different goals. The first stage is to support the student to
remember the names and symbols of elements from the periodic table. The gameplay of
this stage is adapted from a “Bubble Shooter” game. The single-player video game
Bubble Shooter probably became famous as it is very intuitive and easy to learn. It is a
mix of “Tetris” and “Connect Four” (Shooter-bubble (2019). This creates a game
addiction feeling similar to the Candy Crush Saga game (Chen, C., 2016). The aim of
Bubble Shooter is to collect as many points as possible. To get points you need to destroy
the colored bubbles. For the Chemistry pop game, the player must connect and group at
least three bubbles of the same property to collect them according to the goal, which is
given at each level. Players must shoot the bubbles with given symbols to collect and
9
clear the goal, which OF
COLLEGE uses the elements' names.
COMMUNICATION To pass each
AND INFORMATION level, players must clear all
TECHNOLOGY
progress bars within the time and moves limits. The second stage is to help students
remember the group and period of elements from the periodic table. The bubbles with
element symbols will be released randomly and will always be moving. Players must use
their fingers to touch, hold and drag to form a circle around bubbles with the same
property and need at least three bubbles to collect them and clear the goal, which would
be the group or period numbers. The last stage is to help students remember the 5-
chemical compounds. The bubbles will be collected if the connection of bubbles is in
accordance with a chemical compound. To pass each level,
players must clear all progress bars within the time limit. The prototype game was tested
and evaluated with a sample student population.
Synthesis
After reviewing the literature and studies, most of the research positive in the
gamification of learning material. The goal of this literature review was to support the
idea on game based learning and the gamification. The underlying result of the literature
and studies shows that the uses of games improve students in learning. The increasing
integration of digital games and applied sciences into learning environments has an
impact on student’s learning. Game- based learning has been shown to be effective in
both learning and teaching. Information learned through game- based learning is retained
longer that information learned through other techniques. A successful learning process is
one in which you are completely immersed in the task at hand. At the same time,
10
gamificationCOLLEGE
becomesOFthe latest phenomena
COMMUNICATION to try to engaged
AND INFORMATION the students fully in
TECHNOLOGY
learning. The use of it has a successful outcome may it be used in business or in
education. (Chou, 2017; Mollick and Rothbard, 2014) .
Meanwhile, the methods of teaching in the Philippines are still relatively
traditional and lack innovation. Game Based Learning in the Philippines still has less
study and is highly probable that use of it in instruction will not guarantee learning gains
over time. “Filipinos might have designed board games utilized in class, however very
few Filipinos have researched on the use of educational games as learning tools.” (Conte,
2017, p 2). The same with the lack of interest in the study of Philippine mythology. Many
teachers and
students find the lack of enthusiasm in the subject. It is very important to learn about the
Philippine mythology because according to Jacano (2018), it is the most important
functions in the society
11
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
This chapter covers the requirements analysis, documentations and design of
software, system, product or processes.
Requirements Analysis
Choose
Squid Puzzle Time
Game Level
130
seconds
Flipmatc Pairs 60
h
seconds
10 15 20
Back History
Pairs Pairs Pairs 12
Squid
Figure 1
Data Flow Diagram
The Squid Game Data Flow Diagram contains one external entity and twelve
processes.
Based on the diagram, the squid game starts with the flipmatch and puzzle game.
When you click the flipmatch button, it will take you to the pairs then you will choose on
the 10 pairs, 15 pairs and 20 pairs after that there is a squid category. After the game you
will click the back button then if you want to see the rank of your score, just click the
history. In puzzle game, you choose the time level: the 130 seconds and 60 seconds then
after the time is up, you will click the back button and then thte history.
Requirement Documentation
The Squid game consists of two games which is the “Flipmatch and the Puzzle
Game” where the players can choose what they are going to play. The Flipmatch game
consists of different level: The 10 pairs, 15 pairs and 20 pairs where the players can
choose how many pairs they are going to find a match, there is a squid category. Squid
Category contains different types, colors and varieties of squid that are going to find its
13
match. It hasCOLLEGE
differentOFlevel from 10 pairsAND
COMMUNICATION to INFORMATION
20 pairs, while the pairs are getting higher,
TECHNOLOGY
the difficulties of the game can affect you.
There are also a time while playing the game, it indicates on how fast you find their
match in the categories and your game will saved into the history. In history, the time and
the date on when you play the game will be save. The faster the time you finish matching,
you will get into Top three, based on the different pairs.
In Puzzle Game, you can choose the time level: the 130 seconds and the 60
seconds. If you choose the 130 seconds, the time that you are going to play the game will
be on 130 seconds, also that is how 60 seconds worked when you are playing the game.
When the time level is fully consume, the game will stop,the time is up and will post your
score.
14
Design of Software, System, Product and or Processes
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT
Design of Squid Game Development of Squid Evaluation of Squid

as to: Game using: Game as to:
ISO/IEC 25010:2011 ISO/IEC 25010:2011

Functional requirements,
Software Quality Software Quality
Data Flow Diagram,
Metrics: Metrics:
Block Diagram, Iterative
1.1 Compatibility; model. 1.1 Compatibility;
1.2 Usability; Hardware: 1.2 Usability;

 Personal computer, 1.3 Reliability;
1.3 Reliability;
Laptop, Android
1.4 Usability; Smartphone 1.4 Usability;
Software:
1.5 Maintainability;  Unity3D, Adobe 1.5 Maintainability;
1.6 Portability; Photoshop, Adobe 1.6 Portability;

