#73 - Preliminary Assessment Report - Setidevi Ss

Disaster Resilience of School Project
(DRSP)
School Assessment and Intervention Design Report

(Part 1: Field Assessment Report)
#73_SETIDEVI SECONDARY SCHOOL

(EMIS NO: 23-009-0003)
Bodgaun,
Indrawati, RMC-11,
Sindhupalchowk
Submitted to:
Central level Project Implementation Unit (CLPIU Education)
Gyaneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Prepared By:
Design and Supervision Consultant
Tel: +977-1-5245144
December, 2019
PROJECT AND REPORT DESCRIPTION
Project: Disaster Resilience of School Project (DRSP)
Client: Central level Project Implementation Unit (CLPIU Education)

Gyaneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal
Consultant: Design and Supervision Consultant (DSC) - M/S Umar Munshi Associates
in association with Sub-Consultants ERMC (P) Ltd, PACE Consultants (P)
Ltd and Progressive Research & Consulting Services
Lakhe Marg, New Baneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Phone: 01-5245144
Document: School Assessment and Intervention Design Report
Scope: SHREE SETIDEVI SECONDARY SCHOOL (EMIS230090003)
Part: √ Part 1: Field Assessment Report

Part 2: Intermediate Assessment Report
Part 3: Final Technical Report
Study Team: Paulo Barbosa – Team Leader

Ishrat Alam - Structural Engineer
Rabindra Adhikari – Structural Engineer
Pushkar Koirala – Structural Engineer
Dinesh Dulal – Structural Engineer
….
….
Date: December 2019
2|Page
Contents
1. Summary........................................................................................................................................4
1.1 School Location, Site Condition and Local Implication...........................................................4
1.2 School Condition....................................................................................................................6
1.3 Building Condition and Proposed Test...................................................................................7
1.4 Priority Issues.........................................................................................................................7
2. School Detail..................................................................................................................................8
3. Building Details............................................................................................................................11
3.1 Block 1.................................................................................................................................11
3.2 Block 2.................................................................................................................................13
3.3 Block 3.................................................................................................................................15
3.4 Block 4.................................................................................................................................17
3.5 Block 5.................................................................................................................................19
3|Page
1. Summary
1.1 School Location, Site Condition and Local Implication
Figure: Location/site Plan (osm.org)
Figure: Location/Site plan (maps.google.com)
4|Page
Terrain and Topography:
The school lies in hilly region of Sinhupalchwok district. Although soil test was not
conducted, medium soil is estimated from adjacent cut areas.
The school lies on mountainous terrain. Blocks are constructed in flat area.
As per the preliminary assessment and field observation by the team Block 4 needs to be
retrofitted, and block-1 need to be repair whereas other blocks 2, 3, 5 require no
intervention. 3-C-9 and 1- T-5 are going to be constructed under DRSP project.
Accessibility:
The accessibility to school is quite difficult, with unsurfaced road to the gate. Vehicle
accesses in all seasons
The school is about 5km sipaghat which is the nearest market of that locality.
Built up area and Emergency Exit:
There is sufficient open space inside the compound for assembly.
Public Property and Social Issues:
The school is running in its school own land. There are no facilities by trust.
Historical Value:
No existing structure was identified with historical values.
Cultural Implication:
No any traditional settlements has been observed in the locality.
Infrastructure Implication:
Electricity: Available
Internet: none
Because of accessible location, most infrastructure materials can be available.
CONCLUSION: Satisfactory to proceed for further intervention.
5|Page
1.2 School Condition
1.2.1 School Site Plan
Figure: Site plan from topography survey
1.2.2 Ongoing/Planned Construction
Being Demolished:
None.
Block to be constructed
3 –C-9 and 1-T-5 are going to be constructed under the DRSP Project.
Other Planned Intervention:

None.
1.2.3 Landslide Potential
None.
1.2.4 Flood Potential

Neither there is no river nearby, nor there chance of inundation. But good pitching of
open space is required for the easy access during monsoon season.
1.2.5 Other Site Hazards

None.
6|Page
1.3 Building Condition and Proposed Test
Based on the site assessment, following condition are observed. The most likely intervention and
appropriate tests to be carried out are also included. The more detailed explanation are presented in
the later sections for individual structure.
Buildin Structure No of Damage / Defects Most likely Proposed Test

g Type Stories Intervention* (at this stage)
1 Steel Frame 1 Minor cracks, Recommended for X
recent construction minor repairing of
block
2 RCC 2 Unaffected No intervention X
recommended
3 Steel Frame 1 Unaffected No intervention X
recommended
4 RCC 1 Minor cracks Limit to one storey/ X
Recommended for
retrofitting
5 Steel Frame 1 Bands present , no No intervention X
cracks , unaffected recommended
* The more justifiable intervention will be identified in intermediate assessment report (next part of
the report) with more detailed structural assessment, cost implication and other affecting factors.
1.4 Priority Issues

Based on the site assessment and information available, following things shall be resolved at the
soonest for the smooth progress of the project:
 Approval of the proposed test

