Professional Documents
Culture Documents
16 PF MA-II Drvinitanarain
16 PF MA-II Drvinitanarain
COLLEGE, PATNA
M.A. Semester – II
Prof. Vinita Narain
Paper -9 Psychological Assessment
Unit-3
16PF Test
BASIC FEATURES OF THE 16PF QUESTIONNAIRE
First published in 1949, the 16PF Questionnaire has had four major revisions, in
1956, 1962, 1968, and the fifth edition in 1993 (Cattell, R.B. et al.). The latest edition
contains 185 multiple-choice items, with a three point answer format. Item content
is non-threatening, asking about daily behavior, interests, and opinions. The short
ability scale items (Factor B) are grouped together at the end of the questionnaire
with separate instructions. The questionnaire is written at a fifth grade reading level,
and meant for use with people 16 years and older. The instrument provides scores
on the 16 primary scales, 5 global scales, and 3 response bias scales. All personality
scales are bipolar (have clear, meaningful definitions at both ends), and are given in
‘stens’ (standardized-ten scores) ranging from 1 to 10, with a mean of 5.5 and a
standard deviation of 2.0. The latest standardization includes over 10,000 people and
was published in 2001.
Administration
The aims of the test The 16-PF can be used, among other applications, for
identifying personalities, which fit specific profiles for occupational
applications.
16 PF test Factors
The characteristics below represent broad personality fields of the Cattell 16
personality traits theory / 16 PF test. The various groups of personality traits occur
in a lot of people. People who have a high need for social contact, for instance, tend
to be more talkative and more open. However, these don’t always occur together in
a certain individual. Personality is complex and each individual can display
behaviour in conformity with these different characteristics. Furthermore, behaviour
is an interaction between personal and situational variables. The situation a person
is in plays a large role. The Cattell 16 personality traits theory identifies the
following personality traits:
Emotional engagement
The desire to develop intimate relationships with others: outgoing versus reserved
Emotional stability
How calmly people respond to what life brings or what happens in life: calm
versus stressed
Liveliness
Socially secure
The extent to which a person feels at ease in social situations: uninhibited versus
shy
Vigilance
The extent to which someone is cautious with regard to the intentions and
motivations of others: suspicious versus trusting
Openness
Openness to change
The extent to which a person enjoys new situations and experiences: Flexible
versus connected to the familiar
Perfectionism
The need someone feels to trust in structure rather than leaving things to chance:
controlled versus undisciplined
Reasoning ability
The extent to which a person is able to identify and solve numerical and verbal
problems and connections: abstract versus concrete
Dominance
The tendency to have influence and control over others: powerful versus
submissive
Rule aware
Sensitivity
The extent to which emotions and feelings of others affect a person: tender versus
tough
Abstractness
The amount of attention that someone pays to abstract rather than concrete
observations: imaginative versus practical
Uncertainty
Independence
The extent to which a person trusts in his own judgements and capacities and opts
to work solo: self-reliant versus dependant
Tension
Shy, threat-sensitive, timid, hesitant, Social Boldness Socially bold, venturesome, thick-
intimidated (H) skinned, uninhibited
Utilitarian, objective, unsentimental,
Sensitivity Sensitive, aesthetic, sentimental,
tough-minded, self-reliant, no-
(I) tender-minded, intuitive, refined
nonsense, rough
Score Interpretation
Scores are presented in “stens” or standard-ten scale, ranging from 1 to 10, with a
mean of 5.5 and a standard deviation of 2. Sten 4 is considered low, sten 5 or 6
average, and sten 7 high. A+ indicates a high score (right pole) while A- indicates a
low score (left pole) on the primary scale Warmth (A).
The 16PF primary and global scales are bipolar, with well-defined meanings at
both poles rather than varying degrees of the scale. A high or low score on a scale
is not regarded as good or bad. Rather, the score increases the likelihood that the
trait defined at the pole will be distinctive of the individual’s behavior. Whether
that trait is determined to have positive or negative effects depends on the context.