You are on page 1of 19

Disaster Resilience of School Project

(DRSP)

School Assessment and Intervention Design Report


(Part 1: Field Assessment Report)

#71_RAMESHWOR SECONDARY SCHOOL


(EMIS NO: 230050003)
Jugal-5,
Khamare,
Sindhupalchowk District

Submitted to:
Central level Project Implementation Unit (CLPIU Education)
Gyaneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Prepared By:
Design and Supervision Consultant
Tel: +977-1-5245144

December, 2019
PROJECT AND REPORT DESCRIPTION

Project: Disaster Resilience of School Project (DRSP)

Client: Central level Project Implementation Unit (CLPIU Education)


Gyaneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal

Consultant: Design and Supervision Consultant (DSC) - M/S Umar Munshi Associates
in association with Sub-Consultants ERMC (P) Ltd, PACE Consultants (P)
Ltd and Progressive Research & Consulting Services
Lakhe Marg, New Baneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Phone: 01-5245144

Document: School Assessment and Intervention Design Report

Scope: SHREE RAMESHWOR SECONDARY SCHOOL (EMIS230050003)

Part: √ Part 1: Field Assessment Report


Part 2: Intermediate Assessment Report
Part 3: Final Technical Report

Study Team: Paulo Barbosa – Team Leader


Ishrat Alam - Structural Engineer
Rabindra Adhikari – Structural Engineer
Pushkar Koirala – Structural Engineer
Dinesh Dulal – Structural Engineer
….
….

Date: December 2019

2|Page
Contents
1. Summary........................................................................................................................................4
1.1 School Location, Site Condition and Local Implication...........................................................4
1.2 School Condition....................................................................................................................6
1.3 Building Condition and Proposed Test...................................................................................7
1.4 Priority Issues.........................................................................................................................7
2. School Detail..................................................................................................................................8
3. Building Details............................................................................................................................11
3.1 Block 2.................................................................................................................................11
3.2 Block 3.................................................................................................................................13
3.3 Block 10...............................................................................................................................15
3.4 Block 11...............................................................................................................................17

3|Page
1. Summary
1.1 School Location, Site Condition and Local Implication

Figure: Location/site Plan (osm.org)

Figure: Location/Site plan (maps.google.com)

4|Page
Terrain and Topography:

The school lies in hilly region of Sindhupalchwok district. Although soil test was not
conducted, medium soil is estimated from adjacent cut areas.

The school lies on mountainous terrain. Blocks are constructed in flat area.

As per the preliminary assessment and field observation by the team Blocks 2 and 11 need
to be retrofitted, block 10 needs to be repaired and block 3 needs to be demolished. 3-C-7
and 1-T- 5 are going to be constructed under the DRSP Project.

Accessibility:

The accessibility to school is quite difficult, with unsurfaced road to the gate. Vehicle
accesses in all seasons

The school is about 1 KM from Simle which is the nearest market of that locality.

Built up area and Emergency Exit:

There is sufficient open space inside the compound for assembly.

Public Property and Social Issues:

The school is running in its school own and. There are no facilities by trust.

Historical Value:

No existing structure was identified with historical values.

Cultural Implication:

No any traditional settlements has been observed in the locality.

Infrastructure Implication:

Electricity: Available
Internet: none
Because of accessible location, most infrastructure materials can be available.

CONCLUSION: Satisfactory to proceed for further intervention.

5|Page
1.2 School Condition
1.2.1 School Site Plan

Figure: Site plan from topography survey

1.2.2 Ongoing/Planned Construction

Being Demolished:
Block 3.

Block to be constructed

3-C-7 and 1-T-5 going to be constructed under the DRSP Project.

Other Planned Intervention:


None.
1.2.3 Landslide Potential
None.

1.2.4 Flood Potential


Neither there is no river nearby, nor there chance of inundation. But good pitching of
open space is required for the easy access during monsoon season.

1.2.5 Other Site Hazards


None.

6|Page
1.3 Building Condition and Proposed Test
Based on the site assessment, following condition are observed. The most likely intervention and
appropriate tests to be carried out are also included. The more detailed explanation are presented in
the later sections for individual structure.