Illustrator, Visual
1.7 Functionality; and Studio 1.7 Functionality; and
Data gathering
1.8 Performance 1.8 Performance
procedure:
Efficiency Efficiency
 Survey questionnaire
Analysis of data: .
 Mean, Frequency &
Percentage
distribution, Likert
Scale
15
FEEDBACK
Figure 2
Conceptual Framework of the Study
The input-process-output model isused to demonstrate the study's conceptual
framework. The design of the mobile game application that is relevant to ISO/IEC
25010:2011 Software Quality Metrics is one of the study's inputs, Compatibility,
usability, maintainability, portability, functionality, and performance efficiency are
among the ISO's attributes.
The functional requirements, data flow diagram, block diagram, data models, and
iterative model were all employed in the study to create the mobile game application. The
researchers used both hardware and software. For hardware, the researcher used a
personal computer, and for software, unity and Photoshop were used. The information for
the study was gathered through a survey questionnaire, which is going to be distributed
by the researcher. The mean is also employed in the analysis.
16
Figure 3
System Architecture
System architecture with several components is proposed to be the mobile game
application interaction and planning according to their current individual capabilities.
This allows an online observation of the overall mobile game application performance.
The figure above is the system architecture. It is represented by six components
which serve different purpose. The six components on the figure are related on how the
mobile game application is implemented and how it is during runtime. These are the
Squid game, Mobile Phone, Game, Game Interface, Game Logic and the Movement. The
mobile game application Squid game which is the name of the game which operate and
give task within the game. Mobile phone is the required device to play the mobile game
application. Inside the game is the game interface. The movement enables the player to
do a specific task, and the game logic as the fundamental principle on how the game will
be played.
17
COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONFigure 4
AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Block Diagram
1. Choose Game
2. Play the game
3. History
4. Winner
5. Exit/ Close the game
Development and Testing
Designing and
Planning Requirements Deployment
Developing
Testing Evaluation
Figure 5
Iterative Model
In developing the proposed mobile game application, iterative model is used.
Upon completing the planning of the mobile game application, the next step is that
gathering the requirements for the game. Followed by the designing and developing. Next
are the testing and the evaluation. The process continued through a repeated cycle till the
complete mobile game application is ready for deployment as per the requirement. This
method is used with the aim to improve the application at each iteration of cycle.
The researcher used a qualitative approach for this study. The study was carried
out by using a survey questionnaire based on ISO/IEC 25010:2011 given to the
18
respondents.COLLEGE
Cluster OF
sampling will be theAND
COMMUNICATION researcher’s method
INFORMATION to conduct a survey to the
TECHNOLOGY
respective respondents. With the type of research design utilized, the researchers were
able to observe and provide analyzable data that will be a useful tool in developing their
researcher adopted surveys.
Table 1
Distribution of Survey Questionnaire to the selected user of the proposed game
entitled Squid Game.
Respondent Frequency (f) Percentage
Female 24 49%
Male 25 51%
TOTAL 49 100%
Table 1 shows Purposive sampling is a sampling technique where researchers
select a group of subjects (a sample) for study from a larger group (a population) until the
needed criteria and respondents were gained. In the study that were a total of (49)
respondents selected as sample frame and distributed by percentage where (24) of
respondents are female which 49% and rest (25) is Students with 51%. In this regard, the
researchers utilized only the number of respondents.
The product quality model of ISO/IEC 25010:2011 needs by the researcher to
their study, stating that the ISO/IEC 25010:2011-based quality models and respective
Guidance for Producers are available through the following: Compatibility, Usability,
Reliability, Maintainability, Portability, Functionality, and Performance Efficiency.
Data Analysis Plan and Statistics
19
The draft of the questionnaire
COLLEGE was made
OF COMMUNICATION by the researchers
AND INFORMATION and was corrected.
TECHNOLOGY
Suggestions and recommendations were given by the instructor/adviser to enhance the
questionnaire and adopted by the researchers. After this validation, reproduction of
copies of questionnaires was made for the distribution to their respondents.
Statistical Treatment of Data
1. Frequency and Percentage Distribution. This will be used to determine the
ratio of respondents that have same answers with general number of
respondents
Formula:
%=f x 100 %
N
Wherein: % = percentage
f = number of respondents that answered the question
N = total number of respondents
2. Weighted Arithmetic Mean – This tool utilized in order to show the weighted
mean of the intervals and their total weighted of the respondents.
Formula:
❑
∑ f (x)
Xw = ❑
n
Wherein: Xw = Weighted Arithmetic Mean
∑ f (x) = sum of all the products of f and

20
x = s the
COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION weight
AND as 5, 4, 3,TECHNOLOGY
INFORMATION 2, 1
n = sum of all students
3. Likert Scale – this will be used to rate the functions by having a person
complete a questionnaire that requires them to indicate the extent to which
they agree or disagree with a series of statements. It rates by a scale to which
can rate by the user.
Part I
Likert Scale
Statistical Assignment of Class interval on the Level of Satisfaction of the game
Scale Class Interval Descriptive Equivalent
5 4.20-5.00 Excellent (E)
4 3.40-4.19 Very Good (VG)

3 2.60-3.39 Good (G)
2 1.80-2.59 Fair (F)
1 1.00-170 Poor (P)
Part II
Likert Scale
Statistical Assignment of Class interval on the Level of Acceptability of the game
Scale Class Interval Descriptive Equivalent
5 4.20-5.00 Highly Acceptable (HA)
4 3.40-4.19 Moderately Acceptable (MA)