 Verify the land ownership of the school and decide if to carryon intervention or not.
7|Page
2. School Detail
1 GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1 District Sindhupalchowk
1.2 Name of School Shree Seti Devi Secondary School
Contact Person Name and Phone
1.3 Khagendra Prasad Sapkota/9849463167
No:
1.4 School EMIS 230090003
2 GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
Address Indrawati, RMC-11, Bodgaun,
2.1
(Street,City,District,Province,State) Sindhupalchowk
2.2 Locality Indrawati, RMC-11, Bodgaun
2.3 GPS Co-ordinate (Lat,Long) 27.724702, 85.640948

2.4 Climate Records of last 50 Years?

2.5 Accessibility Earthen Road
Locate Within Urban Area? Name of
2.6 No Sipaghat - 5 Km
Nearest Main City or Market?
Is the school accessible for the
children more than one
2.7 Yes Ward 10, 11
VDC/Municipality or more than 2
wards?
Approximate distance from Motorable
2.8 0m
road
2.9 Emergency Exit ? Open
3 DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
3.1 No Of Students (Ficial Year 2076) 274
No of Boys 137
No of Girls 137
3.2 Number of Disable Students 0
Boys
Girls
Catchment area of student (nearby

3.3 villages/districts from where students Ward 10, 11
come to study)
3.4 No of Available Teachers (Staffs) 17

3.5 Education Level (Grades)
Lower Level (ECD Available?) Yes
8|Page
Higher Level 10
Commonly available building
3.6 Stone, sand
materials?
Reinforceme
Unavailable Materials?
nt Cement
Approximate Distance for
5 Km
Transportation?
Mode of Transportation? Truck Tripper
3.7 General terrain of surrounding area Slopy
General topography of school
3.8 Flat
compound
3.9 No. of school building blocks 9
No. of Temporary Learning Centre
3.1 1
(TLC
If TLC (Number of Classes on TLC?)
3.1
Ownership of school's land 12 Ropani
1
(Include all applicable sources)
Is there a safe location outside the
3.1 buildings where ALL staff and
Yes
2 students can currently assemble in
an emergency event?
Excluding safe assembly location, is
3.1
there any additional space for new Yes
3
Blocks on the school?
3.1 No. of individual functional toilet units
WC = 3
4 for Girls
WC = 3 Urinal = 1
5 for Boys
WC = 1
6 for Staffs
3.1
Disable Friendly Toilet? No
7
3.1 How many septic tanks are currently
2
8 present ?
If yes, What is the condition? Good
If Condition is poor? What is the

solution for improvement?
3.1 What kind of water sources is/are
Spring water
9 available ?
What kind of drainage systems are
3.2 None
available ?
3.2 Does school is connected with
Yes
1 electricity ?
3.2 Does the school have compound wall
Yes (poor)
2 ?
3.2 If yes, what kind ? And its

3 condition ?
Is there proximity to unsafe
3.2 structures, such as, perimeter walls,
No
4 water towers, trees, generator and
potentially damaging debris?
4 AVAILABILITY OF PHYSICAL FACILITIES
Particulars Existing Required Remarks
9|Page
(Proposa
(functional) (by school)
l)
4.1 Classrooms 11 20
4.2 Administration/ Office 1 3
4.3 Library 1 2
4.4 Laboratory 0 2
4.5 Health facility/ Treatment room 0 1
4.6 Counseling Room 0 1
4.7 Canteen/ Kitchen 0 1
4.8 Auditorium 0 1
4.9 Toilet
7 14
4.1
Principal Room
0 0 1
4.1
Staff Room
1 0 1
4.1
Club Room
2 0 0
4.1
Audio Visual Room
3 0 0
10 | P a g e
3. Building Details
3.1 Block 1
BLOCK-ID Block-1
1.0 Detail of Building
1.1 Year of Construction? All Floor at a time
Ground Floor 2074 BS 2 Years Old

Year of last repair and
1.2 None
its type
Building ground
1.3
coverage (plinth area)
1.4 No. of Story Ground Floor Only
1.5 Structural typology Steel Frame
Ground
1.6 Building purpose Canteen Classroom Store
Floor

1.7 Number of Classrooms 1
1.7 Type of foundation Wall Strip Footing (Stone)
1.8 Condition of foundation Good
1.9 Wall material Ground Floor Brick Masonry in Cement Mortar
Typical Thickness 230 mm
1.1
Wall condition None
0
1.1
Type of Floor Ground Floor PCC/Punning
1

1.1
Condition of Floor Ground Floor Good
2

1.1
Type of Roof Steel Truss with CGI Sheet
3
1.1
Condition of Roof Good
4
1.1
Size of Column Post size= 70x70mm
5
1.1
Condition of Column NA
6
1.1
Size of Beam NA
7
1.1
Condition of Beam NA
8
1.1 Is there any relative No
11 | P a g e
changes on mass on the
9
floor ?
1.2 Condition of doors and
Frame Good
0 windows?
Panel Good
1.2
Is there any cracks ? No
1
If yes, component
1.2 (locate crack on
No Cracks
2 drawings with proper
ID)
1.2
Previous retrofit ? No
3
2.0 Non Destructive Testing (NDT)
2.1 Requirement of NDT Need to discuss
2.2 Types of NDT required Need to discuss
3.0 Possible recommendation
3.1 Need minor repair ? Yes
3.2 Need major repair ? Need to discuss
3.3 Need retrofitting ? Need to discuss
12 | P a g e
3.2 Block 2
BLOCK-ID Block-2