Buildin Structure No of Damage / Defects Most likely Proposed Test


g Type Stories Intervention* (at this stage)
2 RCC 1 No bands, cracks Recommended for X
retrofitting/ add
splint and bands
with repairing
Replace concrete
with BMC
3 Load Bearing 1 No bands, poor Recommended for X
condition demolition of block
10 RCC 2 Minor cracks, no Recommended for X
Bands repairing of block
11 Load Bearing 1 No bands Recommended for X
retrofitting of
block /Add bands
and splint
* The more justifiable intervention will be identified in intermediate assessment report (next part of
the report) with more detailed structural assessment, cost implication and other affecting factors.

1.4 Priority Issues


Based on the site assessment and information available, following things shall be resolved at the
soonest for the smooth progress of the project:

 Approval of the proposed test


 Verify the land ownership of the school and decide if to carryon intervention or not.

7|Page
2. School Detail
1 GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1 District Sindhupalchowk
1.2 Name of School Shree Remeshwor Secondary School
1.3 Contact Person Name and Phone No: Harisharan Thapa/9849347392
1.4 School EMIS 230050003
2 GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
Address
2.1 Jugal-5, Khamare, Sindhupalchowk
(Street,City,District,Province,State)
2.2 Locality Khamare
2.3 GPS Co-ordinate (Lat,Long) 27.833848, 85.775472

     

2.4 Climate Records of last 50 Years?      


     
     
2.5 Accessibility Earthen Road
Locate Within Urban Area? Name of
2.6 Yes Simle (1 Km)
Nearest Main City or Market?
Is the school accessible for the children
2.7 more than one VDC/Municipality or more Yes  
than 2 wards?
Approximate distance from Motorable
2.8 10m
road
2.9 Emergency Exit ? Open
3 DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
3.1 No Of Students (Ficial Year 2076) 350
  No of Boys 159
  No of Girls 191
3.2 Number of Disable Students 0
  Boys  
  Girls  

Catchment area of student (nearby


3.3 villages/districts from where students Khamare, Simle, Dhade, Ramche, Pepta
come to study)

3.4 No of Available Teachers (Staffs) 23


3.5 Education Level (Grades)  
  Lower Level (ECD Available?) Yes
  Higher Level 10
3.6 Commonly available building materials? Stone, mud, wood

8|Page
Sand , Cement and Iron
  Unavailable Materials?
Rebar Aggregate (Steels)
Approximate Distance for Simle
   
Transportation? (1Km)
  Mode of Transportation? Truck Tripper
3.7 General terrain of surrounding area Slopy
3.8 General topography of school compound Flat
3.9 No. of school building blocks 9
3.1 No. of Temporary Learning Centre (TLC 2
  If TLC (Number of Classes on TLC?) 2
3.1
Ownership of school's land 9 ropani
1
  (Include all applicable sources)  
Is there a safe location outside the
3.1 buildings where ALL staff and students
Yes
2 can currently assemble in an emergency
event?
Excluding safe assembly location, is
3.1
there any additional space for new No
3
Blocks on the school?
3.1 No. of individual functional toilet units for
WC = 1 Urinal = 4  
4 Girls
3.1 No. of individual functional toilet units for
WC = 3 Urinal = 0  
5 Boys
3.1 No. of individual functional toilet units for
WC = 0 Urinal = 0  
6 Staffs
3.1
Disable Friendly Toilet? Yes WC = 1  
7
3.1 How many septic tanks are currently
3 ( 1 poor)
8 present ?
  If yes, What is the condition? Good
If Condition is poor? What is the solution
   
for improvement?
3.1 What kind of water sources is/are
spring water
9 available ?
What kind of drainage systems are
3.2 None
available ?
3.2 Does school is connected with
Yes
1 electricity ?
3.2
Does the school have compound wall ? No
2
3.2
If yes, what kind ? And its condition ?    
3
Is there proximity to unsafe structures,
3.2 such as, perimeter walls, water towers,
NA
4 trees, generator and potentially
damaging debris?
4 AVAILABILITY OF PHYSICAL FACILITIES
Existing Remarks
Required (by
  Particulars (functional (Proposal
school)
) )
4.1 Classrooms 13 20  
4.2 Administration/ Office 1 2  