3 2.60-3.39 Acceptable (A)
21
2
COLLEGE 1.80-2.59
OF COMMUNICATION Slightly
AND INFORMATION Acceptable (SA)
TECHNOLOGY
1 1.00-179 Not Acceptable (NA)
Chapter 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This discusses the presentation, analysis and interpretation of data gathered by the
researchers.
1. Respondent’s evaluation on the Software Quality of Squid Game.
1.1. Compatibility
Table 2
Respondents Evaluation on the Software Quality of the “Squid Game” in terms of
Compatibility.
Compatibility Weighted Quantitative Rank

Mean Description
1. The application can perform its required 4.55 Excellent 2
functions efficiently while sharing a
common environment and resources, without
detrimental impact on any other application.
2. The application has different games that can 4.59 Excellent 1
be play and becomes a thrilling game.
3. The application is compatible with android 4.48 Excellent 3
phones.
Average Weighted Mean 4.54 Excellent
Table 2 shows the evaluation of the respondents on the Software Quality using
ISO/IEC 25010: 2011 in terms of compatibility.
22
IndicatorCOLLEGE
2, “TheOF
application has different
COMMUNICATION games thatTECHNOLOGY
AND INFORMATION can be play and becomes a
thrilling game”, respectively obtained an average weighted mean 4.59 (rank 1)
interpreted as Excellent. Indicator 3, “The application is compatible with android
phones”, obtained the least average weighted mean 4.48 (rank 3) interpreted as Excellent.
The computed overall weighted mean on the evaluation on Squid game as evaluated by
respondents using the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 metrics as to Compatibility was 4.54
interpreted as “Excellent”.
1.2 Usability
Table 3
Usability.
Usability Weighted Quantitative Rank

Mean Description
1. The application users can recognize that the 4.48 Excellent 5
application is appropriate for their needs.
2. The application can be used by specified 4.53 Excellent 4
users to achieve specified goals of learning
to use the application with effectiveness,
efficiency and satisfaction.
3. The application has attributes that make it 4.61 Excellent 1
easy to operate and control.
4. The application protects users against 4.57 Excellent 3
making errors.
5. The application enables pleasing and 4.59 Excellent 2.5
satisfying interaction for the user.
6. The application can be used by people with 4.59 Excellent 2.5
the widest range of characteristics and
capabilities.
ISO/IEC 25010: 2011 in terms of usability.
23
Indicator 3, “The
COLLEGE application has
OF COMMUNICATION attributes
AND that TECHNOLOGY
INFORMATION make it easy to operate and
control”, respectively obtained an average weighted mean 4.61 (rank 1) interpreted as
Excellent. Indicator 2, “The application can be used by specified users to achieve
specified goals of learning to use the application with effectiveness, efficiency and
satisfaction.”, obtained the least average weighted mean 4.53 (rank 4) interpreted as
Excellent. The computed over-all weighted mean on the evaluation on Squid game as
evaluated by respondents using the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 metrics as to usability was 4.56
interpreted as “Excellent”.
1.3 Reliability
Table 4
Reliability.
Reliability Weighted Quantitative Rank

Mean Description
1. The application meets needs for reliability 4.53 Excellent 1.5

under normal operation.
2. The application is operational and accessible 4.51 Excellent 2

when required for use.
3. The application operates as intended despite 4.44 Excellent 3
the presence of hardware or software faults.
4. The application can recover the data directly 4.53 Excellent 1.5
affected and re-establish the desired state of
the application in the event of an
interruption or failure.
ISO/IEC 25010: 2011 in terms of Reliability.
24
Indicators
COLLEGE1 and 4, “The application
OF COMMUNICATION meets needsTECHNOLOGY
AND INFORMATION for reliability under normal
operation” and “The application can recover the data directly affected and re-establish the
desired state of the application in the event of an interruption or failure”, respectively
both obtained an average weighted mean 4.53 (rank 1) interpreted as Excellent. Indicator
3, “The application operates as intended despite the presence of hardware or software
faults”, obtained the least average weighted mean 4.44 (rank 3) interpreted as Excellent.
The computed over-all weighted mean on the evaluation on Squid game as evaluated by
respondents using the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 metrics as to reliability was 4.53 interpreted
as “Excellent”.
1.4 Maintainability
Table 5
Maintainability.
Maintainability Weighted Quantitative Rank

Mean Description
1. The application is composed of discrete 4.57 Excellent 3
components such that a change to one
component has minimal impact on other
components.
2. The application’s asset can be used in more 4.51 Excellent 4
than one device.
3. The application’s effectiveness and 4.63 Excellent 1
efficiency with which it is possible to assess
the impact on an application of an intended
change to one or more of its parts, or to
diagnose an application for deficiencies or
causes of failures, or to identify parts to be
modified.
4. The application can be effectively and 4.48 Excellent 5
efficiently modified without introducing
defects or degrading existing application
quality.
efficiency with which test criteria can be
25
COLLEGE
established forOFanCOMMUNICATION
application andAND INFORMATION
tests can TECHNOLOGY
be performed to determine whether those
criteria have been met.
ISO/IEC 25010: 2011 in terms of Maintainability.
Indicator 3, “The application’s effectiveness and efficiency with which it is
possible to assess the impact on an application of an intended change to one or more
of its parts, or to diagnose an application for deficiencies or causes of failures, or to
identify parts to be modified”, respectively both obtained an average weighted mean
4.63 (rank 1) interpreted as Excellent. Indicator 4, “The application can be effectively
and efficiently modified without introducing defects or degrading existing application
quality”, obtained the least average weighted mean 4.48 (rank 5) interpreted as
Excellent. The computed over-all weighted mean on the evaluation on Squid game as
evaluated by respondents using the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 metrics as to reliability was
4.55 interpreted as “Excellent”.
1.4 Portability
Table 6
Portability.
Portability Weighted Quantitative Rank