Year of last repair and
1.2 None
its type
Building ground
1.3
1.4 No. of Story GF+1Story
1.5 Structural typology RCC Frame Structure
Ground
1.6 Building purpose Office Computer Lab 0
Floor
Under
First
constructio
Floor
n

1.7 Type of foundation Isolated Footing
1.1
Wall condition Cracks
0
1.1
1

1.1
2

1.1
3
1.1
4
1.1
Size of Column 300x300
5
1.1
6
1.1
Size of Beam 230x300
7
1.1
8
Is there any relative
1.1
changes on mass on the No
9
floor ?
13 | P a g e
Frame Good
0 windows?
Panel Good
1.2
1
If yes, component
1.2 (locate crack on
No Cracks
2 drawings with proper
ID)
1.2
3
14 | P a g e
3.3 Block 3
BLOCK-ID Block-3

Year of last repair and its
1.2 Repair Wall replacement
type
Building ground
1.3
Ground Classroom
1.6 Building purpose 0 0
Floor s (2)

1.1
Wall condition None
0
1.1
1

1.1
2

1.1
3
1.1
4
1.1
Size of Column NA
5
15 | P a g e
1.1
6
1.1
Size of Beam NA
7
1.1
8
1.1
9
floor ?
Frame Good
0 windows?
Panel Good
1.2
1
If yes, component (locate
1.2
crack on drawings with No Cracks
2
proper ID)
1.2
3
2.1 Requirement of NDT No
2.2 Types of NDT required No
16 | P a g e
3.4 Block 4
BLOCK-ID Block-4

Year of last repair and its
1.2 Repair
type
Building ground
1.3
1.5 Structural typology RCC Frame Structure
Ground Classroom
1.6 Building purpose ECD (1) 0
Floor (1)

1.7 Type of foundation Isolated Footing
1.1
Wall condition None
0
1.1
1
17 | P a g e

1.1
2

1.1
Type of Roof RCC
3
1.1
4
1.1
Size of Column 230x230
5
1.1
Condition of Column Good
6
1.1
Size of Beam 230x230
7
1.1
Condition of Beam Good
8
1.1
9
floor ?
Frame Good
0 windows?
Panel Good
1.2
1
1.2
2
proper ID)
1.2
3
18 | P a g e
3.5 Block 5
BLOCK-ID Block-5

Year of last repair and its Replacement
1.2 Repair 2075 BS
type of wall
Building ground coverage
1.3
(plinth area)
Ground Classroom
1.6 Building purpose 0 0
Floor (2)

19 | P a g e
1.1
Wall condition None
0
1.1
1

1.1
2

1.1
3
1.1
4
1.1
Size of Column 0.0
5
1.1
Condition of Column 0.0
6
1.1
Size of Beam 0.0
7
1.1
Condition of Beam N/A
8
1.1
9
floor ?
Frame Good
0 windows?
Panel Good
1.2
1
1.2
2
proper ID)
1.2
3
2.1 Requirement of NDT No
2.2 Types of NDT required No
20 | P a g e
--------------- END OF THE DOCUMENT ---------------
21 | P a g e

#73 - Preliminary Assessment Report - Setidevi Ss

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

#73 - Preliminary Assessment Report - Setidevi Ss

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Disaster Resilience of School Project

School Assessment and Intervention Design Report

#73_SETIDEVI SECONDARY SCHOOL

Project: Disaster Resilience of School Project (DRSP)

Client: Central level Project Implementation Unit (CLPIU Education)

Document: School Assessment and Intervention Design Report

Scope: SHREE SETIDEVI SECONDARY SCHOOL (EMIS230090003)

Part: √ Part 1: Field Assessment Report

Study Team: Paulo Barbosa – Team Leader

Date: December 2019

Figure: Location/site Plan (osm.org)

Figure: Location/Site plan (maps.google.com)

Built up area and Emergency Exit:

There is sufficient open space inside the compound for assembly.

Public Property and Social Issues:

No existing structure was identified with historical values.

No any traditional settlements has been observed in the locality.

CONCLUSION: Satisfactory to proceed for further intervention.

Figure: Site plan from topography survey

1.2.2 Ongoing/Planned Construction

Other Planned Intervention:

1.2.4 Flood Potential

1.2.5 Other Site Hazards

Buildin Structure No of Damage / Defects Most likely Proposed Test

1.4 Priority Issues

 Approval of the proposed test

2.4 Climate Records of last 50 Years?

Catchment area of student (nearby

3.4 No of Available Teachers (Staffs) 17

You might also like