9|Page
4.3 Library 0 1  
4.4 Laboratory 1 2  
4.5 Health facility/ Treatment room 0 1  
4.6 Counseling Room 0 1  
4.7 Canteen/ Kitchen 0 2  
4.8 Auditorium 0 1  
4.9 Toilet
     
4.1
Principal Room
0 0 1  
4.1
Staff Room
1 0 1  
4.1
Club Room
2 0 0  
4.1
Audio Visual Room
3 0 0  

10 | P a g e
3. Building Details
3.1 Block 2
  BLOCK-ID Block-2
1.0 Detail of Building
1.1 Year of Construction? All Floor at a time  
  Ground Floor 2068 BS 8 Years Old
       
       
Year of last repair and its
1.2 None  
type
Building ground
1.3  
coverage (plinth area)
1.4 No. of Story Ground Floor Only
1.5 Structural typology RCC Frame Structure
Ground
1.6 Building purpose ECD Library Store
Floor
           
           
1.7 Number of Classrooms 1
1.7 Type of foundation Isolated Footing
1.8 Condition of foundation Good
1.9 Wall material Ground Floor Brick Masonry in Cement Mortar
    Typical Thickness 230mm
1.1
Wall condition Cracks  
0
1.1
Type of Floor Ground Floor PCC/Punning
1
       
1.1
Condition of Floor Ground Floor Good
2
       
1.1
Type of Roof RCC
3
1.1
Condition of Roof Good
4
1.1
Size of Column 300X300
5
1.1
Condition of Column 0.0      
6
1.1
Size of Beam 300X300
7
1.1
Condition of Beam NA
8
Is there any relative
1.1
changes on mass on the No
9
floor ?

11 | P a g e
1.2 Condition of doors and
Frame Good  
0 windows?
    Panel Good  
1.2
Is there any cracks ? Yes
1
If yes, component (locate
1.2
crack on drawings with Provided in Crack Maping
2
proper ID)
1.2
Previous retrofit ? No
3
2.0 Non Destructive Testing (NDT)
2.1 Requirement of NDT Need to discuss
2.2 Types of NDT required Need to discuss
3.0 Possible recommendation
3.1 Need minor repair ? Yes
3.2 Need major repair ? Need to discuss
3.3 Need retrofitting ? Need to discuss

12 | P a g e
3.2 Block 3
  BLOCK-ID Block-3
1.0 Detail of Building
1.1 Year of Construction? All Floor at a time  
  Ground Floor 2074 BS 2 Years Old
       
       
Year of last repair and
1.2 None  
its type
Building ground
1.3  
coverage (plinth area)
1.4 No. of Story Ground Floor Only
1.5 Structural typology Load Bearing
Ground
1.6 Building purpose Toilet 0 0
Floor
           
           
Number of
1.7 0
Classrooms
1.7 Type of foundation Wall Strip Footing (Stone)
Condition of
1.8 Good
foundation
1.9 Wall material Ground Floor Stone Masonry in Cement mortar
    Typical Thickness 500mm
1.1
Wall condition None  
0
1.1
Type of Floor Ground Floor PCC/Punning
1
       
1.1
Condition of Floor Ground Floor Good
2
       
1.1
Type of Roof Timber Truss with CGI Sheet
3
1.1
Condition of Roof Good
4
1.1
Size of Column NA
5
1.1
Condition of Column NA      
6
1.1
Size of Beam NA
7
1.1
Condition of Beam NA
8
Is there any relative
1.1
changes on mass on No
9
the floor ?