Mean Description
1. The application can effectively and 4.53 Excellent 3
efficiently be adapted for different or
evolving hardware, software or other
operational or usage environments.
efficiency with which an application
can be successfully installed and/or
uninstalled in a specified environment.
26
COLLEGE
3. The OF COMMUNICATION
application can replace AND INFORMATION
specified TECHNOLOGY
4.57 Excellent 2
software for the same purpose in the
same environment.
ISO/IEC 25010: 2011 in terms of Portability.
Indicator 2, “The application’s effectiveness and efficiency with which an application
can be successfully installed and/or uninstalled in a specified environment”, respectively
obtained an average weighted mean 4.61 (rank 1) interpreted as Excellent. Indicator 1,
“The application can effectively and efficiently be adapted for different or evolving
hardware, software or other operational or usage environments”, obtained the least
average weighted mean 4.53 (rank 3) interpreted as Excellent. The computed over-all
weighted mean on the evaluation on Squid game as evaluated by respondents using the
ISO/IEC 25010:2011 metrics as to reliability was 4.57 interpreted as “Excellent”.
2. Respondent’s evaluation on the Level of Acceptability of Squid Game.
2.1. Functionality
Table 7
Respondents Evaluation on the Level of Acceptability of the “Squid Game” in terms
of Functionality.
Functionality Weighted Quantitative Rank

Mean Description
1. The application is capable of 4.53 Highly Acceptable 4
completing its functions efficiently.
accepting instructions accurately.
3. The application’s software is error 4.57 Highly Acceptable 2
free.
4. The application has adaptive 4.55 Highly Acceptable 3
functionality.
27
COLLEGE OFisCOMMUNICATION
5. The application dedicated to the AND INFORMATION
4.61 TECHNOLOGY
Highly Acceptable 1
owner of device.
Average Weighted Mean 4.55 Highly Acceptable
Table 7 shows the evaluation of the respondents on the Acceptability using
ISO/IEC 25010: 2011 in terms of Functionality.
Indicator 5, “The application is dedicated to the owner of device”, respectively
obtained an average weighted mean 4.61 (rank 1) interpreted as Highly Acceptable.
Indicator 2, “The application is capable of accepting instructions accurately”, obtained
the least average weighted mean 4.51 (rank 5) interpreted as Highly Acceptable. The
computed over-all weighted mean on the evaluation of the respondents on the
Acceptability using ISO/IEC 25010: 2011 in terms of Functionality was 4.55 interpreted
as “Highly Acceptable”.
2.2 Performance
Table 8
Respondents Evaluation on the Level of Acceptability of the “Squid Game” in terms
of Performance Efficiency.
Performance Efficiency Weighted Quantitative Rank

