Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Literature Review
02 Methodology
• Lebesgue Quadratic Stochastic Operator
03 Result
• Regularity of New Class of Lebesgue Quadratic
Stochastic Operator Generated by 2-Partition
04 Conclusion
RESEARCH BACKGROUND
Quadratic stochastic operator (QSO) Central problem of QSO
is a mapping of the simplex The asymptotic behavior of their
trajectories
m
S m −1
= x = ( x1 ,..., xm ) m
: xi 0, xi = 1
i =1
Ganikhodjaev and On (3,3)-Gaussian Quadratic Stochastic A (n, k)-Gaussian quadratic stochastic operators is
Hamzah (2017) Operators defined and the trajectory behaviour of (3,3)-Gaussian
quadratic stochastic operators is investigated. The
necessary and sufficient conditions for regularity of these
operators is established.
Hamzah and On non-ergodic Gaussian quadratic The authors consider a Gaussian QSO with six different
Ganikhodjaev (2018) stochastic operators pairs of parameters and show that there exist
parameters such that the corresponding QSO is non-
ergodic.
Hardin and A Quasi-strictly Non-Volterra Quadratic A four-parameter family of non-Volterra operators
Rozikov (2019) Stochastic Operator defined on the two-dimensional simplex has a unique
fixed point except for a case. Depending on the
parameters, the type of this fixed point is established. The
set of limit points for each trajectory can be a single point
or can contain a 2-periodic trajectory.
Karim, Hamzah and A Class of Geometric Quadratic A family of Geometric QSO generated by 2-partition of
Ganikhodjaev (2019) Stochastic Operator on Countable State singleton with two different parameters is a regular
Space and Its Regularity transformation.
Karim, Hamzah and Regularity of Geometric quadratic A family of Geometric QSO generated by 2-partition of
Ganikhodjaev (2020) stochastic operator generated by 2- infinite points with two different parameters is a regular
partition of infinite points transformation.
LEBESGUE QUADRATIC STOCHASTIC OPERATOR
Nonlinear transformation Let = A1 , A2 ,..., Am be a measurable 𝑚-
partition of the set 𝑋 and = Bij : i, j = 1, 2,..., m
V :S(X,F) → S(X,F) set of all be a corresponding partition of the
probability Cartesian square of 𝑋 × 𝑋 , where
state space 𝜎-algebra of 𝑋 measures on Bii = Ai Ai for i = 1, 2,..., m and
measurable Bij = ( Ai Aj ) ( Aj Ai ) if i j
defined as follows: space 𝑋, 𝐹
Define the probability measure 𝑃 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝐴
(V )( A) = P ( x, y, A ) d ( x ) d ( y ) (2)
X X
as follows:
S (X,F) A F P ( x, y, A) = ij ( A) if ( x, y ) Bij
A family of
ij : i, j = 1,..., m
(V )( A) = P ( x, y, A ) d ( x ) d ( y ) By mathematical
(V ) ( A ) = P ( x, y, A ) dV n ( x ) dV n ( y )
n +1
X X X X
m induction m
= ( A) d ( x ) d ( y )
ij
= ( A) dV ( x ) dV ( y )
i , j =1 Ai A j
ij
n n
i , j =1 Ai A j
( A) (V ) ( A ) (V ) ( A )
m
ij ( A) ( Ai ) ( Aj )
m
= = ij
n
i
n
j
i , j =1
i , j =1 with
(V n+1 ) ( Ak ) = ( A ) (V ) ( A ) (V ) ( A )
m
n n
ij k i j (3)
i , j =1
For a measurable space 𝑋, 𝐹 a
sequence 𝜇𝑛 is said to converge strongly lim n ( A) = ( A)
n →
to a limit 𝜇 if
Definition 1 A QSO 𝑉 is called a regular (weak regular), for any initial measure
𝜆 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋, 𝐹 , where the strong limit (respectively weak limit) lim 𝑉 𝑛 𝜆 = 𝜇 exists
𝑛→∞
𝑛
Assume 𝑥𝑘 = 𝑉 𝑛 𝜆 𝐴𝑘 and 𝑃𝑖𝑗,𝑘 = 𝜇𝑖𝑗 𝐴𝑘 . m
Then, the system of equations in (2) can be (Wx )k = Pij ,k xi x j (4)
rewritten as follows: i , j =1
s 0 +
usual Lebesgue measure
= ( A) d ( x ) d ( y ) + ( A) d ( x ) d ( y )
A1 A1
s1
A1 A2
s3
+ s3 ( A ) d ( x ) d ( y ) + ( A) d ( x ) d ( y )
s2
A2 A1 A2 A2
= s1 ( A ) 2 ( A1 ) + 2 s3 ( A ) ( A1 ) ( A2 ) + s2 ( A ) 2 ( A2 )
= s1 ( a, b ) 2 ( 0, ) ) + 2 s3 ( a, b ) ( 0, ) ) ( ,1) + s2 ( a, b ) 2 ( ,1) ,
( A ) = s ( A ) ( ( A1 ) ) + 2 s ( A ) ( A1 ) ( A2 ) + s ( A ) ( ( A2 ) )
2 2
1 3 2
s ( 0, ) ) 2 ( 0, ) ) + 2 ( ,1) + 2 s ( 0, ) ) ( 0, ) ) ( ,1)
1
+ 2 s3 ( a, b )
3
s1 ( ,1) ( 0, ) ) + ( ,1) + 2 s3 ( ,1) ( 0, ) ) ( ,1)
2 2
+ s2 ( a, b ) s1 ( ,1) 2 ( 0, ) ) + 2 ( ,1) + 2 s3 ( ,1) ( 0, ) ) ( ,1) .
2
By mathematical
( A) = s ( A) ( ( A1 ) ) + 2s3 ( A) ( A1 ) ( A2 ) + s ( A) ( ( A2 ) )
2 2
( n +1) ( n) ( n) ( n) ( n)
induction
1 2
(6)
The limit behavior of (6) is fully determined by 𝜆 𝑛 𝐴1 and 𝜆 𝑛 𝐴2 with the following form:
( ) (
( n +1) ( A1 ) = s ( A1 ) ( n ) ( A1 ) + 2 s ( A1 ) ( n ) ( A1 ) ( n ) ( A2 ) + s ( A1 ) ( n ) ( A2 ) )
2 2
1 3 2
+ ( 0, ) ) ( ( ) ( ,1) ) ,
2
n
s2
(7)
( A ) = ( A ) ( ( ) ( A ) ) + 2 ( A ) ( ) ( A ) ( ) ( A ) + ( A ) ( ( ) ( A ) )
2 2
( n +1
)
2 s1 2
n
1 s3 2
n
1
n
2 s2 2
n
2
y = ax 2 + 2bx (1 − x ) + c (1 − x ) = ( a − 2b + c ) x 2 + 2 (b − c ) x + c
2
(9)
Theorem 1 A fixed point of the transformation in (9) is unique and belongs to 0,1 .
Theorem 2 If 0 < Δ < 4, then a fixed point is attractive, and if 4 < Δ < 5, then a
fixed point is repelling .
Let 𝑦 ′ = 𝑓 ′ 𝛾 , where 𝛾 is a fixed point and 𝑓 𝑥 is a right-hand side of the equation in (9)
and 𝑓 ′ 𝑥 is its derivative.
Let 𝜑 = 𝑓 ′ 𝛾 = 2 𝑎 − 2𝑏 + 𝑐 𝛾 + 2 𝑏 − 𝑐 𝜑 =1− Δ