13 | P a g e
1.2 Condition of doors and
Frame Good  
0 windows?
    Panel Good  
1.2
Is there any cracks ? Yes
1
If yes, component
1.2 (locate crack on
Provided in Crack Mapping
2 drawings with proper
ID)
1.2
Previous retrofit ? No
3
2.0 Non Destructive Testing (NDT)
2.1 Requirement of NDT No
Types of NDT
2.2 No
required
3.0 Possible recommendation
3.1 Need minor repair ? Yes
3.2 Need major repair ? Need to discuss
3.3 Need retrofitting ? Need to discuss

14 | P a g e
3.3 Block 10
  BLOCK-ID Block-10
1.0 Detail of Building
1.1 Year of Construction? All Floor at a time  
  Ground Floor 2074 BS 2 Years Old
       
       
Year of last repair and
1.2 None  
its type
Building ground
1.3  
coverage (plinth area)
1.4 No. of Story GF+1Story
1.5 Structural typology RCC Frame Structure
Groun Classroom(4
1.6 Building purpose 0 0
d Floor )
Frist Compute/Scienc Classroom(2
    Office (1)
Floor e Lab (1) )
           
1.7 Number of Classrooms 4
1.7 Type of foundation Isolated Footing
Condition of
1.8 Good
foundation
Brick Masonry in Cement
1.9 Wall material Ground Floor
Mortar
    Typical Thickness 230mm
1.1
Wall condition Cracks  
0
1.1
Type of Floor Ground Floor PCC/Punning
1
       
1.1
Condition of Floor Ground Floor Good
2
       
1.1
Type of Roof RCC
3
1.1
Condition of Roof Good
4
1.1
Size of Column 350X350mm
5

15 | P a g e
1.1
Condition of Column Good      
6
1.1
Size of Beam 230x400mm
7
1.1
Condition of Beam Good
8
Is there any relative
1.1
changes on mass on No
9
the floor ?
1.2 Condition of doors and
Frame Good  
0 windows?
    Panel Good  
1.2
Is there any cracks ? Yes
1
If yes, component
1.2 (locate crack on
Provided in Crack Mapping
2 drawings with proper
ID)
1.2
Previous retrofit ? No
3
2.0 Non Destructive Testing (NDT)
2.1 Requirement of NDT Need to discuss
Types of NDT
2.2 Need to discuss
required
3.0 Possible recommendation
3.1 Need minor repair ? Yes
3.2 Need major repair ? Need to discuss
3.3 Need retrofitting ? Need to discuss

16 | P a g e
3.4 Block 11
  BLOCK-ID Block-11
1.0 Detail of Building
1.1 Year of Construction? All Floor at a time  
  Ground Floor 2074 BS 2 Years Old
       
       
Year of last repair and
1.2 None  
its type
Building ground
1.3  
coverage (plinth area)
1.4 No. of Story Ground Floor Only
1.5 Structural typology Load Bearing
Ground
1.6 Building purpose Toilet 0 0
Floor
           
           
1.7 Number of Classrooms 0
1.7 Type of foundation Wall Strip Footing (Stone)
Condition of
1.8 Good
foundation
1.9 Wall material Ground Floor Brick Masonry in Cement Mortar
    Typical Thickness 230mm
1.1
Wall condition None  
0
1.1
Type of Floor Ground Floor PCC/Punning
1
       
1.1
Condition of Floor Ground Floor Good
2
       
1.1
Type of Roof RCC
3
1.1
Condition of Roof Good
4
1.1
Size of Column NA
5
1.1
Condition of Column NA      
6

17 | P a g e
1.1
Size of Beam NA
7
1.1
Condition of Beam NA
8
Is there any relative
1.1
changes on mass on No
9
the floor ?
1.2 Condition of doors and
Frame Good  
0 windows?
    Panel Good  
1.2
Is there any cracks ? No
1
If yes, component
1.2 (locate crack on
No Cracks
2 drawings with proper
ID)
1.2
Previous retrofit ? No
3
2.0 Non Destructive Testing (NDT)
2.1 Requirement of NDT No
Types of NDT
2.2 No
required
3.0 Possible recommendation
3.1 Need minor repair ? Yes
3.2 Need major repair ? Need to discuss
3.3 Need retrofitting ? Need to discuss

18 | P a g e
--------------- END OF THE DOCUMENT ---------------

19 | P a g e

You might also like