Mean Description
completing tasks in a fast and
efficient.
2. The application requires minimal 4.48 Highly Acceptable 4
steps to get information needed.
3. The application buttons are easy to 4.46 Highly Acceptable 5
understand and control.
4. The application can provide the 4.51 Highly Acceptable 3
necessary information required by the
user.
5. The application has reliable 4.55 Highly Acceptable 1
information.
Average Weighted Mean 4.51 Highly Acceptable
28
Table 8 shows the evaluation of the respondents on the Acceptability using
ISO/IEC 25010: 2011 in terms of Performance Efficiency.
Indicator 5, “The application has reliable information”, respectively obtained an
average weighted mean 4.55 (rank 1) interpreted as Highly Acceptable. Indicator 3, “The
application is capable of accepting instructions accurately”, obtained the least average
weighted mean 4.46 (rank 5) interpreted as Highly Acceptable. The computed over-all
weighted mean on the evaluation of the respondents on the Acceptability using ISO/IEC
25010: 2011 in terms of Functionality was 4.51 interpreted as “Highly Acceptable”.
29
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter consists of three parts. The first part gives the summary of findings.
The second part is the conclusions of the inquiry which derived from pertinent findings.
The last part presents valid recommendations necessary for the improvement of the
proposed mobile game application.
Summary and Findings
The respondent’s evaluation on the software quality of “Squid Game” were as
follows; the respondents evaluated the mobile game application as Satisfied with a
weighted mean of 4.54 in terms of compatibility; the respondents evaluated the mobile
game application as Satisfied with a weighted mean of 4.56 in terms of usability; the
respondents evaluated the mobile game application as Satisfied with a weighted mean of
4.53 in terms of reliability; the respondents evaluated the mobile game application as
Satisfied with a weighted mean of 4.55 in terms of maintainability; the respondents
30
evaluated theCOLLEGE
mobile OF
game application asAND
COMMUNICATION Satisfied with a weighted
INFORMATION mean of 4.57 in terms
TECHNOLOGY
of portability;
Moreover, the respondent’s evaluation on the level of acceptability of “Squid
Game” were as follow. Students evaluated the mobile game application as Satisfied with
a weighted mean of 4.55 in terms of Functionality; the respondents evaluated the mobile
game application as Satisfied with a weighted mean of 4.51 in terms of Performance.
Conclusions
The following conclusions which made by the researcher’s based on the summary
of findings:
1. The overall respondents’ evaluated on the Software Quality of “Squid Game” was
interpreted by the respondents as Excellent.
2. The overall respondents’ evaluated on the Level of Acceptability of “Squid
Game” was interpreted by the students as Highly Acceptable.
Recommendations:
From the findings and conclusions of the study, the following are the
recommendations:
1. The implementation of “Squid Game” as a tool for schools is recommended.
2. Maintain the application accuracy and consistency of the task.
31
3. Enhanced functionality
COLLEGE through system
OF COMMUNICATION completeness
AND INFORMATION and develop performance
TECHNOLOGY
through developing user-friendliness of the system.
4. Further enhance the performance of the required functions at different hardware
specification and software environment.
REFERENCES
Lee J. and Jung H. 2019, “A Study on The Improvement of Mobile Coloring Book Game
Interface”, Journal of Korea Game Society, Vol. 19, No. 4,pp 109-118
https://www.grin.com/document/436031
Allery, L. (2014). How to Make Use of Educational Games. Education for Primary
Care. Vol.25:65–6.Retrieved
from http://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?
T=P&P=AN&K=93455035&S=R&D=ehh&EbscoContent=dGJyMNHX8kSeprY
4yOvsOLCmr1Gep7JSr664Sa6WxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMO7o44vh5ep
T69fnhrnb4osA
Annetta, L. A. (2011). The “I’s” have it: A framework for serious educational game
design. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 105-112.
32
Becker, K. (2021).
COLLEGEWhat’s the difference between
OF COMMUNICATION gamification,
AND INFORMATION serious games,
TECHNOLOGY
educational games, and game-based learning? Academia Letters, Article
209. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL209
Conte Jr., P. D. (2017, December 4). Effect of Game-Based Learning on Students’
Performance in Economics: A Case of “L-AKAD para sa Pilipino.” PSU Journal
of Education, Management and Social Sciences. Retrieved December 3, 2021,
from https://psurj.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/JEMSS_0001.pdf
D’Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., Haertel, G. (2014).
Simulations for STEM Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Menlo
Park. CA: SRI International
Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, et al. (2011) From game design elements to
gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Proceedings of the 15th international
academic MindTrek conference: envisioning future media environments,
Tampere, Finland, 28–30, pp.9–15.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2012). Games, motivation and learning: A
research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467.
Gee, J. (2013, November 16). GBL Influences James Gee’s Principles for game Based
Learning. Legends of Learning. Retrieved December 1, 2021, from
https://www.legendsoflearning.com/blog/james-paul-gee-game-based-learning
33
Gee, J. P. (2013). What
COLLEGE OFvideo games haveAND
COMMUNICATION to teach us aboutTECHNOLOGY
INFORMATION learning and literacy. New
York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jocano, F. L. (2018, November 11). MYTHOLOGY AND PHILIPPINE STUDIES: Why It
Is Important. The Aswang Project. Retrieved December 2, 2021, from
https://www.aswangproject.com/mythology-and-philippine-studies-why-it-is-
important/
Mackay, R. F. (2013, March 1). Playing to learn: Panelists at Stanford discussion say
using games as an educational tool provides opportunities for deeper learning.
Stanford University. Retrieved December 2, 2021, from
https://news.stanford.edu/2013/03/01/games-education-tool-030113/.
Miranda, C. (2021a, October 10). ENGKANTO: THE SHARDS Philippine Mythology
Board Game. The Aswang Project. Retrieved December 4, 2021, from
https://www.aswangproject.com/engkanto-the-shards/
Reid, Maurice, Brown, Steve, and Tabibzadeh, (2012), “Capstone Teaching Models -
Combining Simulation, Analytical Intuitive Learning Processes, History and
Effectiveness”. Journal of Education for Business. Vol. 87(3), pp. 178-184, 2012.
Vandercruysse, S., Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. (2012, February). Game-Based
Learning: A Review on the Effectiveness of Educational Games. ResearchGate.
Retrieved December 1, 2021, from
34
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260360868_Game-
Based_Learning_A_Review_on_the_Effectiveness_of_Educational_Games
Von Wangenheim, C.G. Savi, R. and A.F. Borgatto. (2012), “DELIVER! –An
Educational Game for Teaching Earned Value Management in Computing
Courses”. Information and Software Technology. Vol. 54(3): pp. 286-298, 2012.
Welbers, K., Konijn, E., Burgers, C., de Vaate, A., Eden, A., & Brugman, B. (2019),
February 27). Gamification as a tool for engaging student learning: A field
experiment with a gamified app. SAGE Journals. Retrieved December 1, 2021,
from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2042753018818342
35
Appendix A
Relevant Source Code
36
Flipmatch
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using UnityEngine;
using UnityEngine.UI;
public class PictureManager : MonoBehaviour

{
public Picture PicturePrefab;
public Transform PicSpawnPosition;
public Vector2 StartPosition = new Vector2(-2.15f, 3.62f);
[Space] [Header("GameOver")]
public GameObject GameOverPanel;
public GameObject NewBestTimeText;
public GameObject YourTimeText;
public GameObject EndTimeText;
public enum GameState
{
NoAction,
MovingOnPosition,
DeletingPuzzles,
FlipBack,
Checking,
GameEnd
};
public enum PuzzleState
{
PuzzleRotating,
CanRotate
};
public enum RevealedState
{
NoRevealed,
OneRevealed,
TwoRevealed
};
//
[HideInInspector]
public GameState CurrentGameState;
//
[HideInInspector]
public PuzzleState CurrentPuzzleState;
//
37
[HideInInspector]
public RevealedState PuzzleRevealedNumber;
//
[HideInInspector]
public List<Picture> PictureList;
private Vector2 _offset = new Vector2(1.5f, 1.52f);
private Vector2 _offsetFor15Pairs = new Vector2(1.12f, 1.30f);
private Vector2 _offsetFor20Pairs = new Vector2(1.14f, 1.20f);
private Vector3 _newScaleDown = new Vector3(1f, 1f, 0.001f);
private List<Material> _materialList = new List<Material>();
private List<string> _texturePathList = new List<string>();
private Material _firstMaterial;
private string _firstTexturePath;
private int _firstRevealedPic;
private int _secondRevealedPic;
private int _revealedPicNumber = 0;
private int _picToDestroy1;
private int _picToDestroy2;
private bool _coroutineStarted = false;
private int _pairNumbers;
private int _removedPairs;
private Timer _gameTimer;
void Start()
{
CurrentGameState = GameState.NoAction;
CurrentPuzzleState = PuzzleState.CanRotate;
PuzzleRevealedNumber = RevealedState.NoRevealed;
_revealedPicNumber = 0;
_firstRevealedPic = -1;
_secondRevealedPic = -1;
_removedPairs = 0;
_pairNumbers = (int) GameSettings.Instance.GetPairNumber();
_gameTimer = GameObject.Find("Main Camera").GetComponent<Timer>();
LoadMaterials();
if (GameSettings.Instance.GetPairNumber() ==
GameSettings.EPairNumber.E10Pairs)
{
CurrentGameState = GameState.MovingOnPosition;
SpawnPictureMesh(4, 5, StartPosition, _offset, false);
MovePicture(4, 5, StartPosition, _offset);
}
else if (GameSettings.Instance.GetPairNumber() ==
{
38
SpawnPictureMesh(5, 6, StartPosition,
COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION _offset, true);TECHNOLOGY
AND INFORMATION
MovePicture(5, 6, StartPosition, _offsetFor15Pairs);
}
else if (GameSettings.Instance.GetPairNumber() ==
{
SpawnPictureMesh(5, 8, StartPosition, _offset, true);
MovePicture(5, 8, StartPosition, _offsetFor20Pairs);
}
}
public void CheckPicture()
{
CurrentGameState = GameState.Checking;
for (int id = 0; id < PictureList.Count; id++)
{
if (PictureList[id].Revealed && _revealedPicNumber < 2)
{
if (_revealedPicNumber == 0)
{
_firstRevealedPic = id;
_revealedPicNumber++;
}
else if (_revealedPicNumber == 1)
{
_secondRevealedPic = id;
_revealedPicNumber++;
}
}
}
if (_revealedPicNumber == 2)
{
if (PictureList[_firstRevealedPic].GetIndex() ==
PictureList[_secondRevealedPic].GetIndex() && _firstRevealedPic !=
_secondRevealedPic)
{
CurrentGameState = GameState.DeletingPuzzles;
_picToDestroy1 = _firstRevealedPic;
_picToDestroy2 = _secondRevealedPic;
}
else
{
CurrentGameState = GameState.FlipBack;
}
}
39
CurrentPuzzleState = PictureManager.PuzzleState.CanRotate;
if (CurrentGameState == GameState.Checking)
{
}
}
private void DestroyPicture()
{
PictureList[_picToDestroy1].Deactivate();
PictureList[_picToDestroy2].Deactivate();
_removedPairs++;
CurrentPuzzleState = PuzzleState.CanRotate;
}
private IEnumerator FlipBack()
{
_coroutineStarted = true;
yield return new WaitForSeconds(0.5f);
PictureList[_firstRevealedPic].FlipBack();
PictureList[_secondRevealedPic].FlipBack();
PictureList[_firstRevealedPic].Revealed = false;
PictureList[_secondRevealedPic].Revealed = false;
_coroutineStarted = false;
}
private void LoadMaterials()
{
var materialFilePath = GameSettings.Instance.GetMaterialDirectoryName();
var textureFilePath =
GameSettings.Instance.GetPuzzleCategoryTextureDirectoryName();
var pairNumber = (int)GameSettings.Instance.GetPairNumber();
const string matBaseName = "Pic";
var firstMaterialName = "Back";
for (var index = 1; index <= pairNumber; index++)
{
var currentFilePath = materialFilePath + matBaseName + index;
Material mat = Resources.Load(currentFilePath, typeof(Material)) as Material;
_materialList.Add(mat);
var currentTextureFilePath = textureFilePath + matBaseName + index;
_texturePathList.Add(currentTextureFilePath);
}
_firstTexturePath = textureFilePath + firstMaterialName;
40
_firstMaterial
COLLEGE = Resources.Load(materialFilePath
OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION+ firstMaterialName,
TECHNOLOGY
typeof(Material)) as Material;
}
void Update()
{
if (CurrentGameState == GameState.DeletingPuzzles)
{
if (CurrentPuzzleState == PuzzleState.CanRotate)
{
DestroyPicture();
CheckGameEnd();
}
}
if (CurrentGameState == GameState.FlipBack)
{
if (CurrentPuzzleState == PuzzleState.CanRotate && _coroutineStarted == false)
{
StartCoroutine(FlipBack());
}
}
if(CurrentGameState == GameState.GameEnd){
if(PictureList[_firstRevealedPic].gameObject.activeSelf == false &&
PictureList[_secondRevealedPic].gameObject.activeSelf == false &&
GameOverPanel.activeSelf == false)
{
ShowEndGameInformation();
}
}
}
private bool CheckGameEnd(){
if(_removedPairs == _pairNumbers && CurrentGameState !=
GameState.GameEnd){
CurrentGameState = GameState.GameEnd;
_gameTimer.StopTimer();
Config.PlaceScoreOnBoard(_gameTimer.GetCurrentTime());
}
return (CurrentGameState == GameState.GameEnd);
}
private void ShowEndGameInformation(){
GameOverPanel.SetActive(true);
if(Config.IsBestScore()){
NewBestTimeText.SetActive(true);
YourTimeText.SetActive(false);
}
else{
41
NewBestTimeText.SetActive(false);
YourTimeText.SetActive(true);
}
// YourTimeText.SetActive(true);
var timer = _gameTimer.GetCurrentTime();
var minutes = Mathf.Floor(timer / 60);
var seconds = Mathf.RoundToInt(timer % 60);
var newText = minutes.ToString("00") + ":" + seconds.ToString("00");
EndTimeText.GetComponent<Text>().text = newText;
}
private void SpawnPictureMesh(int rows, int columns, Vector2 Pos, Vector2 offset,
bool scaleDown)
{
for (int col = 0; col < columns; col++)
{
for (int row = 0; row < rows; row++)
{
var tempPicture = (Picture)Instantiate(PicturePrefab,
PicSpawnPosition.position, PicturePrefab.transform.rotation);
if (scaleDown)
{
tempPicture.transform.localScale = _newScaleDown;
}
tempPicture.name = tempPicture.name + 'c' + col + 'r' + row;
PictureList.Add(tempPicture);
}
}
ApplyTextures();
}
public void ApplyTextures()
{
var rndMatIndex = Random.Range(0, _materialList.Count);
var AppliedTimes = new int[_materialList.Count];
for (int i = 0; i < _materialList.Count; i++)
{
AppliedTimes[i] = 0;
}
foreach (var o in PictureList)
{
var randPrevious = rndMatIndex;
var counter = 0;
var forceMat = false;
while (AppliedTimes[rndMatIndex] >= 2 || ((randPrevious == rndMatIndex) && !
forceMat))
{
rndMatIndex = Random.Range(0, _materialList.Count);
42
counter++;
if (counter > 100)
{
for (var j = 0; j < _materialList.Count; j++)
{
if (AppliedTimes[j] < 2)
{
rndMatIndex = j;
forceMat = true;
}
}
if (forceMat == false)
return;
}
}
o.SetFirstMaterial(_firstMaterial, _firstTexturePath);
o.ApplyFirstMaterial();
o.SetSecondMaterial(_materialList[rndMatIndex],
_texturePathList[rndMatIndex]);
o.SetIndex(rndMatIndex);
o.Revealed = false;
// o.ApplySecondMaterial();
AppliedTimes[rndMatIndex] += 1;
forceMat = false;
}
}
private void MovePicture(int rows, int columns, Vector2 pos, Vector2 offset)
{
var index = 0;
for (var col = 0; col < columns; col++)
{
for (int row = 0; row < rows; row++)
{
var targetPosition = new Vector3((pos.x + (offset.x * row)), (pos.y - (offset.y *
col)), 0.0f);
StartCoroutine(MoveToPosition(targetPosition, PictureList[index]));
index++;
}
}
}
private IEnumerator MoveToPosition(Vector3 target, Picture obj)
{
var randomDis = 7;
while (obj.transform.position != target)
{
43
obj.transform.position = Vector3.MoveTowards(obj.transform.position,
COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY target,
randomDis * Time.deltaTime);
yield return 0;
}
}
}
Board
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using DG.Tweening;
using UnityEngine;
using UnityEngine.UI;
using Debug = UnityEngine.Debug;
using Random = UnityEngine.Random;
//
public sealed class Board : MonoBehaviour
{
public static Board Instance { get; private set; }
[SerializeField] private AudioClip collectSound;
[SerializeField] private AudioSource audioSource;
public Row[] rows;
public Tile[,] Tiles { get; private set; }
public int Width => Tiles.GetLength(0);
public int Height => Tiles.GetLength(1);
private readonly List<Tile> _selection = new List<Tile>();
private const float TweenDuration = 0.25f;
private void Awake() => Instance = this;
private void Start()
{
Tiles = new Tile[rows.Max(row => row.tiles.Length), rows.Length];
for (var y = 0; y < Height; y++)
{
for (var x = 0; x < Width; x++)
{
var tile = rows[y].tiles[x];
tile.x = x;
tile.y = y;
tile.Item = ItemDatabase.Items[Random.Range(0,
ItemDatabase.Items.Length)];
Tiles[x, y] = tile;
44
} COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
}
}
public async void Select(Tile tile)
{
if (!_selection.Contains(tile))
{
if (_selection.Count > 0)
{
if (Array.IndexOf(_selection[0].Neighbours, tile) != -1) _selection.Add(tile);
}
else
{
_selection.Add(tile);
}
}
if (_selection.Count < 2) return;
await Swap(_selection[0], _selection[1]);
if (CanPop())
{
Pop();
}
else
{
await Swap(_selection[0], _selection[1]);
}
_selection.Clear();
}
public async Task Swap(Tile tile1, Tile tile2)
{
var icon1 = tile1.icon;
var icon2 = tile2.icon;
var icon1Transform = icon1.transform;
var icon2Transform = icon2.transform;
var sequence = DOTween.Sequence();
sequence.Join(icon1Transform.DOMove(icon2Transform.position,
TweenDuration)).Join(icon2Transform.DOMove(icon1Transform.position,
TweenDuration));
await sequence.Play().AsyncWaitForCompletion();
icon1Transform.SetParent(tile2.transform);
icon2Transform.SetParent(tile1.transform);
tile1.icon = icon2;
tile2.icon = icon1;
var tileItem = tile1.Item;
tile1.Item = tile2.Item;
45
tile2.Item = tileItem;
}
private bool CanPop()
{
if (Tiles[x, y].GetConnectedTiles().Skip(1).Count() >= 2) return true;
return false;
}
private async void Pop()
{
{
{
var tile = Tiles[x, y];
var connectedTiles = tile.GetConnectedTiles();
if (connectedTiles.Skip(1).Count() < 2) continue;
var deflateSequence = DOTween.Sequence();
foreach (var connectedTile in connectedTiles)
deflateSequence.Join(connectedTile.icon.transform.DOScale(Vector3.zero,
TweenDuration));
// Audio
audioSource.PlayOneShot(collectSound);
// Score
ScoreCounter.Instance.Score += tile.Item.value * connectedTiles.Count;
// ScoreCount.Instance.Scores += tile.Item.value * connectedTiles.Count;
await deflateSequence.Play().AsyncWaitForCompletion();
var inflateSequence = DOTween.Sequence();
foreach (var connectedTile in connectedTiles)
{
connectedTile.Item = ItemDatabase.Items[Random.Range(0,
ItemDatabase.Items.Length)];
inflateSequence.Join(connectedTile.icon.transform.DOScale(Vector3.one,
TweenDuration));
}
await inflateSequence.Play().AsyncWaitForCompletion();
//
x = 0;
y = 0;
}
}
}
}
46
Appendix B
Evaluation Tool or Test Documents
47
Appendix C
Users’ Guide
48
Appendix D
Screen Layouts
49
Appendix E
Test Results
50
Appendix F
Copy of Request Letter/ MOA/ MOU
51
Appendix G
Curriculum Vitae
52
49

Squid Game 5

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Squid Game 5

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION AND.

Villanueva, Thaddeus Jadion

Republic of the Philippines

This, study entitled “SQUIDGAME” prepared and submitted by Thaddeus

ENGR. CARL ANGELO PAMPLONA

ENGR. MELOJEAN C. MARAVE DR. GEOFFREY S. SEPILLO

MR. DANIEL A. BACHILLAR, MSCS MR. DARWIN M. MORAÑA

to make this study successful.

Menchie A. Dela Cruz, PhD, Dean of the College of Communication and

recommendations in order to improve this study,

Mrs.Myrna S. Pangan, Principal of Polytechnic College of Botolan, for allowing

blessings, knowledge, and wisdom bestowed upon the researchers.

Polytechnic College of Botolan. It is sought to determine the quality of the application

using ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Software Quality Metrics in terms of compatibility, usability,

maintainability, portability, functionality, and performance efficiency. The researcher is

total of 30 students as the respondents.

The researchers recommend the implementation of “Squid Game” as a tool for

schools is recommended, The implementation of “Squid Game” as a tool for schools is

functionality through system completeness and develop performance through developing

functions at different hardware specification and software environment.

Purpose and Description......................................................................................................2

Scope and Limitations..........................................................................................................3

CHAPTER 2. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE/ SYSTEMS

Review of Related Literature, Studies/ Systems..................................................................6

Design of Software, System, Product and or Processes………………………………….16

Development and Testing………………………………….…………………………….19

Data Analysis Plan and Statistics……………………………………………………..….21

CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Compatibility………...………………...24

Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Usability.…………………………........24

Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Reliability……………………………...25

Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Maintainability………………………...27

Evaluation of the Software Quality in terms of Portability……………….......................28

Evaluation of the Level of Acceptability in terms of Functionality…...………………...29

Evaluation of the Level of Acceptability in terms of Performance…...………………...30

Appendix A Relevant Source Code...................................................................................38

Appendix B Evaluation Tool or Test Documents..............................................................49

Appendix D Screen Layouts .............................................................................................51

Appendix E Test Results....................................................................................................52

Appendix F Copy of Request Letter/ MOA/ MOU ..........................................................53

Appendix G Curriculum Vitae ..........................................................................................54

Table Title Page

1 Distribution of Survey Questionnaire to the ……………………. 21

selected user of the proposed game entitled

2 Respondents Evaluation on the Software Quality ……………… 24

of the “Squid Game” in terms of Compatibility

3 Respondents Evaluation on the Software Quality ……………… 24

of the “Squid Game” in terms of Usability

4 Respondents Evaluation on the Software Quality ……………... 25

of the “Squid Game” in terms of Reliability

5 Respondents Evaluation on the Software Quality ………………. 27

of the “Squid Game” in terms of Maintainability

6 Respondents Evaluation on the Software Quality ……………… 28

of the “Squid Game” in terms of Portability

7 Respondents Evaluation on the Level of Acceptability ………... 29

of the “Squid Game” in terms of Functionality

8 Respondents Evaluation on the Level of Acceptability ………… 30

of the “Squid Game” in terms of Performance

1 Data Flow Diagram……………………………………………. 13

ISO/IEC International Organization for Standardization and International

used to execute the tablets, smartphones and android phones.

gaming, application system, knowledge base system and data processing.